Analyze Diet
Comparative clinical pathology2011; 21(3); 333-336; doi: 10.1007/s00580-011-1280-x

Comparison of helminth and hard tick infestation between riding and work horses in Ahwaz, Iran.

Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 2011-07-21 PubMed ID: 22707930PubMed Central: PMC3362720DOI: 10.1007/s00580-011-1280-xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research is focused on comparing the infestation of parasitic worms and hard ticks in riding and work horses in Ahwaz, Iran. The impetus for the study was the significant detrimental effects of these parasites on horse health, as well as the associated economic implications.

Introduction

  • The abstract begins by highlighting the importance and severity of the issue being studied. Parasites in horses are a significant problem, leading to considerable health issues in the animals, such as diarrhea, colic, weight loss, poor growth, and even death, and causing massive financial implications through the costs of control measures.
  • It then gives a detailed description of the parasites affecting horses, particularly ticks, and their life cycle stages. The study focuses on two types of ticks; hard ticks and soft ticks. These ticks can suck a significant amount of blood from horses, impacting their health.

Methods

  • The study’s methodology is based on diagnostic tests, including the counting of eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) and indentifying larvae per gram of faeces (LPG), as well as faecal worm egg counts. This information is critical in determining the type of parasite infestation and deciding on the appropriate treatment.
  • The abstract emphasizes the importance of the Modified Wisconsin Sugar Flotation Method, which is highly sensitive and able to indicate the absence of adult parasites. It sheds light on how this technique can help monitor the rate of re-contamination of the animal’s environment.

Aim of the Study

  • The study was conducted in Ahwaz, Iran, where worm parasite infection is common and leads to significant economic losses. The goal was to determine the prevalence of external and internal parasite infestations in about 120 horses in the region.
  • This research was considered particularly necessary due to a lack of existing data in this field in Iran. The findings will potentially provide useful insight to help in the control and prevention of these parasites, improving equine health and mitigating economic losses.

Cite This Article

APA
Khosravi M, Kavosh F, Taghavi-Moghadam A, Ghaem-Maghami S, Pirali-Kheirabadi K, Rahimi-Feyli P, Navid-Pour S, Amin-Pour A, Arbabi F. (2011). Comparison of helminth and hard tick infestation between riding and work horses in Ahwaz, Iran. Comp Clin Path, 21(3), 333-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-011-1280-x

Publication

ISSN: 1618-5641
NlmUniqueID: 101134362
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 21
Issue: 3
Pages: 333-336

Researcher Affiliations

Khosravi, Mohammad
    Kavosh, Fariba
      Taghavi-Moghadam, Ahmad
        Ghaem-Maghami, Shamsodin
          Pirali-Kheirabadi, Khodadad
            Rahimi-Feyli, Peyman
              Navid-Pour, Shahrokh
                Amin-Pour, Arash
                  Arbabi, Fateme

                    References

                    This article includes 17 references
                    1. Boxell AC, Gibson KT, Hobbs RP, Thompson RC. Occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites in horses in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia.. Aust Vet J 2004 Jan-Feb;82(1-2):91-5.
                    2. Coates B. SWAT! Equine external parasite control: management.. SA Horseman 2007;2:38–40.
                    3. Eslami A, Bokai S, Tabatabai V. Equine parasites in Iran.. J Equine Vet Sci 2005;25:143–144.
                    4. Evans PA, Rood K. Faecal egg count tests improve deworming programs.. .
                    5. Francisco I, Arias M, Cortiñas FJ, Francisco R, Mochales E, Dacal V, Suárez JL, Uriarte J, Morrondo P, Sánchez-Andrade R, Díez-Baños P, Paz-Silva A. Intrinsic Factors Influencing the Infection by Helminth Parasites in Horses under an Oceanic Climate Area (NW Spain).. J Parasitol Res 2009;2009.
                      pmc: PMC2915776pubmed: 20721327doi: 10.1155/2009/616173google scholar: lookup
                    6. George JE, Davey RB, Pound JM. Introduced ticks and tick-borne diseases: the threat and approaches to eradication.. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2002 Nov;18(3):401-16, vi.
                      doi: 10.1016/S0749-0720(02)00030-0pubmed: 12442574google scholar: lookup
                    7. Kaufman PE, Koehler PO, Butle JF. External parasites on horses.. .
                    8. Kingscote AA. Common Parasites of Canadian Animals.. Can J Comp Med (Gard) 1938 Feb;2(2):47-55.
                      pmc: PMC1701897pubmed: 17647363
                    9. Labruna MB, Kerber CE, Ferreira F, Faccini JL, De Waal DT, Gennari SM. Risk factors to tick infestations and their occurrence on horses in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.. Vet Parasitol 2001 May 9;97(1):1-14.
                      doi: 10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00387-9pubmed: 11337122google scholar: lookup
                    10. Martins IVF, Verocai GG, Correia TR, Melo RMPS, Pereira MJS. Survey on control and management practices of equine helminthes infection.. Pesquisa Vet Brasil 2009;29:253–257.
                    11. Nielsen MK, Baptiste KE, Tolliver SC, Collins SS, Lyons ET. Analysis of multiyear studies in horses in Kentucky to ascertain whether counts of eggs and larvae per gram of feces are reliable indicators of numbers of strongyles and ascarids present.. Vet Parasitol 2010 Nov 24;174(1-2):77-84.
                      doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.08.007pubmed: 20850927google scholar: lookup
                    12. Papazahariadou M, Papadopoulos E, Diakou A, Ptochos S. Gastrointestinal parasites of stabled and grazing horses in Central and Northern Greece.. J Equine Vet Sci 2009;29:233–236.
                    13. Raynaud JP, Jones RM, Bliss DH, Le Stang JP, Kerboeuf D. The control of parasitic gastroenteritis of grazing cattle in Normandy, France using the morantel sustained release bolus.. Vet Parasitol 1983 Jul;12(3-4):261-72.
                      doi: 10.1016/0304-4017(83)90032-8pubmed: 6684357google scholar: lookup
                    14. Saeed K, Qadir Z, Ashraf K, Ahmad N. Role of intrinsic and extrinsic epidemiological factors on strongylosis in horses.. J Anim Plant Sci 2010;20:277–280.
                    15. Sotiraki ST, Badouvas AG, Himonas CA. A survey on the prevalence of internal parasites of equines in Macedonia and Thessalia-Greece.. J Equine Vet Sci 1997;17:550–552.
                    16. Tavakoli M. Survey on geographical distribution of ticks in Lorestan province.. Tarbiat Modarres Western Iran; 1997. p. 112.
                    17. Taylor MA, Coop RL, Wall RL. Veterinary parasitology.. Blackwell London; 2007.

                    Citations

                    This article has been cited 3 times.
                    1. Dik B, Ceylan O, Ceylan C, Tekindal MA, Semassel A, Sönmez G, Derinbay Ekici Ö. Ectoparasites of feral horses [Equus ferus caballus (Linnaeus., 1758)] on Karadağ Mountain, Karaman, Turkey. J Parasit Dis 2020 Sep;44(3):590-596.
                      doi: 10.1007/s12639-020-01234-4pubmed: 32801511google scholar: lookup
                    2. Khamesipour F, Taktaz-Hafshejani T, Tebit KE, Razavi SM, Hosseini SR. Prevalence of endo- and ecto-parasites of equines in Iran: A systematic review. Vet Med Sci 2021 Jan;7(1):25-34.
                      doi: 10.1002/vms3.321pubmed: 32644306google scholar: lookup
                    3. Sazmand A, Bahari A, Papi S, Otranto D. Parasitic diseases of equids in Iran (1931-2020): a literature review. Parasit Vectors 2020 Nov 19;13(1):586.
                      doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04472-wpubmed: 33213507google scholar: lookup