Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal2018; 50(5); 594-601; doi: 10.1111/evj.12815

Clinical effect of corticosteroids in asthma-affected horses: A quantitative synthesis.

Abstract: There are limited findings from low-powered studies based on few number of subjects with equine asthma. Furthermore, no studies have been performed to assess a meaningful clinically detectable impact of corticosteroids in equine asthma. Objective: To assess and compare the clinical effect of inhaled and systemic corticosteroids in equine asthma and identify a quantitative clinical score suitable to assess the Minimal Important Difference (MID), expressed as the Minimally Clinically Detectable Difference (MCDD). Methods: Pair-wise and network meta-analysis. Methods: Literature searches for studies on corticosteroid therapy in equine asthma were performed. The risk of publication bias was assessed by Funnel plots and Egger's test. The effect on changes in clinical scores vs. control was analysed via random-effects models and Bayesian networks. Results: Corticosteroids significantly improved the clinical condition (Standardised Mean Difference: -1.52, 95% CrI -2.07 to -0.98; P<0.001 vs. control). No difference was detected between inhaled and systemic corticosteroids with regard to the changes in clinical scores (Relative Effect: 0.08, 95% CrI -1.45 to 1.32; P = 0.8). An Improved clinically Detectable Equine Asthma Scoring System (IDEASS) indicated that corticosteroids improved the clinical condition of asthmatic horses by 30% compared with controls (IDEASS value: -2.36, 95% CI -3.39 to -1.33; P<0.001). A one-point change in IDEASS represented the MCDD in equine asthma. Conclusions: Moderate quality of evidence for systemic corticosteroids. Conclusions: Inhaled corticosteroids are effective in improving the clinical condition of horses with equine asthma and prevent exacerbations. Systemic corticosteroids should be used only in selected cases with symptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness during exacerbation. IDEASS requires further validation but may represent a suitable approach to rank the level of asthma severity and assess the clinical effect of pharmacotherapy in horses with equine asthma.
Publication Date: 2018-02-23 PubMed ID: 29393535DOI: 10.1111/evj.12815Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Meta-Analysis

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on the comparative clinical impacts of inhaled and systemic corticosteroids on horses suffering from equine asthma, and explores a new scoring system called IDEASS for evaluating the disease’s severity.

Objective of the Study

  • The study aims to evaluate and compare the effects of inhaled and systemic corticosteroids on equine asthma. It also seeks to establish a quantitative clinical score, known as the Minimal Important Difference (MID), also expressed as the Minimally Clinically Detectable Difference (MCDD). This involves the introduction and early assessment of a new scoring system known as the Improved clinically Detectable Equine Asthma Scoring System (IDEASS).

Methods

  • A pair-wise and network meta-analysis was conducted by carrying out literature searches for studies exploring corticosteroid therapy in cases of equine asthma.
  • To ensure the validity of the obtained studies, the risk of publication bias was evaluated using Funnel plots and Egger’s test.
  • Furthermore, changes in clinical scores from treatment with corticosteroids versus controls were analysed using random-effects models and Bayesian networks.

Results

  • The results indicated a significant improvement in the clinical condition of horses suffering from equine asthma after corticosteroid treatment (Both from inhaled and systemic corticosteroids).
  • The IDEASS scoring system suggested a 30% improvement in the clinical condition of the asthma-affected horses compared to controls, after corticosteroid treatment.
  • There was no substantial difference detected between the effects of inhaled and systemic corticosteroids on the changes observed in clinical scores.

Conclusion

  • The study supports the use of inhaled corticosteroids as an effective solution for improving the clinical condition of horses with equine asthma and preventing exacerbations.
  • Systemic corticosteroids should be reserved for selected cases only, especially those displaying symptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness during exacerbation.
  • The IDEASS scoring system appears promising, but needs further validation. Once validated, it could be used to categorize the severity of equine asthma, and assess the clinical effectiveness of pharmaceutical treatments in horses suffering from the disease.

Cite This Article

APA
(2018). Clinical effect of corticosteroids in asthma-affected horses: A quantitative synthesis. Equine Vet J, 50(5), 594-601. https://doi.org/10.1111/evj.12815

Publication

ISSN: 2042-3306
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 50
Issue: 5
Pages: 594-601

Researcher Affiliations

MeSH Terms

  • Adrenal Cortex Hormones / administration & dosage
  • Adrenal Cortex Hormones / therapeutic use
  • Animals
  • Asthma / drug therapy
  • Asthma / veterinary
  • Drug Administration Routes / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / drug therapy
  • Horses

Citations

This article has been cited 7 times.
  1. Rutledge JJ, Paegelow J, Ritchey J, Singh A, Rizzi T, Murray C, Gilliam L, Crisman E, Williams NJ, Holbrook TC. Nebulized glycosylated caffeic acid phenylether ester attenuation of environmental particulate-induced airway inflammation in horses. Front Vet Sci 2022;9:958567.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.958567pubmed: 36406065google scholar: lookup
  2. Mainguy-Seers S, Lavoie JP. Glucocorticoid treatment in horses with asthma: A narrative review. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Jul;35(4):2045-2057.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16189pubmed: 34085342google scholar: lookup
  3. Millares-Ramirez EM, Lavoie JP. Bronchial angiogenesis in horses with severe asthma and its response to corticosteroids. J Vet Intern Med 2021 Jul;35(4):2026-2034.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16159pubmed: 34048095google scholar: lookup
  4. Pirie RS, Mueller HW, Engel O, Albrecht B, von Salis-Soglio M. Inhaled ciclesonide is efficacious and well tolerated in the treatment of severe equine asthma in a large prospective European clinical trial. Equine Vet J 2021 Nov;53(6):1094-1104.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13419pubmed: 33403727google scholar: lookup
  5. Couetil L, Cardwell JM, Leguillette R, Mazan M, Richard E, Bienzle D, Bullone M, Gerber V, Ivester K, Lavoie JP, Martin J, Moran G, Niedźwiedź A, Pusterla N, Swiderski C. Equine Asthma: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Front Vet Sci 2020;7:450.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00450pubmed: 32903600google scholar: lookup
  6. Lendl L, Wirth C, Merle R, Barton AK. Influence of a Standardized Lunging Exercise Test on BALF Cytology in Horses Suffering from Mild-Moderate Equine Asthma. Animals (Basel) 2025 Aug 19;15(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ani15162428pubmed: 40867756google scholar: lookup
  7. Lendl L, Barton AK. Equine Asthma Diagnostics: Review of Influencing Factors and Difficulties in Diagnosing Subclinical Disease. Animals (Basel) 2024 Dec 4;14(23).
    doi: 10.3390/ani14233504pubmed: 39682469google scholar: lookup