FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Equine veterinary journal2020; 53(5); 1056-1062; doi: 10.1111/evj.13390

Caecal fermentation characteristics of commonly used feed ingredients.

Abstract: Commercial horse feeds use cereal grains and by-products; however, their effects on the caecal environment remain poorly characterised. Objective: Characterise the effect of commonly used feed ingredients on caecal pH and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration. Methods: 6 × 6 Latin square. Methods: Two days prior to the start of the study, 6 caecally cannulated Quarter horses were moved into individual stalls where Smooth bromegrass hay (brome) was offered at 2.0% BW/d split between 2 feedings (0600 and 1800). On day 0, caecal digesta was collected every 2 h for 12 h relative to the 0600 feeding to establish control values for horses consuming only brome (HAY). On day 1, horses began consuming their respective treatments which consisted of beet pulp (BP), maize (M), dehydrated alfalfa (A), oats (OAT), soybean hulls (SBH), or wheat middlings (WM) at 0.25% BW/d split into 2 feedings. On day 7 of each treatment period, caecal digesta was collected every 2 h for 12 h and analysed for pH and VFA. Data were analysed using mixed ANOVA with repeated measures, fixed effects of treatment and time and random effects of horse and period. Results: There was a main effect of hour (P ≤ .05) indicative of post-prandial shifts in caecal metabolites. There were no main effects of treatment on pH or VFA concentration (P ≥ .3). Effects of hour × treatment (P ≤ .04) were observed for all response variables. Regardless of treatment or hour, caecal pH remained well within normal limits. Three horses exhibited signs of lower oesophageal choke immediately after consumption of BP pellets. Conclusions: Interactions between ingredients when mixed for formulation of a concentrate warrant further research. Furthermore, a short adaptation period was chosen to mimic common management practices. Conclusions: Minimal differences in caecal fermentation parameters were detected when ingredients were fed at a common inclusion level.
© 2020 EVJ Ltd.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2020-12-08 PubMed ID: 33222236DOI: 10.1111/evj.13390Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research study investigates the impact of various common feed ingredients on caecal pH and fermentation levels of horses. It concludes that different feed types produced minimal changes in fermentation parameters, but mixed ingredient formulations and their interactions need further research.

Introduction and Objective

The main objective of this research was to study and understand how commonly used horse feed ingredients affect the pH levels and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations in the caecum of horses. The digestive health of horses largely depends on the fermentation process carried out in the caecum, and so this objective holds importance.

Methods

  • Six quarter horses were used in a 6 x 6 Latin Square study model.
  • Prior to the start of the study, hay was administered to the horses for two days.
  • After re-establishing baseline values, different treatment feeds consisting of beet pulp, maize, dehydrated alfalfa, oats, soybean hulls, or wheat middlings were introduced.
  • The effects of each feed type on caecal pH and VFA were monitored over seven days, with samples collected every two hours for twelve hours.
  • The resultant data was examined using mixed ANOVA with repeated measures.

Results

  • Minor shifts in caecal metabolites were noticed post feeding, although they were not significant enough to be seen as treatment effects.
  • No obvious effects on pH levels or VFA concentrations were recorded in response to the varied feed treatments.
  • Despite slight variations, the pH levels in the caecum stayed well within normal ranges across all feed types.
  • Interestingly, beet pulp consumption led to some horses showing signs of lower oesophageal choke.

Conclusions

Overall, the study demonstrated minimal differences in caecal pH and volatile fatty acid concentrations as a response to consuming different feed ingredients. Researchers concluded further studies are required to investigate the interactions between mixed feed ingredients, suggesting that the short study adaptation period was chosen to mimic routine management practices. Despite holding its significance, the research prompts for further, more in-depth studies on the formulation of compound feeds and its effects on equine gut health.

Cite This Article

APA
Ochonski P, Drouillard JS, Douthit TL, Vahl C, Lattimer JM. (2020). Caecal fermentation characteristics of commonly used feed ingredients. Equine Vet J, 53(5), 1056-1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.13390

Publication

Equine veterinary journal
ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 53
Issue: 5
Pages: 1056-1062

Researcher Affiliations

Ochonski, Patricia
  • Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Drouillard, James S
  • Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Douthit, Teresa L
  • Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Vahl, Christopher
  • Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
Lattimer, James M
  • Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animal Feed / analysis
  • Animals
  • Cecum / metabolism
  • Diet / veterinary
  • Fatty Acids, Volatile / metabolism
  • Fermentation
  • Horses

Grant Funding

  • Kansas State University and the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station

References

This article includes 39 references
  1. Potter GD, Arnold FF, Householder DD, Hamsen DH, Brown KM. Digestion of starch in the small or large intestine of the equine.. Pferdeheilkunde 1992;1:107-11.
  2. Kienzle E. Small intestinal digestion of starch in the horse.. Revue Med Vet 1994;145:199-204.
  3. Sunvold GD, Hussein HS, Fahey GC Jr, Merchen NR, Reinhart GA. In vitro fermentation of cellulose, beet pulp, citrus pulp, and citrus protein using fecal inoculum from cats, dogs, horses, humans, and pigs and ruminal fluid from cattle.. J Anim Sci 1995;73:3639-48.
  4. Elghandour MMY, Vazquez Chagoyan JC, Salem AZM, Kholif AE, Martinez Castaneda JS, Camacho LM. In vitro fermetative capacity of equine fecal inocula of 9 fibrous forages in the presences of different doses of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. J Eq Vet Sci 2013;34:619-25.
  5. Salem AZM, Elghandour MMY, Kholif AE, Odongo NE, Jimenez FJP, Montes-de-Oca R. The effect of feeding horses a high fiber diet with or without exogenous fibrolytic enzyme supplementation on nutrient digestion, blood chemistry, fecal coliform count, and in vitro fermentation.. J Eq Vet Sci 2015;35:735-43.
  6. Kholif AE, Baza-Garcia LA, Elghandour MMY, Salem AZM, Barbabosa S, Dominguez-Vara IA. In vitro assessment of fecal inocula from horses fed on high-fiber diets with fibrolytic enzymes addition on gas, methane, and carbon dioxide production as indicators of hindgut activity.. J Eq Vet Sci 2016;39:44-50.
  7. Sorensen RJ, Douthit T, Drouillard J, Lattimer JM. Effect of forage type on cecal and fecal microbiome and fermentation parameters in the horse.. J Eq Vet Sci 2019;76:78.
  8. Jensen RB, Naesset JA, Austbø D, Tauson AH. Fecal and cecal pH in horses fed hay only or hay and pelleted barley.. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Feed Science Conference. 2013:18-20.
  9. Murray JMD, McMullin P, Handel I, Hastie PM. Comparison of intestinal contents from different regions of the equine gastrointestinal tract as inocula for use in an in vitro gas production technique.. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2013;187:98-103.
  10. Glinsky MJ, Smith RM, Spires HR, Davis CL. Measurement of volatile fatty acid production rates in the cecum of the pony.. J Anim Sci 1976;42:1465-70.
  11. Vermorel M, Martin-Rosset W, Vernet J. Energy utilization of twelve forages or mixed diets for sport horses.. Liv Prod Sci 1997;47:157-67.
  12. NRC. Nutrient requirements of horses (6th rev. ed).. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 2007:3-9.
  13. Beard WL, Slough TL, Gunkel CD. Technical note: A 2-stage cecal cannulation technique in standing horses.. J Anim Sci 2011;89:2425-9.
  14. Jordan KV, Drouillard JS, Douthit TL, Lattimer JM. Effects of sodium caseinate on hindgut fermentation and fiber digestion in horses.. J Anim Sci 2019;97:813-9.
  15. Douthit TL, Leventhal HR, Uwituze S, Halpin MY, Lopes ALA, Drouillard JS. Megasphera elsdenii attenuates lactate accumulation in cultures of equine cecal microorganisms provided with starch or oligofructose.. J Eq Vet Sci 2019;74:1-8.
  16. Fehlberg LK, Lattimer JM, Vahl CI, Drouillard JS, Douthit TL. Digestibility of diets containing calcium salts of fatty acids or soybean oil in horses.. Transl Anim Sci 2020;4:1-12.
  17. Ochonski P, Douthit T, Drouillard J, Vahl C, Lattimer JM. Changes in cecal environment and forage intake of horses fed increasing amounts of starch.. J Eq Vet Sci 2019;76:70.
  18. Cloverdale JA, Moore JA, Tyler HD, Miller-Auwerda PA. Soybean hulls as an alternative feed for horses.. J Anim Sci 2004;82:1663-8.
  19. Hussein HS, Vogedes LA, Fernandez GCJ, Frankeny RL. Effects of cereal grain supplementation on apparent digestibility of nutrients and concentrations of fermentation end-products in the feces and serum of horses consuming alfalfa cubes.. J Anim Sci 2004;82:1986-96.
  20. Argenzio RA, Lowe JE, Pickard DW, Stevens CE. Digesta passage and water exchange in the equine large intestine.. Am J Physiol 1974;226:1035-42.
  21. Hoffman RM, Wilson JA, Kronfeld DS, Cooper WL, Lawrence LA, Sklan D. Hydrolyzable carbohydrates in pasture, hay, and horse feeds: direct assay and seasonal variation.. J Anim Sci 2001;79:500-6.
  22. Blasi DA, Drouillard JS, Titgemeyer EC, Paisley SI, Brouk ML. Soybean hulls, composition, and feeding value for beef and dairy cattle.. Manhattan, KS, USA: Kansas State University; 2000.
  23. Hintz HF, Argenzio RA, Schryver HF. Digestion coefficients, blood glucose levels, and molar percentages of volatile acids in intestinal fluid of ponies fed varying forage-grain ratios.. J Anim Sci 1971;33:992-5.
  24. Medina B, Girard ID, Jacotot E, Julliand V. Effect of a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on microbial profiles and fermentation parameters in the large intestine of horses fed a high fiber or high starch diet.. J Anim Sci 2002;80:2600-9.
  25. Sadet-Bourgeteau S, Philippeau C, Julliand V. Effect of concentrate feeding sequence on equine hindgut fermentation parameters.. Animal 2017;11:1146-52.
  26. Hughes SA, Shewry PR, Gibson GR, McCleary BV, Rastall RA. In vitro fermentation of oat and barley derived β-glucans by human fecal microbiota.. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2008;64:482-93.
  27. West JM. Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle.. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:2131-44.
  28. Pearce SC, Gabler NK, Ross JW, Escobar J, Patience JF, Rhoads RP. The effects of heat stress and plane of nutrition on metabolism in growing pigs.. J Anim Sci 2013;91:2108-18.
  29. Moore-Coyler MJS, Hyslop JJ, Longland AC, Cí·¯ord D. The mobile bag technique as a method for determining the degradation of four botanically diverse fibrous feedstuffs in the small intestine and total digestive tract of ponies.. Brit J Nutr 2002;88:729-40.
  30. Ralston SL. Feeding dentally challenged horses.. Clin Tech Eq Pract 2005;4:117-9.
  31. Murray JMD, Longland A, Moore-Coyler M. In vitro fermentation of different ratios of high-temperature dried lucerne and sugar beet pulp incubated with an equine faecal inoculum.. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2006;129:89-98.
  32. Brøkner C, Austbø D, Naesset JA, Back Knudsen KE, Tauson AH. The effect of sugar beet pulp on caecal pH in Norwegian cold-blooded horses.. The impact of nutrition on health and welfare of horses (p. 210-2). Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2010.
  33. Jensen RB, Austbø D, Blache D, Bach Knudsen KE, Tauson A-H. The effect of feeding barley or hay alone or in combination with molassesed sugar beet pulp on metabolic responses in plasma and caecum of horses.. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2016;214:53-65.
  34. DelCurto T, Cochran RC, Harmon DL, Beharka AA, Jacques KA, Towne G. Supplementation of dormant tallgrass-prairie forage: I. Influence of varying supplemental protein and (or) energy levels on forage utilization characteristics of beef steers in confinement.. J Anim Sci 1990a;68:515-31.
  35. Firkins JL. Effects of feeding nonforage fiber sources on site of fiber digestion.. J Dairy Sci 1997;80;1426-37.
  36. Dixon RM, Stockdale CR. Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilisation.. Aust J Ag Res 1999;50:757-74.
  37. Humer E, Khol-Parisini A, Hirsch R, Zebeli Q. Characterizing the moisture expansion of common single and mixed equine feeds by their water-holding capacity and nutrient composition.. J Eq Vet Sci 2018;67:118-27.
  38. Grimm P, Terra Braga M, Destrez A, Julliand V, Julliand S. Sugar beet pulp presentation alters intake behavior of horses.. J Eq Vet Sci 2019;76:82.
  39. Hudson NPH, McGorum BC, Dixon PM. A review of 4 cases of dysphagia in the horse: buccal abscess, lingual abscess, retropharyngeal foreign body and oesophageal obstruction.. Equine Vet Educ 2006;18:199-204.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 100,127 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.