Analyze Diet
Microbiological research2007; 164(3); 260-266; doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.11.017

Characterization of enterococci populations in livestock manure using BIOLOG.

Abstract: The BIOLOG system was used to generate knowledge of enterococci populations found in fresh and dry manure of livestock (cattle (Bos taurus), horse (Equus caballus), and sheep (Ovis aires)). Six-hundred and forty Enterococcus isolates from the host sources were observed as a combined fresh manure unit and a combined dry manure unit, E. casseliflavus and E. mundtii were predominant in fresh manure (36% and 35%, respectively) as well as in dry manure (51% and 28%, respectively). The other species were found at a frequency of less than 10%. A chi-square test of the two most predominant Enterococcus sp. indicated that there were some significant differences among the frequency of E. casseliflavus and E. mundtii in cattle and sheep, but not horse. Despite these differences, these two species were overwhelmingly predominant among all three livestock sources.
Publication Date: 2007-04-03 PubMed ID: 17408940DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2006.11.017Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research used the BIOLOG system to examine and understand enterococci populations in fresh and dry livestock manure. The study found that E. casseliflavus and E. mundtii were the dominant species in both types of manure.

Methodology and Findings

  • The researchers used the BIOLOG system, an identification process that uses carbon metabolism to determine the presence of certain microorganisms, to study the populations of enterococci in livestock manure.
  • The livestock included in the study were cattle, horses, and sheep. These animals were chosen as they all produce significant quantities of manure and are common livestock animals.
  • The study obtained 640 Enterococcus isolates, which refer to a pure sample of a bacterial species obtained for research, from the manure of these livestock. These isolates were then separated into two categories – fresh manure and dry manure.
  • Their findings revealed that in both fresh and dry manure, E. casseliflavus and E. mundtii were the most common species of enterococci, constituting 36% and 35% of the populations of enterococci in fresh manure and 51% and 28% in dry manure respectively.
  • All other species made up less than 10% of the bacteria present in the manure.

Statistical Analysis

  • The researchers used a chi-square test, a statistical test used to determine if there’s a significant association between categorical variables, to measure the distribution of the two most common species of enterococci.
  • The results showed a significant difference in the frequency of E. casseliflavus and E. mundtii among cattle and sheep. However, this statistical difference was not seen in horse manure.
  • A noteworthy observation was that despite these differences, E. casseliflavus and E. mundtii were the dominant species in all three livestock sources, signaling these are the most common enterococci in livestock manure regardless of the animal source.

Cite This Article

APA
Graves A, Weaver RW, Entry J. (2007). Characterization of enterococci populations in livestock manure using BIOLOG. Microbiol Res, 164(3), 260-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.11.017

Publication

ISSN: 1618-0623
NlmUniqueID: 9437794
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 164
Issue: 3
Pages: 260-266

Researcher Affiliations

Graves, Alexandria
  • Department of Soil Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7619, USA. alexandria_graves@ncsu.edu
Weaver, R W
    Entry, James

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Animals, Domestic / microbiology
      • Bacterial Typing Techniques
      • Biodiversity
      • Cattle
      • Enterococcus / classification
      • Enterococcus / isolation & purification
      • Enterococcus / metabolism
      • Horses
      • Manure / microbiology
      • Sheep

      Citations

      This article has been cited 5 times.
      1. Malara G, Trifirò C, Bartolotta A, Conte M, Denisi P. A rare skin infection in atopic dermatitis: A case report.. Clin Case Rep 2020 Dec;8(12):2945-2947.
        doi: 10.1002/ccr3.3167pubmed: 33363856google scholar: lookup
      2. Giannattasio-Ferraz S, Maskeri L, Oliveira AP, Barbosa-Stancioli EF, Putonti C. Draft Genome Sequences of Three Enterococcus casseliflavus Strains Isolated from the Urine of Healthy Bovine Heifers (Gyr Breed).. Microbiol Resour Announc 2020 May 21;9(21).
        doi: 10.1128/MRA.00386-20pubmed: 32439672google scholar: lookup
      3. Procházková P, Hanč A, Dvořák J, Roubalová R, Drešlová M, Částková T, Šustr V, Škanta F, Pacheco NIN, Bilej M. Contribution of Eisenia andrei earthworms in pathogen reduction during vermicomposting.. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2018 Sep;25(26):26267-26278.
        doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2662-2pubmed: 29978314google scholar: lookup
      4. Manyi-Loh CE, Mamphweli SN, Meyer EL, Makaka G, Simon M, Okoh AI. An Overview of the Control of Bacterial Pathogens in Cattle Manure.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016 Aug 25;13(9).
        doi: 10.3390/ijerph13090843pubmed: 27571092google scholar: lookup
      5. Low JR, Teoh CS, Chien JM, Huang EH. Enterococcus casseliflavus endophthalmitis due to metallic intraocular foreign body.. Eye (Lond) 2015 Jun;29(6):840-1.
        doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.332pubmed: 25657040google scholar: lookup