Analyze Diet
Equine veterinary journal1999; 31(3); 197-202; doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03172.x

Comparison of bacteriology and cytology of tracheal fluid samples collected by percutaneous transtracheal aspiration or via an endoscope using a plugged, guarded catheter.

Abstract: Cytological and bacteriological results from tracheal fluid samples obtained endoscopically using a telescoping, plugged catheter (TPC) were compared with results from samples collected by percutaneous transtracheal aspiration (PTA). The TPC technique and PTA were performed in random order on 9 healthy Standardbred geldings. Three weeks later the procedures were performed on the same horses in the reverse order. The presence of oropharyngeal contamination was determined by quantitative bacteriology and quantification of squamous epithelial cells (SEC)/ml sample. The relative numbers of macrophages, haemosiderophages, giant cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophils did not differ between techniques. The number of SEC/ml was greater in samples with more colony forming units/ml indicating that quantification of SEC provides evidence of the probable degree of oropharyngeal contamination. Fifteen out of the 18 TPC samples were free of contamination, indicating that the TPC can provide adequate samples for bacteriology. The results also indicate that tracheoscopy sometimes results in oropharyngeal contamination of the trachea, but that this does not affect the results of the TPC sample.
Publication Date: 1999-07-13 PubMed ID: 10402131DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03172.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research paper compares two methods of collecting tracheal fluid samples in horses – percutaneous transtracheal aspiration (PTA) and a telescoping, plugged catheter (TPC) – in terms of their bacteriological and cytological output. It found no difference between the methods in terms of their cellular composition but noticed a higher incidence of oropharyngeal contamination in samples with greater quantities of squamous epithelial cells.

Research Objectives and Methodology

  • The objective of this research was to compare the cytological and bacteriological output of tracheal fluid samples collected by evaluation of PTA and TPC techniques.
  • The study was performed on 9 healthy Standardbred geldings, with the order of procedures randomized. After 3 weeks, the methods were reversed.
  • The presence of oropharyngeal contamination, which could indicate inaccuracies in testing and diagnosis, was determined through quantitative bacteriology and quantification of squamous epithelial cells (SEC) per milliliter sample.

Findings

  • The research found no significant difference between the two sample collection techniques in terms of the relative numbers of macrophages, haemosiderophages, giant cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes and eosinophils, as they remained similar in both methods.
  • The number of SEC/ml was discovered to be higher in samples with more colony-forming units/ml, suggesting that quantification of SEC can be an indicative factor for the extent of oropharyngeal contamination.
  • It was observed that 15 out of the 18 TPC samples were free of contamination, implying that TPC technique can be effective in providing adequate samples for bacteriology.

Implications

  • The findings may indicate that tracheoscopy, although commonly used and practiced, can lead to oropharyngeal contamination of the trachea, thereby potentially affecting the accuracy of the result.
  • However, the study also found that such contamination does not affect the results for TPC sample collection.
  • This result can prove to be valuable in deciding the more effective and accurate method for collecting tracheal fluid samples, aiding physicians in achieving more accurate diagnoses and treatments.

Cite This Article

APA
Christley RM, Hodgson DR, Rose RJ, Reid SW, Hodgson JL. (1999). Comparison of bacteriology and cytology of tracheal fluid samples collected by percutaneous transtracheal aspiration or via an endoscope using a plugged, guarded catheter. Equine Vet J, 31(3), 197-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-3306.1999.tb03172.x

Publication

ISSN: 0425-1644
NlmUniqueID: 0173320
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 31
Issue: 3
Pages: 197-202

Researcher Affiliations

Christley, R M
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, PMB4 Narellan Delivery Centre, NSW, Australia.
Hodgson, D R
    Rose, R J
      Reid, S W
        Hodgson, J L

          MeSH Terms

          • Animals
          • Bronchoscopy / veterinary
          • Male
          • Random Allocation
          • Staphylococcus / isolation & purification
          • Streptococcus / isolation & purification
          • Suction / methods
          • Suction / veterinary
          • Trachea / cytology
          • Trachea / microbiology

          Citations

          This article has been cited 3 times.
          1. Husulak ML, Manning ST, Meachem MD, Burgess HJ, Epp TY, Montgomery JB. Does antimicrobial therapy improve outcomes in horses with severe equine asthma and a positive tracheal wash bacterial culture?. Can J Vet Res 2018 Jul;82(3):184-191.
            pubmed: 30026642
          2. Bond SL, Timsit E, Workentine M, Alexander T, Léguillette R. Upper and lower respiratory tract microbiota in horses: bacterial communities associated with health and mild asthma (inflammatory airway disease) and effects of dexamethasone. BMC Microbiol 2017 Aug 23;17(1):184.
            doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1092-5pubmed: 28835202google scholar: lookup
          3. Savitske BJ, Dulli RJ, Paul NC, Washburn KE. Transtracheal Wash Fluid Collection and Analysis in Healthy Goats. J Vet Intern Med 2025 Sep-Oct;39(5):e70211.
            doi: 10.1111/jvim.70211pubmed: 40958735google scholar: lookup