Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2007; 39(5); 407-413; doi: 10.2746/042516407x185719

Assessment of mild hindlimb lameness during over ground locomotion using linear discriminant analysis of inertial sensor data.

Abstract: Hindlimb lameness is common and can be difficult to diagnose or quantify in evaluating response to nerve blocks. An objective measure of lameness can also be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment's contribution to evidence-based medicine. The inertial sensor system can be used to capture 6 degree of freedom movement during over ground locomotion and here was used to quantify tuber coxae movement in nonlame and lame horses. Objective: Tuber coxae movement is useful for discriminating between nonlame and lame horses. Objective: To measure left and right tuber coxae movement in lame and nonlame horses during over ground locomotion and to implement a linear discriminant analysis to discriminate between lame and nonlame horses. Methods: Two inertial sensors were attached to the skin over left and right tuber coxae of 21 horses (9 mildly and 12 not lame). Horses were trotted on a hard surface. A total of 1021 strides were collected. For each stride 34 features were extracted from the dorsoventral and craniocaudal movement and used in 2 different classification scenarios (lame vs. nonlame or left lame, right lame and nonlame) using linear discriminant analysis. Results: Six degree of freedom inertial sensors were successfully used to collect kinematic data continuously from left and right tuber coxae in horses during over ground locomotion. These data were used for an automated classification of lameness. In the first scenario, a sensitivity of 89% was achieved with a specificity of 75%. In the second scenario, all horses could be correctly assigned to the correct class in a simple 3 class reclassification test. Conclusions: A mobile system that reliably detects and quantifies hindlimb lameness in horses during unconstrained locomotion could be a valuable tool to perform an evidence-based assessment of lameness in horses in a clinical setting, e.g. before and after nerve blocks or before and after surgery.
Publication Date: 2007-10-04 PubMed ID: 17910264DOI: 10.2746/042516407x185719Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study focuses on the use of an inertial sensor system to detect and measure the degree of hindlimb lameness in horses. The system measures the movement of the tuber coxae in horses, providing data that allows for a more objective evaluation of lameness.

Objective and Background

  • The objective of this study was to explore the potential of an inertial sensor system in detecting and quantifying hindlimb lameness in horses. Hindlimb lameness is a common problem in horses and can be tough to diagnose. An objective method to measure lameness is vital to accurately evaluate the effectiveness of treatment and to contribute to evidence-based medicine.
  • Specifically, the research aimed to assess the movement of the tuber coxae, a part of the horse’s body that can provide useful data for distinguishing between lame and non-lame horses. This was measured during the horse’s over-ground movement, or locomotion.

Methodology

  • Two inertial sensors were fixed on 21 horses, over their left and right tuber coxae. The sample included both non-lame and mildly lame horses.
  • The horses were made to trot on a hard surface, during which data from a total of 1021 strides were collected from the sensors. The sensors captured six degrees of freedom of movement, primarily focusing on the dorsoventral and craniocaudal movements.
  • The collected data, featuring 34 distinguishing aspects, were then analyzed to classify the horses into various groups, specifically lame vs. non-lame and right lame, left lame, and non-lame.

Results

  • The sensor system successfully gathered continuous kinematic data from the left and right tuber coxae during the horse’s over-ground locomotion.
  • The data were used to automatically classify lameness with an 89% sensitivity and 75% specificity in the first scenario (lame vs. non-lame).
  • In the second instance (right-lame, left-lame, non-lame), the horses could be accurately allocated into the correct groups in a simple 3-class reclassification test.

Conclusions

  • This study demonstrated that a mobile system that reliably detects and quantifies hindlimb lameness in horses during unrestricted movement could be an essential tool in a clinical setting.
  • Such a system enables evidence-based examination of lameness before initiating treatments such as nerve blocks or surgical intervention, leading to an enhanced understanding of the problem and more effective intervention strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Pfau T, Robilliard JJ, Weller R, Jespers K, Eliashar E, Wilson AM. (2007). Assessment of mild hindlimb lameness during over ground locomotion using linear discriminant analysis of inertial sensor data. Equine Vet J, 39(5), 407-413. https://doi.org/10.2746/042516407x185719

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 39
Issue: 5
Pages: 407-413

Researcher Affiliations

Pfau, T
  • Structure and Motion Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Basic Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, North Mymms, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL9 7TA, UK.
Robilliard, J J
    Weller, R
      Jespers, K
        Eliashar, E
          Wilson, A M

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Biomechanical Phenomena / instrumentation
            • Biomechanical Phenomena / methods
            • Biomechanical Phenomena / standards
            • Diagnosis, Differential
            • Discriminant Analysis
            • Hindlimb / physiopathology
            • Horses / physiology
            • Kinetics
            • Lameness, Animal / classification
            • Lameness, Animal / diagnosis
            • Locomotion / physiology
            • Monitoring, Ambulatory / instrumentation
            • Monitoring, Ambulatory / methods
            • Monitoring, Ambulatory / standards
            • Monitoring, Ambulatory / veterinary
            • Sensitivity and Specificity
            • Severity of Illness Index
            • Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted

            Grant Funding

            • BB/E013244/1 / Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

            Citations

            This article has been cited 11 times.
            1. Poizat E, Gérard M, Macaire C, De Azevedo E, Denoix JM, Coudry V, Jacquet S, Bertoni L, Tallaj A, Audigié F, Hatrisse C, Hébert C, Martin P, Marin F, Hanne-Poujade S, Chateau H. Discrimination of the Lame Limb in Horses Using a Machine Learning Method (Support Vector Machine) Based on Asymmetry Indices Measured by the EQUISYM System. Sensors (Basel) 2025 Feb 12;25(4).
              doi: 10.3390/s25041095pubmed: 40006323google scholar: lookup
            2. Crecan CM, Peștean CP. Inertial Sensor Technologies-Their Role in Equine Gait Analysis, a Review. Sensors (Basel) 2023 Jul 11;23(14).
              doi: 10.3390/s23146301pubmed: 37514599google scholar: lookup
            3. Liebig P, Pröhl H, Sudhaus-Jörn N, Hankel J, Visscher C, Jung K. Interactive, Browser-Based Graphics to Visualize Complex Data in Education of Biomedical Sciences for Veterinary Students. Med Sci Educ 2022 Dec;32(6):1323-1335.
              doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01613-xpubmed: 36532410google scholar: lookup
            4. Cummings CO, Krucik DDR, Price E. Clinical predictive models in equine medicine: A systematic review. Equine Vet J 2023 Jul;55(4):573-583.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.13880pubmed: 36199162google scholar: lookup
            5. Pfau T, Bolt DM, Fiske-Jackson A, Gerdes C, Hoenecke K, Lynch L, Perrier M, Smith RKW. Linear Discriminant Analysis for Investigating Differences in Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Horses before/after Diagnostic Analgesia in Relation to Expert Judgement. Animals (Basel) 2022 Mar 17;12(6).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12060762pubmed: 35327159google scholar: lookup
            6. Pfau T, Scott WM, Sternberg Allen T. Upper Body Movement Symmetry in Reining Quarter Horses during Trot In-Hand, on the Lunge and during Ridden Exercise. Animals (Basel) 2022 Feb 27;12(5).
              doi: 10.3390/ani12050596pubmed: 35268165google scholar: lookup
            7. MacKechnie-Guire R, Pfau T. Differential Rotational Movement of the Thoracolumbosacral Spine in High-Level Dressage Horses Ridden in a Straight Line, in Sitting Trot and Seated Canter Compared to In-Hand Trot. Animals (Basel) 2021 Mar 20;11(3).
              doi: 10.3390/ani11030888pubmed: 33804702google scholar: lookup
            8. Bosch S, Serra Bragança F, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag BJ, Voskamp J, Back W, van Weeren R, Havinga P. EquiMoves: A Wireless Networked Inertial Measurement System for Objective Examination of Horse Gait. Sensors (Basel) 2018 Mar 13;18(3).
              doi: 10.3390/s18030850pubmed: 29534022google scholar: lookup
            9. Ladha C, O'Sullivan J, Belshaw Z, Asher L. GaitKeeper: A System for Measuring Canine Gait. Sensors (Basel) 2017 Feb 8;17(2).
              doi: 10.3390/s17020309pubmed: 28208707google scholar: lookup
            10. Delco ML, Kennedy JG, Bonassar LJ, Fortier LA. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle: A distinct clinical entity requiring new research approaches. J Orthop Res 2017 Mar;35(3):440-453.
              doi: 10.1002/jor.23462pubmed: 27764893google scholar: lookup
            11. Olsen E, Andersen PH, Pfau T. Accuracy and precision of equine gait event detection during walking with limb and trunk mounted inertial sensors. Sensors (Basel) 2012;12(6):8145-56.
              doi: 10.3390/s120608145pubmed: 22969392google scholar: lookup