Assessment of three variations of the 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue assay for measurement of sulfated glycosaminoglycan concentrations in equine synovial fluid.
Abstract: To determine whether 3 variations of the 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay yield comparable results when measuring sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) concentrations in equine synovial fluid (SF). Methods: 25 samples of SF collected from affected joints of 13 horses and 13 samples of SF collected from nonaffected (control) joints of 4 horses. Methods: Sulfated glycosaminoglycan concentrations were measured by the direct spectrophotometric (ie, Farndale), microplate, and indirect DMMB assays in samples of SF collected from normal and affected joints and in samples digested with nucleases, papain, and hyaluronidase. Results: All 3 assays reacted similarly to standard solutions of sGAGs and digestion of SF samples with nucleases, papain, and hyaluronidase. Nucleic acids were not important interfering substances, and papain and hyaluronidase could not be used interchangeably to digest SE All 3 assays proved to have satisfactory precision (SD < 10%), but each DMMB assay resulted in significantly different measures of sGAG in equine SF. Conclusions: Samples of SF should be digested with papain or hyaluronidase prior to measurement via DMMB assay. Researchers currently are unable to compare clinical information when variations of the DMMB assay are used, because each DMMB assay yields substantially different sGAG concentrations in SF. Of the 3 assays examined here, we recommend use of the direct spectrophotometric DMMB assay.
Publication Date: 2003-07-15 PubMed ID: 12856776DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.900Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
- Analytical Methods
- Biochemistry
- Biotechnology
- Clinical Pathology
- Clinical Study
- Comparative Study
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Technique
- Disease Diagnosis
- Equine Health
- Glycosaminoglycan
- Horses
- In Vitro Research
- Laboratory Methods
- Molecular biology
- Physiology
- Spectroscopy
- Synovial Fluid
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Research
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research focuses on comparing three variations of the 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMMB) assay and how they perform in measuring sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) concentrations in equine synovial fluid. The study shows that all three DMMB assays react similarly, but produce significantly different measures of sGAG, suggesting the need for standardization in clinical comparisons.
Methods
- The researchers studied 25 samples of synovial fluid (SF) collected from the affected joints of 13 horses, and 13 samples from the non-affected joints of 4 horses. They used these samples to test the performance of three variations of the DMMB assay.
- sGAG concentrations were measured using the direct spectrophotometric (i.e., Farndale), microplate, and indirect DMMB assays.
- The researchers treated some of the SF samples with substances like nucleases, papain, and hyaluronidase. This was done to gauge the response of the assays to standard solutions of sGAGs, and to these digestion agents.
Results
- The results of the study showed that all three DMMB assays behaved similarly to sGAG standard solutions and to SF samples that were digested with nucleases, papain, and hyaluronidase.
- The study demonstrated that nucleic acids were not a significant factor of interference, and that papain and hyaluronidase could not be used interchangeably for digesting SF.
- While each DMMB assay demonstrated satisfactory precision (with a standard deviation of less than 10%), they each resulted in significantly different measurements of sGAG concentrations in the equine SF.
Conclusions
- The study concludes that to measure sGAG concentrations in SF using the DMMB assay, SF samples should first be digested with either papain or hyaluronidase.
- The study also highlights that the lack of uniformity between the DMMB assay variations makes it impossible to compare clinical data when different versions of the DMMB assay are used, since they yield distinctly different sGAG concentrations in SF.
- From the three assays examined, the study recommends the use of the direct spectrophotometric DMMB assay for the most accurate results.
Cite This Article
APA
Oke SL, Hurtig MB, Keates RA, Wright JR, Lumsden JH.
(2003).
Assessment of three variations of the 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue assay for measurement of sulfated glycosaminoglycan concentrations in equine synovial fluid.
Am J Vet Res, 64(7), 900-906.
https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.900 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, Canada.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Glycosaminoglycans / analysis
- Horse Diseases / diagnosis
- Horses
- Joint Diseases / diagnosis
- Joint Diseases / veterinary
- Joints
- Methylene Blue / analogs & derivatives
- Reproducibility of Results
- Spectrophotometry / methods
- Spectrophotometry / veterinary
- Synovial Fluid / chemistry
Citations
This article has been cited 5 times.- McCready E, Easley JT, Risch M, Troyer KL, Johnson JW, Gadomski BC, McGilvray KC, Kisiday JD, Nelson BB. Biomechanical, Morphological, and Biochemical Characteristics of Articular Cartilage of the Ovine Humeral Head. Cartilage 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):19476035221081465.
- Byron CR, Trahan RA. Comparison of the Effects of Interleukin-1 on Equine Articular Cartilage Explants and Cocultures of Osteochondral and Synovial Explants. Front Vet Sci 2017;4:152.
- Zheng CH, Levenston ME. Fact versus artifact: avoiding erroneous estimates of sulfated glycosaminoglycan content using the dimethylmethylene blue colorimetric assay for tissue-engineered constructs. Eur Cell Mater 2015 Apr 19;29:224-36; discussion 236.
- Duesterdieck-Zellmer KF, Moneta L, Ott JF, Larson MK, Gorman EM, Hunter B, Löhr CV, Payton ME, Morré JT, Maier CS. Effects of low and high dose intraarticular tiludronate on synovial fluid and clinical variables in healthy horses-a preliminary investigation. PeerJ 2014;2:e534.
- Moldaschl J, Chariyev-Prinz F, Toegel S, Keck M, Hiden U, Egger D, Kasper C. Spheroid trilineage differentiation model of primary mesenchymal stem/stromal cells under hypoxia and serum-free culture conditions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2024;12:1444363.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists