Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2016; 45(2); 240-245; doi: 10.1111/vsu.12442

Comparison of Arthroscopic Lavage and Needle Lavage Techniques, and Lavage Volume on the Recovery of Colored Microspheres From the Tarsocrural Joints of Cadaver Horses.

Abstract: To quantify recovery of colored microspheres from normal cadaver tarsocrural joints using arthroscopic or needle lavage with 1-5 L of fluid. Methods: Ex vivo experimental study. Methods: Adult Quarter Horse cadavers (n = 8). Methods: After euthanasia, 1.5 × 10(6)  colored microspheres were injected into each tarsocrural joint. Each joint was randomly assigned to receive lavage (5 L 0.9% NaCl) with an arthroscope (dorsomedial arthroscope and dorsolateral egress cannula) or three 14 g needles (dorsomedial ingress, dorsolateral, and plantarolateral egress). Egress fluid from each liter was collected separately over time and the number of microspheres present in each recovered liter determined by spectrophotometry. Results: A significant interaction was present between treatment group and liter of fluid (P < .01). The number of microspheres recovered in the first liter of lavage fluid was significantly higher in the needle lavage group than in the arthroscopic lavage group (P < .01). For both groups, the number of microspheres recovered in the first liter of lavage fluid represented a majority of the total microspheres collected and was significantly different from each subsequent liter collected (P 1 L.
Publication Date: 2016-01-15 PubMed ID: 26773461DOI: 10.1111/vsu.12442Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study investigates the comparison between arthroscopic and needle lavage techniques for recovery of colored microspheres from the joints of horse cadavers. The results show that needle lavage yielded a significantly higher number of microspheres in the first liter of lavage fluid than arthroscopic lavage.

Objective and Methodology

  • The study revolves around an experiment on adult Quarter Horse cadavers to quantify the recovery of colored microspheres from tarsocrural joints (ankle joints) using arthroscopic or needle lavage with volumes ranging from 1 to 5 liters of fluid.
  • After the horses were euthanized, 1.5 million colored microspheres were injected into each tarsocrural joint.
  • The joints were randomly assigned to undergo lavage, a washing out process using 5L of 0.9% saline, either with an arthroscope or three 14-gauge needles.
  • The fluid that egressed from each liter of lavage was collected separately over time and the quantity of microspheres in each recovered liter was measured using spectrophotometry, a method for determining the concentration of colored compounds in a solution.

Results

  • A statistically significant interaction was found between the treatment group and amount of fluid used.
  • The first liter of lavage fluid from the needle lavage group contained a significantly higher number of microspheres compared to the arthroscopic lavage group.
  • For both groups, the first liter of lavage fluid contained the majority of total microspheres recovered and was distinguishably different from each subsequent liter collected.
  • There was no difference observed in the number of microspheres recovered between the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th liter within or between the two treatment groups.

Conclusions

  • Based on the findings, the study concludes that the tarsocrural lavage using three 14-gauge needles was more effective at removing colored microspheres from the joint than the arthroscopic lavage. This indicates that the number or placement of portals might be more significant than the size of the portal and the flow rate.
  • Furthermore, there was no difference observed in the microsphere recovery with lavage volumes greater than 1 liter. This suggests that increasing the volume of lavage fluid beyond 1 liter does not yield a higher recovery rate of microspheres.

Cite This Article

APA
Loftin PG, Beard WL, Guyan ME, White BJ. (2016). Comparison of Arthroscopic Lavage and Needle Lavage Techniques, and Lavage Volume on the Recovery of Colored Microspheres From the Tarsocrural Joints of Cadaver Horses. Vet Surg, 45(2), 240-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.12442

Publication

ISSN: 1532-950X
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 45
Issue: 2
Pages: 240-245

Researcher Affiliations

Loftin, Patrick G
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
Beard, Warren L
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
Guyan, Megan E
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.
White, Brad J
  • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Arthroscopy / instrumentation
  • Arthroscopy / veterinary
  • Cadaver
  • Contrast Media / administration & dosage
  • Female
  • Horses / injuries
  • Horses / surgery
  • Injections, Intra-Articular / instrumentation
  • Injections, Intra-Articular / veterinary
  • Male
  • Microspheres
  • Tarsal Joints / injuries
  • Tarsal Joints / surgery
  • Therapeutic Irrigation / instrumentation
  • Therapeutic Irrigation / veterinary

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Beggan CP, Panizzi L, Oliver LJ. Efficacy of needle and endoscopic lavage on the recuperation of microspheres from the adult equine metacarpo-/metatarsophalangeal joint and digital flexor tendon sheath. Vet Surg 2025 Aug;54(6):1157-1166.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.14298pubmed: 40556484google scholar: lookup