FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Acta veterinaria Scandinavica2025; 67(1); 3; doi: 10.1186/s13028-024-00787-1

Companion animal and equine clinical research: a Nordic perspective.

Abstract: The societal value of cats, dogs and horses is high, and the companion and sport animal health care sector is growing. Clinical research concerning cats, dogs and horses is crucial for the development of evidence-based medical care that benefits animals and their owners, and has implications for human and environmental health from a One Health perspective. Basic information on companion animal and equine research enables more directed measures to improve conditions for research within the area. The aim of the present study was to describe Nordic companion animal and equine clinical research from 2010 to 2019, including bibliometrics, human resources and funding. Results: There were 2 042 published research publications originating from Nordic countries on cats (n = 282), dogs (n = 1 086), and horses (n = 781) from 2010 to 2019. The majority (83%) of the publications came from the four Nordic universities with veterinary programs. Seven percent of the publications were collaborations between two or more Nordic universities. Approximately 18% of the PhD theses (178 out of 970) from veterinary faculties or corresponding units concerned these species, most of them dogs (n = 86), followed by horses (n = 64), cats (n = 15) or a combination of these species (n = 13). The scientific areas cardiology, infectious diseases, reproduction, and surgery were prominent for all three species. A large proportion of grants were received from small- to medium-sized funding bodies, mainly funding running costs and only to a limited degree salaries. During 2010-2019, costs for veterinary and other services for cats and dogs steadily increased. The growth of the veterinary healthcare sector was not reflected in an increasing number of clinical research publications, for which no increase was seen after 2014. Conclusions: Despite a high societal value of the species, veterinary clinical research on sports and companion animals has not increased, in contrast to the veterinary healthcare sector. Activities stimulating the research area, e.g. funding bodies enabling coverage of salaries, are needed. The development of Nordic veterinary clinical care may benefit from strengthened research cooperation between countries.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-01-06 PubMed ID: 39762871PubMed Central: 5934865DOI: 10.1186/s13028-024-00787-1Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study delves into Nordic clinical research concerning companion animals (dogs and cats) and sport animals (horses), highlighting research outputs, human resources, and funding between 2010 and 2019. Despite the recognized societal value of these animals and a growing healthcare sector for them, research within this sector hasn’t shown a similar growth.

Key Findings

  • Between 2010 and 2019, there were 2,042 published research articles from Nordic countries focusing on dogs, cats, and horses. However, this volume did not increase after 2014, even though the animal health care sector has been growing.
    • Specifically, a total of 282 studies focused on cats, 1,086 on dogs, and 781 on horses.
  • The bulk of the publications—approximately 83%—were from four Nordic universities offering veterinary programs.
    • Only a minority (7%) of the publications were collaborative efforts between two or more Nordic universities.
  • Out of 970 PhD theses from veterinary faculties or institutions, about 18% (178) were about companion or sport animals—mostly dogs, followed by horses, cats, or a mix of these species.
  • Research commonly covered areas such as cardiology, infectious diseases, reproduction, and surgery for all three species.
  • Funding was primarily received from medium to small entities covering mainly operational costs and, to a lesser extent, salaries. Meanwhile, costs for veterinary services for cats and dogs have consistently increased over the period.

Conclusions and Implications

  • Despite the high societal value of cats, dogs, and horses and the growth of the animal health care industry, clinical research about these animals has not seen a proportional increase.
  • There is a need for initiatives to promote the research in the sector, such as funding bodies that cover salaries.
  • Nordic veterinary clinical care can potentially benefit from better research cooperation among countries.

Cite This Article

APA
Holst BS, Engelmann A, Gröndahl G, Gunnarsson L, Haug Haaland A, Hielm-Björkman A, Moe L, Rhodin M, Rönnberg H, Stråhle M, Toljander Y, Kristensen AT, Hagberg Gustavsson M. (2025). Companion animal and equine clinical research: a Nordic perspective. Acta Vet Scand, 67(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13028-024-00787-1

Publication

Acta veterinaria Scandinavica
ISSN: 1751-0147
NlmUniqueID: 0370400
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 67
Issue: 1
Pages: 3

Researcher Affiliations

Holst, Bodil Ström
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden. bodil.strom-holst@slu.se.
Engelmann, Alejandro
  • SLU University Library, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7071, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gröndahl, Gittan
  • Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Gunnarsson, Lotta
  • Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Haug Haaland, Anita
  • Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1433, Ås, Norway.
Hielm-Björkman, Anna
  • Department of Equine and Small Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, PO Box 57, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Moe, Lars
  • Department of Companion Animal Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1433, Ås, Norway.
Rhodin, Marie
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7036, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Rönnberg, Henrik
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Stråhle, Marie
  • SLU University Library, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7071, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Toljander, Ylva
  • SLU University Library, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7071, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kristensen, Annemarie Thuri
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hagberg Gustavsson, Malin
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
  • Department of Animal Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, PO Box 7036, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.

MeSH Terms

  • Horses
  • Animals
  • Scandinavian and Nordic Countries
  • Dogs
  • Cats
  • Biomedical Research / economics
  • Biomedical Research / trends
  • Pets / economics
  • Bibliometrics
  • Veterinary Medicine / economics
  • Veterinary Medicine / statistics & numerical data

Grant Funding

  • SLU ua2018.4.3-44506 / SLU Future Animals, Nature and Health

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study did not require official or institutional ethical approval. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 50 references
  1. Hoffmann R, Lagerkvist CJ, Hagberg Gustavsson M, Holst BS. Economic perspective on the value of cats and dogs.. Soc Anim 2018;27:595–613.
    doi: 10.1163/15685306-12341494google scholar: lookup
  2. Hoffmann R, Lagerkvist CJ, Hagberg Gustavsson M, Holst BS. An empirical examination of the conceptualization of companion animals.. BMC Psychol 2018;6:15.
    doi: 10.1186/s40359-018-0228-1pubmed: 29724234pmc: 5934865google scholar: lookup
  3. Hoffmann R, Lokrantz M, Lagerkvist CJ, Hagberg Gustavsson M, Holst BS. Värdet av hundar och katter i Sverige.. SLU Framtidens djur, natur och hälsas rapportserie Uppsala 2017. p. 62.
  4. Bunketorp-Käll L, Lundgren-Nilsson Å, Samuelsson H, Pekny T, Blomvé K, Pekna M. Long-term improvements after multimodal rehabilitation in late phase after stroke: a randomized controlled trial.. Stroke 2017;48:1916–24.
    doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.016433pubmed: 28619985google scholar: lookup
  5. Coffman AN, Bernstein ER, Davies SC, Justice AF. The impact of a canine-assisted reading program on readers needing extra practice.. Read Teach 2023;76:724–34.
    doi: 10.1002/trtr.2192google scholar: lookup
  6. Grajfoner D, Ke GN, Wong RMM. The effect of pets on human mental health and wellbeing during COVID-19 lockdown in Malaysia.. Animals 2021;11(9):2689.
    doi: 10.3390/ani11092689pubmed: 34573655pmc: 8470955google scholar: lookup
  7. Harris A, Williams JM. The impact of a horse riding intervention on the social functioning of children with autism spectrum disorder.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:776.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070776pubmed: 28708075pmc: 5551214google scholar: lookup
  8. Lindström Nilsson M, Funkquist EL, Edner A, Engvall G. Children report positive experiences of animal-assisted therapy in paediatric hospital care.. Acta Paediatr 2020;109:1049–56.
    doi: 10.1111/apa.15047pubmed: 31597211google scholar: lookup
  9. Lönker NS, Fechner K, Wahed AAE. Horses as a crucial part of One Health.. Vet Sci 2020;7:28.
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci7010028pubmed: 32121327pmc: 7157506google scholar: lookup
  10. Lundquist WP. Disability, riding, and identity: a qualitative study on the influence of riding on the identity construction of people with disabilities.. Intl J Disabil Dev Educ 2014;61:67–79.
    doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2014.878543google scholar: lookup
  11. Martin F, Bachert KE, Snow L, Tu H-W, Belahbib J, Lyn SA. Depression, anxiety, and happiness in dog owners and potential dog owners during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.. PLoS ONE 2021;16: e0260676.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260676pubmed: 34910761pmc: 8673598google scholar: lookup
  12. Mičková E, Machová K, Daďová K, Svobodová I. Does dog ownership affect physical activity, sleep, and self-reported health in older adults?. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:3355.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183355pubmed: 31514379pmc: 6765935google scholar: lookup
  13. Mubanga M, Byberg L, Nowak C, Egenvall A, Magnusson PK, Ingelsson E. Dog ownership and the risk of cardiovascular disease and death—a nationwide cohort study.. Sci Rep 2017;7:15821.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16118-6pubmed: 29150678pmc: 5693989google scholar: lookup
  14. Pálsdóttir AM, Gudmundsson M, Grahn P. Equine-assisted intervention to improve perceived value of everyday occupations and quality of life in people with lifelong neurological disorders: a prospective controlled study.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:2431.
    doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072431pubmed: 32260047pmc: 7177295google scholar: lookup
  15. Jia L, Yang X, Jiang Y. The pet exposure effect: exploring the differential impact of dogs versus cats on consumer mindsets.. J Mark 2022;86:42–57.
    doi: 10.1177/00222429221078036google scholar: lookup
  16. Kristiansen JE. Kjaeledyr i norske husholdninger.. Samfunnsspeilet 1994. p. 18–21.
  17. Lounasmeri L. Eläinruoka on rakkaudella ostettu Sparraaja.. 2002;4:34–8.
  18. Nielsen B. Familiernes kæledyr.. Nyt fra Danmarks statistik 2000. Nr. 499.
  19. . Hundar och katter allt vanligare i svenska hem.. 2017.
  20. Amiot CE, Gagné C, Bastian B. Pet ownership and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.. Sci Rep 2022;12:6091.
    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10019-zpubmed: 35413973pmc: 9002031google scholar: lookup
  21. Hytönen MK, Lohi H. Canine models of human rare disorders.. Rare Dis 2016.
    doi: 10.1080/21675511.2016.1241362pubmed: 27803843pmc: 5070630google scholar: lookup
  22. Shearin AL, Ostrander EA. Leading the way: canine models of genomics and disease.. Dis Model Mech 2010;3:27–34.
    doi: 10.1242/dmm.004358pubmed: 20075379pmc: 4068608google scholar: lookup
  23. Kol A, Arzi B, Athanasiou KA, Farmer DL, Nolta JA, Rebhun RB. Companion animals: translational scientist’s new best friends.. Sci Transl Med 2015.
    doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9116pubmed: 26446953pmc: 4806851google scholar: lookup
  24. Fall T, Lundholm C, Örtqvist AK, Fall K, Fang F, Hedhammar Å. Early exposure to dogs and farm animals and the risk of childhood asthma.. JAMA Pediatr 2015;169: e153219.
    doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.3219pubmed: 26523822google scholar: lookup
  25. Chandler M, Cunningham S, Lund EM, Khanna C, Naramore R, Patel A. Obesity and associated comorbidities in people and companion animals: a one health perspective.. J Comp Pathol 2017;156:296–309.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2017.03.006pubmed: 28460795google scholar: lookup
  26. Ojwang V, Nwaru BI, Takkinen HM, Kaila M, Niemelä O, Haapala AM. Early exposure to cats, dogs and farm animals and the risk of childhood asthma and allergy.. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2020;31:265–72.
    doi: 10.1111/pai.13186pubmed: 31829464google scholar: lookup
  27. Lappalainen MH, Huttunen K, Roponen M, Remes S, Hirvonen MR, Pekkanen J. Exposure to dogs is associated with a decreased tumour necrosis factor-α-producing capacity in early life.. Clin Exp Allergy 2010;40:1498–506.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03566.xpubmed: 20633030google scholar: lookup
  28. Kantele A, Paajanen J, Turunen S, Pakkanen SH, Patjas A, Itkonen L. Scent dogs in detection of COVID-19: triple-blinded randomised trial and operational real-life screening in airport setting.. BMJ Glob Health 2022;7: e008024.
    doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008024pubmed: 35577391google scholar: lookup
  29. . Om dyrehold og dyrevelferd.. St.meld. nr. 12. (2002–2003) 2003. p. 185.
  30. Wallis LJ, Szabó D, Erdélyi-Belle B, Kubinyi E. Demographic change across the lifespan of pet dogs and their impact on health status.. Front Vet Sci 2018;5:200.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00200pubmed: 30191153pmc: 6115627google scholar: lookup
  31. Cozzi B, Ballarin C, Mantovani R, Rota A. Aging and veterinary care of cats, dogs, and horses through the records of three university veterinary hospitals.. Front Vet Sci 2017;4:14.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00014pubmed: 28261586pmc: 5306394google scholar: lookup
  32. Springer S, Sandøe P, Grimm H, Corr SA, Kristensen AT, Lund TB. Managing conflicting ethical concerns in modern small animal practice-a comparative study of veterinarian’s decision ethics in Austria. Denmark and the UK. PLoS One 2021;16: e0253420.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253420pubmed: 34143850google scholar: lookup
  33. . Svensk Djursjukvård branschrapport 2019.. p. 15.
  34. Nordqvist L, Adamsson J. Bättre konkurrens om fler byter djurförsäkring.. Konkurrensverkets rapportserie 2018. p. 100.
  35. Richvoldsen G. Mange dropper hundeforsikring.. 2021.
  36. Bederoff J. Fyrfota kunder allt fler i coronatider.. 2020.
  37. . Veterinæren : yrke - organisasjon - samfunn : Den norske veterinærforening 125 år.. Den norske veterinærforening. 2013.
  38. . Dyreklinikk.no Landets dyreklinikker på nett.. .
  39. . Hästar och anläggningar med häst. Resultat från en intermittent undersökning.. Sveriges officiella statistik Statistiska meddelanden 2016;2017:23.
  40. . Hästnäringen i siffror.. 2019.
  41. Enhäll J, Nordgren M, Kättström H. Hästhållning i Sverige 2010.. Swedish Board of Agriculture; 2012. p. 72.
  42. Association ST. Swedish Trotting Association. Yearly report on racing.. 2022.
  43. . Swedish Equestrian Federation.. .
  44. Riksidrottsförbundet. Idrottsrörelsen i siffror.. 2023.
  45. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.. Scientometr 2010;84:523–38.
    doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3google scholar: lookup
  46. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer.. ISSI Newsletter 2011;7(3):50–4.
  47. . European Board of Veterinary Specialisation.. .
  48. Akselsen B. Fra klinikkene på Adamstua til Universitetsdyrehospital på Ås - A til Å rapporten.. 2010. p. 103.
  49. Skipper AM, Packer RMA, O’Neill DG. Researcher, research thyself? Mapping the landscape of canine health and welfare research funding provided by UK not-for-profit organisations from 2012–2022.. PLoS ONE 2024;19: e0303498.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303498pubmed: 38781269pmc: 11115267google scholar: lookup
  50. FVE. Vet Survey. Survey of the veterinary profession in Europe: Federation of veterinarians of Europe. 2019.

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,850 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.