Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2009; 41(6); 526-533; doi: 10.2746/042516409x386976

Arthroscopic visualisation of the third metacarpal and metatarsal condyles in the horse.

Abstract: Arthroscopy of the fetlock joints is a routine surgical procedure in the horse. It is unclear how much of the articular surface of the condyles of the metacarpal (MCIII)/metatarsal (MTIII) bone can be visualised using either the dorsal or palmar/plantar arthroscopic approach. Objective: To investigate which part of the articular surface of the MCIII/MTIII condyles of the fetlock joints can be evaluated arthroscopically using: 1) dorsal approach in combination with flexion; 2) standard palmar/plantar approach; or 3) additional portal at the base of the sesamoid bone with joint extension. Methods: All 3 arthroscopic approaches were performed on 20 fore- and 20 hindlimbs of 14 cadavers. For each approach, a curette was inserted ipsilaterally to create a lesion at the most distal part of the condyle that could be seen. After disarticulation and placement of a nail in each lesion, the maximally reachable angle was calculated on a perfect lateromedial radiograph. The 0 degrees angle was determined as the distal crossing of the best fitting circle around the condyle with a line parallel to the dorsal MCIII/MTIII bone running through the circle centre (positive angle dorsal to 0 degrees, negative palmar/plantar to 0 degrees). Results: Using the dorsal approach with flexion, a significantly larger area of visualisation was present in the hind- (-23.4 degrees) compared to the forelimb (+2.7 degrees). Using the palmar/plantar approach (fore: -60.4 degrees; hind: -70.7 degrees) and the approach at the base of the sesamoid bone (fore: -36.3 degrees; hind: -47.6 degrees) more cartilage could be seen in the fore- compared to the hindlimb. When combining the 3 approaches, the remaining nonvisible part measured 38.9 degrees in the fore- and 24.2 degrees in the hindlimb, both located palmaro/plantarodistally. Conclusions: The use of dorsal and palmar/plantar arthroscopic approaches in combination with flexion and extension of the fetlock joint allows visualisation of the majority of the cartilage of the MCIII/MTIII condyles. The nonvisible section is smaller in the hindlimb compared to the forelimb. Conclusions: Knowledge of the specific areas of visualisation of the condyles on arthroscopy is important for both diagnostic and therapeutic planning of fetlock disorders.
Publication Date: 2009-10-07 PubMed ID: 19803046DOI: 10.2746/042516409x386976Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates how much of the horse’s metacarpal (MCIII)/metatarsal (MTIII) condyles’ articular surface can be seen through different arthroscopic approaches during a routine surgical procedure on the fetlock joints.

Objective

The objective of the study was to determine the visibility of the MCIII/MTIII condyles, critical to horse fetlock joint surgeries, by using three different arthroscopy approaches. The techniques used were:

  • the dorsal approach in combination with flexion
  • the standard palmar/plantar approach
  • the additional portal at the base of the sesamoid bone with joint extension

Method

The study was conducted on 20 fore- and 20 hindlimbs of 14 horse cadavers. For each approach, a curette was used to create a lesion at the condyle’s most visible distal part. The study further investigated the angles achieved by inserting a nail in each lesion and calculating the maximally reachable angle upon a perfect lateromedial radiograph.

Results

The dorsal approach with flexion revealed a larger viewpoint in the hindlimb compared to the forelimb. The palmar/plantar approach showed more cartilage in the forelimb compared to the hindlimb. The additional portal at the sesamoid bone displayed similar results. When combining all three, the nonvisible parts measured 38.9 degrees in the forelimb and 24.2 degrees in the hindlimb.

Conclusions

The research concluded that majority of the MCIII/MTIII condyles’ cartilage can be visualized by combining dorsal and palmar/plantar arthroscopic approaches with flexion and extension of the fetlock joint. The nonvisible section was found to be smaller in the hindlimb than the forelimb.

The findings from this study provide greater insights for veterinarians to plan effectively for fetlock disorders, knowing specifically the visible areas of the condyles during arthroscopy.

Cite This Article

APA
Vanderperren K, Martens A, Haers H, Duchateau L, Saunders JH. (2009). Arthroscopic visualisation of the third metacarpal and metatarsal condyles in the horse. Equine Vet J, 41(6), 526-533. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516409x386976

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 41
Issue: 6
Pages: 526-533

Researcher Affiliations

Vanderperren, K
  • Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging and Small Animal Orthopaedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Martens, A
    Haers, H
      Duchateau, L
        Saunders, J H

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Arthroscopy / methods
          • Arthroscopy / veterinary
          • Cadaver
          • Cartilage, Articular / anatomy & histology
          • Female
          • Horses / anatomy & histology
          • Joints / anatomy & histology
          • Male
          • Metacarpal Bones / anatomy & histology
          • Metatarsal Bones / anatomy & histology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 1 times.
          1. Al-Sobayil F, Sadan MA, El-Shafaey EA, Allouch J. Intra-articular injection in the hind limb joints of dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) using anatomical and arthrographic-guided landmarks. Vet World 2021 Aug;14(8):2055-2063.