Analyze Diet
Veterinary ophthalmology2015; 19(4); 297-304; doi: 10.1111/vop.12298

Comparative morphological evaluation of domestic animal cornea.

Abstract: This study described corneal morphology in different domestic animals using histological and immunohistochemical methods. Specifically, we evaluated the species-specific distribution pattern of cytokeratins (CKs) and aquaporins (AQPs) to assess their contribution to the strength and transparency of the cornea, respectively. Methods: Corneal sections (2 μm thick) were obtained from 28 pigs, 11 cows, two goats, six horses, four dogs, and five cats and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reaction. Immunohistochemistry was also performed using CK1 to 3 and AQP1 and 5 antibodies. Results: Domestic animal corneas were composed of corneal epithelium, stroma, Descemet's membrane, and corneal endothelium. Bowman's layer was not detected using the PAS reaction. The three-layered epithelium was thinnest in carnivores and thickest in equines and bovines. CKs were demonstrated immunohistochemically in all species examined, especially in the most superficial layer of the corneal epithelium. CKs were more widely distributed in canine and feline corneal epithelial cell layers compared to other species. The corneal monolayer endothelium was immunostained with AQP1 in all species examined, and it was also present in stromal keratocytes in a species-specific manner. In contrast, AQP5 was exclusively localized to the corneal epithelium. Epithelial staining patterns varied markedly between species, and the widest distribution of AQP5 was demonstrated in feline epithelial cell layers. Conclusions: Differences in the distribution of CKs and AQPs in various species suggest species differences in the maintenance of structural integrity and fluid balance.
Publication Date: 2015-07-20 PubMed ID: 26190143DOI: 10.1111/vop.12298Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research focuses on the examination of the corneal structure in various domestic animals with an emphasis on understanding their strength and transparency. The study leverages histological and immunohistochemical methods.

Research Methodology

  • Corneal sections, approximately 2µm thick, were taken from a range of animals including 28 pigs, 11 cows, two goats, six horses, four dogs, and five cats.
  • The sections were stained using hematoxylin-eosin and PAS (periodic acid-Schiff) to perform histological examinations. This allows for visualizing the various layers and components of the corneas.
  • The study also applied immunohistochemistry, utilizing antibodies for CK (cytokeratins) and AQPs (aquaporins). CK contributes to cornea strength, while AQP helps maintain its transparency.

Research Findings

  • All corneas of the animals studied were found to be comprised of four layers – the corneal epithelium, stroma, Descemet’s membrane, and corneal endothelium. The Bowman’s layer wasn’t detected using the PAS reaction.
  • The thickness of the three-layered epithelium varied; it was the thickest in horses and cows, while the thinnest in carnivores.
  • CK presences were confirmed in all species, especially in the superficial layer of the corneal epithelium. Dogs and cats showed a wider distribution compared to other animals.
  • All species also showed presence of AQP1 in the endothelium, with stromal keratocytes displaying species-specific behavior. AQP5, on the other hand, was found exclusively in the corneal epithelium, with the distribution pattern varying significantly among different species. Felines showed the most widespread distribution of AQP5 in their epithelial cells.

Conclusion of the Research

  • Differences in CK and AQP distribution in various species suggest inherent differences in maintenance of structural integrity and fluid balance in different animal corneas.
  • The observations and findings could aid in developing a deeper understanding of corneal biology and disease pathogenesis in different species, thereby enabling designing appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Cite This Article

APA
Nautscher N, Bauer A, Steffl M, Amselgruber WM. (2015). Comparative morphological evaluation of domestic animal cornea. Vet Ophthalmol, 19(4), 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12298

Publication

ISSN: 1463-5224
NlmUniqueID: 100887377
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 19
Issue: 4
Pages: 297-304

Researcher Affiliations

Nautscher, Nadine
  • Institute of Anatomy and Physiology of Domestic Animals, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 35, D-70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
Bauer, Achim
  • Institute of Anatomy and Physiology of Domestic Animals, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 35, D-70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
Steffl, Martin
  • Institute of Anatomy and Physiology of Domestic Animals, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 35, D-70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
Amselgruber, Werner M
  • Institute of Anatomy and Physiology of Domestic Animals, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 35, D-70599, Stuttgart, Germany.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Animals, Domestic / anatomy & histology
  • Animals, Domestic / classification
  • Cornea / anatomy & histology
  • Species Specificity

Citations

This article has been cited 23 times.
  1. Wilson SE. The Cornea: No Difference in the Wound Healing Response to Injury Related to Whether, or Not, There's a Bowman's Layer. Biomolecules 2023 Apr 29;13(5).
    doi: 10.3390/biom13050771pubmed: 37238641google scholar: lookup
  2. Bhend ME, Kempuraj D, Sinha NR, Gupta S, Mohan RR. Role of aquaporins in corneal healing post chemical injury. Exp Eye Res 2023 Mar;228:109390.
    doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2023.109390pubmed: 36696947google scholar: lookup
  3. Klećkowska-Nawrot J, Goździewska-Harłajczuk K, Barszcz K. Comparative Histology of the Cornea and Palisades of Vogt in the Different Wild Ruminants (Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae, Tragulidae). Animals (Basel) 2022 Nov 17;12(22).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12223188pubmed: 36428415google scholar: lookup
  4. Park SY, Holmqvist K, Niehorster DC, Huber L, Virányi Z. How to improve data quality in dog eye tracking. Behav Res Methods 2023 Jun;55(4):1513-1536.
    doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01788-6pubmed: 35680764google scholar: lookup
  5. Paszta W, Goździewska-Harłajczuk K, Klećkowska-Nawrot J. Morphology and Histology of the Orbital Region and Eye of the Asiatic Black Bear (Ursus thibetanus)-Similarities and Differences within the Caniformia Suborder. Animals (Basel) 2022 Mar 22;12(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ani12070801pubmed: 35405790google scholar: lookup
  6. Almubrad T, Mencucci R, Smedowski A, Samivel R, Almutleb E, Alkanaan A, Khan AA, Masmali A, Akhtar S. Ultrastructural study of collagen fibrils, proteoglycans and lamellae of the cornea treated with iontophoresis - UVA cross-linking and hypotonic riboflavin solution. Saudi J Biol Sci 2021 Dec;28(12):7160-7174.
    doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.019pubmed: 34867019google scholar: lookup
  7. Paszta W, Klećkowska-Nawrot JE, Goździewska-Harłajczuk K. Anatomical and morphometric evaluation of the orbit, eye tunics, eyelids and orbital glands of the captive females of the South African painted dog (Lycaon pictus pictus Temminck, 1820) (Caniformia: Canidae). PLoS One 2021;16(4):e0249368.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249368pubmed: 33872321google scholar: lookup
  8. Subasinghe SK, Ogbuehi KC, Mitchell L, Dias GJ. Animal model with structural similarity to human corneal collagen fibrillar arrangement. Anat Sci Int 2021 Mar;96(2):286-293.
    doi: 10.1007/s12565-020-00590-8pubmed: 33392925google scholar: lookup
  9. Wilson SE. Bowman's layer in the cornea- structure and function and regeneration. Exp Eye Res 2020 Jun;195:108033.
    doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108033pubmed: 32339517google scholar: lookup
  10. Crespo-Moral M, García-Posadas L, López-García A, Diebold Y. Histological and immunohistochemical characterization of the porcine ocular surface. PLoS One 2020;15(1):e0227732.
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227732pubmed: 31929592google scholar: lookup
  11. Kammergruber E, Rahn C, Nell B, Gabner S, Egerbacher M. Morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of the equine corneal epithelium. Vet Ophthalmol 2019 Nov;22(6):778-790.
    doi: 10.1111/vop.12651pubmed: 30767359google scholar: lookup
  12. Das S, Liu CH, Singh M, Twa MD, Larin KV. Modified wavelength scanning interferometry for simultaneous tomography and topography of the cornea with Fourier domain optical coherence tomography. Biomed Opt Express 2018 Sep 1;9(9):4443-4458.
    doi: 10.1364/BOE.9.004443pubmed: 30615727google scholar: lookup
  13. Miyagi H, Kim S, Li J, Murphy CJ, Thomasy SM. Topical Rho-Associated Kinase Inhibitor, Y27632, Accelerates Corneal Endothelial Regeneration in a Canine Cryoinjury Model. Cornea 2019 Mar;38(3):352-359.
    doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001823pubmed: 30516555google scholar: lookup
  14. Shull OR, Reilly CM, Davis LB, Murphy CJ, Thomasy SM. Phenotypic Characterization of Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy in German Shorthaired and Wirehaired Pointers Using In Vivo Advanced Corneal Imaging and Histopathology. Cornea 2018 Jan;37(1):88-94.
    doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001431pubmed: 29077583google scholar: lookup
  15. Patruno M, Perazzi A, Martinello T, Blaseotto A, Di Iorio E, Iacopetti I. Morphological description of limbal epithelium: searching for stem cells crypts in the dog, cat, pig, cow, sheep and horse. Vet Res Commun 2017 Jun;41(2):169-173.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-017-9676-ypubmed: 28110374google scholar: lookup
  16. Thomasy SM, Cortes DE, Hoehn AL, Calderon AC, Li JY, Murphy CJ. In Vivo Imaging of Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy in Boston Terriers: A Spontaneous, Canine Model for Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2016 Jul 1;57(9):OCT495-503.
    doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18885pubmed: 27454658google scholar: lookup
  17. Klećkowska-Nawrot J, Chrószcz A, Aktaş A, Paszta W, Goździewska-Harłajczuk K, Poradowski D. Comparative Histology of the Cornea and Palisades of Vogt in Various Non-Human Primates. Vet Sci 2026 Jan 22;13(1).
    doi: 10.3390/vetsci13010109pubmed: 41600765google scholar: lookup
  18. Tozetti RAR, Moreira MVL, Araújo RLS, Hirano LQL, Moore BA, Galera PD. Comparative Corneal Histomorphometry Between Birds of Different Species. Biology (Basel) 2025 May 25;14(6).
    doi: 10.3390/biology14060603pubmed: 40563855google scholar: lookup
  19. Santos G, Delgado E, Silva B, Braz BS, Gonçalves L. Topical Ocular Drug Delivery: The Impact of Permeation Enhancers. Pharmaceutics 2025 Mar 31;17(4).
    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17040447pubmed: 40284442google scholar: lookup
  20. Viehmeister K, Manuelli A, Guerin C, Kappes S, Lamprecht A. Imaging-Based Drug Penetration Profiling in an Excised Sheep Cornea Model. Pharmaceutics 2024 Aug 26;16(9).
    doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16091126pubmed: 39339164google scholar: lookup
  21. Klećkowska-Nawrot JE, Goździewska-Harłajczuk K, Barszcz K, Stegmann KO. Morphological examination of the visual system and orbital region in the red panda (Ailurus fulgens fulgens). BMC Vet Res 2024 Jul 2;20(1):284.
    doi: 10.1186/s12917-024-04152-2pubmed: 38956555google scholar: lookup
  22. Melnyk S, Bollag WB. Aquaporins in the Cornea. Int J Mol Sci 2024 Mar 28;25(7).
    doi: 10.3390/ijms25073748pubmed: 38612559google scholar: lookup
  23. Samelska K, Kupis M, Szymanek K, Izdebska J, Zaleska-Żmijewska A, Skopiński P. The immunology of corneal limbal stem cells: the up-to-date approach to stem cell transplantation. Cent Eur J Immunol 2023;48(3):245-250.
    doi: 10.5114/ceji.2023.132033pubmed: 37901870google scholar: lookup