Analyze Diet
Animal blood groups and biochemical genetics1985; 16(2); 93-108; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1985.tb01458.x

Blood group and protein polymorphism gene frequencies for seven breeds of horses in the United States.

Abstract: Gene frequencies at 20 blood group and protein polymorphism loci (A, C, D, K, P, Q, U, Al, Tf, Pi, Xk, Es, Gc, PGD, CA, Cat, PGM, AP, Hb and PHI) are given for seven horse breeds in the United States (Thoroughbred, Arabian, Standardbred, Morgan, Quarter Horse, Paso Fino and Peruvian Paso). These data are used to calculate that the battery of tests is at least 96% effective for recognizing incorrect paternity in these breeds. In addition to paternity testing, these tests can be applied to studies of breed relationships.
Publication Date: 1985-01-01 PubMed ID: 4037429DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1985.tb01458.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article presents a study on gene frequencies in seven breeds of horses in the United States and discusses the efficiency of a battery of tests designed to recognize incorrect paternity.

Overview of the Research

  • The study was conducted on seven breeds of horses in the United States, namely Thoroughbred, Arabian, Standardbred, Morgan, Quarter Horse, Paso Fino, and Peruvian Paso.
  • Researchers undertook the investigation of gene frequencies at 20 blood group and protein polymorphism loci, which are distinguished points on a chromosome.

Significance of the Blood Group and Protein Polymorphism Loci

  • The blood group and protein polymorphism loci referred to here (A, C, D, K, P, Q, U, Al, Tf, Pi, Xk, Es, Gc, PGD, CA, Cat, PGM, AP, Hb, and PHI) are characteristic points in a horse’s DNA that can indicate its specific breed and familial relationships.
  • The distribution and frequency of these specific loci in a breed can provide crucial information about its genetic identity and relatedness to other breeds. This is immensely beneficial in understanding breed relationships and characteristics.

Paternity Testing

  • The research paper describes how the collected data from these genetic loci were utilized to calibrate a test battery designed for the recognition of incorrect paternity.
  • According to the study, this test battery demonstrated a least 96% effectiveness in recognizing incorrect paternity in these breeds. This implies that the battery of tests possesses remarkable accuracy and reliability in identifying false parentage claims in the evaluated breeds of horses.

Applications Beyond Paternity Testing

  • Aside from paternity verification, the researchers highlight possibilities of utilizing these tests in studies concerning relationships among breeds. The genetic data obtained from these tests can help to map out breed lineages and connectivity, imparting greater insight into breed evolution and migration patterns.

Cite This Article

APA
Trommershausen Bowling A, Clark RS. (1985). Blood group and protein polymorphism gene frequencies for seven breeds of horses in the United States. Anim Blood Groups Biochem Genet, 16(2), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.1985.tb01458.x

Publication

ISSN: 0003-3480
NlmUniqueID: 0263344
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 2
Pages: 93-108

Researcher Affiliations

Trommershausen Bowling, A
    Clark, R S

      MeSH Terms

      • Animal Husbandry
      • Animals
      • Blood Group Antigens / genetics
      • Blood Grouping and Crossmatching
      • Blood Proteins / genetics
      • Gene Frequency
      • Horses / blood
      • Horses / genetics
      • Polymorphism, Genetic
      • Species Specificity

      Citations

      This article has been cited 7 times.
      1. Kakoi H, Kikuchi M, Ishige T, Nagata SI, Hirosawa Y, Tanaka S, Kishinami T. Investigation of erythrocyte antigen frequencies in draft horse populations in Japan to assess blood donor suitability. J Equine Sci 2021 Mar;32(1):17-19.
        doi: 10.1294/jes.32.17pubmed: 33776536google scholar: lookup
      2. Marín Navas C, Delgado Bermejo JV, McLean AK, León Jurado JM, Torres ARBYR, Navas González FJ. Discriminant Canonical Analysis of the Contribution of Spanish and Arabian Purebred Horses to the Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Hispano-Arabian Horses. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jan 21;11(2).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11020269pubmed: 33494478google scholar: lookup
      3. Proverbio D, Perego R, Baggiani L, Ferrucci F, Zucca E, Nobile F, Spada E. Prevalence of Ca Blood Type and Alloantibodies in a Population of Horses from Italy. Animals (Basel) 2020 Jul 13;10(7).
        doi: 10.3390/ani10071179pubmed: 32668596google scholar: lookup
      4. Fenn MS, Bortsie-Aryee AD, Perkins GA, Mann S, Tomlinson JE, Wood EM, Mix SE, Stokol T. Agreement of stall-side and laboratory major crossmatch tests with the reference standard method in horses. J Vet Intern Med 2020 Mar;34(2):941-948.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.15710pubmed: 32017276google scholar: lookup
      5. Iwańczyk E, Juras R, Cholewiński G, Cothran EG. Genetic structure and phylogenetic relationships of the Polish Heavy horse. J Appl Genet 2006;47(4):353-9.
        doi: 10.1007/BF03194645pubmed: 17132900google scholar: lookup
      6. Lindgren G, Sandberg K, Persson H, Marklund S, Breen M, Sandgren B, Carlstén J, Ellegren H. A primary male autosomal linkage map of the horse genome. Genome Res 1998 Sep;8(9):951-66.
        doi: 10.1101/gr.8.9.951pubmed: 9750194google scholar: lookup
      7. Roneus B, Arnason T, Collinder E, Rasmussen M. Arthroscopic removal of palmar/plantar osteochondral fragments (POF) in the metacarpo- and metatarso-phalangeal joints of standardbred trotters--outcome and possible genetic background to POF. Acta Vet Scand 1998;39(1):15-24.
        doi: 10.1186/BF03547803pubmed: 9592942google scholar: lookup