Analyze Diet
Journal of applied genetics2009; 50(2); 133-143; doi: 10.1007/BF03195664

Combining microsatellite and pedigree data to estimate relationships among Skyros ponies.

Abstract: Relationship coefficients are particularly useful to improve genetic management of endangered populations. These coefficients are traditionally based on pedigree data, but in case of incomplete or inexistent pedigrees they are replaced by coefficients calculated from molecular data. The main objective of this study was to develop a new method to estimate relationship coefficients by combining molecular with pedigree data, which is useful for specific situations where neither pedigree nor molecular data are complete. The developed method was applied to contribute to the conservation of the Skyros pony breed, which consists of less than 200 individuals, divided into 3 main herds or subpopulations. In this study, relationships between individuals were estimated using traditional estimators as well as the newly developed method. For this purpose, 99 Skyros ponies were genotyped at 16 microsatellite loci. It appeared that the limitation of the most common molecular-based estimators is the use of weights that assume relationships equal to 0. The results showed that, as a consequence of this limitation, negative relationship values can be obtained in small inbred populations, for example. By contrast, the combined estimator gave no negative values. Using principal component analysis, the combined estimator also enabled a better graphic differentiation between the 3 subpopulations defined previously. In conclusion, this new estimator can be a promising alternative to traditionally used estimators, especially in inbred populations, with both incomplete pedigree and molecular information.
Publication Date: 2009-05-13 PubMed ID: 19433910DOI: 10.1007/BF03195664Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article presents a novel method for estimating relationship coefficients in endangered populations, specifically applied to the Skyros pony breed. The method combines both molecular and pedigree data to improve genetic management of the Ponies.

Objective and Purpose of the Study

  • The study aimed to develop a new method to estimate relationship coefficients in populations where pedigree and molecular data are both incomplete.
  • This was deemed critical in aiding the conservation efforts of the endangered Skyros pony breed, which has less than 200 individuals, divided into three main herds or subpopulations.
  • Understanding genetic relationships between individuals in such endangered populations helps ensure the healthiest possible breeding and thus aids in conservation.

Methodology Used

  • The study genotyped 99 Skyros ponies at 16 microsatellite loci, using both traditional estimators and the new method developed for this study.
  • The new method combines traditional pedigree data (tracking lineages based on recorded family history) with molecular data derived from DNA analysis, or genotyping.

Key Findings

  • The common molecular-based estimators have a limitation in their reliance on assumption of relationships equal to zero.
  • This limitation leads to possible negative relationship values particularly in the case of small inbred populations.
  • The new combined method developed in this study did not result in any negative values, thus eliminating this particular limitation.
  • Using principal component analysis, the new estimator also enabled better graphical differentiation between the three Skyros pony subpopulations previously defined.

Conclusion and Implications

  • The study concludes that this new combined estimator can be a promising alternative to traditionally used estimators, particularly in managing inbred populations with incomplete pedigree and molecular information.
  • Implementing this method can significantly enhance the genetic management and subsequent conservation efforts towards endangered populations like the Skyros ponies.

Cite This Article

APA
Bomcke E, Gengler N. (2009). Combining microsatellite and pedigree data to estimate relationships among Skyros ponies. J Appl Genet, 50(2), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03195664

Publication

ISSN: 1234-1983
NlmUniqueID: 9514582
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 50
Issue: 2
Pages: 133-143

Researcher Affiliations

Bomcke, E
  • Gembloux Agricultural University, Animal Science Unit, Passage des Déportés, Gembloux, Belgium. bomcke.e@fsagx.ac.be
Gengler, N

    MeSH Terms

    • Animals
    • Breeding
    • Genetics, Population
    • Horses / classification
    • Horses / genetics
    • Microsatellite Repeats / genetics
    • Pedigree

    References

    This article includes 19 references
    1. Thomas SC, Hill WG. Sibship reconstruction in hierarchical population structures using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques.. Genet Res 2002 Jun;79(3):227-34.
      pubmed: 12220130doi: 10.1017/s0016672302005669google scholar: lookup
    2. Nejati-Javaremi A, Smith C, Gibson JP. Effect of total allelic relationship on accuracy of evaluation and response to selection.. J Anim Sci 1997 Jul;75(7):1738-45.
      pubmed: 9222829doi: 10.2527/1997.7571738xgoogle scholar: lookup
    3. Caballero A, Toro MA. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations.. Genet Res 2000 Jun;75(3):331-43.
      pubmed: 10893869doi: 10.1017/s0016672399004449google scholar: lookup
    4. Dimsoski P. Development of a 17-plex microsatellite polymerase chain reaction kit for genotyping horses.. Croat Med J 2003 Jun;44(3):332-5.
      pubmed: 12808728
    5. Hedrick PW, Miller PS. Conservation Genetics: Techniques and Fundamentals.. Ecol Appl 1992 Feb;2(1):30-46.
      pubmed: 27759190doi: 10.2307/1941887google scholar: lookup
    6. Huby M, Griffon L, Moureaux S, De Rochambeau H, Danchin-Burge C, Verrier E. Genetic variability of six French meat sheep breeds in relation to their genetic management.. Genet Sel Evol 2003 Nov-Dec;35(6):637-55.
      pubmed: 14604512doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-35-7-637google scholar: lookup
    7. . Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers.. Mol Ecol 1999 Jul;8(7):1231-1234.
    8. Lynch M, Ritland K. Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers.. Genetics 1999 Aug;152(4):1753-66.
      pubmed: 10430599doi: 10.1093/genetics/152.4.1753google scholar: lookup
    9. Morin PA, Moore JJ, Chakraborty R, Jin L, Goodall J, Woodruff DS. Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees.. Science 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1193-201.
      pubmed: 7915048doi: 10.1126/science.7915048google scholar: lookup
    10. Ritland K. Marker-inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature.. Mol Ecol 2000 Sep;9(9):1195-204.
    11. Csilléry K, Johnson T, Beraldi D, Clutton-Brock T, Coltman D, Hansson B, Spong G, Pemberton JM. Performance of marker-based relatedness estimators in natural populations of outbred vertebrates.. Genetics 2006 Aug;173(4):2091-101.
      pubmed: 16783017doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.057331google scholar: lookup
    12. Glaubitz JC, Rhodes OE, Dewoody JA. Prospects for inferring pairwise relationships with single nucleotide polymorphisms.. Mol Ecol 2003 Apr;12(4):1039-47.
    13. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms.. Am J Hum Genet 1980 May;32(3):314-31.
      pubmed: 6247908
    14. Goodisman MA, Crozier RH. Population and colony genetic structure of the primitive termite Mastotermes darwiniensis.. Evolution 2002 Jan;56(1):70-83.
    15. Queller DC, Goodnight KF. ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS.. Evolution 1989 Mar;43(2):258-275.
    16. Li CC, Weeks DE, Chakravarti A. Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness.. Hum Hered 1993 Jan-Feb;43(1):45-52.
      pubmed: 8514326doi: 10.1159/000154113google scholar: lookup
    17. Oliehoek PA, Windig JJ, van Arendonk JA, Bijma P. Estimating relatedness between individuals in general populations with a focus on their use in conservation programs.. Genetics 2006 May;173(1):483-96.
      pubmed: 16510792doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.049940google scholar: lookup
    18. Van de Casteele T, Galbusera P, Matthysen E. A comparison of microsatellite-based pairwise relatedness estimators.. Mol Ecol 2001 Jun;10(6):1539-49.
    19. Baumung R, Sölkner J. Pedigree and marker information requirements to monitor genetic variability.. Genet Sel Evol 2003 Jul-Aug;35(4):369-83.
      pubmed: 12927072doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-35-5-369google scholar: lookup

    Citations

    This article has been cited 3 times.
    1. Senju N, Tozaki T, Kakoi H, Shinjo A, Matsuyama R, Almunia J, Takasu M. Genetic diversity of the Yonaguni horse based on polymorphisms in microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. J Vet Med Sci 2017 Feb 28;79(2):425-431.
      doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0040pubmed: 28049866google scholar: lookup
    2. Senju N, Tozaki T, Kakoi H, Almunia J, Maeda M, Matsuyama R, Takasu M. Genetic characterization of the Miyako horse based on polymorphisms of microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA. J Vet Med Sci 2017 Jan 24;79(1):218-223.
      doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0111pubmed: 27795462google scholar: lookup
    3. Bömcke E, Gengler N, Cothran EG. Genetic variability in the Skyros pony and its relationship with other Greek and foreign horse breeds. Genet Mol Biol 2011 Jan;34(1):68-76.