FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / BMC Vet Res / Bidirectional knotless barbed versus conventional smooth sut...
BMC veterinary research2020; 16(1); 250; doi: 10.1186/s12917-020-02449-6

Bidirectional knotless barbed versus conventional smooth suture for closure of surgical wounds in inguinal castration in horses.

Abstract: Castration of the stallion is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures in the horse. Recently barbed suture materials for surgical wound closure were introduced to the market with manufacturers claiming that these sutures enhance speed and security as they eliminate the need to tie knots. Recently, it has been suggested that this type of suture may increase postoperative complications. This study aimed at investigating and comparing a bidirectional absorbable knotless barbed suture (KBS) to a conventional smooth suture (SS) for wound closure of inguinal castrations in the horse. This was done by evaluating short-term and post-discharge complications and by comparing the time spent on suturing the surgical wounds after bilateral inguinal castration, which was performed on 45 horses undergoing castration at The Large Animal Teaching Hospital at University of Copenhagen from September 2017 to May 2019. Results: Short-term complications were few; at 24 h minor swelling occurred in 29 and 33% of horses sutured with KBS and SS respectively and cutaneous dehiscence during recovery occurred in two horses of each group. Post-discharge follow-up revealed that three horses needed veterinary attention for treatment of complications (scrotal swelling (n = 1, KBS); wound exudation (n = 1, SS) and wound dehiscence after return to pasture (n = 1, SS)). Wound closure was achieved 6 min faster with KBS than with SS (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Use of the KBS suture did not result in increased occurrence of postoperative complications. Wound closure was faster with KBS than with SS in equine bilateral inguinal castration. Our results show that KBS can safely be used in the horse following bilateral inguinal castrations without adverse effects and with a reduction in suturing time.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-07-17 PubMed ID: 32680516PubMed Central: PMC7368766DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02449-6Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research compares the use of a knotless barbed suture to a conventional smooth suture for wound closure in equine castrations, finding that the barbed suture does not increase postoperative complications and reduces suturing time.

Objective of the Research

The goal of this study was to examine whether a new type of suture material – a bidirectional absorbable knotless barbed suture (KBS) – could improve outcomes and efficiency in castrations of stallions, compared to conventional smooth suture (SS). The researchers were testing manufacturer claims that this KBS is quicker to use and may be more secure, because it eliminates the requirement for tied knots.

Methodology

To achieve this objective,

  • The team carried out bilateral inguinal castration on 45 horses at the Large Animal Teaching Hospital at the University of Copenhagen between September 2017 and May 2019.
  • They monitored both short-term and post-discharge complications after the procedure to evaluate any impact of the suture material,
  • and analyzed the time taken to finish the suturing portion of the surgery.

Outcomes

The results showed short-term complications were minimal, whether KBS or SS was used:

  • Within 24 hours post-surgery, minor swelling was observed in about a third of horses irrespective of the type of suture used.
  • Furthermore, in both groups, two horses each showed cutaneous dehiscence (splitting along a natural or surgical seam) during recovery.

After discharge from the hospital,

  • Three horses needed veterinary care for treatment of complications such as scrotal swelling, wound exudation and wound dehiscence after returning to pasture.
  • It was found that KBS was able to close wounds six minutes faster than SS.

Conclusions

The use of a KBS did not lead to an increased number of postoperative complications, contradicting earlier suggestions that these kinds of sutures might add to complications. Importantly, the time saved with KBS compared to SS during the suturing procedure confirmed the manufacture’s claim about the improved efficiency. The researchers concluded that KBS can be used safely in horse castrations without increased risk and with a reduction in suturing time.

Cite This Article

APA
Adler DMT, Østergaard S, Jørgensen E, Jacobsen S. (2020). Bidirectional knotless barbed versus conventional smooth suture for closure of surgical wounds in inguinal castration in horses. BMC Vet Res, 16(1), 250. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02449-6

Publication

BMC veterinary research
ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 1
Pages: 250

Researcher Affiliations

Adler, Ditte Marie Top
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark. dima@sund.ku.dk.
Østergaard, Stine
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.
Jørgensen, Elin
  • Department of Pharmacy, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacobsen, Stine
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Taastrup, Denmark.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses / surgery
  • Male
  • Operative Time
  • Orchiectomy / adverse effects
  • Orchiectomy / instrumentation
  • Orchiectomy / veterinary
  • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
  • Suture Techniques / veterinary
  • Sutures / veterinary

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

References

This article includes 31 references
  1. Kummer M, Gygax D, Jackson M, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Fürst A. Results and complications of a novel technique for primary castration with an inguinal approach in horses.. Equine Vet J 2009;41(6):547–551.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X415018pubmed: 19803049google scholar: lookup
  2. Mason B, Newton J, Payne R, Pilsworth R. Costs and complications of equine castration: a UK practice-based study comparing ‘standing nonsutured’and ‘recumbent sutured’techniques.. Equine Vet J 2005;37(5):468–472.
    doi: 10.2746/042516405774479988pubmed: 16163951google scholar: lookup
  3. Schumacher J. Testis.. In: Auer JA, Stick JA, Kümmerle JM, Prange T, editors. Equine Surgery. 5. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2018. pp. 994–1034.
  4. Celeste C. Selection of suture materials, suture patterns, and drains for wound closure.. In: Theoret C, Schumacher J, editors. Equine wound management. 3. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell; 2017. pp. 173–199.
  5. Greenberg JA, Einarsson JI. The use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy.. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15(5):621–623.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.06.004pubmed: 18619922google scholar: lookup
  6. Ragle CA, Yiannikouris S, Tibary AA, Fransson BA. Use of a barbed suture for laparoscopic closure of the internal inguinal rings in a horse.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2013;242(2):249–253.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.242.2.249pubmed: 23276104google scholar: lookup
  7. Ehrhart NP, Kaminskaya K, Miller JA, Zaruby JF. In vivo assessment of absorbable knotless barbed suture for single layer gastrotomy and enterotomy closure.. Vet Surg 2013;42(2):210–216.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.01090.xpubmed: 23373618google scholar: lookup
  8. Albanese V, Hanson RR, McMaster MA, Koehler JW, Caldwell FJ. Use of a barbed knotless suture for laparoscopic ablation of the nephrosplenic space in 8 horses.. Vet Surg 2016;45(6):824–830.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12520pubmed: 27410676google scholar: lookup
  9. Corsalini J, Gialletti R, Lotto E, Nannarone S. Laparoscopic uteropexy (Mesometrium imbrication) in three mares using a barbed suture.. J Equine Vet Sci 2016;40:102–105.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.02.236google scholar: lookup
  10. Kieves NR, Krebs AI. Comparison of leak pressures for single-layer simple continuous suture pattern for cystotomy closure using barbed and monofilament suture material in an ex vivo canine model.. Vet Surg 2017;46(3):412–416.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12632pubmed: 28177538google scholar: lookup
  11. Einarsson J, Chavan N, Suzuki Y, Jonsdottir G, Vellinga T, Greenberg J. Use of bidirectional barbed suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: evaluation of perioperative outcomes, safety, and efficacy.. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2011;18(1):92–95.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.10.003pubmed: 21094097google scholar: lookup
  12. Chawla H, van der List JP, Fein NB, Henry MW, Pearle AD. Barbed suture is associated with increased risk of wound infection after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.. J Arthroplast 2016;31(7):1561–1567.
    doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.007pubmed: 26872587google scholar: lookup
  13. Hammond DC. Barbed sutures in plastic surgery: a personal experience.. Aesthet Surg J 2013;33(3_Supplement):32S–39S.
    doi: 10.1177/1090820X13499578pubmed: 24084877google scholar: lookup
  14. Major DS, Duff AH, Cohen ND, Hardy J. Ex vivo comparison of single-layer and double-layer laparoscopic closure of equine bladders with 2 types of barbed sutures.. Vet Surg 2017;46(8):1145–1153.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12719pubmed: 28972268google scholar: lookup
  15. Ruzickova P, Burns P, Piat P, Frasch MG, Beauchamp G, Elce YA. Ex vivo biomechanical comparison of 4 suture materials for laparoscopic bladder closure in the horse.. Vet Surg 2016;45(3):374–349.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12455pubmed: 27012927google scholar: lookup
  16. Nelson BB, Hassel DM. In vitro comparison of V-Loc™ versus Biosyn™ in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum.. Vet Surg 2014;43(1):80–84.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12081.xpubmed: 24256315google scholar: lookup
  17. Giusto G, Caramello V, Comino F, Gandini M. Ex vivo comparison of barbed and unbarbed sutures for the closure of caecal and pelvic flexure enterotomies in horses.. Vet Ital 2019;55(3):269–274.
    pubmed: 31599552
  18. Sinovich M, Archer DC, Meunier NV, Kelly PG. Ex vivo comparison of barbed sutures for pelvic flexure enterotomy in horses.. Vet Surg 2020;49(3):487–95.
    pubmed: 31724764
  19. Gandini M, Nannarone S, Giusto G. Laparoscopic nephrosplenic space ablation with barbed suture in eight horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2017;250(4):431–436.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.250.4.431pubmed: 28165309google scholar: lookup
  20. Moran ME, Marsh C, Perrotti M. Bidirectional-barbed sutured knotless running anastomosis v classic Van Velthoven suturing in a model system.. J Endourol 2007;21(10):1175–1178.
    doi: 10.1089/end.2007.9913pubmed: 17949320google scholar: lookup
  21. Alvarez WA, Scharf VF, Case JB. Comparison of laparoscopic and open cystopexy in a cadaveric canine model.. Vet Surg 2015;44(S1):44–49.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12284.xpubmed: 25997938google scholar: lookup
  22. Austin DC, Keeney BJ, Dempsey BE, Koenig KM. Are barbed sutures associated with 90-day reoperation rates after primary TKA?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475(11):2655–2665.
    doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5474-7pmc: PMC5638747pubmed: 28801877google scholar: lookup
  23. Smith EL, DiSegna ST, Shukla PY, Matzkin EG. Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty.. J Arthroplast 2014;29(2):283–287.
    doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.031pubmed: 24275262google scholar: lookup
  24. Campbell AL, Patrick DA Jr, Liabaud B, Geller JA. Superficial wound closure complications with barbed sutures following knee arthroplasty.. J Arthroplast 2014;29(5):966–969.
    doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.045pubmed: 24184326google scholar: lookup
  25. Zhang W, Xue D, Yin H. Barbed versus traditional sutures for wound closure in knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.. Sci Rep 2016;6:19764.
    doi: 10.1038/srep19764pmc: PMC4726393pubmed: 26805714google scholar: lookup
  26. Robert MP, Chapuis RJ, de Fourmestraux C, Geffroy OJ. Complications and risk factors of castration with primary wound closure: retrospective study in 159 horses.. Can Vet J 2017;58(5):466.
    pmc: PMC5394602pubmed: 28487590
  27. Murtha AP, Kaplan AL, Paglia MJ, Mills BB, Feldstein ML, Ruff GL. Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117(6):1769–1780.
    doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000209971.08264.b0pubmed: 16651950google scholar: lookup
  28. Motosko CC, Zakhem GA, Saadeh PB, Hazen A. The implications of barbed sutures on scar aesthetics: a systematic review.. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;142(2):337–343.
    doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004552pubmed: 29794638google scholar: lookup
  29. Rubin JP, Hunstad JP, Polynice A. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures.. Aesthet Surg J 2014;34(2):272–283.
    doi: 10.1177/1090820X13519264pubmed: 24421408google scholar: lookup
  30. Zaruby J, Gingras K, Taylor J, Maul D. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure biomechanical wound strength and histology.. Aesthet Surg J 2011;31(2):232–240.
    doi: 10.1177/1090820X10395010pubmed: 21317121google scholar: lookup
  31. Duffy DJ, Duddy HR, Keating S, Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD. Influence of barbed suture on leak pressures after double-layer inverting closure of cystotomy sites in sheep.. Vet Surg 2018;47(7):902–907.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12935pubmed: 30178885google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,344 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.