Analyze Diet
Veterinary sciences2022; 9(2); 52; doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020052

Bias Associated with Peripheral Non-Invasive Compared to Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring in Healthy Anaesthetised and Standing Horses Using the Bionet BM7Vet.

Abstract: To compare arterial blood pressure (ABP) measured invasively (IBP) to ABP measured non-invasively (NIBP) via oscillometry in healthy anaesthetised and standing horses using the Bionet BM7Vet. Fourteen horses were anaesthetised for elective procedures (anaesthetised group) and 10 horses were enrolled for standing blood pressure manipulation (standing group). In both groups, IBP and NIBP-corrected to heart level were measured every 3 min using the Bionet BM7Vet. The overall mean difference (bias), standard deviation and limits of agreement (LOA) were calculated for paired IBP and NIBP systolic (SAP), mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) blood pressure measurements. In anaesthetised horses, the NIBP cuff was placed at either the proximal tail base or the metacarpus. Invasive MAP was used to retrospectively characterise measurements into hypotensive (≤70 mm Hg), normotensive (71-110 mm Hg) or hypertensive (≥111 mm Hg) subgroups. In standing horses, the NIBP cuff was placed at the tail base only and invasive MAP was manipulated to achieve hypertension (≥126 mm Hg) and hypotension (≤90 mm Hg) using phenylephrine and acepromazine, respectively. When measuring NIBP at the tail in anaesthetised horses, the Bionet BM7Vet failed on 8/185 occasions and overestimated SAP, MAP and DAP during hypotension and normotension. The biases (lower, upper LOA) for MAP were -11.4 (-33.3, 10.5) and -6.0 (-25.8, 13.8) mm Hg, respectively. Hypertension could not be evaluated. When measuring NIBP at the metacarpus in anaesthetised horses, the Bionet BM7Vet failed on 24/65 occasions and underestimated SAP, MAP and DAP when all ABP subgroups were combined. The bias (lower, upper LOA) for pooled MAP was 3.6 (-44.3, 51.6) mm Hg. When measuring NIBP at the tail in standing horses, the Bionet BM7Vet failed on 64/268 occasions and underestimated SAP, MAP and DAP during hypotension, normotension and hypertension. The biases (lower, upper LOA) for MAP were 16.3 (-10.5, 43.1), 16.6 (-19.5, 52.7) and 30.0 (-8.1, 68.0) mm Hg, respectively. Monitoring NIBP on the Bionet BM7Vet in anaesthetised horses overestimated ABP at the tail and underestimated ABP at the metacarpus. The device inaccurately detected hypotension and should be used cautiously. In standing horses, the Bionet BM7Vet underestimated ABP at the tail, especially during pharmacologically induced hypertension.
Publication Date: 2022-01-28 PubMed ID: 35202305PubMed Central: PMC8878245DOI: 10.3390/vetsci9020052Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses an analysis of blood pressure measurements in horses, comparing readings taken invasively vs non-invasively with the Bionet BM7Vet device. The results suggest that the non-invasive procedure can often overestimate or underestimate arterial blood pressure, especially during conditions of hypotension or hypertension.

Objective and Study Groups

  • The study aimed to investigate the accuracy of invasive blood pressure (IBP) measurements versus non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) readings using a device called the Bionet BM7Vet.
  • Two groups of horses were studied: those anaesthetised for elective procedures and those standing normally. Fourteen horses were in the anaesthetised group, and ten were in the standing group.

Methodology

  • IBP and NIBP were measured every three minutes using the Bionet BM7Vet device. Data collected include systolic, mean, and diastolic blood pressure measurements.
  • The Bionet BM7Vet was applied differently in both the study groups. It was placed at the proximal tail base or the metacarpus for anesthesia, while for standing horses, the device was placed at the tail base.
  • For the standing horse group, hypertension and hypotension were artificially induced using drugs, allowing the researchers to test the device under a variety of blood pressure conditions.

Results and Findings

  • The study came across numerous instances where non-invasive blood pressure readings were either overestimated or underestimated. In general, the Bionet BM7Vet device wasn’t completely reliable, with discrepancies varying based on the horse’s blood pressure state (hypotensive, normotensive, or hypertensive), and the site of application (tail base or metacarpus).
  • For instance, when used on anaesthetised horses at the tail base, the device failed 8 out of 185 times, overestimating systolic, mean, and diastolic blood pressure measurements during hypotension and normotension.
  • When used on anaesthetised horses at the metacarpus, the device failed 24 out of 65 times, underestimating blood pressure when all blood pressure subgroups were evaluated.
  • In the standing horse group, the device failed 64 out of 268 times, often underestimating blood pressure during all states of induced blood pressure.

Conclusions

  • The results from this study suggest that when using the Bionet BM7Vet device, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring tends to overestimate arterial blood pressure in anaesthetised horses at the tail and underestimate it at the metacarpus, making it unreliable especially in detecting hypotension.
  • In standing horses, the device often underestimated arterial blood pressure at the tail, and was particularly inaccurate during induced hypertension.
  • Overall, the study advises caution when using this device for monitoring non-invasive blood pressure in horses due to these biases.

Cite This Article

APA
Pratt S, Barnes TS, Cowling N, de Klerk K, Rainger J, Sole-Guitart A, Woldeyohannes S, Goodwin W. (2022). Bias Associated with Peripheral Non-Invasive Compared to Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring in Healthy Anaesthetised and Standing Horses Using the Bionet BM7Vet. Vet Sci, 9(2), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci9020052

Publication

ISSN: 2306-7381
NlmUniqueID: 101680127
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 9
Issue: 2
PII: 52

Researcher Affiliations

Pratt, Shaun
  • School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
Barnes, Tamsin S
  • School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
  • Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
Cowling, Nicholas
  • School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
de Klerk, Karla
  • School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
Rainger, Joanne
  • School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
Sole-Guitart, Albert
  • School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
Woldeyohannes, Solomon
  • School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.
Goodwin, Wendy
  • School of Veterinary Science, Gatton Campus, The University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, Australia.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 29 references
  1. Bidwell LA, Bramlage LR, Rood WA. Equine perioperative fatalities associated with general anaesthesia at a private practice--a retrospective case series.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2007 Jan;34(1):23-30.
  2. Grandy JL, Steffey EP, Hodgson DS, Woliner MJ. Arterial hypotension and the development of postanesthetic myopathy in halothane-anesthetized horses.. Am J Vet Res 1987 Feb;48(2):192-7.
    pubmed: 3826855
  3. Magdesian KG. Monitoring the critically ill equine patient.. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2004 Apr;20(1):11-39.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2003.12.001pubmed: 15062457google scholar: lookup
  4. Young SS, Taylor PM. Factors influencing the outcome of equine anaesthesia: a review of 1,314 cases.. Equine Vet J 1993 Mar;25(2):147-51.
  5. Hardy J. Venous and arterial catheterisation and fluid thearpy. .
  6. Drynan EA, Schier M, Raisis AL. Comparison of invasive and noninvasive blood pressure measurements in anaesthetized horses using the Surgivet V9203.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2016 May;43(3):301-8.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12297pubmed: 26313264google scholar: lookup
  7. Fouche A, Auer U, Iff I. Comparison of non-invasive and invasive blood pressure measuremeants in horses during anaesthesia using the oscillometric blood pressure monitor S/5 Datex Ohmeda. Pferdeheilkunde 2016;32:479–484.
    doi: 10.21836/PEM20160509google scholar: lookup
  8. Hatz LA, Hartnack S, Kümmerle J, Hässig M, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R. A study of measurement of noninvasive blood pressure with the oscillometric device, Sentinel, in isoflurane-anaesthetized horses.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015 Jul;42(4):369-76.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12213pubmed: 25082169google scholar: lookup
  9. Heliczer N, Lorello O, Casoni D, Navas de Solis C. Accuracy and Precision of Noninvasive Blood Pressure in Normo-, Hyper-, and Hypotensive Standing and Anesthetized Adult Horses.. J Vet Intern Med 2016 May;30(3):866-72.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13928pmc: PMC4913577pubmed: 27059803google scholar: lookup
  10. Olsen E, Pedersen TL, Robinson R, Haubro Andersen P. Accuracy and precision of oscillometric blood pressure in standing conscious horses.. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):85-92.
    doi: 10.1111/vec.12411pubmed: 26488617google scholar: lookup
  11. Tünsmeyer J, Hopster K, Feige K, Kästner SB. Agreement of high definition oscillometry with direct arterial blood pressure measurement at different blood pressure ranges in horses under general anaesthesia.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2015 May;42(3):286-91.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12203pubmed: 25053371google scholar: lookup
  12. Yamaoka TT, Flaherty D, Pawson P, Scott M, Auckburally A. Comparison of arterial blood pressure measurements obtained invasively or oscillometrically using a Datex S/5 Compact monitor in anaesthetised adult horses.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2017 May;44(3):492-501.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2016.05.008pubmed: 28528758google scholar: lookup
  13. Giguère S, Knowles HA Jr, Valverde A, Bucki E, Young L. Accuracy of indirect measurement of blood pressure in neonatal foals.. J Vet Intern Med 2005 Jul-Aug;19(4):571-6.
  14. Nout YS, Corley TT, Donaldson LL, Furr MO. Indirect oscillometric and direct blood pressure measurements in anaesthetised and conscious neonatal foals. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2002;12:75–80.
  15. Duke T, Filzek U, Read MR, Read EK, Ferguson JG. Clinical observations surrounding an increased incidence of postanesthetic myopathy in halothane-anesthetized horses.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2006 Mar;33(2):122-7.
  16. Hubbell JAE, Muir WW. Monitoring anaesthesia. .
  17. Schwarzwald CC, Bonagura JD, Muir WW. The cardiovascular system. .
  18. Gornik HL, Garcia B, Wolski K, Jones DC, Macdonald KA, Fronek A. Validation of a method for determination of the ankle-brachial index in the seated position.. J Vasc Surg 2008 Nov;48(5):1204-10.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.06.052pubmed: 18829231google scholar: lookup
  19. Carstensen B. Comparing Clinical Measurement Methods: A Practical Guide. .
  20. Brown S, Atkins C, Bagley R, Carr A, Cowgill L, Davidson M, Egner B, Elliott J, Henik R, Labato M, Littman M, Polzin D, Ross L, Snyder P, Stepien R. Guidelines for the identification, evaluation, and management of systemic hypertension in dogs and cats.. J Vet Intern Med 2007 May-Jun;21(3):542-58.
  21. Carstensen B. The MethComp Package for R: Statistical Analysis of Method Comparison Studies. .
  22. . Bionetus BM7VET Operation Manual. 2016; p. 139.
  23. Bailey SR, Habershon-Butcher JL, Ransom KJ, Elliott J, Menzies-Gow NJ. Hypertension and insulin resistance in a mixed-breed population of ponies predisposed to laminitis.. Am J Vet Res 2008 Jan;69(1):122-9.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.69.1.122pubmed: 18167097google scholar: lookup
  24. Hubbell JAE, Muir WW. Anaesthetic associated complications. .
  25. Amoore JN, Geake WB, Scott DHT. The effects of pulse rate, artifact and pulse strength on oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure measurements. J. Clin. Eng. 1998;23:103–109.
  26. Shuai W, Wang XX, Hong K, Peng Q, Li JX, Li P, Cheng XS, Su H. How to estimate heart rate from pulse rate reported by oscillometric method in atrial fibrillation: The value of pulse rate variation.. Int J Cardiol 2016 Nov 1;222:1022-1026.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.091pubmed: 27537542google scholar: lookup
  27. Jacobs-Fohrman ZR, Barnes TS, McEwen MM, Goodwin WA. Clinical evaluation of arterial blood pressure in anesthetized dogs by use of a veterinary-specific multiparameter monitor.. Am J Vet Res 2020 Aug;81(8):635-641.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.81.8.635pubmed: 32701000google scholar: lookup
  28. da Cunha AF, Ramos SJ, Domingues M, Beaufrère H, Shelby A, Stout R, Acierno MJ. Agreement between two oscillometric blood pressure technologies and invasively measured arterial pressure in the dog.. Vet Anaesth Analg 2016 Mar;43(2):199-203.
    doi: 10.1111/vaa.12312pubmed: 26451748google scholar: lookup
  29. Vachon C, Belanger MC, Burns PM. Evaluation of oscillometric and Doppler ultrasonic devices for blood pressure measurements in anesthetized and conscious dogs.. Res Vet Sci 2014 Aug;97(1):111-7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.05.003pubmed: 24924217google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Mendoza FJ, Buzon-Cuevas A, Aguilera-Aguilera R, Gonzalez-De Cara CA, De Las Heras A, Perez-Ecija A. Hemodynamic Response to Lipopolysaccharide Infusion and Effect of Meloxicam Administration on Cardiac Function in Donkeys. Animals (Basel) 2024 Dec 18;14(24).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14243660pubmed: 39765564google scholar: lookup