FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2013; 40(4); 410-418; doi: 10.1111/vaa.12025

Attitude of Brazilian veterinarians in the recognition and treatment of pain in horses and cattle.

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess the use of analgesics, describe the attitudes of Brazilian veterinarians towards pain relief in horses and cattle and evaluate the differences due to gender, year of graduation and type of practice. Methods: Prospective survey. Methods: Questionnaires were sent to 1000 large animal veterinarians by mail, internet and delivered in person during national meetings. The survey investigated the attitudes of Brazilian veterinarians to the recognition and treatment of pain in large animals and consisted of sections asking about demographic data, use of analgesic drugs, attitudes to pain relief and to the assessment of pain. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze frequencies. Simple post hoc comparisons were performed using the chi-square test. Results: Eight hundred questionnaires were collected, but 87 were discarded because they were incomplete or blank. The opioid of choice for use in large animals was butorphanol (43.4%) followed by tramadol (39%). Flunixin (83.2%) and ketoprofen (67.6%) were the most frequently used NSAIDs by Brazilian veterinarians. Respondents indicated that horses received preoperative analgesics for laparotomy more frequently (72.9%) than cattle (58.5%). The most frequently administered preoperative drugs for laparotomy in horses were flunixin (38.4%) and xylazine (23.6%), whereas the preoperative drugs for the same surgical procedure in cattle were xylazine (31.8%) and the local administration of lidocaine (48%). Fracture repair was considered the most painful surgical procedure for both species. Most veterinarians (84.1%) believed that their knowledge in this area was not adequate. Conclusions: Although these Brazilian veterinarians thought that their knowledge on recognition and treatment of pain was not adequate, the use of analgesic in large animals was similar in Brazil to that reported in other countries.
© 2013 The Authors. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia © 2013 Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists and the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2013-03-06 PubMed ID: 23461405DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12025Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study explores the attitudes and behaviors of Brazilian veterinarians in relation to pain recognition and treatment in horses and cattle. It identifies common analgesics used, reports on differences based on demographics, and discusses practitioners’ self-assessed knowledge deficiency in this area.

Research Methodology

The researchers conducted a survey among 1,000 large animal veterinarians in Brazil. The tools of dissemination were diverse and included direct mailing, internet, and face-to-face distribution during events. The survey explored participants’ attitudes towards pain recognition and treatment in large animals, demographic information, how often they used analgesic drugs, and their approach towards pain assessment and relief.

Data Analysis

The collected data was scrutinized using descriptive statistical tools to determine frequencies. Using the chi-square test, simple post hoc comparisons were made. Some data had to be discarded due to incompletions or blank responses.

Results

  • The top choices for opioids in large animals were butorphanol and tramadol.
  • The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) most commonly utilized were flunixin and ketoprofen.
  • Preoperative analgesics delivery, particularly before laparotomy, was more prevalent for horses than for cattle. Flunixin and xylazine were the drugs most frequently administered to horses pre-laparotomy, while xylazine and lidocaine were the common choices for cattle.
  • Fracture repair was perceived as the most painful surgical procedure for both horses and cattle.
  • A significant majority of the practitioners (84.1%) expressed that they did not think their knowledge about pain recognition and treatment in large animals was adequate.

Conclusions

The research noted that despite practitioners’ perceived inadequacy in their understanding of pain assessment and treatment, the analgesic use in Brazil is closely aligned with international patterns. The report suggests a need for further education and resources to address the lack of confidence among veterinarians in their knowledge of large animal pain management.

Cite This Article

APA
Lorena SE, Luna SP, Lascelles BD, Corrente JE. (2013). Attitude of Brazilian veterinarians in the recognition and treatment of pain in horses and cattle. Vet Anaesth Analg, 40(4), 410-418. https://doi.org/10.1111/vaa.12025

Publication

Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 40
Issue: 4
Pages: 410-418

Researcher Affiliations

Lorena, Sílvia E R S
  • Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anaesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, Brazil.
Luna, Stélio P L
    Lascelles, B Duncan X
      Corrente, José E

        MeSH Terms

        • Adult
        • Analgesics / therapeutic use
        • Animal Welfare
        • Animals
        • Brazil
        • Cattle
        • Cattle Diseases / drug therapy
        • Data Collection
        • Female
        • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
        • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
        • Horses
        • Humans
        • Knowledge
        • Male
        • Pain / drug therapy
        • Pain / veterinary
        • Surveys and Questionnaires
        • Veterinarians / standards

        Citations

        This article has been cited 18 times.
        1. Zein S, Jensen KC, Müller K. Survey of German veterinarians' approaches to pain assessment and management of perioperative pain in pet rabbits. Vet Rec 2026 Jan Jul 31;198(3):e92-e100.
          doi: 10.1002/vetr.6018pubmed: 41342384google scholar: lookup
        2. Maldonado Moreno N, Alves Moreira J, Araujo De Oliveira L, Sanches Gontijo A, Castilho Baldi ML, Rocha Wenceslau R, Beier SL. Analgesic and Gastrointestinal Effects of Methadone in Horses Undergoing Orchiectomy. Animals (Basel) 2025 Aug 11;15(16).
          doi: 10.3390/ani15162358pubmed: 40867687google scholar: lookup
        3. Tomacheuski RM, Klostermann C, Frank D, Taffarel MO, Pinho RH, Monteiro BP, Esteves Trindade PH, Desrochers A, Nichols S, Gleerup K, Luna SPL, Steagall PV. Bovine pain scale: A novel tool for pain assessment in cattle undergoing surgery in the hospital setting. PLoS One 2025;20(5):e0323710.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323710pubmed: 40408538google scholar: lookup
        4. Sato S, Kanno C, Ueda R, Maeda Y, Takahashi F. A retrospective study of injectable versus inhalation anesthesia for umbilical surgery in Japanese black calves. Vet Res Commun 2025 Mar 11;49(3):137.
          doi: 10.1007/s11259-025-10711-1pubmed: 40067525google scholar: lookup
        5. Interlandi C, Spadola F, Neve VC, Tabbì M, Di Pietro S, Giudice E, Macrì D, Costa GL. Use of butorphanol as a local anaesthetic for pain management in calves undergoing umbilical hernia repair. Front Vet Sci 2024;11:1470957.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1470957pubmed: 39421832google scholar: lookup
        6. Tomacheuski RM, de Oliveira AR, Trindade PHE, Lopez-Soriano M, Merenda VR, Luna SPL, Pairis-Garcia MD. Real-time and video-recorded pain assessment in beef cattle: clinical application and reliability in young, adult bulls undergoing surgical castration. Sci Rep 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15257.
          doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65890-9pubmed: 38956118google scholar: lookup
        7. Spahija N, Lutvikadić I, Ćoso A, Maksimović A. Current attitudes and self-rated abilities of Bosnia and Herzegovina veterinarians toward pain recognition and quantification in domestic animals. Anim Welf 2023;32:e50.
          doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.46pubmed: 38487441google scholar: lookup
        8. Tschoner T, Mueller KR, Zablotski Y, Feist M. Pain Assessment in Cattle by Use of Numerical Rating and Visual Analogue Scales-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Animals (Basel) 2024 Jan 22;14(2).
          doi: 10.3390/ani14020351pubmed: 38275811google scholar: lookup
        9. Fonseca MW, Trindade PHE, Pinho RH, Justo AA, Tomacheuski RM, Silva NEOFD, Gonçalves HC, Luna SPL. Development and Validation of the Unesp-Botucatu Goat Acute Pain Scale. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jun 28;13(13).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13132136pubmed: 37443934google scholar: lookup
        10. Costa GL, Leonardi F, Interlandi C, Licata P, Lizarraga I, Macrì F, Macrì D, Ferrantelli V, Spadola F. Tramadol Administered Intravenously Either as a Bolus or a Slow Injection in Pain Management of Romifidine-Sedated Calves Undergoing Umbilical Hernia Repair. Animals (Basel) 2023 Mar 24;13(7).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13071145pubmed: 37048401google scholar: lookup
        11. Tomacheuski RM, Oliveira AR, Trindade PHE, Oliveira FA, Candido CP, Teixeira Neto FJ, Steagall PV, Luna SPL. Reliability and Validity of UNESP-Botucatu Cattle Pain Scale and Cow Pain Scale in Bos taurus and Bos indicus Bulls to Assess Postoperative Pain of Surgical Orchiectomy. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 20;13(3).
          doi: 10.3390/ani13030364pubmed: 36766253google scholar: lookup
        12. Tomacheuski RM, Monteiro BP, Evangelista MC, Luna SPL, Steagall PV. Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist. PLoS One 2023;18(1):e0280830.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280830pubmed: 36662813google scholar: lookup
        13. van Dyke R, Connor M, Miele A. An Investigation into the Perceptions of Veterinarians towards Perioperative Pain Management in Calves. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 24;11(7).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11071882pubmed: 34202730google scholar: lookup
        14. Steagall PV, Bustamante H, Johnson CB, Turner PV. Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs. Animals (Basel) 2021 May 21;11(6).
          doi: 10.3390/ani11061483pubmed: 34063847google scholar: lookup
        15. Tomacheuski RM, Monteiro BP, Evangelista MC, Luna SPL, Steagall PV. Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review protocol using the COSMIN checklist. PLoS One 2021;16(5):e0251435.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251435pubmed: 33989321google scholar: lookup
        16. Belli M, de Oliveira AR, de Lima MT, Trindade PHE, Steagall PV, Luna SPL. Clinical validation of the short and long UNESP-Botucatu scales for feline pain assessment. PeerJ 2021;9:e11225.
          doi: 10.7717/peerj.11225pubmed: 33954046google scholar: lookup
        17. Silva NEOF, Trindade PHE, Oliveira AR, Taffarel MO, Moreira MAP, Denadai R, Rocha PB, Luna SPL. Validation of the Unesp-Botucatu composite scale to assess acute postoperative abdominal pain in sheep (USAPS). PLoS One 2020;15(10):e0239622.
          doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239622pubmed: 33052903google scholar: lookup
        18. de Oliveira FA, Luna SP, do Amaral JB, Rodrigues KA, Sant'Anna AC, Daolio M, Brondani JT. Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu unidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cattle. BMC Vet Res 2014 Sep 6;10:200.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0200-0pubmed: 25192598google scholar: lookup
        Subscribe to our newsletter
        Join 99,727 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.