Comparative mapping in equids: the asine X chromosome is rearranged compared to horse and Hartmann’s mountain zebra.
Abstract: The X chromosomes of the extant equids, in general, share morphology and banding pattern similarities. However, the donkey X is, in part, an exception because of significantly different centromeric index and variant banding patterns in the pericentromeric region. To verify the underlying molecular basis of this difference, twelve equine BAC clones were FISH mapped to donkey (EAS) and Hartmann's mountain zebra (EZH) metaphase spreads. Loci from the terminal region of Xp and distal to terminal regions of the Xq showed the same order and relative position in all three species, implying cross-species conservation of these chromosomal segments. However, loci from the proximal/pericentromeric regions of either arms showed similar FISH locations in horse and zebra but a slightly deviant location and relative position in the donkey. Three of the markers (tel-OTC, TRAP170 and (ps)ALDH2- cen) located on the short arm of ECAX and EZHX were found inverted on the long arm of EASX, along with the transposition of the centromere. This molecular evidence of a pericentromeric inversion helps define the likely evolutionary breakpoints causing the rearrangement. The breakpoints most likely correspond to the region between Xp16-->q12 in the horse and Xp12-->q13 in the donkey. The findings coupled with the highly conserved X-chromosome gene order between horse and outgroup species, human and cat, suggest that the equine type X is ancestral while the asine type X arose as a result of an independent inversion event. The study adds two new markers to horse, 11 to donkey and 12 to Hartmann's zebra gene maps, thus contributing to the expansion of comparative maps in the equids.
Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
Publication Date: 2002-11-20 PubMed ID: 12438800DOI: 10.1159/000063050Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research examines the genetic similarities and differences among the X chromosomes of donkeys (asines), horses, and Hartmann’s mountain zebras. The researchers found that the donkey’s X chromosome has significant structural differences in the centromeric region from its counterparts in horses and zebras, suggesting an evolutionarily distinct inversion event.
Research Background and Methodology
- This study uses comparative mapping, a technique used to identify the corresponding regions between the genomes of different species, to scrutinize the X chromosomes of three different equids, namely horses, donkeys, and Hartmann’s mountain zebras.
- The researchers divided the chromosome into different regions for analysis, notably the terminal region of Xp and distal to terminal regions of the Xq, and the proximal/pericentromeric regions.
- The method involved the mapping of twelve equine BAC clones (a technique used for analyzing DNA sequences) to metaphase spreads (a visualization method for chromosomes) of the given species.
Findings
- Results showed that the X chromosome’s terminal and distal regions have a consistent structure across all three equids studied, suggesting a shared evolutionary past.
- However, the chromosome’s pericentromeric regions showed a slight deviation in donkeys, implying a potential rearrangement in this species. This rearrangement resulted in an inversion of three markers from the short arm to the long arm of the donkey’s X chromosome.
- Moreover, they identified a shift in the chromosome’s centromere position in donkeys, further supporting the theory of chromosomal rearrangement.
- The researchers identified the potential points or breakpoints for this inversion within the regions between Xp16-q12 in horses and Xp12-q13 in donkeys.
Implications
- The comparison between horses and outgroup species, including humans and cats, suggests that the horse-type X chromosome represents the ancestral form. Therefore, the specific inversion seen in the donkey chromosome likely arose from an independent evolutionary event.
- This study enhances the understanding of chromosome rearrangement and evolution in equids, providing valuable insight into the specific evolutionary pathways these species have followed.
- The research adds numerous new markers to the gene maps of horses, donkeys, and Hartmann’s mountain zebras, contributing to the enrichment of comparative maps in this group of animals.
Cite This Article
APA
Raudsepp T, Lear TL, Chowdhary BP.
(2002).
Comparative mapping in equids: the asine X chromosome is rearranged compared to horse and Hartmann’s mountain zebra.
Cytogenet Genome Res, 96(1-4), 206-209.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000063050 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Department of Veterinary Anatomy and Public Health, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Chromosome Banding
- Chromosome Mapping
- Chromosomes, Artificial, Bacterial / genetics
- Equidae / genetics
- Gene Rearrangement / genetics
- Genetic Markers
- Genetic Variation
- Horses / genetics
- Metaphase / genetics
- X Chromosome
Citations
This article has been cited 9 times.- Gömer A, Puff C, Reinecke B, Bracht S, Conze M, Baumgärtner W, Steinmann J, Feige K, Cavalleri JMV, Steinmann E, Todt D. Experimental cross-species infection of donkeys with equine hepacivirus and analysis of host immune signatures.. One Health Outlook 2022 May 9;4(1):9.
- Li S, Zhao G, Han H, Li Y, Li J, Wang J, Cao G, Li X. Genome collinearity analysis illuminates the evolution of donkey chromosome 1 and horse chromosome 5 in perissodactyls: A comparative study.. BMC Genomics 2021 Sep 15;22(1):665.
- Renaud G, Petersen B, Seguin-Orlando A, Bertelsen MF, Waller A, Newton R, Paillot R, Bryant N, Vaudin M, Librado P, Orlando L. Improved de novo genomic assembly for the domestic donkey.. Sci Adv 2018 Apr;4(4):eaaq0392.
- Nergadze SG, Piras FM, Gamba R, Corbo M, Cerutti F, McCarter JGW, Cappelletti E, Gozzo F, Harman RM, Antczak DF, Miller D, Scharfe M, Pavesi G, Raimondi E, Sullivan KF, Giulotto E. Birth, evolution, and transmission of satellite-free mammalian centromeric domains.. Genome Res 2018 Jun;28(6):789-799.
- Romanenko SA, Serdyukova NA, Perelman PL, Pavlova SV, Bulatova NS, Golenishchev FN, Stanyon R, Graphodatsky AS. Intrachromosomal Rearrangements in Rodents from the Perspective of Comparative Region-Specific Painting.. Genes (Basel) 2017 Aug 30;8(9).
- Musilova P, Kubickova S, Vahala J, Rubes J. Subchromosomal karyotype evolution in Equidae.. Chromosome Res 2013 Apr;21(2):175-87.
- Musilova P, Kubickova S, Horin P, Vodicka R, Rubes J. Karyotypic relationships in Asiatic asses (kulan and kiang) as defined using horse chromosome arm-specific and region-specific probes.. Chromosome Res 2009;17(6):783-90.
- Chowdhary BP, Raudsepp T. The horse genome derby: racing from map to whole genome sequence.. Chromosome Res 2008;16(1):109-27.
- Marchal JA, Acosta MJ, Nietzel H, Sperling K, Bullejos M, Díaz de la Guardia R, Sánchez A. X chromosome painting in Microtus: origin and evolution of the giant sex chromosomes.. Chromosome Res 2004;12(8):767-76.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists