Analyze Diet
The Veterinary record1982; 111(14); 316-318; doi: 10.1136/vr.111.14.316

Comparative effects of oral administration of trimethoprim/sulphadiazine or oxytetracycline on the faecal flora of horses.

Abstract: A study was carried out on the bacteriological faecal flora of horses before and after oral doses of oxytetracycline or trimethoprim plus sulphadiazine. Administration of oxytetracycline was rapidly followed by large increases in counts of coliforms. Bacteroides and Streptococcus species, the disappearance of Veillonella species, the appearance of Clostridium perfringens type A in large numbers and the accumulation of watery fluid in the rectal contents. These changes were not seen following administration of trimethoprim-sulphadiazine and it was concluded that oral treatment of horses with this combination was unlikely to be accompanied by the hazard of inducing colitis.
Publication Date: 1982-10-02 PubMed ID: 6293150DOI: 10.1136/vr.111.14.316Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article compares the impacts of two drugs, oxytetracycline and a combination of trimethoprim/sulphadiazine, on the gut bacteria of horses. It finds that oxytetracycline leads to significant changes in the bacterial composition that could potentially cause colitis, while trimethoprim/sulphadiazine did not show these effects.

Study Overview

This scientific study was designed to assess and compare the impacts of two common antibacterial drugs, oxytetracycline and a combination of trimethoprim and sulphadiazine, on the bacterial flora found in horse faeces before and after oral administration of the drugs.

Methods Used

  • The researchers orally administered either oxytetracycline or a combination of trimethoprim and sulphadiazine to the horses involved in the study.
  • After the administration of the drugs, changes in the horses’ bacteriological faecal flora were closely monitored and observed over a period of time.

Results and Findings

When analyzing the bacterial composition in the horses’ faeces after administering the drugs, the researchers found:

  • The administration of oxytetracycline led to a rapid rise in counts of several types of bacteria including coliforms, Bacteroides and Streptococcus species.
  • Additionally, it caused the disappearance of Veillonella species and led to the appearance of Clostridium perfringens type A in large numbers.
  • A significant physical change was also observed with the accumulation of watery fluid in the rectal contents of the horses treated with oxytetracycline.
  • Contrarily, none of these changes were reported following the administration of the combination of trimethoprim and sulphadiazine.

Conclusion

Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the oral treatment of horses with trimethoprim-sulphadiazine is preferable as it doesn’t induce significant changes in the gut bacteria as observed with oxytetracycline. The researchers inferred that this combination drug is unlikely to present the risk of colitis, an inflammation of the colon, which may potentially be caused by the alterations in the gut bacteria due to administration of oxytetracycline.

Cite This Article

APA
White G, Prior SD. (1982). Comparative effects of oral administration of trimethoprim/sulphadiazine or oxytetracycline on the faecal flora of horses. Vet Rec, 111(14), 316-318. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.111.14.316

Publication

ISSN: 0042-4900
NlmUniqueID: 0031164
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 111
Issue: 14
Pages: 316-318

Researcher Affiliations

White, G
    Prior, S D

      MeSH Terms

      • Administration, Oral
      • Animals
      • Bacteria / drug effects
      • Bacteroides / drug effects
      • Clostridium perfringens / drug effects
      • Drug Combinations
      • Enterobacteriaceae / drug effects
      • Feces / microbiology
      • Horses / microbiology
      • Male
      • Oxytetracycline / pharmacology
      • Species Specificity
      • Streptococcus / drug effects
      • Sulfadiazine / pharmacology
      • Trimethoprim / pharmacology
      • Veillonella / drug effects

      Citations

      This article has been cited 6 times.
      1. Bishop RC, Kemper AM, Clark LV, Wilkins PA, McCoy AM. Stability of Gastric Fluid and Fecal Microbial Populations in Healthy Horses under Pasture and Stable Conditions. Animals (Basel) 2024 Oct 16;14(20).
        doi: 10.3390/ani14202979pubmed: 39457909google scholar: lookup
      2. Gomez D, Toribio R, Caddey B, Costa M, Vijan S, Dembek K. Longitudinal effects of oral administration of antimicrobial drugs on fecal microbiota of horses. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Nov-Dec;37(6):2562-2572.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.16853pubmed: 37681574google scholar: lookup
      3. Liepman RS, Swink JM, Habing GG, Boyaka PN, Caddey B, Costa M, Gomez DE, Toribio RE. Effects of Intravenous Antimicrobial Drugs on the Equine Fecal Microbiome. Animals (Basel) 2022 Apr 13;12(8).
        doi: 10.3390/ani12081013pubmed: 35454258google scholar: lookup
      4. Arnold C, Pilla R, Chaffin K, Lidbury J, Steiner J, Suchodolski J. Alterations in the Fecal Microbiome and Metabolome of Horses with Antimicrobial-Associated Diarrhea Compared to Antibiotic-Treated and Non-Treated Healthy Case Controls. Animals (Basel) 2021 Jun 17;11(6).
        doi: 10.3390/ani11061807pubmed: 34204371google scholar: lookup
      5. Crosby DE, Labens R, Hughes KJ, Nielsen S, Hilbert BJ. Factors Associated With Survival and Return to Function Following Synovial Infections in Horses. Front Vet Sci 2019;6:367.
        doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00367pubmed: 31696123google scholar: lookup
      6. Costa MC, Stämpfli HR, Arroyo LG, Allen-Vercoe E, Gomes RG, Weese JS. Changes in the equine fecal microbiota associated with the use of systemic antimicrobial drugs. BMC Vet Res 2015 Feb 3;11:19.
        doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0335-7pubmed: 25644524google scholar: lookup