Analyze Diet

Comparison of feces versus rectal swabs for the molecular detection of Lawsonia intracellularis in foals with equine proliferative enteropathy.

Abstract: The purpose of the current study was to compare the molecular detection rate of Lawsonia intracellularis between feces and rectal swabs collected from 42 foals with suspected equine proliferative enteropathy (EPE). Fecal samples and rectal swabs were processed for DNA purification by using an automated extraction system. The purified DNA was then analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of the aspartate ammonia lyase (aspA) gene of L. intracellularis. Absolute quantitation was calculated by using a standard curve for L. intracellularis and expressed as copy numbers of the aspA gene of L. intracellularis per microliter of purified DNA. The combined PCR detection rate for L. intracellularis was 90%, with 38 foals testing PCR positive in feces (33 samples), rectal swabs (32), or both (27). Six foals tested PCR positive only in feces, whereas 5 tested positive only in rectal swabs. Feces yielded a significantly higher aspA gene copy number of L. intracellularis than rectal swabs. Feces and rectal swabs tested PCR negative from 4 foals. In conclusion, the results showed that feces yielded similar numbers of PCR-positive results, with a higher L. intracellularis aspA gene load than rectal swabs. By analyzing dual samples, the PCR detection rate for L. intracellularis increased from 76% and 79% for rectal swabs and feces, respectively, to 90%. Rectal swabs should be considered as an alternative sample type for EPE-suspected patients with decreased or no fecal output.
Publication Date: 2010-09-03 PubMed ID: 20807932DOI: 10.1177/104063871002200513Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article compares the effectiveness of using fecal samples versus rectal swabs for detecting the bacterium Lawsonia intracellularis in foals that may have equine proliferative enteropathy (EPE), a disease that affects the intestines. The study found that feces yielded similar detection results but carried a higher bacterial load than rectal swabs, both contributing towards a combined detection rate of 90%.

Methodology

  • The study involved 42 foals suspected of having EPE. Both fecal samples and rectal swabs were collected from each foal as the basis for the comparison.
  • The samples were processed for DNA purification using an automated extraction system.
  • The purified DNA was then examined using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to look for the presence of the aspartate ammonia lyase (aspA) gene of L. intracellularis.
  • Quantitative measurements of the aspA gene were performed using a standard curve for L. intracellularis, and the results were presented as the copy number of the gene per microliter of purified DNA.

Results

  • The combined PCR detection rate for L. intracellularis was 90%, with 38 of the 42 foals testing positive in either feces or rectal swabs or both.
  • Six foals specifically tested PCR-positive only in feces, while five others tested positive only in rectal swabs.
  • Overall, the fecal samples yielded a higher copy number of the aspA gene of L. intracellularis compared to the rectal swabs. Hence, feces were found to have a higher bacterial load for L. intracellularis.
  • Four foals test results were negative for L. intracellularis in both feces and rectal swabs.

Conclusion

  • The findings suggest that both fecal samples and rectal swabs yield similar PCR-positive results for L. intracellularis, but the bacterial load was significantly higher in feces.
  • By testing both types of samples, the PCR detection rate for L. intracellularis increased from approximately 76%-79% (for each sample type separately) to 90% (when combined).
  • Considering these findings, the study recommends the consideration of rectal swabs as an alternative sample type for suspected cases of EPE, particularly in foals with decreased or no fecal output.

Cite This Article

APA
Pusterla N, Mapes S, Johnson C, Slovis N, Page A, Gebhart C. (2010). Comparison of feces versus rectal swabs for the molecular detection of Lawsonia intracellularis in foals with equine proliferative enteropathy. J Vet Diagn Invest, 22(5), 741-744. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063871002200513

Publication

ISSN: 1040-6387
NlmUniqueID: 9011490
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 22
Issue: 5
Pages: 741-744

Researcher Affiliations

Pusterla, Nicola
  • Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. npusterla@ucdavis.edu
Mapes, Samantha
    Johnson, Cara
      Slovis, Nathan
        Page, Allen
          Gebhart, Connie

            MeSH Terms

            • Animals
            • Aspartate Ammonia-Lyase / genetics
            • Bacterial Proteins / genetics
            • DNA, Bacterial / genetics
            • DNA, Bacterial / isolation & purification
            • Desulfovibrionaceae Infections / veterinary
            • Desulfovibrionaceae Infections / virology
            • Feces / virology
            • Genes, Bacterial
            • Horse Diseases / virology
            • Horses
            • Lawsonia Bacteria / genetics
            • Lawsonia Bacteria / isolation & purification
            • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
            • Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
            • RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / genetics
            • Rectum / virology

            Citations

            This article has been cited 8 times.
            1. Matté YA, Baldasso DZ, Rezende MA, Lui JFM, Seibel AC, Guizzo JA, Frandoloso R, Kreutz LC. Immunological insights into the occurrence of Lawsonia intracellularis in horses from southern Brazil using flow cytometry. Vet World 2025 Apr;18(4):755-762.
            2. Wu W, Wang L, Xie R, Peng C, Yang H, Zhu H, Luo Y, Hua L, Chen H, Wu B, Peng Z. Development and application of a triplex real-time PCR method for the detection of Lawsonia intracellularis, Brachyspira hyodysenteriae, and Clostridium perfringens. Microbiol Spectr 2025 Jun 3;13(6):e0323724.
              doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03237-24pubmed: 40366193google scholar: lookup
            3. Leutenegger CM, Lozoya CE, Tereski J, Savard C, Ogeer J, Lallier R. Emergence of Ancylostoma caninum parasites with the benzimidazole resistance F167Y polymorphism in the US dog population. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist 2023 Apr;21:131-140.
              doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2023.01.001pubmed: 36958067google scholar: lookup
            4. Engiles JB, Uzal FA, Navarro MA, Reef VB, Bender SJ. Phlegmonous gastritis in 2 yearling horses. J Vet Diagn Invest 2022 May;34(3):429-438.
              doi: 10.1177/10406387211065044pubmed: 35000510google scholar: lookup
            5. Bohlin AM, Olsen SN, Laursen SH, Öhman A, van Galen G. Lawsonia intracellularis associated equine proliferative enteropathy in Danish weanling foals. Acta Vet Scand 2019 Mar 8;61(1):12.
              doi: 10.1186/s13028-019-0447-3pubmed: 30850006google scholar: lookup
            6. Pusterla N, Gebhart C. Lawsonia intracellularis infection and proliferative enteropathy in foals. Vet Microbiol 2013 Nov 29;167(1-2):34-41.
              doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.06.017pubmed: 23871678google scholar: lookup
            7. Pusterla N, Gebhart CJ. Equine proliferative enteropathy--a review of recent developments. Equine Vet J 2013 Jul;45(4):403-9.
              doi: 10.1111/evj.12075pubmed: 23662705google scholar: lookup
            8. Lerner A, Romano J, Chmelnitsky I, Navon-Venezia S, Edgar R, Carmeli Y. Rectal swabs are suitable for quantifying the carriage load of KPC-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013 Mar;57(3):1474-9.
              doi: 10.1128/AAC.01275-12pubmed: 23295937google scholar: lookup