FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / Animals (Basel) / Characterization of Normal Bone in the Equine Distal Limb wi...
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2024; 14(7); 1064; doi: 10.3390/ani14071064

Characterization of Normal Bone in the Equine Distal Limb with Effective Atomic Number and Electron Density Determined with Single-Source Dual Energy and Detector-Based Spectral Computed Tomography.

Abstract: Single-source dual energy (SSDECT) and detector-based spectral computed tomography (DBSCT) are emerging technologies allowing the interrogation of materials that have different attenuation properties at different energies. Both technologies enable the calculation of effective atomic number (EAN), an index to determine tissue composition, and electron density (ED), which is assumed to be associated with cellularity in tissues. In the present prospective observational study, EAN and ED values were determined for 16 zones in normal subchondral and trabecular bone of 37 equine cadaver limbs. Using both technologies, the following findings were obtained: 1. palmar/plantar EAN zone values in the fetlock increased significantly with increasing age of the horse; 2. all EAN and ED values were significantly lower in the trabecular bone than in the subchondral bone of all phalanges; 3. in the distal phalanx and navicular bone, most EAN and ED values were significantly lower compared to the proximal and middle phalanx; and 4. some EAN and ED values were significantly different between front and hind limbs. Several EAN and ED values significantly differed between SSDECT and DBSCT. The reported EAN and ED values in the subchondral and trabecular bone of the equine distal limb may serve as preliminary reference values and aid future evaluation and classification of diseases.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2024-03-30 PubMed ID: 38612304PubMed Central: PMC11010807DOI: 10.3390/ani14071064Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study uses emerging technologies, considered Single-source Dual Energy (SSDECT) and Detector-Based Spectral Computed Tomography (DBSCT), to examine the composition and cellularity of horse bone tissue. The research found certain key differences in effective atomic number and electron density values in different zones of the equine bone, highlighting their potential use in future disease diagnosis and classification.

Understanding the Research

The research involved the use of two emerging technologies – Single-source Dual Energy (SSDECT) and Detector-Based Spectral Computed Tomography (DBSCT). These technologies have the capacity to investigate materials possessing differing attenuation properties at various energy levels.

Key to this research are the concepts of Effective Atomic Number (EAN) and Electron Density (ED). EAN serves as an index to identify tissue composition, while ED is associated with cellularity in tissues.

Through the research, EAN and ED values were identified for distinct zones in the subchondral and trabecular bone of 37 equine cadaver limbs.

Main Findings

The research yielded several noteworthy findings:

  • The EAN zone values in the fetlock (a joint area in the horse leg) increased noticeably with the horse’s age.
  • EAN and ED values were significantly lower in trabecular bone compared to subchondral bone – these are two specific types of bone comprising different parts of the bone structure.
  • Most EAN and ED values were significantly lesser in the distal phalanx, and navicular bone as compared to the proximal and middle phalanx. These areas represent different sections of the horse’s foot.
  • Differences were also observed in EAN and ED values between front and hind limbs of the horse.
  • The application of SSDECT and DBSCT resulted in differing EAN and ED values, indicating differences in the two methodologies.

Implications and Future Applications

The EAN and ED values discovered through this research can serve as initial reference values to aid future studies. Moreover, these findings could also be potentially helpful in the assessment and classification of bone diseases. Observing these changes in bone tissue characteristics may provide valuable insights into the underlying cause of various bone conditions in equines.

Cite This Article

APA
Steiner J, Richter H, Kaufmann R, Ohlerth S. (2024). Characterization of Normal Bone in the Equine Distal Limb with Effective Atomic Number and Electron Density Determined with Single-Source Dual Energy and Detector-Based Spectral Computed Tomography. Animals (Basel), 14(7), 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14071064

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 7
PII: 1064

Researcher Affiliations

Steiner, Janine
  • Clinic of Diagnostic Imaging, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Richter, Henning
  • Clinic of Diagnostic Imaging, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Kaufmann, Rolf
  • Effectum Medical AG, 4600 Olten, Switzerland.
Ohlerth, Stefanie
  • Clinic of Diagnostic Imaging, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 41 references
  1. McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Fletcher JG. Dual- and Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Technical Approaches, and Clinical Applications. Radiology 2015;276:637–653.
    doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142631pmc: PMC4557396pubmed: 26302388google scholar: lookup
  2. Goo HW, Goo JM. Dual-Energy CT: New Horizon in Medical Imaging. Korean J. Radiol. 2017;18:555–569.
    doi: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.555pmc: PMC5447632pubmed: 28670151google scholar: lookup
  3. Chakrabarti R, Gupta V, Vyas S, Gupta K, Singh V. Correlation of dual energy computed tomography electron density measurements with cerebral glioma grade. Neuroradiol. J. 2022;35:352–362.
    doi: 10.1177/19714009211047455pmc: PMC9244748pubmed: 34605334google scholar: lookup
  4. Garcia LIR, Pérez Azorin JF, Almansa JF. A new method to measure electron density and effective atomic number using dual-energy CT images. Phys. Med. Biol. 2016;61:265–279.
    doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/1/265pubmed: 26649484google scholar: lookup
  5. Henriksen T, Baarli J. The effective atomic number. Radiat. Res. 1957;6:415–423.
    doi: 10.2307/3570508pubmed: 13420344google scholar: lookup
  6. Kaichi Y, Tatsugami F, Nakamura Y, Baba Y, Iida M, Higaki T, Kiguchi M, Tsushima S, Yamasaki F, Amatya VJ. Improved differentiation between high- and low-grade gliomas by combining dual-energy CT analysis and perfusion CT. Medicine 2018;97:e11670.
    doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011670pmc: PMC6133561pubmed: 30095624google scholar: lookup
  7. Tatsugami F, Higaki T, Kiguchi M, Tsushima S, Taniguchi A, Kaichi Y, Yamagami T, Awai K. Measurement of electron density and effective atomic number by dual-energy scan using a 320-detector computed tomography scanner with raw data-based analysis: A phantom study. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2014;38:824–827.
    doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000129pubmed: 24983439google scholar: lookup
  8. Kulkarni NM, Eisner BH, Pinho DF, Joshi MC, Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV. Determination of renal stone composition in phantom and patients using single-source dual-energy computed tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2013;37:37–45.
    doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182720f66pubmed: 23321831google scholar: lookup
  9. Salameh JP, McInnes MDF, McGrath TA, Salameh G, Schieda N. Diagnostic Accuracy of Dual-Energy CT for Evaluation of Renal Masses: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2019;212:W100–W105.
    doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20527pubmed: 30714831google scholar: lookup
  10. Shinohara Y, Sakamoto M, Kuya K, Kishimoto J, Iwata N, Ohta Y, Fujii S, Watanabe T, Ogawa T. Assessment of carotid plaque composition using fast-kV switching dual-energy CT with gemstone detector: Comparison with extracorporeal and virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound. Neuroradiology 2015;57:889–895.
    doi: 10.1007/s00234-015-1541-5pubmed: 25981057google scholar: lookup
  11. Nakajima S, Ito H, Mitsuhashi T, Kubo Y, Matsui K, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Omori H, Nakaoka T, Sakura H. Clinical application of effective atomic number for classifying non-calcified coronary plaques by dual-energy computed tomography. Atherosclerosis 2017;261:138–143.
    doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.03.025pubmed: 28372786google scholar: lookup
  12. Hünemohr N, Krauss B, Tremmel C, Ackermann B, Jäkel O, Greilich S. Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates. Phys. Med. Biol. 2014;59:83–96.
    doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/1/83pubmed: 24334601google scholar: lookup
  13. Onishi S, Fujioka C, Kaichi Y, Amatya VJ, Ishifuro M, Takeshima Y, Awai K, Sugiyama K, Kurisu K, Yamasaki F. Utility of dual-energy CT for predicting the vascularity of meningiomas. Eur. J. Radiol. 2020;123:108790.
    doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108790pubmed: 31864141google scholar: lookup
  14. Nagano H, Takumi K, Nakajo M, Fukukura Y, Kumagae Y, Jinguji M, Tani A, Yoshiura T. Dual-Energy CT-Derived Electron Density for Diagnosing Metastatic Mediastinal Lymph Nodes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Comparison With Conventional CT and FDG PET/CT Findings. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2022;218:66–74.
    doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26208pubmed: 34319164google scholar: lookup
  15. Bae K, Jeon KN. Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism in Unenhanced Dual Energy CT Using an Electron Density Image. Diagnostics 2021;11:1841.
    doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101841pmc: PMC8534653pubmed: 34679538google scholar: lookup
  16. Nelles C, Lennartz S. Spinal Hematoma Visualized with Dual-energy CT-derived Electron Density Overlay Maps. Radiology 2023;307:e222680.
    doi: 10.1148/radiol.222680pubmed: 37039691google scholar: lookup
  17. Ognard J, Bourhis D, Cadieu R, Grenier M, Saccardy C, Alavi Z, Salem DB. Feasibility of use of medical dual energy scanner for forensic detection and characterization of explosives, a phantom study. Int. J. Legal Med. 2020;134:1915–1925.
    doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02315-ypubmed: 32444948google scholar: lookup
  18. Shim E, Kim BH, Kang WY, Hong SJ, Kang CH, Ahn KS, Lee H, Kwack TJ. Diagnostic performance of electron-density dual-energy CT in detection of cervical disc herniation in comparison with standard gray-scale CT and virtual non-calcium images. Eur. Radiol. 2022;32:2209–2220.
    doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08374-ypmc: PMC8782689pubmed: 35064315google scholar: lookup
  19. Pascart T, Norberciak L, Legrand J, Becce F, Budzik JF. Dual-energy computed tomography in calcium pyrophosphate deposition: Initial clinical experience. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2019;27:1309–1314.
    doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.007google scholar: lookup
  20. Faulkner JE, Broeckx BJG, Martens A, Raes E, Haardt H, Vanderperren K. Single energy metal artifact reduction performs better than virtual monoenergetic dual-energy reconstruction in CT of the equine proximal phalanx. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2023;64:677–685.
    doi: 10.1111/vru.13258pubmed: 37280760google scholar: lookup
  21. Nykamp SG. Dual-energy computed tomography of canine uroliths. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2017;78:1150–1155.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.78.10.1150pubmed: 28945133google scholar: lookup
  22. Eisenbarth JM, Gauntt DM, Rivas AE. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Diagnosis and Monitoring Attempted Medical Management of a Large Urate Urolith in a Desert Tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). J. Herpetol. Med. Surg. 2022;32:26–34.
    doi: 10.5818/JHMS-S-20-00016.1google scholar: lookup
  23. Germonpré J, Vandekerckhove LMJ, Raes E, Chiers K, Jans L, Vanderperren K. Post-mortem feasibility of dual-energy computed tomography in the detection of bone edema-like lesions in the equine foot: A proof of concept. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024;10:1201017.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1201017pmc: PMC10797750pubmed: 38249561google scholar: lookup
  24. Smith MRW, Kawcak CE, McIlwraith CW. Science in brief: Report on the Havemeyer Foundation workshop on subchondral bone problems in the equine athlete. Equine Vet. J. 2016;48:6–8.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12518pubmed: 26663405google scholar: lookup
  25. Martig S, Chen W, Lee PVS, Whitton RC. Bone fatigue and its implications for injuries in racehorses. Equine Vet. J. 2014;46:408–415.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12241pubmed: 24528139google scholar: lookup
  26. Zeinali-Rafsanjani B, Faghihi R, Mosleh-Shirazi MA, Saeedi-Moghadam M, Jalli R, Sina S. Effect of age-dependent bone electron density on the calculated dose distribution from kilovoltage and megavoltage photon and electron radiotherapy in paediatric MRI-only treatment planning. Br. J. Radiol. 2018;91:20170511.
    doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170511pmc: PMC5966214pubmed: 29091480google scholar: lookup
  27. O’Hare LMS, Cox PG, Singer ER. Finite element analysis of stress in the equine proximal phalanx. Equine Vet. J. 2013;45:273–277.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00635.xpubmed: 22943561google scholar: lookup
  28. Brünisholz HP, Hagen R, Fürst AE, Kuemmerle JM. Radiographic and Computed Tomographic Configuration of Incomplete Proximal Fractures of the Proximal Phalanx in Horses Not Used for Racing. Vet. Surg. 2015;44:809–815.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12364pubmed: 26197984google scholar: lookup
  29. Stewart HL, Kawcak CE. The Importance of Subchondral Bone in the Pathophysiology of Osteoarthritis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2018;5:178.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00178pmc: PMC6122109pubmed: 30211173google scholar: lookup
  30. Borges AP, Antunes C, Curvo-Semedo L. Pros and Cons of Dual-Energy CT Systems: “One Does Not Fit All”. Tomography 2023;9:195–216.
    doi: 10.3390/tomography9010017pmc: PMC9964233pubmed: 36828369google scholar: lookup
  31. Pourvaziri A, Parakh A, Cao J, Locascio J, Eisner B, Sahani D, Kambadakone A. Comparison of Four Dual-Energy CT Scanner Technologies for Determining Renal Stone Composition: A Phantom Approach. Radiology 2022;304:580–589.
    doi: 10.1148/radiol.210822pubmed: 35638928google scholar: lookup
  32. Kawahara D, Ozawa S, Yokomachi K, Fujioka C, Kimura T, Awai K, Nagata Y. Synthesized effective atomic numbers for commercially available dual-energy CT. Rep. Pract. Oncol. Radiother. 2020;25:692–697.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.02.007pmc: PMC7352035pubmed: 32684854google scholar: lookup
  33. Santschi EM. Articular fetlock injuries in exercising horses. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2008;24:117–132.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2007.11.011google scholar: lookup
  34. Omoumi P, Becce F, Racine D, Ott JG, Andreisek G, Verdun FR. Dual-Energy CT: Basic Principles, Technical Approaches, and Applications in Musculoskeletal Imaging (Part 1). Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2015;19:431–437.
    doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569253pubmed: 26696081google scholar: lookup
  35. Gosangi B, Mandell JC, Weaver MJ, Uyeda JW, Smith SE, Sodickson AD, Khurana B. Bone Marrow Edema at Dual-Energy CT: A Game Changer in the Emergency Department. Radiographics 2020;40:859–874.
    doi: 10.1148/rg.2020190173pubmed: 32364883google scholar: lookup
  36. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement, ICRU Report 44. 1st ed. ICRU; Bethesda, MD, USA: 1988. pp. 21–22, 37.
  37. Russo P. Handbook for X-ray Imaging: Physics and Technology. 1st ed. CRC Press; Boca Raton FL, USA: 2018. p. 1115.
  38. Hontoir F, Nisolle JF, Meurisse H, Simon V, Tallier M, Vanderstricht R, Antoine N, Piret J, Clegg P, Vandeweerd JM. A comparison of 3-T magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography arthrography to identify structural cartilage defects of the fetlock joint in the horse. Vet. J. 2014;199:115–122.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.10.021pubmed: 24321368google scholar: lookup
  39. Johnston GCA, Ahern BJ, Palmieri C, Young AC. Imaging and Gross Pathological Appearance of Changes in the Parasagittal Grooves of Thoroughbred Racehorses. Animals 2021;11:3366.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11123366pmc: PMC8697963pubmed: 34944142google scholar: lookup
  40. Englund M, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Aliabadi MY, Lewis CE, Torner J, Nevitt MC, Sack B, Felson DT. Meniscal tear in knees without surgery and the development of radiographic osteoarthritis among middle-aged and elderly persons: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:831–839.
    doi: 10.1002/art.24383pmc: PMC2758243pubmed: 19248082google scholar: lookup
  41. Noble P, Singer ER, Jeffery NS. Does subchondral bone of the equine proximal phalanx adapt to race training?. J. Anat. 2016;229:104–113.
    doi: 10.1111/joa.12478pmc: PMC5341590pubmed: 27075139google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.