Analyze Diet
Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics1991; 14(3); 300-309; doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1991.tb00840.x

Clinical investigations of halothane and isoflurane for induction and maintenance of foal anesthesia.

Abstract: Fifty-eight foals were divided into two groups for study of aspects of the clinical anesthetic management of foals and to characterize effects of halothane (n = 30) and isoflurane (n = 28) in foals. There were no significant differences (P greater than 0.05) in the demographics of the two groups. Results of hemograms and biochemical analysis of venous blood samples before and after anesthesia were either not influenced or only mildly (clinically unimportant) affected by either agent. Like adult horses, foals have an increased PaCO2 when anesthetized with inhaled anesthetics. We could detect no difference in the magnitude of increase in PaCO2 with either anesthetic. Anesthetic induction and recovery was most rapid with isoflurane. The quality of induction and recovery was similarly acceptable with either agent. Heart rate during isoflurane was not significantly different from conscious conditions but during halothane, heart rate was significantly less than control except at 91-120 min when statistical significance was not detected. These results support the clinical impression that foals can be safely and reliably anesthetized with either agent.
Publication Date: 1991-09-01 PubMed ID: 1744938DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1991.tb00840.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study conducts a comparative analysis of the effects of two anesthetic drugs (halothane and isoflurane) on young horses, or foals. The research suggests both anesthetics are safe for use in foals, with relatively minor variations in effects, such as the speed of induction and recovery, or possible impacts on heart rate.

Objective and Methodology

  • The study was conducted to compare the clinical anesthetic management of foals using two types of anesthetic drugs, halothane and isoflurane.
  • Fifty-eight foals were divided into two equal groups for the investigation, with 30 administered halothane and 28 given isoflurane.
  • Measurements were taken of features such as the speed of the anesthetic’s induction and recovery, the quality of these processes, and any biochemical changes in venous blood samples before and after anesthesia.

Findings and Interpretations

  • The study found no significant differences in the demographics of the two groups (meaning, age, gender, weight, breed, etc., of the foals were statistically similar).
  • The results of blood tests before and after the administration of the anesthetics showed minimal, clinically unimportant changes, suggesting that neither agent significantly altered foal health.
  • Similarly to adult horses, foals exhibited an increased PaCO2 (partial pressure of carbon dioxide) level when under anesthesia. However, there was no detectable difference in the magnitude of this increase between the two anesthetics.
  • Anesthesia induction and recovery was most rapid with isoflurane, although the quality of these processes was deemed acceptable for both drugs.
  • Heart rate during isoflurane anesthesia was not significantly different from awake or conscious conditions. However, during halothane anesthesia, the heart rate was notably lower than control, except at the 91-120 minutes duration mark.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The results of this investigation support the premise that foals can safely and reliably be anesthetized with either halothane or isoflurane.
  • Though there were minor differences observed, such as isoflurane’s speedier induction and recovery and halothane’s temporary decrease in heart rate, both anesthetic agents were found to be effective without causing harm to the foals.

Cite This Article

APA
Steffey EP, Willits N, Wong P, Hildebrand SV, Wheat JD, Meagher DM, Hodgson D, Pascoe JR, Heath RB, Dunlop C. (1991). Clinical investigations of halothane and isoflurane for induction and maintenance of foal anesthesia. J Vet Pharmacol Ther, 14(3), 300-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1991.tb00840.x

Publication

ISSN: 0140-7783
NlmUniqueID: 7910920
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 14
Issue: 3
Pages: 300-309

Researcher Affiliations

Steffey, E P
  • Department of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616.
Willits, N
    Wong, P
      Hildebrand, S V
        Wheat, J D
          Meagher, D M
            Hodgson, D
              Pascoe, J R
                Heath, R B
                  Dunlop, C

                    MeSH Terms

                    • Anesthesia, Inhalation / veterinary
                    • Animals
                    • Blood Cells / drug effects
                    • Blood Pressure / drug effects
                    • Carbon Dioxide / blood
                    • Female
                    • Halothane
                    • Heart Rate / drug effects
                    • Horses / physiology
                    • Isoflurane
                    • Male
                    • Prospective Studies
                    • Respiration / drug effects

                    Citations

                    This article has been cited 0 times.