Analyze Diet
American journal of veterinary research2013; 75(1); 34-40; doi: 10.2460/ajvr.75.1.34

Comparison between palpation and ultrasonography for evaluation of experimentally induced effusion in the distal interphalangeal joint of horses.

Abstract: To ultrasonographically quantify experimentally induced effusion of the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint of horses and compare results with those obtained with palpation. Methods: 8 forelimbs from equine cadavers and forelimbs of 5 mares. Methods: Preliminary ex vivo experiments were performed to validate the methods. Then, the DIP joints of the forelimbs of standing horses were serially distended with saline (0.9% NaCl) solution (1, 4, and 10 mL) by injection through an intra-articular catheter. Two ultrasonographers measured distension of the dorsal recess of the DIP joint, and 2 surgeons, who were not aware of the volume injected, graded joint effusion by palpation. Results: Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability was excellent for ultrasonographic measurements. Interobserver agreement for use of palpation to detect joint distension was moderate (κ = 0.45). There was an overall increase in the palpation distension grade with an increase in injected volume. Sensitivity for detection with palpation of larger volumes (4 and 10 mL) was high (92% and 100%, respectively). However, sensitivity was lower (57%) for detection with palpation of minimal distension (1 mL). Conclusions: Although palpation provided a reliable clinical assessment of DIP joint effusion for volumes of 4 to 10 mL, ultrasonographic measurements were easy to obtain, more accurate, and able to detect smaller amounts of distension. This may be clinically relevant for the assessment of effusion of the DIP joint that can arise in horses with early osteoarthritis or infectious arthritis with concomitant soft tissue swelling that precludes accurate assessment with palpation.
Publication Date: 2013-12-29 PubMed ID: 24370243DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.75.1.34Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article discusses an experiment aimed at quantifying and comparing two methods of assessing fluid build-up (effusion) in the distal interphalangeal joint (a joint in the limb) of horses: palpation and ultrasonography.

Objective of the Research

  • The research was carried out to ultrasonographically measure effusion in the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint of horses, create a comparison with results achieved through palpation, and assess their accuracy and reliability.

Methods Used

  • Initial experiments were done on 8 forelimbs from horse cadavers to validate methods before applying them to 5 living horses.
  • The DIP joints of the horses’ forelimbs were filled with different volumes of saline solution (1, 4, and 10 mL) through an intra-articular catheter.
  • Two ultrasonographers measured the swelling of the DIP joint, and two surgeons (unaware of the volume injected) evaluated the joint effusion by feeling it (palpation).

Results of the Research

  • There was excellent consistency between the measurements taken by the two ultrasonographers and individual repeatability.
  • The agreement between the two surgeons using palpation was considered moderate.
  • As the volume injected into the joint increased, so did the palpation distension grade recorded by the surgeons.
  • The sensitivity of palpation for detecting larger volumes (4 and 10 mL) was high (92% and 100% respectively). However, its sensitivity was lower (57%) for detecting minimal distension (1 mL).

Conclusions of the Study

  • While palpation offered a dependable clinical assessment of DIP joint effusion for volumes of 4-10 mL, ultrasonographic measurements were found to be easier to obtain, more precise, and able to detect smaller amounts of swelling.
  • This assessment finds significance in the medical field, especially in the early detection of effusion in the DIP joint, which can emerge in horses suffering from initial stages of osteoarthritis or infectious arthritis alongside accompanying soft tissue swelling that hinders accurate assessment through palpation.

Cite This Article

APA
Olive J, Lambert N, Bubeck KA, Beauchamp G, Laverty S. (2013). Comparison between palpation and ultrasonography for evaluation of experimentally induced effusion in the distal interphalangeal joint of horses. Am J Vet Res, 75(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.75.1.34

Publication

ISSN: 1943-5681
NlmUniqueID: 0375011
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 75
Issue: 1
Pages: 34-40

Researcher Affiliations

Olive, Julien
  • Comparative Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Département de sciences cliniques, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, St Hyacinthe, QC J2S 7C6, Canada.
Lambert, Nathalie
    Bubeck, Kirstin A
      Beauchamp, Guy
        Laverty, Sheila

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Cadaver
          • Female
          • Forelimb / diagnostic imaging
          • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
          • Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
          • Horse Diseases / etiology
          • Horses
          • Joint Diseases / diagnosis
          • Joint Diseases / diagnostic imaging
          • Joint Diseases / etiology
          • Joint Diseases / veterinary
          • Joints / diagnostic imaging
          • Osteoarthritis / diagnosis
          • Osteoarthritis / diagnostic imaging
          • Osteoarthritis / etiology
          • Osteoarthritis / veterinary
          • Palpation / methods
          • Palpation / veterinary
          • Toe Joint / diagnostic imaging
          • Toe Joint / pathology
          • Ultrasonography / methods
          • Ultrasonography / veterinary

          Citations

          This article has been cited 0 times.