Analyze Diet
Veterinary microbiology1998; 62(2); 135-143; doi: 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00202-8

Comparative molecular characterization of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis of different origin.

Abstract: Ribotyping and susceptibility to 17 antimicrobial agents were used to compare 37 isolates of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis (28 from horses, 1 from cattle, 3 from sheep and 5 from goats) derived from various types of lesions, and different geographic locations. According to the presence of nitrate reductase, all but one isolate from horses reduced nitrate (nitrate-positive), whereas all isolates from sheep and goats were unable to reduce nitrate (nitrate-negative). The ribotype of the nitrate-negative isolate from a horse with ulcerative lymphangitis was identical to all the other isolates from horses, and different than the ribotype of nitrate-negative isolates from sheep and goats. Ribotyping with one of the restriction endonucleases, Apa 1, revealed differences between, but not within, the two biotypes. However, ribotyping with Pst 1 endonuclease revealed one variant within the equine biotype and one variant within the ovine biotype. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; microgram/ml) of antimicrobial agents against isolates from nitrate-negative and nitrate-positive groups was very similar, with the exception of isolates from sheep and goats which had a higher MIC for amikacin than isolates from horses and cattle.
Publication Date: 1998-08-08 PubMed ID: 9695286DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00202-8Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aims to characterize Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis in different animals and locations through ribotyping and testing its susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Striking differences emerged in its nitrate reduction capability and unique genomic variants identified through endonuclease ribotyping, contributing to understanding antimicrobial resistance.

Objective and Methodology

  • The researchers targeted to categorize and contrast 37 isolates of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis obtained from distinctive lesions and varied geographical strata. The source animals for these bacterial isolates included horses (28), cattle (1), sheep (3), and goats (5).
  • Approaches adopted for this comparison were ribotyping and testing bacterial susceptibility to 17 distinct antimicrobial agents.
  • Ribotyping, a genotyping method that analyses fragment patterns derived from restriction endonucleases on the ribosomal RNA of the bacteria, was done using two restriction endonucleases, specifically Apa 1 and Pst 1.
  • The ability of the isolates to reduce nitrate (nitrate positivity or negativity) was also evaluated, as this property varies among bacteria and serves as an essential differentiation parameter.

Findings

  • Almost all isolates from horses proved nitrate-positive, that is, they could reduce nitrate, barring one. Conversely, all isolates extracted from sheep and goats couldn’t reduce nitrate (nitrate-negative).
  • Differences in ribotype patterns emerged in the study. Notably, one nitrate-negative isolate from a horse was ribotypically identical to other equine isolates but differed from the nitrate-negative isolates procured from sheep and goats.
  • Ribotyping with Apa 1 endonuclease revealed inter-biotype differences but didn’t register differences within each biotype.
  • Contrastingly, ribotyping using Pst 1 endonuclease unraveled one variant within each equine and ovine biotype, signifying intra-biotype genomic variants.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility

  • The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC; microgram/ml) of antimicrobials, signifying the smallest amount of an antimicrobial that inhibits visible bacterial growth, showed consistent outcomes between nitrate-negative and nitrate-positive groups with one exception.
  • The C. pseudotuberculosis isolates from sheep and goats exhibited higher MIC for amikacin, an antibiotic. This indicates that they were more resistant to this drug, requiring a more significant amount to inhibit bacterial growth, compared to isolates from horses and cattle.

Implication

  • This research enhances understanding of the genetic diversity in C. pseudotuberculosis across different hosts and locations, promising an enriched understanding of the bacterial pathogenicity and drug resistance which, in turn, assists in devising effective therapeutic strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Costa LR, Spier SJ, Hirsh DC. (1998). Comparative molecular characterization of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis of different origin. Vet Microbiol, 62(2), 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00202-8

Publication

ISSN: 0378-1135
NlmUniqueID: 7705469
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 62
Issue: 2
Pages: 135-143

Researcher Affiliations

Costa, L R
  • Department of Veterinary Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616, USA. costa_l@vt8200.vetmed.lsu.edu
Spier, S J
    Hirsh, D C

      MeSH Terms

      • Animals
      • Anti-Bacterial Agents / pharmacology
      • Blotting, Southern / veterinary
      • California
      • Cattle
      • Corynebacterium Infections / microbiology
      • Corynebacterium Infections / veterinary
      • Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis / classification
      • Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis / drug effects
      • Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis / genetics
      • DNA, Bacterial / chemistry
      • DNA, Ribosomal / chemistry
      • Goats
      • Horse Diseases / microbiology
      • Horses
      • Microbial Sensitivity Tests / veterinary
      • New Mexico
      • Nitrates / chemistry
      • Nucleic Acid Hybridization
      • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
      • Restriction Mapping / veterinary
      • Sheep
      • South Africa

      Citations

      This article has been cited 12 times.
      1. Meng W, Chen S, Huang L, Yang J, Zhang W, Zhong Z, Zhou Z, Liu H, Fu H, He T, Peng G. Isolation, characterization, and pathogenicity assessment of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis biovar equi strains from alpacas (Vicugna pacos) in China. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1206187.
        doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1206187pubmed: 37465023google scholar: lookup
      2. Sting R, Geiger C, Rietschel W, Blazey B, Schwabe I, Rau J, Schneider-Bühl L. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Infections in Alpacas (Vicugna pacos). Animals (Basel) 2022 Jun 22;12(13).
        doi: 10.3390/ani12131612pubmed: 35804511google scholar: lookup
      3. Schlicher J, Schmitt S, Stevens MJA, Stephan R, Ghielmetti G. Molecular Characterization of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis Isolated over a 15-Year Period in Switzerland. Vet Sci 2021 Jul 30;8(8).
        doi: 10.3390/vetsci8080151pubmed: 34437473google scholar: lookup
      4. Peinado RDS, Olivier DS, Eberle RJ, de Moraes FR, Amaral MS, Arni RK, Coronado MA. Binding studies of a putative C. pseudotuberculosis target protein from Vitamin B(12) Metabolism. Sci Rep 2019 Apr 23;9(1):6350.
        doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42935-ypubmed: 31015525google scholar: lookup
      5. Breslin JW, Yang Y, Scallan JP, Sweat RS, Adderley SP, Murfee WL. Lymphatic Vessel Network Structure and Physiology. Compr Physiol 2018 Dec 13;9(1):207-299.
        doi: 10.1002/cphy.c180015pubmed: 30549020google scholar: lookup
      6. Oliveira A, Teixeira P, Azevedo M, Jamal SB, Tiwari S, Almeida S, Silva A, Barh D, Dorneles EM, Haas DJ, Heinemann MB, Ghosh P, Lage AP, Figueiredo H, Ferreira RS, Azevedo V. Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis may be under anagenesis and biovar Equi forms biovar Ovis: a phylogenic inference from sequence and structural analysis. BMC Microbiol 2016 Jun 2;16:100.
        doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0717-4pubmed: 27251711google scholar: lookup
      7. Rhodes DM, Magdesian KG, Byrne BA, Kass PH, Edman J, Spier SJ. Minimum inhibitory concentrations of equine Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates (1996-2012). J Vet Intern Med 2015 Jan;29(1):327-32.
        doi: 10.1111/jvim.12534pubmed: 25586790google scholar: lookup
      8. Dorneles EM, Santana JA, Ribeiro D, Dorella FA, Guimarães AS, Moawad MS, Selim SA, Garaldi AL, Miyoshi A, Ribeiro MG, Gouveia AM, Azevedo V, Heinemann MB, Lage AP. Evaluation of ERIC-PCR as genotyping method for Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis isolates. PLoS One 2014;9(6):e98758.
        doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098758pubmed: 24901343google scholar: lookup
      9. Norman TE, Batista M, Lawhon SD, Zhang S, Kuskie KR, Swinford AK, Bernstein LR, Cohen ND. In vitro susceptibility of equine-obtained isolates of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis to gallium maltolate and 20 other antimicrobial agents. J Clin Microbiol 2014 Jul;52(7):2684-5.
        doi: 10.1128/JCM.01252-14pubmed: 24829243google scholar: lookup
      10. Miller MJ, McDole JR, Newberry RD. Microanatomy of the intestinal lymphatic system. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010 Oct;1207 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):E21-8.
      11. Tejedor-Junco MT, Lupiola P, Schulz U, Gutierrez C. Isolation of nitrate-reductase positive Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis from dromedary camels. Trop Anim Health Prod 2008 Apr;40(3):165-7.
        doi: 10.1007/s11250-007-9077-2pubmed: 18484117google scholar: lookup
      12. Tejedor MT, Martin JL, Corbera JA, Shulz U, Gutierrez C. Pseudotuberculosis in dromedary camels in the Canary Islands. Trop Anim Health Prod 2004 Jul;36(5):459-62.