Comparison Between Gynecological Examination Methods and Sample Collection Techniques for the Diagnosis of Endometritis in Subfertile Mares.
Abstract: Endometritis is a relevant cause of subfertility in mares. However, the accurate diagnosis, essential for effective treatment, can be difficult due to the variability of results and interpretations resulting from different examination methods and sample collection techniques. The present work compared gynecological evaluation methods and sample collection techniques to diagnose endometritis in subfertile mares. Forty animals with a history of subfertility were selected for gynecological evaluation using clinical methodologies, such as perineal conformation, transrectal palpation and ultrasonography, vaginoscopy, and digital examination of the cervix. In addition, we performed laboratory analyses, including uterine microbiological culture and endometrial cytology and histology, of which the latter is the gold standard for the diagnosis of endometritis. Samples were collected for microbiological culture and endometrial cytological evaluations using three different techniques: a commercial cytobrush/swab collector, low-volume uterine flush, and a new tested technique, by flush the fragment resulting from the endometrial biopsy. Transrectal palpation and ultrasound showed the best results among clinical examinations. However, they were less efficient in laboratory tests of endometrial cytology and uterine microbiological culture, in which the latter showed the highest sensitivity and specificity for endometritis compared with endometrial histology. The use of multiple results from different methods has also proved to be an effective alternative for diagnosis. Among the techniques used to collect endometrial material for cytology and microbiological culture, the most effective and practical in this study was the commercial cytobrush/swab collector.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication Date: 2022-10-23 PubMed ID: 36283589DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104147Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research explores the best methods for diagnosing endometritis in subfertile mares by comparing different examination methods and sample collection techniques. It concludes that, whilst transrectal palpation and ultrasound are effective clinical techniques, integration of multiple methods offers a more accurate diagnosis. Commercial cytobrush/swab collector was found to be the most effective in collecting samples for microbiological and cytological analyses.
Research Background and Aims
- Endometritis, inflammation of the uterus lining, is a significant cause of subfertility in horses.
- Obtaining an accurate diagnosis is critical for determining the most effective treatment.
- This research aimed to identify the most reliable diagnosis method for endometritis by comparing various clinical examinations and sample collection techniques.
Methods and Sample Collection Techniques
- The sample of subjects consists of forty subfertile mares.
- Clinical evaluation techniques included perineal conformation, vaginoscopy, transrectal palpation and ultrasonography, and digital examination of the cervix.
- Laboratory analyses involved uterine microbiological culture and endometrial cytology and histology, with the latter being the gold standard for endometritis diagnosis.
- Three different techniques were used for sample collection: a commercial cytobrush/swab collector, low-volume uterine flush, and a new tested method involving flushing the fragment resulting from endometrial biopsy.
Findings and Conclusions
- The results suggest that transrectal palpation and ultrasound are the most effective clinical examination methodologies.
- However, these methods were found less effective compared to endometrial cytology and uterine microbiological culture tests.
- Integrating multiple test results provided a more accurate diagnosis.
- Also, the commercial cytobrush/swab collector was identified as the most effective method for endometrial material collection for cytology and microbiological culture.
Implications of the Study
- The research shows the importance of combining different methods in the diagnosis of endometritis.
- An understanding of which techniques are most effective is helpful for veterinary professionals when dealing with subfertility in mares.
- The findings also point out areas of further research, such as developing new sample collection techniques that can lead to more accurate diagnoses.
Cite This Article
APA
Teixeira-Soares CM, Viana AGA, Ribeiro IM, Silva KDP, Sancler-Silva YFR, Machado-Neves M.
(2022).
Comparison Between Gynecological Examination Methods and Sample Collection Techniques for the Diagnosis of Endometritis in Subfertile Mares.
J Equine Vet Sci, 119, 104147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104147 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil. Electronic address: carlosmattos1991@gmail.com.
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
- Departamento de Zootecnia Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Medicina Veterinária, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil; Departamento de Biologia Geral, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.
MeSH Terms
- Horses
- Female
- Animals
- Horse Diseases / diagnosis
- Endometritis / diagnosis
- Endometritis / veterinary
- Endometrium / diagnostic imaging
- Uterus / diagnostic imaging
- Specimen Handling / veterinary
- Infertility / pathology
- Infertility / veterinary
Citations
This article has been cited 0 times.Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists