Analyze Diet
The Cornell veterinarian1984; 74(2); 166-171;

Choledocholithiasis in a horse.

Abstract: Choledocholithiasis was diagnosed in a five-year-old gelding on the basis of laboratory results and histopathology. Surgery was performed to relieve the obstruction. The horse responded favorably and at 39 days postoperatively was clinically and clinicopathologically normal.
Publication Date: 1984-04-01 PubMed ID: 6467948
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research paper reports a case of Choledocholithiasis — the presence of stones in the bile duct — in a five-year-old male horse that was successfully diagnosed and treated through surgical intervention. The horse showed significant improvement and was considered normal based on clinical and laboratory evaluations 39 days after the surgery.

About Choledocholithiasis

  • Choledocholithiasis is a condition that involves the formation of stones in the bile duct, which can lead to a blockage and subsequent complications. It is relatively rare in equine species.
  • This medical situation can be quite serious because it can obstruct the flow of bile, resulting in subsequent liver dysfunction.

Case Presentation and Diagnosis

  • This particular case involved a five-year-old gelding, a castrated male horse. The researchers identified the issue based on signs displayed by the horse, laboratory tests, and histopathology which is the study of disease in tissues.
  • Initial diagnostic tests included blood tests to detect any abnormalities. The observation of liver enzymes may have indicated signs of liver dysfunction, which could signify a blockage in the bile duct.

Treatment and Postoperative Recovery

  • Surgery was opted for to relieve the blockage. The removal of the stone assisted in restoring normal bile flow, thereby potentially preventing further damage to the liver and gallbladder.
  • Postoperative checks and tests were conducted to track the horse’s recovery. At 39 days post-surgery, the horse was observed to be clinically normal, indicating it had healed appropriately from the surgical intervention and its symptoms had resolved.
  • The term ‘clinically normal’ is significant here as it refers to the fact that the horse did not display any signs of illness, and the laboratory test results were within normal ranges.

Significance of the Study

  • This successful identification and treatment of Choledocholithiasis in a horse underscore the importance of specific diagnostic tools like histopathology in veterinary medicine, particularly in diagnosing uncommon conditions.
  • This case also exemplifies the potential of surgical intervention as an effective treatment strategy for choledocholithiasis in horses, contributing to the limited literature on such occurrences in the equine species.

Cite This Article

APA
Roussel AJ, Becht JL, Adams SB. (1984). Choledocholithiasis in a horse. Cornell Vet, 74(2), 166-171.

Publication

ISSN: 0010-8901
NlmUniqueID: 0074245
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 74
Issue: 2
Pages: 166-171

Researcher Affiliations

Roussel, A J
    Becht, J L
      Adams, S B

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Gallstones / diagnosis
        • Gallstones / surgery
        • Gallstones / veterinary
        • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
        • Horse Diseases / surgery
        • Horses
        • Liver Function Tests / veterinary

        Citations

        This article has been cited 1 times.
        1. Linn-Peirano SC, Hepworth-Warren K, Kinsella H, Diaz-Campos D, Brenseke BM, Cianciolo RE, Schroeder E, Schreeg ME. Ingesta-associated choledocholithiasis in horses: 2 cases and literature review. J Vet Diagn Invest 2023 Jul;35(4):417-424.
          doi: 10.1177/10406387231177251pubmed: 37232550google scholar: lookup