FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / J Adv Vet Anim Res / Antioxidants in assisted reproductive technologies: An overv...
Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research2021; 8(1); 173-184; doi: 10.5455/javar.2021.h500

Antioxidants in assisted reproductive technologies: An overview on dog, cat, and horse.

Abstract: Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are widely used as a tool to improve reproductive performance in both humans and animals. In particular, in the veterinary field, ARTs are used to improve animal genetics, recover endangered animals, and produce offspring in the event of subfertility or infertility in males or females. However, the use of ARTs did not improve the fertilization rate in some animals due to various factors such as the difficulty in reproducing an anatomical and humoral substrate typical of the natural condition or due to the increase in catabolites and their difficult elimination. The in vitro environment allows the production and increase in the concentration of substances, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), which could be harmful to gametes. If produced in high concentration, the ROS becomes deleterious, both in vitro and in vivo systems. It has been seen that the use of antioxidants can help neutralize or counteract the production of ROS. The present study aims to report the latest findings regarding the use of antioxidants in ARTs of some domestic species, such as dogs, cats, and horses, compared to other animal species, such as cattle, in which ARTs have instead developed more widely.
Copyright: © Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2021-03-11 PubMed ID: 33860028PubMed Central: PMC8043350DOI: 10.5455/javar.2021.h500Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article
  • Review

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study explores the role of antioxidants in enhancing the effect of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) in domestic animals like dogs, cats, and horses. It specifically investigates how antioxidants counteract harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) influences on the reproductive systems of these animals.

Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Veterinary Field

  • This study primarily deals with assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), techniques used to enhance reproductive performance. In the veterinary field, these are used to improve animal genetics, recover endangered species, and produce offspring in the event of subfertility or infertility in male or female animals.
  • Despite their extensive use, ARTs have not always improved the fertilization rate across all animals due to a variety of circumstances, including the challenge of replicating natural anatomical and humoral substrates, and the accumulation of hard-to-eliminate catabolites.

The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species

  • The research highlights the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS), substances produced during biological processes. These, when produced in high concentrations, can be harmful to an animal’s gametes – the reproductive cells.
  • Both endogenous (arising from normal metabolic processes) and exogenous (arising from outside factors such as pollution or radiation) ROS can lead to harmful effects on gametes, affecting their capacity to function efficiently.

The Impact of Antioxidants

  • The study examines how antioxidants can potentially neutralize or counteract the detrimental impact of ROS on gametes, thus potentially enhancing the effectiveness of ARTs.
  • Antioxidants have the ability to interact with ROS, preventing them from causing damage. This is crucial as the negative impact of ROS can cause difficulties in the effectiveness of ARTs.

Focus on Domestic Animals

  • The research primarily focuses on the use of antioxidants in ARTs for domestic animals such as dogs, cats, and horses.
  • These species were chosen for comparison to other animal species like cattle, where ARTs have developed more broadly and effectively. The research aims to use this comparison to further the development and effectiveness of ARTs in these less explored animals.

Cite This Article

APA
Ciani F, Maruccio L, Cocchia N, d'Angelo D, Carotenuto D, Avallone L, Namagerdi AA, Tafuri S. (2021). Antioxidants in assisted reproductive technologies: An overview on dog, cat, and horse. J Adv Vet Anim Res, 8(1), 173-184. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2021.h500

Publication

Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research
ISSN: 2311-7710
NlmUniqueID: 101647585
Country: Bangladesh
Language: English
Volume: 8
Issue: 1
Pages: 173-184

Researcher Affiliations

Ciani, Francesca
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • These authors contributed equally.
Maruccio, Lucianna
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
  • These authors contributed equally.
Cocchia, Natascia
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
d'Angelo, Danila
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Carotenuto, Domenico
  • UNMSM, Universidad Nacional Mayor San Marcos, Lima, Peru.
Avallone, Luigi
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Namagerdi, Asadoor Amirkhani
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Tafuri, Simona
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Production, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 92 references
  1. Cocchia N, Ciani F, El-Rass R, Russo M, Borzacchiello G, Esposito V. Cryopreservation of feline epididymal spermatozoa from dead and alive animals and its use in assisted reproduction. Zygote 2010;18(1):1–8.
    pubmed: 19939333doi: 10.1017/s0967199409990256google scholar: lookup
  2. Ciani F, Cocchia N, Rizzo M, Ponzio P, Tortora G, Avallone L. Sex determining of cat embryo and some feline species. Zygote 2008;16(2):169–77.
    pubmed: 18405438doi: 10.1017/s0967199408004681google scholar: lookup
  3. Ciani F, Cocchia N, Esposito L, Avallone L. Fertility cryopreservation. 2012. In: Wu B, editor. Advances in embryo transfer book. London, UK: IntechOpen; pp. 225–48.
  4. Cocchia N, Corteggio A, Altamura G, Tafuri S, Rea S, Rosapane I. The effects of superoxide dismutase addition to the transport medium on cumulus-oocyte complex apoptosis and IVF outcome in cats (Felis catus). Reprod Bio 2015;15:56–64.
    pubmed: 25726378doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2014.10.002google scholar: lookup
  5. Del Prete C, Ciani F, Tafuri S, Pasolini MP, Della Valle G, Palumbo V. Effect of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase supplementation in the extender on chilled semen of fertile and hypofertile dogs. J Vet Sci 2018;19(5):667–75.
    pmc: PMC6167334pubmed: 29649854doi: 10.4142/jvs.2018.19.5.667google scholar: lookup
  6. Cocchia N, Tafuri S, Del Prete C, Palumbo V, Esposito L, Avallone L. Antioxidant supplementation to medium for in vitro embryo production in Felis catus. Pol J Vet Sci 2019;22(3):573–9.
    pubmed: 31560466
  7. Costantino M, Giuberti G, Caraglia A, Caraglia M, Lombardi A, Misso G. Possible antioxidant role of SPA therapy with chlorine–sulphur–bicarbonate mineral water. Amino Acids 2009;36:161–5.
    pubmed: 18288460doi: 10.1007/s00726-008-0032-ygoogle scholar: lookup
  8. Del Prete C, Stout T, Montagnaro S, Pagnini U, Uccello M, Florio P. Combined addition of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathione peroxidase improves quality of cooled stored stallion semen. Anim Reprod Sci 2019;210:106195.
    pubmed: 31635777doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106195google scholar: lookup
  9. Polge C, Smith AU, Parkes AS. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 1949;164:666.
    pubmed: 18143360doi: 10.1038/164666a0google scholar: lookup
  10. Foote RH. The history of artificial insemination: aelected notes and notables. J Anim Sci 2002;80:1–10.
    doi: 10.2527/animalsci2002.80e-suppl_21agoogle scholar: lookup
  11. Thibier M, Wagner HG. World statistics for artificial insemination in cattle. Livest Prod Sci 2002;74(2):203–21.
    doi: 10.1016/s0301-6226(01)00291-3google scholar: lookup
  12. Zhu J, Moawad AR, Wang CY, Li HF, Ren JY, Dai YF. Advances in in vitro production of sheep embryos. Int J Vet Sci Med 2018;6(Suppl):S15–26.
    pmc: PMC6161858pubmed: 30761316doi: 10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.02.003google scholar: lookup
  13. Sjunnesson Y. In vitro fertilisation in domestic mammals-a brief overview. Ups J Med Sci 2020;125(2):68–76.
    pmc: PMC7721027pubmed: 31833449doi: 10.1080/03009734.2019.1697911google scholar: lookup
  14. Oberlender G, López SR, De Ondiz Sánchez AD, Vieira LA, Pereira MB, de Fátima Silva L. In vitro fertilization of porcine oocytes is affected by spermatic coincubation time. Pesqui Vet Bras 2016;36:58–64.
    doi: 10.1590/s0100-736x2016001300009google scholar: lookup
  15. Van Soom A, Rijsselaere T, Filliers M. Cats and dogs: two neglected species in this era of embryo production in vitro?. Reprod Domest Anim 2014;49:87–91.
    pubmed: 24947866doi: 10.1111/rda.12303google scholar: lookup
  16. Bertolini M, Bertolini LR. Advances in reproductive technologies in cattle: from artificial insemination to cloning. Rev Fac Med Vet Zootecnia 2009;56(3):184–94.
  17. Nicholas FW, Smith C. Increased rates of genetic change in dairy cattle by embryo transfer and splitting. Anim Prod 1983;36:341–53.
    doi: 10.1017/s0003356100010382google scholar: lookup
  18. Uehara T, Yanagamachi R. Microsurgical injection of transformation. Biol Reprod 1976;470:467–70.
    pubmed: 974199doi: 10.1095/biolreprod15.4.467google scholar: lookup
  19. Salamone DF, Canel NG, Rodriguez B. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in domestic and wild mammals. Reproduction 2017;154:111–24.
    pubmed: 29196493doi: 10.1530/rep-17-0357google scholar: lookup
  20. Cocchia N, Ciani F, Russo M, El Rass R, Rosapane I, Avallone L. Immature cat oocyte vitrification in open pulled straws (OPSs) using a cryoprotectant mixture. Cryobiology 2010;60(2):229–34.
    pubmed: 20079725doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2010.01.003google scholar: lookup
  21. Huang Z, Gao L, Hou Y, Zhu S, Fu X. Cryopreservation of farm animal gametes and embryos: recent updates and progress. Front Agric Sci Eng 2019;6(1):42–53.
    doi: 10.15302/j-fase-2018231google scholar: lookup
  22. Sharma P. Biology and management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Oncologist 2016;21(9):1050–62.
    pmc: PMC5016071pubmed: 27401886doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0067google scholar: lookup
  23. Tian XC, Kubota C, Enright B, Yang X. Cloning animals by somatic cell nuclear transfer - biological factors. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2003;1:1–7.
    pmc: PMC521203pubmed: 14614770doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-1-98google scholar: lookup
  24. Campbell KHS, Fisher P, Chen WC, Choi I, Kelly RDW, Lee JH. Somatic cell nuclear transfer: past, present and future perspectives. Theriogenology 2007;68:S214–31.
    pubmed: 17610946doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.05.059google scholar: lookup
  25. Benson EE. Cryopreservation of phytodiversity: a critical appraisal of theory & practice. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2008;27(3):141–219.
    doi: 10.1080/07352680802202034google scholar: lookup
  26. Amstislavsky SY, Brusentsev EYu, Abramova TO, Ragaeva DS, Rozhkova IN, Igonina TN. Applying reproductive technologies and genome resource banking to laboratory animals. Russ J Genet Appl Res 2016;6(4):373–7.
    doi: 10.1134/s2079059716040031google scholar: lookup
  27. Lushchak VI. Free radicals, reactive oxygen species, oxidative stress and its classification. Chem Biol Interact 2014;224C:164–75.
    pubmed: 25452175doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2014.10.016google scholar: lookup
  28. Dutta S, Majzoub A, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress and sperm function: a systematic review on evaluation and management. Arab J Urol 2019;17(2):87–97.
    pmc: PMC6600059pubmed: 31285919doi: 10.1080/2090598x.2019.1599624google scholar: lookup
  29. Esposito L, Auletta L, Ciani F, Pelagalli A, Pasolini MP, Lamagna B. Hair cortisol levels in captive brown hare (Lepus europaeus): potential effect of sex, age, and breeding technology. Eur J Wildl Res 2017;63:62.
    doi: 10.1007/s10344-017-1121-6google scholar: lookup
  30. Esposito L, Tafuri S, Cocchia N, Fasanelli R, Piscopo N, Lamagna B. Assessment of living conditions in wild boars by analysis of oxidative stress markers. J Appl Anim Welf Sci 2020;10:1–8.
    pubmed: 32649230doi: 10.1080/10888705.2020.1790365google scholar: lookup
  31. Wang S, He G, Chen M, Zuo T, Xu W, Liu X. The role of antioxidant enzymes in the ovaries. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017;2017:4371714.
    pmc: PMC5632900pubmed: 29147461doi: 10.1155/2017/4371714google scholar: lookup
  32. Lu J, Wang Z, Cao J, Chen Y, Dong Y. A novel and compact review on the role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018;16:80.
    pmc: PMC6102891pubmed: 30126412doi: 10.1186/s12958-018-0391-5google scholar: lookup
  33. Tafuri S, Ciani F, Iorio EL, Esposito L, Cocchia N. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and male fertility. New discoveries in embryology. InTech 2015;2:19–40.
    doi: 10.5772/60632google scholar: lookup
  34. Forman HJ, Maiorino M, Ursini F. Signaling functions of reactive oxygen species. Biochemistry 2010;49:835–42.
    pmc: PMC4226395pubmed: 20050630doi: 10.1021/bi9020378google scholar: lookup
  35. Halliwell B. Free radicals and antioxidants: updating a personal view. Nutr Rev 2012;70(5):257–65.
    pubmed: 22537212doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00476.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  36. Van Raamsdonk JM, Hekimi S. Superoxide dismutase is dispensable for normal animal lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:5785–90.
    pmc: PMC3326508pubmed: 22451939doi: 10.1073/pnas.1116158109google scholar: lookup
  37. Scibior D, Czeczot H. Catalase: structure, properties, functions. Postepy hig Med Dośw 2006;60:170–80.
    pubmed: 16618987
  38. Galecka E, Jacewicz R, Mrowicka M, Florkowski A, Galecki P. Antioxidative enzymes - structure, properties, functions. Pol Merkur Lekarski 2008;25:266–8.
    pubmed: 19112846
  39. He L, He T, Farrar S, Ji L, Liu T, Ma X. Antioxidants maintain cellular redox homeostasis by elimination of reactive oxygen species. Cell Physiol Biochem 2017;44(2):532–53.
    pubmed: 29145191doi: 10.1159/000485089google scholar: lookup
  40. Barros AI, Nunes FM, Gonçalves B, Bennett RN, Silva AP. Effect of cooking on total vitamin C contents and antioxidant activity of sweet chestnuts (Castanea sativa Mill.). Food Chem 2011;128(1):165–72.
    pubmed: 25214344doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.013google scholar: lookup
  41. Mustacich DJ, Bruno RS, Traber MG. Vitamin E. Vitam Horm 2007;76:1–21.
    pubmed: 17628169doi: 10.1016/s0083-6729(07)76001-6google scholar: lookup
  42. Behrman HR, Kodaman PH, Preston SL, Gao S. Oxidative stress and the ovary. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2001;8:S40–2.
    pubmed: 11223371doi: 10.1177/1071557601008001s13google scholar: lookup
  43. Orsi NM, Gopichandran N, Leese HJ, Picton HM, Harris SE. Fluctuations in bovine ovarian follicular fluid composition throughout the oestrous cycle. Reproduction 2005;129:219–28.
    pubmed: 15695616doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00460google scholar: lookup
  44. Agarwal A, Aponte-Mellado A, Premkumar BJ, Shaman A, Gupta S. The effects of oxidative stress on female reproduction: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2012;10:49.
    pmc: PMC3527168pubmed: 22748101doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-49google scholar: lookup
  45. Seidel GE. Lessons from reproductive technology research. Annu Rev Anim Biosci 2015;3:467–87.
    pubmed: 25493540doi: 10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103709google scholar: lookup
  46. Jang G, Kim MK, Lee BC. Current status and applications of somatic cell nuclear transfer in dogs. Theriogenology 2010;74:1311–20.
    pubmed: 20688377doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.05.036google scholar: lookup
  47. Thomassen R, Farstad W. Artificial insemination in canids: a useful tool in breeding and conservation. Theriogenology 2009;71:190–9.
    pubmed: 18947865
  48. England GCW, Von Heimendahl A. Physiology and endocrinology of the female. BSAVA manual of canine and feline reproduction and neonatology. 2010;2nd edition, British Small Animal Veterinary Association, Gloucester, UK, pp 1–12.
    doi: 10.22233/9781905319541.1google scholar: lookup
  49. Chastant-Maillard S, Viaris de Lesegno C, Chebrout M, Thoumire S, Meylheuc T, Fontbonne A. The canine oocyte: uncommon features of in vivo and in vitro maturation. Reprod Fertil Dev 2011;23:391–402.
    pubmed: 21426857doi: 10.1071/rd10064google scholar: lookup
  50. Kutzler MA. Estrus induction and synchronization in canids and felids. Theriogenology 2007;68:354–74.
    pubmed: 17582484doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.014google scholar: lookup
  51. Tsutsui T, Hori T, Endo S, Hayama A, Kawakami E. Intrauterine transfer of early canine embryos. Theriogenology 2006;66:1703–5.
    pubmed: 16497366doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.01.009google scholar: lookup
  52. Mukai C, Nelson JL, Cheong SH, Diel de Amorim M, Travis AJ. Impacts of oocyte/zygote timing for in vitro fertilization and gene editing in the dog. Theriogenology 2020;150:347–52.
    pubmed: 32088047doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.02.003google scholar: lookup
  53. Grandhaye J, Partyka A, Ligocka Z, Dudek A, Nizanski W, Jeanpierre E. Metformin improves quality of post-thaw canine semen. Animals 2020;10:287.
    pmc: PMC7070956pubmed: 32059492doi: 10.3390/ani10020287google scholar: lookup
  54. González A, Arando A, Acosta A, Alcalá CJ, Arrebola FA, Pérez-Marína CC. Frozen dog spermatozoa are negatively affected during storage at −80, −21 and −8°C. Anim Reprod Sci 2019;210:106197.
    pubmed: 31635782doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.106197google scholar: lookup
  55. Pena FJ, Nunez-Martinez I, Moran JM. Semen technologies in dog breeding: an update. Reprod Domest Anim 2006;41(2):21–9.
    pubmed: 16984466doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00766.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  56. Caturla-Sánchez E, Sánchez-Calabuiga MJ, Pérez-Gutiérreza JF, Cerdeira J, Castaño C, Santiago-Moreno J. Vitrification of dog spermatozoa: effects of two cryoprotectants (sucrose or trehalose) and two warming procedures. Cryobiology 2018;80:126–9.
    pubmed: 29126865doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.11.001google scholar: lookup
  57. Cerdeira J, Sanchez-Calabuig MJ, Perez-Gutierrez JF, Hijon M, Castano C, Santiago-Moreno J. Cryopreservation effects on canine sperm morphometric variables and ultrastructure: comparison between vitrification and conventional freezing. Cryobiology 2020;95:164–70.
    pubmed: 32229272doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.03.007google scholar: lookup
  58. Hori T, Yoshikuni R, Kobayashi M, Kawakami E. Effects of storage temperature and semen extender on stored canine semen. J Vet Med Sci 2014;76:259–631.
    pmc: PMC3982825pubmed: 24088408doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0303google scholar: lookup
  59. Aparnak P, Saberivand A. Effects of curcumin on canine semen parameters and expression of NOX5 gene in cryopreserved spermatozoa. Vet Res Forum 2019;10(3):221–6.
    pmc: PMC6828172pubmed: 31737231
  60. Gharajelar SN, Rajab Ali Sadrkhanloo RA, Masoud Onsori M, Adel Saberivand A. A comparative study on the effects of different cryoprotectants on the quality of canine sperm during vitrification process. Vet Res Forum 2016;7(3):235–9.
    pmc: PMC5094163pubmed: 27872720
  61. England GCW. Semen evaluation, artificial insemination. 2000. In: Etinger JS, Feldman EC, editors. Veterinary internal medicine. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; pp. 1571–85.
  62. Yamashiro H, Narita K, Sugimura S, Han YJ, Sugawara A, Morohaku K. Trehalose enhanced the freezability of poodle dog sperm collected by an artificial vagina (AV). Anim Reprod Sci 2007;102:165–71.
    pubmed: 17412534doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.02.026google scholar: lookup
  63. Zakošek Pipan M, Casal ML, Šterbenc N, Virant Klun I, Mrkun J. Vitrification using oy lecithin and sucrose: a new way to store the sperm for the preservation of canine reproductive function. Animals 2020;10:653.
    pmc: PMC7222707pubmed: 32283781doi: 10.3390/ani10040653google scholar: lookup
  64. Qamar AY, Fang X, Kim MJ, Cho J. Myoinositol supplementation of freezing medium improves the quality-related parameters of dog sperm. Animals (Basel) 2019;9(12):1038.
    pmc: PMC6940725pubmed: 31783679doi: 10.3390/ani9121038google scholar: lookup
  65. Bevilacqua A, Carlomagno G, Gerli S, Montanino Oliva M, Devroey P, Lanzone A. Results from the international consensus conference on myo-inositol and D-chiro-inositol in obstetrics and gynecology-assisted reproduction technology. Gynecol Endocrinol 2015;31:441–6.
    pubmed: 26036719doi: 10.3109/09513590.2015.1006616google scholar: lookup
  66. Pope CE. Aspects of in vivo oocyte production, blastocyst development, and embryo transfer in the cat. Theriogenology 2014;81(1):126–37.
    pubmed: 24274417doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.09.006google scholar: lookup
  67. Kothari S, Thompson A, Agarwal A, du Plessis SS. Free radicals: their beneficial and detrimental effects on sperm function. Indian J Exp Biol 2010;48:425–35.
    pubmed: 20795359
  68. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, du Plessis SS. Utility of antioxidants during assisted reproductive techniques: an evidence based review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014;12:1–19.
    pmc: PMC4258799pubmed: 25421286doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-112google scholar: lookup
  69. Rakhit M, Gokul SR, Agarwal A, du Plessis SS. Antioxidant strategies to overcome OS in IVF-Embryo transfer. 2013. In: Agarwal A, Aziz N, Rizk B, editors. Studies on women’s health. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; pp. 237–62.
    doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-041-0_13google scholar: lookup
  70. Tremellen K. Oxidative stress and male infertility - a clinical perspective. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:243–58.
    pubmed: 18281241doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn004google scholar: lookup
  71. Cetica PD, Pintos LN, Dalvit GC, Beconi MT. Antioxidant enzyme activity and oxidative stress in bovine oocyte in vitro maturation. IUBMB Life 2001;51(1):57–64.
    pubmed: 11419698doi: 10.1080/15216540152035073google scholar: lookup
  72. Zuelke KA, Jeffay SC, Zucker RM, Perreault SD. Glutathione (GSH) concentrations vary with the cell cycle in maturing hamster oocytes, zygotes, and pre-implantation stage embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 2003;64(1):106–12.
    pubmed: 12420305doi: 10.1002/mrd.10214google scholar: lookup
  73. Luvoni GC, Chigioni S. Culture strategies for maturation of carnivore oocytes. Theriogenology 2006;66:1471–5.
    pubmed: 16540159doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.02.004google scholar: lookup
  74. Ochota M, Pasieka A, Nizanski W. Superoxide dismutase and taurine supplementation improves in vitro blastocyst yield from poor-quality feline oocytes. Theriogenology 2016;85:922–7.
    pubmed: 26643604doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2015.10.042google scholar: lookup
  75. Thiangtum K, Pinyopummin A, Hori T, Kawakami E, Tsutsui T. Effect of catalase and superoxide dismutase on motility, viability and acrosomal integrity of frozen-thawed cat spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim 2009;44:369–72.
    pubmed: 19754607doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2009.01420.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  76. Thuwanut P, Chatdarong K, Techakumphu M, Axnér E. The effect of antioxidants on motility, viability, acrosome integrity and DNA integrity of frozen-thawed epididymal cat spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2008;70(2):233–40.
    pubmed: 18501416doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.005google scholar: lookup
  77. Macente BI, Ribeiro Gutierrez R, Apparício M, de Carvalho Balieiro C, Menegasso Mansano CF, Pereira MM. Cat epididymal semen cryopreserved with and without vitamin E: effect on sperm parameters and lipid peroxidation. Anim Reprod 2018;15(4):1193–8.
    pmc: PMC8203110pubmed: 34221131doi: 10.21451/1984-3143-ar2018-0001google scholar: lookup
  78. Piras AR, Ariu F, Falchi L, Zedda MT, Pau S, Schianchi E. Resveratrol treatment during maturation enhances developmental competence of oocytes after prolonged ovary storage at 4°C in the domestic cat model. Theriogenology 2020;44:152–7.
    pubmed: 31951984doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.009google scholar: lookup
  79. Aurich C. Recent advances in cooled semen technology. Anim Reprod Sci 2008;107:268–75.
    pubmed: 18524507doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.04.015google scholar: lookup
  80. Janett F, Thun R, Niederer K, Burger D, Hassig M. Seasonal changes in semen quality and freezability in the Warmblood stallion. Theriogenology 2003;60:453–61.
    pubmed: 12763159doi: 10.1016/s0093-691x(03)00046-3google scholar: lookup
  81. Gamboa S, Rodrigues AS, Henriques L, Batista C, Santos JR. Seasonal functional relevance of sperm characteristics in equine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2010;73:950–8.
    pubmed: 20083300doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.11.023google scholar: lookup
  82. de Andrade AFC, Arruda RP, Torres MA, Pieri NCG, Leite TG, Celeghini ECC. Nitric oxide in frozen-thawed equine sperm: effects on motility, membrane integrity and sperm capacitation. Anim Reprod Sci 2018;195:176–84.
    pubmed: 29861341doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.05.022google scholar: lookup
  83. Morte MI, Rodrigues AM, Soares D, Rodrigues AS, Gamboa S, Ramalho-Santosa J. The quantification of lipid and protein oxidation in stallion spermatozoa and seminal plasma: seasonal distinctions and correlations with DNA strand breaks, classical seminal parameters and stallion fertility. Anim Reprod Sci 2008;106:36–47.
    pubmed: 17451892doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.020google scholar: lookup
  84. Aitken RJ, Jones KT, Robertson SA. Reactive oxygen species and sperm function in sickness and in health. J Androl 2012;33:1096–106.
    pubmed: 22879525doi: 10.2164/jandrol.112.016535google scholar: lookup
  85. Contri A, De Amicis I, Molinari A, Faustini M, Gramenzi A, Robbe D. Effect of dietary antioxidant supplementation on fresh semen quality in stallion. Theriogenology 2011;75(7):1319–26.
    pubmed: 21295825doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.12.003google scholar: lookup
  86. Del Prete C, Tafuri S, Ciani F, Pasolini MP, Ciotola F, Albarella S. Influences of dietary supplementation with Lepidium meyenii (Maca) on stallion sperm production and on preservation of sperm quality during storage at 5°C. Andrology 2018;6(2):351–61.
    pubmed: 29359412doi: 10.1111/andr.12463google scholar: lookup
  87. Tafuri S, Cocchia N, Carotenuto D, Vassetti A, Staropoli A, Mastellone V. Chemical analysis of Lepidium meyenii (Maca) and its effects on redox status and on reproductive biology in stallions. Molecules 2019a;1981;24.
    pmc: PMC6571579pubmed: 31126050doi: 10.3390/molecules24101981google scholar: lookup
  88. Tafuri S, Cocchia N, Vassetti A, Carotenuto D, Esposito L, Maruccio L. Lepidium meyenii (Maca) in male reproduction. Nat Prod Res 2019b;5:1–10.
    pubmed: 31805775doi: 10.1080/14786419.2019.1698572google scholar: lookup
  89. Turunen M, Olsson J, Dallner G. Metabolism and function of coenzyme Q. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004;1660(1–2):171–99.
    pubmed: 14757233doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2003.11.012google scholar: lookup
  90. Franco JSV, Chaveiro A, Gois A, Silva FM. Effects of a-tocopherol and ascorbic acid on equine semen quality after cryopreservation. J Equine Vet Sci 2013;33:787–93.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.12.012google scholar: lookup
  91. Nogueira BG, Sampaio BFB, Souza MIL, Costa E, Silva EV, Zuccari CESN. Coenzyme Q10 and a-tocopherol prevent the lipid peroxidation of cooled equine semen. Reprod Domest Anim 2015;50:1003–10.
    pubmed: 26489521doi: 10.1111/rda.12627google scholar: lookup
  92. Martins HS, Souza MR, Penna CFAM, da Silva GC, Cortes SF, Stahlberg R. Milk, caseinate and lactoferrin addition to equine semen cooling extenders. Andrologia 2016;48:950–6.
    pubmed: 27739145doi: 10.1111/and.12523google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.