FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Can Vet J / Bacterial isolates from equine infections in western Canada ...
The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2008; 49(2); 153-160;

Bacterial isolates from equine infections in western Canada (1998-2003).

Abstract: All bacterial samples of equine origin submitted to the diagnostic laboratory at the Western College of Veterinary Medicine from January 1998 to December 2003 from either "in-clinic" or Field Service cases were accessed (1323 submissions). The most common bacterial isolates from specific presenting signs were identified, along with their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. The most common site from which significant bacterial isolates were recovered was the respiratory tract, followed by wounds. Streptococcus zooepidemicus was the most common isolate from most infections, followed by Escherichia coli. Antimicrobial resistance was not common in the isolates and acquired antimicrobial resistance to multiple drugs was rare. The results are compared with previous published studies from other institutions and used to suggest appropriate antimicrobial treatments for equine infections in western Canada. Isolats de bactéries provenant d’infections équines dans l’Ouest du Canada (1998–2003). Tous les échantillons bactériens d’origine équine en provenance de l’hôpital ou de la clinique ambulatoire, soumis au laboratoire de diagnostic au Western College of Veterinary Medicine de janvier 1998 à décembre 2003, ont été évalués (1323 dossiers). Les isolats bactériens les plus fréquents ont été identifiés à partir des signes cliniques distinctifs et simultanément, leurs motifs de susceptibilité in-vitro aux antimicrobiens ont été déterminés. Le tractus respiratoire constituait le site le plus fréquent de recouvrement d’isolats bactériens significatifs alors que les plaies en constituaient le 2e. Streptococcus zooepidemicus constituait l’espèce bactérienne la plus commune isolée de la plupart des infections suivi d’Escherichia coli. La résistance aux antimicrobiens n’était pas fréquente dans les isolats et la multirésistance acquise demeurait un fait rare. Les résultats sont comparés à ceux d’études déjà publiées provenant d’autres institutions et servent à proposer des traitements antimicrobiens efficaces aux infections équines dans l’ouest du Canada. (Traduit par Docteur André Blouin)
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2008-03-04 PubMed ID: 18309745PubMed Central: PMC2216435
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research focuses on analyzing bacterial samples from equine infections in Western Canada between 1998 and 2003, which were submitted to the Western College of Veterinary Medicine. The study aims to identify the most common isolates from specific presenting signs, track their in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and propose suitable antibiotic treatments for equine infections in the region.

Research Methodology

  • The data was taken from bacterial samples originating from horses. These were submitted to the Western College of Veterinary Medicine’s diagnostic laboratory between the years 1998 and 2003.
  • The samples came from two sources. They were either “in-clinic” or Field Service cases. The number of submissions was significant, amounting to 1323 submissions in total.

Findings and Key Highlights

  • The primary site from which significant bacterial isolates were recovered was the respiratory tract. This observation was followed by the recovery of significant bacterial isolates from wounds.
  • Analysis of various infections found that Streptococcus zooepidemicus was the most common isolate. This bacterium was followed by Escherichia coli, another common bacterium found in the samples.
  • The study also investigated the antimicrobial susceptibility of these bacterial isolates. It found that antimicrobial resistance was not a common trait in these samples. It was also observed that acquired antimicrobial resistance to multiple drugs was a rare occurrence.

Comparative Analysis and Recommendations

  • The findings were compared with previously published studies from other institutions. This comparative analysis helped shed light on the commonality and deviations of the current study from the existing ones.
  • Based on the research findings and the comparative analysis, appropriate antimicrobial treatments for equine infections in Western Canada were suggested. These proposed treatments could prove beneficial in effectively managing and treating equine infections in the region.

Cite This Article

APA
Clark C, Greenwood S, Boison JO, Chirino-Trejo M, Dowling PM. (2008). Bacterial isolates from equine infections in western Canada (1998-2003). Can Vet J, 49(2), 153-160.

Publication

The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne
ISSN: 0008-5286
NlmUniqueID: 0004653
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 49
Issue: 2
Pages: 153-160

Researcher Affiliations

Clark, Chris
  • Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4. chris.clark@usask.ca
Greenwood, Sarah
    Boison, Joe O
      Chirino-Trejo, Manuel
        Dowling, Patricia M

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
          • Canada / epidemiology
          • Colony Count, Microbial / veterinary
          • Drug Resistance, Bacterial
          • Escherichia coli / drug effects
          • Escherichia coli Infections / drug therapy
          • Escherichia coli Infections / epidemiology
          • Escherichia coli Infections / microbiology
          • Escherichia coli Infections / veterinary
          • Female
          • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
          • Horse Diseases / epidemiology
          • Horse Diseases / microbiology
          • Horses
          • Male
          • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
          • Respiratory Tract Infections / drug therapy
          • Respiratory Tract Infections / epidemiology
          • Respiratory Tract Infections / microbiology
          • Respiratory Tract Infections / veterinary
          • Streptococcal Infections / drug therapy
          • Streptococcal Infections / epidemiology
          • Streptococcal Infections / microbiology
          • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
          • Streptococcus equi / drug effects
          • Wounds and Injuries / drug therapy
          • Wounds and Injuries / epidemiology
          • Wounds and Injuries / microbiology
          • Wounds and Injuries / veterinary

          References

          This article includes 40 references
          1. Canadian Veterinary Medical Association. Guidelines on the prudent use of antimicrobials in animals. Ottawa: Can Vet Med Assoc; 2000.
          2. Sweeney CR, Holcombe SJ, Barningham SC, Beech J. Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial isolates from horses with pneumonia or pleuropneumonia and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the aerobes. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1991;198:839–842.
            pubmed: 2026535
          3. Marsh PS, Palmer JE. Bacterial isolates from blood and their susceptibility patterns in critically ill foals: 543 cases (1991–1998). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:1608–1610.
            pubmed: 11393374
          4. Giguere S, Sweeney CR. Antimicrobial drug use in horses. In: Prescott JF, Baggot JD, Walker RD, editors. Antimicrobial therapy in veterinary medicine. Vol. 3. Ames: Iowa State Univ Pr; 2000. pp. 509–536.
          5. Bauer AW, Roberts CE, Kirby WM. Single disk versus multiple disc and plate dilution techniques for antibiotic sensitivity testing. Antibiotic Ann 1959;7:574–580.
            pubmed: 13797620
          6. NCCLS. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk and Dilution Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria Isolated from Animals. Approved Standard — M31-A2. 2. Wayne, Pennsylvania: Natl Comm Clin Lab Standards; 2002.
          7. Walker RD. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing and interpretation of results. In: Prescott J, Baggot JD, Walker RD, editors. Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. 3. Ames: Iowa State Univ Press; 2000. pp. 12–26.
          8. Moore RM, Schneider RK, Kowalski J, Bramlage LR, Mecklenburg LM, Kohn CW. Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from 233 horses with musculoskeletal infection during 1979–1989. Equine Vet J 1992;24:450–456.
            pubmed: 1459058
          9. Wilson W. Rational selection of antimicrobials for use in horses. Proc 47th Annu Conv Am Assoc Equine Pract 2001:75–93.
          10. Feary DJ, Hyatt D, Traub-Dargatz J. Investigation of falsely reported resistance of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus isolates from horses to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. J Vet Diagn Invest 2005;17:483–486.
            pubmed: 16312244
          11. Ensink JM, Bosch G, van Duijkeren E. Clinical efficacy of prophylactic adminstration of trimethoprim/sulfadiazine in a Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus infection model in ponies. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2005;28:45–49.
            pubmed: 15720514
          12. Scheuch BM, Van Hoogmoed LM, Wilson WD. Comparison of intraosseous or intravenous infusion for delivery of amikacin sulfate to the tibiotarsal joint of horses. Am J Vet Res 2002;63:374–380.
            pubmed: 11911572
          13. Tsukayama DT, Van Loon HJ, Cartwright C. The evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during antibiotic rotation in a medical intensive care unit: the RADAR-trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004;24:339–345.
            pubmed: 15380258
          14. Christley RM, Hodgson DR, Rose RJ. A case-control study of respiratory disease in Thoroughbred racehorses in Sydney, Australia. Equine Vet J 2001;33:256–264.
            pubmed: 11352347
          15. Burrell MH, Wood JL, Whitwell KE, Chanter N, Mackintosh ME, Mumford JA. Respiratory disease in thoroughbred horses in training: the relationships between disease and viruses, bacteria and environment. Vet Rec 1996;139:308–313.
            pubmed: 8893488
          16. Dixon PM, Railton DI, McGorum BC. Equine pulmonary disease: a case control study of 300 referred cases. Part 1: examination techniques, diagnostic criteria and diagnoses. Equine Vet J 1995;27:416–421.
            pubmed: 8565937
          17. Lavoie JP, Fiset L, Laverty S. Review of 40 cases of lung abscesses in foals and adult horses. Equine Vet J 1994;26:348–352.
            pubmed: 7988535
          18. Oikawa M, Kamada M, Yoshikawa T. Pathology of equine pneumonia associated with transport and isolation of Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus. J Comp Pathol 1994;111:205–212.
            pubmed: 7806706
          19. Hoffman AM, Viel L, Prescott J, Rosendal S, Thorsen J. Association of microbiologic flora with clinical, endoscopic, and pulmonary cytological findings in foals with distal respiratory tract infection. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:1515–1522.
            pubmed: 8250386
          20. Woolcock JB. Epidemiology of equine streptococci. Res Vet Sci 1975;18:113–114.
            pubmed: 1118660
          21. Newton JR, Wood JL, Dunn K, deBrauwere M, Chanter N. Naturally occurring persistent and asymptomatic infection of the guttural pouches of horses with Streptococcus equi. Vet Rec 1997;140:84–90.
            pubmed: 9032908
          22. Judy CE, Chaffin MK, Cohen SH. Empyema of the guttural pouch (auditory tube diverticulum) in horses: 91 cases (1977–1997). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999;215:1666–1670.
            pubmed: 14567432
          23. Sweeney CR, Divers TJ, Benson CE. Anaerobic bacteria in 21 horses with pleuropneumonia. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985;187:721–724.
            pubmed: 4055490
          24. Wood JL, Chanter N, Newton JR. An outbreak of respiratory disease in horses associated with Mycoplasma felis infection. Vet Rec 1997;140:388–391.
            pubmed: 9141220
          25. Raphel Sweeny C, Divers TJ, Benson CE. Anaerobic bacteria in 21 horses with pleuropneumonia. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985;187:721–723.
            pubmed: 4055490
          26. McCue PM, Hughes JP, Jang S. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns for equine endometrial isolates. California Vet 1991;45:23–26.
          27. Hinrichs K, Cummings MR, Sertich PL, Kenney RM. Clinical significance of aerobic bacterial flora of the uterus, vagina, vestibule, and clitoral fossa of clinically normal mares. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988;193:72–75.
            pubmed: 3417532
          28. Perkins N. Equine reproductive pharmacology. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1999;15:687–704.
            pubmed: 10589474
          29. MacLeay JM, Kohn CW. Results of quantitative cultures of urine by free catch and catheterization from healthy adult horses. J Vet Intern Med 1998;12:76–78.
            pubmed: 9560762
          30. Butt TD, Bailey JV, Dowling PM, Fretz PB. Comparison of 2 techniques for regional antibiotic delivery to the equine forelimb: intraosseous perfusion vs. intravenous perfusion. Can Vet J 2001;42:617–622.
            pmc: PMC1476572pubmed: 11519271
          31. Schneider RK, Bramlage LR, Moore RM, Mecklenburg LM, Kohn CW, Gabel A. A retrospective study of 192 horses affected with septic arthritis/tenosynovitis. Equine Vet J 1992;24:436–442.
            pubmed: 1459056
          32. Shimozawa K, Anzai T, Kamada M, Takatori K. Fungal and bacterial isolation from racehorses with infectious dermatosis. J Equine Sci 1997;8:89–93.
          33. Hariharan H, McPhee L, Heaney S, Bryenton J. Antimicrobial drug susceptibility of clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Can Vet J 1995;36:166–168.
            pmc: PMC1686901pubmed: 7757922
          34. Traub-Dargatz JL, George JL, Dargatz DA, Morley PS, Southwood LL, Tillotson K. Survey of complications and antimicrobial use in equine patients at veterinary teaching hospitals that underwent surgery because of colic. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002;220:1359–1365.
            pubmed: 11991416
          35. Moore CP, Collins BK, Fales WH. Antibacterial susceptibility patterns for microbial isolates associated with infectious keratitis in horses: 63 cases (1986–1994). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;207:928–933.
            pubmed: 7559027
          36. Moore CP, Collins BK, Fales WH, Halenda R. Antimicrobial agents for treatment of infectious keratitis in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995;207:855–862.
            pubmed: 7559004
          37. Dowling PM. Peptide antibiotics: Polymixins, glycopeptides and bacitraci. In: Giguere S, Prescott J, Baggot JD, Walker RD, Dowling PM, editors. Antimicrobial Therapy in Veterinary Medicine. 4. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publ Professional; 2006. pp. 171–178.
          38. Tanowitz H, Chan J. Gram-positive sepsis. Crit Care Med 2000;28:3081–3082.
            pubmed: 10966302
          39. Adams SB, Fessler JF. Umbilical cord remnant infections in foals; 16 cases (1975–1985). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1987;190:316–318.
            pubmed: 3558073
          40. Apley MD, Brown SA, Fedorka-Cray PJ. Role of veterinary therapeutics in bacterial resistance development: animal and public health perspectives. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998;212:1209–1213.
            pubmed: 9569153
          Subscribe to our newsletter
          Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.