Comparison of 3 corneal cytology collection methods for evaluating equine ulcerative keratitis: Cytobrush, kimura platinum spatula, and handle edge of scalpel blade.
Abstract: To compare corneal cytology samples from three common sampling techniques: cytobrush (CB), Kimura platinum spatula (KS), and the handle edge of a scalpel blade (SB). Methods: Equine patients presenting to the University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine with ulcerative keratitis were included. Following diagnosis of corneal ulcer and sampling for microbial culture, two cytology samples per technique were collected with sterile CB, KS, and SB in a randomized order. Cytologic evaluation was performed by two observers masked to collection method. Objective measures of sample cellularity, quality, distribution, and identification of infectious organisms were recorded per 10 monolayer cell populations using 50× magnification with oil immersion which were compared to culture results. Variables were compared using ANOVA with Student's t test when appropriate and Cohen's kappa (k) to evaluate inter- and intra-observer agreement (IOA) between observers and techniques. Results: Twenty equine patients (120 samples) were included. The IOA between observers was substantial (k = 0.75 ± 0.06) for cytological parameters. SB provided the most cellular samples (P < .01). There was a trend toward agreement (k = 0.12 ± 0.16) in technique for sample quality (P = .08). CB and SB had significantly poorer cell distribution than KS (P < .05). Infection was confirmed in 12 of 20 patients with SB and CB techniques having a significantly higher diagnostic yield than KS (P < .05) and was most consistent with infection confirmed on culture. Conclusions: The SB provided the most diagnostic samples but all three techniques are clinically useful in evaluating equine ulcerative keratitis.
© 2018 American College of Veterinary Ophthalmologists.
Publication Date: 2018-04-24 PubMed ID: 29687947DOI: 10.1111/vop.12574Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Clinical Trial
- Veterinary
- Comparative Study
- Journal Article
- Clinical Examination
- Clinical Findings
- Clinical Pathology
- Clinical Signs
- Clinical Study
- Comparative Study
- Cytology
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Technique
- Disease Diagnosis
- Equine Diseases
- Equine Health
- In Vivo
- Infection
- Microbiology
- Microscopy
- Ophthalmology
- Veterinary Care
- Veterinary Medicine
- Veterinary Practice
- Veterinary Research
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
This research was conducted to compare three different methods of collecting corneal cytology samples in diagnosing ulcerative keratitis in horses. The study found the scalpel blade technique to provide the most diagnostic samples, although all methods proved beneficial in the clinical evaluation.
Methods
- The researchers included equine patients presented at the University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine diagnosed with ulcerative keratitis.
- After diagnosing the corneal ulcer and collecting a microbial culture, each technique under scrutiny – the cytobrush, Kimura platinum spatula, and handle edge of a scalpel blade – was used to collect two cytology samples, picked at random.
- Cytological evaluation was performed by two observers, who were not aware of the particular collection technique used.
- Objective measures including sample cellularity, quality, distribution, and identification of infectious organisms were recorded for ten monolayer cell populations, viewed under 50x magnification with oil immersion.
- The researchers compared these findings to the results from the microbial cultures.
- They used statistical tests, including ANOVA and Student’s t-test, to compare the variables, as well as Cohen’s kappa to evaluate the agreement between observers and techniques.
Results
- Twenty horses, totaling 120 samples, were included in the study.
- The inter-observer agreement between the two observers was substantial, based on calculated k-values.
- The scalpel blade method provided the most cellular samples, which proved to be highly significant.
- There was a slight agreement in sample quality by different techniques.
- It was found that the samples from the cytobrush and scalpel blade methods had lower cell distribution than those from the Kimura spatula technique.
- The scalpel blade and cytobrush techniques had a significantly higher diagnostic yield in confirming infection than the Kimura spatula method.
Conclusions
- Overall, the study concluded that the scalpel blade method yielded the most diagnostic samples, hence making it the preferred choice for corneal cytology sample collection when diagnosing ulcerative keratitis in horses.
- However, it is worth noting that all three techniques were found to be clinically useful in diagnosing the condition, implying that they could be complementary in their application depending on the clinical setting and the resources available.
Cite This Article
APA
Proietto L, Beatty SS, Plummer CE.
(2018).
Comparison of 3 corneal cytology collection methods for evaluating equine ulcerative keratitis: Cytobrush, kimura platinum spatula, and handle edge of scalpel blade.
Vet Ophthalmol, 22(2), 153-160.
https://doi.org/10.1111/vop.12574 Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- Departments of Small and Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Department of Comparative, Diagnostic, and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
- Departments of Small and Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Cornea / pathology
- Corneal Ulcer / microbiology
- Corneal Ulcer / pathology
- Corneal Ulcer / veterinary
- Cytological Techniques / instrumentation
- Cytological Techniques / veterinary
- Horse Diseases / microbiology
- Horse Diseases / pathology
- Horses
- Prospective Studies
Citations
This article has been cited 2 times.- Kovalcuka L, Sarpio L, Nikolajenko M. Comparison of five conjunctival cytology sampling methods in normal cat eyes. Vet World 2023 Apr;16(4):779-785.
- Çakır Bayram L, Abay S, Satıcıoğlu İB, Güvenç T, Ekebaş G, Aydın F. The ocular pyogranulomatous lesion in a Gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua) from the Antarctic Peninsula: evaluation of microbiological and histopathological analysis outcomes. Vet Res Commun 2021 Sep;45(2-3):143-158.
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists