Analyze Diet

Comparison of 4 agar gel immunodiffusion kits for serologic detection of equine infectious anemia virus antibodies.

Abstract: Using 85 sera collected from horses that had been experimentally infected with equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) and 200 field sera collected from racehorses in Japan, we compared 4 agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) kits for serologic detection of EIAV antibodies from Idexx, VMRD, IDvet, and the National Engineering Research Center of Veterinary Biologics, China (NECVB). The positive control lines were sufficiently clear in all kits for evaluation to be made, with slight differences in sharpness: NECVB was the sharpest, followed by VMRD, IDvet, and Idexx. The test results for all 285 samples agreed among the 4 kits, with 62 positives and 223 negatives. The sensitivities and specificities of VMRD, IDvet, and NECVB compared with the Idexx kit were 100%, and the kappa coefficient values between the kits were 1.0 for all combinations. We concluded that the testing capacity of these 4 kits was virtually identical.
Publication Date: 2023-05-02 PubMed ID: 37129383PubMed Central: PMC10331386DOI: 10.1177/10406387231171567Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research compared four testing kits used to detect equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) antibodies in horses and found that the performance of all four kits was virtually identical.

Objective and Methodology

  • The main objective of the research was to compare the performance of four separate agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) kits. These kits are designed to detect the presence of equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) antibodies in horse sera.
  • The kits compared were from Idexx, VMRD, IDvet, and the National Engineering Research Center of Veterinary Biologics, China (NECVB).
  • The researchers used a total of 285 serum samples, 85 of which were from horses experimentally infected with EIAV, and the remaining 200 were collected from racehorses in Japan.

Findings

  • All the kits produced clear positive control lines, which varied slightly in sharpness. The sharpest line was produced by the NECVB kit, followed by VMRD, IDvet, and Idexx.
  • The test results from all 285 samples were consistent across all four kits. There were 62 positive and 223 negative results.
  • The sensitivity and specificity of VMRD, IDvet, and NECVB kits were all found to be 100% compared to the Idexx kit.
  • The kappa coefficient values, which measure the agreement between the kits, were 1.0 for all combinations, indicating perfect agreement.

Conclusion

  • The researchers concluded that the testing capacity of the four kits was virtually identical.
  • This means that all four kits are identically effective in detecting equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV) antibodies in horse sera.

Cite This Article

APA
Bannai H, Kambayashi Y, Nemoto M, Yamanaka T, Tsujimura K. (2023). Comparison of 4 agar gel immunodiffusion kits for serologic detection of equine infectious anemia virus antibodies. J Vet Diagn Invest, 35(4), 430-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387231171567

Publication

ISSN: 1943-4936
NlmUniqueID: 9011490
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 35
Issue: 4
Pages: 430-432

Researcher Affiliations

Bannai, Hiroshi
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Kambayashi, Yoshinori
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Nemoto, Manabu
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Yamanaka, Takashi
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Tsujimura, Koji
  • Equine Research Institute, Japan Racing Association, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Infectious Anemia Virus, Equine
  • Equine Infectious Anemia / diagnosis
  • Agar
  • Immunodiffusion / veterinary
  • Immunodiffusion / methods
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

This article includes 10 references
  1. Cook RF. Equine infectious anaemia. 2009:56–71.
  2. International Collating Centre, Information Exchange on Infectious Equine Disease. Fourth quarter summary report: October–December 2020, 2021. https://www.jdata.co.za/iccviewer/media/20204summ.pdf
  3. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.. Biometrics 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.
    pubmed: 843571
  4. Lupulovic D, Savić S, Gaudaire D, Berthet N, Grgić Ž, Matović K, Deshiere A, Hans A. Identification and genetic characterization of equine infectious anemia virus in Western Balkans.. BMC Vet Res 2021 Apr 15;17(1):168.
    pmc: PMC8051041pubmed: 33858420doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02849-2google scholar: lookup
  5. More SJ, Aznar I, Bailey DC, Larkin JF, Leadon DP, Lenihan P, Flaherty B, Fogarty U, Brangan P. An outbreak of equine infectious anaemia in Ireland during 2006: investigation methodology, initial source of infection, diagnosis and clinical presentation, modes of transmission and spread in the Meath cluster.. Equine Vet J 2008 Nov;40(7):706-8.
    pubmed: 19165942doi: 10.2746/042516408x363305google scholar: lookup
  6. Nemoto M, Yamanaka T, Bannai H, Tsujimura K, Ueno T, Mekata H, Yoshida A, Koyama A, Kokado H. Comparison of two agar gel immunodiffusion protocols for diagnosing equine infectious anemia.. J Vet Med Sci 2018 Aug 10;80(8):1245-1247.
    pmc: PMC6115256pubmed: 29899176doi: 10.1292/jvms.18-0103google scholar: lookup
  7. Paré J, Simard C. Comparison of commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays and agar gel immunodiffusion tests for the serodiagnosis of equine infectious anemia.. Can J Vet Res 2004 Oct;68(4):254-8.
    pmc: PMC1111355pubmed: 15581219
  8. Spickler AR. Equine infectious anemia fact sheet. 2022Dec.
  9. Williams DL, Issel CJ, Steelman CD, Adams WV Jr, Benton CV. Studies with equine infectious anemia virus: transmission attempts by mosquitoes and survival of virus on vector mouthparts and hypodermic needles, and in mosquito tissue culture.. Am J Vet Res 1981 Sep;42(9):1469-73.
    pubmed: 6119953
  10. World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH). Chapter 3.6.6. Equine infectious anaemia. 2019May.

Citations

This article has been cited 3 times.
  1. Liang H, Zhou B, Hu Z, Chu X, Wang X, Du C, Wang X. Development of a Broad-Spectrum Antigen-Capture ELISA Using Combined Anti-p26 Polyclonal and Monoclonal Antibodies for Detection of Equine Infectious Anemia Virus. Microorganisms 2025 Jun 27;13(7).
  2. Ostuni A, Frontoso R, Crudele MA, Barca L, Amati M, Boni R, De Vendel J, Raimondi P, Bavoso A. Comparative Evaluation of a Multistrain Indirect ELISA Targeting Anti- p26 and gp45 Antibodies for EIAV Detection. Pathogens 2025 Jun 8;14(6).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens14060575pubmed: 40559583google scholar: lookup
  3. Domínguez-Odio A, González LIC, Alfonso DM, Guevara-Hernández F, La O Arias MA, Zayas MP, Ríos MÁB. Serodiagnosis of equine infectious anemia by indirect ELISA based on a novel synthetic peptide derived from gp45 glycoprotein. Vet Res Commun 2025 Apr 22;49(3):174.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-025-10707-xpubmed: 40261479google scholar: lookup