Abstract: Animal allergens, particularly those from cats, dogs, and horses, are significant risk factors for the development of allergic diseases in childhood. Managing animal allergies requires allergen avoidance and, when this is not feasible, specific immunotherapy. Patient history remains the cornerstone of diagnosis, providing the foundation for diagnostic algorithms. Extract-based tests, such as skin prick tests and specific IgE measurements, are essential for confirmation and screening. However, traditional extract-based diagnostic methods have notable limitations, as they are unable to distinguish between primary sensitization and immunological cross-sensitization, and also has the potential for both false negatives and false positives. Polysensitization may arise from either multiple independent sensitizations (co-sensitization) or cross-sensitizations, between homologous allergens. Due to complex cross-reactivity and polysensitization in mammals, extract-based tests are often insufficient in determining the true allergen, so molecular allergen testing should be used. Even with molecular testing, there is no consensus on how to define complex and intriguing sensitization patterns in mammals. In this report, we review the literature on cat, dog, and horse allergies and propose a novel approach to identifying complex sensitization patterns based on the current state of knowledge. We recommend that the evaluation of cat, dog, and horse allergies should begin with investigating genuine sensitization to Fel d 1, Can f 4/5, and Equ c 4, respectively. As a subsequent step, we propose a practical approach to determine primary allergen sensitization within the lipocalin group. Secondary sensitizations should then be evaluated in the context of recent contact history and presenting symptoms. While serum albumin is less strongly associated with true animal allergies, we suggest that it may serve as a complementary marker when considered alongside cross-reactive food allergen molecules.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This research article discusses new insights into allergies caused by cats, dogs, and horses, emphasizing diagnostic challenges and proposing a structured approach for identifying true allergen sensitizations.
Background and Importance of Animal Allergens in Childhood Allergies
Animal allergens, especially from cats, dogs, and horses, are key risk factors for developing allergic diseases in children.
Exposure to these allergens can cause a range of allergic reactions, necessitating accurate diagnosis and management.
Management typically includes allergen avoidance and specific immunotherapy when avoidance is difficult.
Current Diagnostic Practices and Limitations
Diagnosis primarily relies on patient history, which forms the basis for further diagnostic testing algorithms.
Extract-based tests, such as skin prick tests and specific IgE antibody measurements, are widely used for confirmation and screening.
However, extract-based methods have significant drawbacks:
Inability to differentiate between primary sensitization to an allergen and immunological cross-sensitization (allergic reactions caused by structurally similar allergens from different sources).
Potential for false-negative and false-positive results.
Complications in interpreting polysensitization—a condition where patients react to multiple allergens, either due to multiple independent sensitizations (co-sensitization) or due to cross-reactivity across allergens.
Challenges with Cross-Reactivity and Polysensitization
Cross-reactivity is particularly complex among mammalian allergens because proteins like lipocalins and serum albumins are homologous, sharing similar structures.
Extract-based tests often fail to pinpoint the actual causative allergen due to these overlaps.
Polysensitization can confound diagnosis, making it difficult to distinguish whether a patient is sensitized to several allergens independently or due to cross-reactivity.
Advances in Molecular Allergen Testing
Molecular allergen testing (component-resolved diagnostics) involves identifying IgE antibodies to specific allergen molecules rather than whole extracts.
This approach enables precise identification of primary sensitization versus cross-sensitization.
Despite its advantages, there is currently no consensus on how to interpret complex sensitization patterns to mammalian allergens discovered via molecular testing.
Proposed Diagnostic Strategy for Cat, Dog, and Horse Allergies
The researchers propose a stepwise approach to improve diagnostic accuracy:
First, assess genuine sensitization to the primary allergen molecules most strongly associated with each animal:
Cat: Fel d 1
Dog: Can f 4 and Can f 5
Horse: Equ c 4
Next, evaluate primary allergen sensitization within the lipocalin protein group, which is common in these animals.
Finally, investigate secondary sensitizations by considering the patient’s recent animal contact history and clinical symptoms.
The approach aims to distinguish genuine sensitization from cross-reactivity and to personalize diagnosis and management plans.
Role of Serum Albumin and Cross-Reactive Food Allergens
Serum albumin, another common allergen protein, is less strongly linked to true mammalian animal allergies compared to primary allergens like Fel d 1.
However, the researchers suggest serum albumin could serve as a complementary diagnostic marker when evaluated alongside cross-reactive food allergens.
This may help in identifying allergic responses that span animal and food sources, improving comprehensive allergy assessment.
Conclusion and Future Directions
This review highlights the complexity of diagnosing allergies to cats, dogs, and horses due to cross-reactivity and polysensitization.
The authors recommend incorporating molecular allergen testing into clinical practice to better define primary versus secondary sensitizations.
They provide a practical, evidence-based algorithm to guide allergy specialists through the identification of true allergen sensitizations.
By improving diagnostic precision, this approach aims to enhance patient management and treatment outcomes for animal-related allergies.
Cite This Article
APA
Koçali B, Ocak M, Şekerel BE.
(2025).
Cat, dog, and horse allergies: emerging new insights.
Turk J Pediatr, 67(4), 445-454.
https://doi.org/10.24953/turkjpediatr.2025.5754