Analyze Diet
Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde1991; 133(7); 311-313;

[CEA test in domestic animals].

Abstract: In human cancer treatment, CEA (carcino embryonic antigen) testing is a routine procedure, even though the test is of low sensitivity (40%) and low specificity (70%). Since tests with polyclonal antibodies render no reproducible results with animal sera, the applicability of a recently available monoclonal CEA test designed for human sera was evaluated. We were able to show that the latter test was of supplemental diagnostic value when testing animal sera. The upper normal limit for dogs is 1.65 ng/ml, for cats 2.81 ng/ml, for cows 2.85 ng/ml, for sheep 2.85 ng/ml and for horses 1.61 ng/ml.
Publication Date: 1991-01-01 PubMed ID: 1962174
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • English Abstract
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The researchers have studied the use of a CEA (carcino embryonic antigen) test, generally used for humans, on animals and have found it to be a useful diagnostic tool. They’ve determined upper limits for dogs, cats, cows, sheep, and horses.

Overview of the CEA Test and Its Traditional Use

  • The carcino embryonic antigen (CEA) test is commonly used in cancer diagnosis and follow-up in humans. Despite its low sensitivity and specificity, meaning it can often give false positives or negatives, it is a standard procedure.
  • Traditionally, the CEA test uses polyclonal antibodies, which can bind to multiple sites on any single antigen, making the results broad and non-specific. This has proved to be inadequate when testing animal sera, the liquid fraction of blood that doesn’t involve clotting factors.

Application of Monoclonal CEA Tests Designed for Human Sera

  • The researchers have examined the applicability of a recently designed CEA test that makes use of monoclonal antibodies instead. Monoclonal antibodies have the advantage of binding to only one specific site, making the results more definitive and reliable.
  • While the test was initially designed for human sera, the researchers applied it to animal sera to evaluate its efficacy. They found this newly designed CEA test was of supplemental diagnostic value when used with animals.

Upper Normal Limit for Different Animals

  • The researchers were able to determine an upper normal limit value for the CEA in various animals. This could facilitate diagnosis of diseases in these animals, particularly various forms of cancer.
  • For dogs, the upper normal limit was found to be 1.65 ng/ml. For cats, it was 2.81 ng/ml. For cows and sheep, the upper normal limit was the same at 2.85 ng/ml, and for horses, it was 1.61 ng/ml.
  • These values could serve as quick reference points when testing pet or farm animals, providing veterinarians with an additional tool for diagnosis.

Cite This Article

APA
Hässig M, Casal M, Von Beust B, Nussbaumer M, Rüsch P. (1991). [CEA test in domestic animals]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd, 133(7), 311-313.

Publication

ISSN: 0036-7281
NlmUniqueID: 0424247
Country: Switzerland
Language: ger
Volume: 133
Issue: 7
Pages: 311-313

Researcher Affiliations

Hässig, M
  • Klinik für Geburtshilfe, Euter- und Jungtierkrankheiten mit Ambulatorium und Klinik für Innere Medizin der Haustiere, Universität Zürich.
Casal, M
    Von Beust, B
      Nussbaumer, M
        Rüsch, P

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Animals, Domestic
          • Carcinoembryonic Antigen / blood
          • Cats
          • Cattle
          • Dogs
          • Horses
          • Neoplasms / diagnosis
          • Neoplasms / veterinary
          • Predictive Value of Tests
          • Reproducibility of Results
          • Sheep

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.