Analyze Diet
Journal of animal science2026; skag135; doi: 10.1093/jas/skag135

Clodronate disodium reduced TRAP5b independent of affecting other systemic biomarkers of bone resorption or formation in yearling, exercising Quarter Horses.

Abstract: Clodronate disodium (CD), a bisphosphonate, modulates bone metabolism. Though extra-label use in juvenile horses is anecdotally reported, impacts on skeletal development are unknown. The objective was to determine the effects of CD on systemic markers of bone turnover in yearling horses undergoing exercise, hypothesizing that biomarkers of bone resorption would decrease while biomarkers of bone formation would not change, and that repeat CD treatments would have greater effect. To test this, 32 yearling Quarter Horses were used in a 168-d trial. Horses were stratified by age (500 ± 13 d), BW (336 ± 26 kg), sex (n = 16 geldings; n = 16 fillies), and initial bone optical density and randomly allocated to one of four treatment groups receiving either 1.8 mg/kg BW CD (Osphos) or isovolumetric saline (placebo). Investigators were blinded to treatments that included control (CON; n = 8), single-dose CD (1X; n = 8; d84), two-doses CD (2X; n = 8; d0 and 84), and four-doses CD (4X; n = 8; d0, 42, 84, and 126). Horses were housed individually in stalls and fed to meet nutrient requirements. Horses exercised 5 d/wk using a free stall exerciser in a phase-based progressive workload; Phase I (d0-84) simulated sales preparation and Phase II (d85-168) mimicked an early training program. Blood was collected on d0, 42, 84, 126, and 168 before treatment injections, when applicable. Serum was analyzed for receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), tartrate resistant acid phosphatase 5 b (TRAP5b), c-terminal crosslinks of type I collagen (CTX-1), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and procollagen type I n-terminal propeptide (PINP) via commercial ELISA or EIA. Data were analyzed using PROC MIXED of SAS with a baseline covariate for BAP. A treatment×time interaction was noted for osteoclastic TRAP5b (P = 0.03), decreasing in 4X from d0 to 126 and returning to baseline at d168, and decreasing in 2X to d84 whereas in CON and 1X it increased or remained the same over time. Serum CTX-1, a type I collagen degradation marker, increased over time (P < 0.01) in all treatments. Osteoblastic BAP increased (P < 0.01) from d42 to 84 and remained elevated until d168. There was no change in PINP (P = 0.35) or osteoclast differentiation signal RANKL (P≥0.24). The results indicate that CD administration in horses undergoing low-intensity exercise reduces a serum biomarker of osteoclast number and activity without affecting serum biomarkers of bone formation or resorption. Clodronate disodium (CD) is a bisphosphonate, a class of bone modulating drugs. Anecdotal reports of extra-label use in juvenile horses in efforts to mask radiographic abnormalities, promote skeletal maturation, and serve as an analgesic exist, despite being labeled for horses ≥ 4 years of age. As juvenile horses subjected to exercise undergo high levels of bone turnover, there is concern regarding the effects of extra-label use of bisphosphonates, such as CD, due to lack of scientific data to inform this extra-label use. This study administered 0, 1, 2, or 4 doses of CD to yearling Quarter Horses undergoing an exercise program. Bone turnover was assessed using circulating concentrations of biomarkers that reflect bone formation and bone resorption. When undergoing low intensity exercise, horses that received CD had lower serum concentrations of a biomarker of osteoclast number and activity, reflecting a decrease in the cells responsible for bone resorption. There were no differences in other biomarkers of bone resorption or bone formation. The CD dose approved for adult horses may not be sufficient to induce systemic changes in bone turnover in yearling, exercising horses. However, additional research is needed to determine local effects on weight bearing bones.
Publication Date: 2026-04-29 PubMed ID: 42054599DOI: 10.1093/jas/skag135Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Research Overview

  • This study investigated how clodronate disodium (CD), a bisphosphonate drug, affects bone metabolism markers in young, exercising Quarter Horses.
  • The main finding was that CD reduced a specific biomarker linked to osteoclast activity (bone resorption cells) without changing other markers of bone formation or resorption.

Background and Purpose

  • Clodronate disodium is a bisphosphonate used to influence bone metabolism and is approved for horses aged ≥ 4 years.
  • Anecdotally, CD is used off-label in juvenile horses to mask bone abnormalities, promote bone growth, or reduce pain, but effects on developing skeletons are unclear.
  • Young exercising horses experience high bone turnover, which raises concerns about potential impacts of off-label bisphosphonate use.
  • The study aimed to determine how CD influences systemic biomarkers of bone formation and resorption in yearling horses under an exercise regimen.
  • The hypothesis was that bone resorption markers would decrease after CD treatment, while bone formation markers would remain unchanged, with repeated treatments having a greater effect.

Experimental Design

  • Subjects: 32 yearling Quarter Horses, balanced by age (~500 days), body weight (~336 kg), sex (16 geldings, 16 fillies), and bone density.
  • Randomized into 4 groups (n = 8 each):
    • Control (CON): placebo saline injections
    • Single-dose CD (1X): CD on day 84
    • Two doses CD (2X): CD on days 0 and 84
    • Four doses CD (4X): CD on days 0, 42, 84, and 126
  • Exercise Protocol:
    • 5 days per week using a free stall exerciser
    • Phase I (days 0-84) simulated sales preparation
    • Phase II (days 85-168) simulated early training
  • Blood samples collected on days 0, 42, 84, 126, and 168 before treatments when applicable.
  • Analyzed serum biomarkers included:
    • TRAP5b (tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b) – osteoclast activity
    • RANKL (receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand) – osteoclast differentiation
    • CTX-1 (C-terminal crosslinks of type I collagen) – bone resorption marker
    • BAP (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase) – bone formation marker
    • PINP (procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide) – bone formation marker
  • Statistical analysis used a mixed model with baseline covariate adjustment for BAP.

Key Findings

  • TRAP5b levels showed a treatment×time interaction:
    • 4X group: TRAP5b decreased from day 0 to 126, then returned to baseline by day 168.
    • 2X group: TRAP5b decreased until day 84.
    • CON and 1X groups: TRAP5b either increased or remained stable over time.
  • This indicates reduced osteoclast number/activity after repeated CD doses.
  • CTX-1 increased over time across all groups, indicating ongoing collagen degradation associated with bone resorption during exercise.
  • BAP, a marker of bone formation, increased from day 42 to 84 and remained elevated, but was unaffected by CD treatment.
  • PINP and RANKL levels did not significantly change with treatment.

Interpretation and Implications

  • CD administration selectively reduced TRAP5b, a biomarker reflecting osteoclastic activity, in exercising yearling horses.
  • This suggests CD lowers osteoclast number or activity without broadly affecting other bone resorption or formation biomarkers systemically.
  • The standard dosing approved for adult horses might be insufficient to cause systemic changes in bone turnover in yearlings undergoing low-intensity exercise.
  • The absence of changes in other biomarkers indicates a limited systemic effect of CD on overall bone remodeling at the molecular level under these conditions.
  • Further research is necessary to:
    • Investigate local effects on weight-bearing bones, which may not be reflected by systemic biomarkers.
    • Determine optimal dosing and potential developmental impacts in juvenile horses.
    • Evaluate safety and efficacy of off-label CD use during skeletal maturation.

Summary

  • This controlled study provides new scientific data on the effects of clodronate disodium in young, exercising horses, quantifying its impact on bone metabolism markers.
  • Findings support that while CD reduces osteoclast activity marker TRAP5b, it does not significantly alter other systemic bone turnover markers during low-intensity exercise, raising questions about dose sufficiency and localized bone effects.
  • These insights are valuable for veterinarians considering bisphosphonate use in juvenile horses and underscore the need for additional targeted research before endorsing extra-label CD use for skeletal modulation or analgesia in yearlings.

Cite This Article

APA
Paris BL, Leatherwood JL, Arnold CE, Glass KG, Conrad MB, George JM, Martinez RE, Colbath AC, Nielsen BD, Welsh TH, Bradbery AN. (2026). Clodronate disodium reduced TRAP5b independent of affecting other systemic biomarkers of bone resorption or formation in yearling, exercising Quarter Horses. J Anim Sci, skag135. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skag135

Publication

ISSN: 1525-3163
NlmUniqueID: 8003002
Country: United States
Language: English
PII: skag135

Researcher Affiliations

Paris, Brittany L
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA.
  • School of Agricultural Sciences, College of Science and Engineering Technology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas, USA 77341.
Leatherwood, Jessica L
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA.
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tarleton.
Arnold, Carolyn E
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA.
  • School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, Texas, 79106, USA.
Glass, Kati G
  • Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA.
Conrad, Matthew B
  • Department of Animal and Range Sciences, College of Agriculture, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA, 59717.
George, James M
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA.
Martinez, Rafael E
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA.
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tarleton.
Colbath, Aimee C
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, 48824.
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853.
Nielsen, Brian D
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA, 48824.
Welsh, Thomas H
  • Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 77843, USA.
Bradbery, Amanda N
  • Department of Animal and Range Sciences, College of Agriculture, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA, 59717.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.