FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 9000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Home / Equine Research Bank / PeerJ / Comparison of incisional complications between skin closures...
PeerJ2018; 6; e5772; doi: 10.7717/peerj.5772

Comparison of incisional complications between skin closures using a simple continuous or intradermal pattern: a pilot study in horses undergoing ventral median celiotomy.

Abstract: Development of incisional complications following ventral median celiotomy might depend on suture pattern for skin closure. Methods: In this prospective study, 21 healthy male horses underwent celiotomy. Skin closure was either performed via a continuous percutaneous pattern (CO group; 5 warmbloods/5 ponies) or an intradermal pattern (ID group; 5 warmbloods/6 ponies). Follow-up examination of the incisional site included daily monitoring for edema, dehiscence, and drainage. Transcutaneous ultrasound was performed at Days 3, 6, and 10 as well as on Week 8 and 12 to evaluate size of edema and presence or absence of sinus formation, and hernia formation. Prevalence of incisional infection on base of positive microbiological analysis at any time up to Day 10 was evaluated and compared between ID and CO group. Furthermore, edema size was analysed by a linear mixed-effect model for group and time dependency. Results: Observed incisional complications included edema (9/10 in CO, 10/11 in ID), suture sinus formation (2/10 in CO, 1/11 in ID), surgical site infection (2/10 in CO, 0/11 in ID), and incisional hernia (1/10 in CO, 0/11 in ID). The overall prevalence of incisional infection was 9.5% without significant differences between both groups (20% in CO, 0% in ID; p = 0.214). Edema size was not dependent on time or group (p = 0.545 and p = 0.627, respectively). Conclusions: CO and ID suture pattern are appropriate for skin closure following ventral median celiotomy in horses. None of the animals in the continuous ID group developed surgical site infections, even without the use of antibiotics.
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2018-11-09 PubMed ID: 30430040PubMed Central: PMC6231425DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5772Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated the impact of different skin closure methods on surgical complications after a certain kind of abdomen surgery (ventral median celiotomy) in horses. The results suggest that both continuous percutaneous and intradermal suturing techniques are suitable for this procedure, although the intradermal method appeared to be associated with fewer post-surgery infections.

Study Design and Methodology

  • In this prospective, controlled study, two different skin closure techniques were evaluated in a group of 21 healthy male horses who underwent ventral median celiotomy, a surgical procedure that involves making an incision in the midline of the abdomen.
  • The horses were divided into two groups. Skin closure in the first group, known as the CO group, was carried out with a continuous percutaneous pattern, while in the second group, referred to as the ID group, an intradermal pattern was used.
  • Postoperative monitoring involved daily checks of the incision site for signs of edema (swelling due to fluid buildup), dehiscence (wound reopening), and drainage. Transcutaneous ultrasound scans were performed on specific days to assess the size of the edema, and to check for the formation of sinus tracts (abnormal channels in the body) or hernias (organs protruding through the surgical incision).
  • The researchers also tested for bacterial infection at the surgical site up to 10 days after the surgery, comparing the results between the ID and CO groups.

Findings

  • The researchers observed a similar incidence of edema in both groups, with 9 out of 10 horses in the CO group and 10 out of 11 horses in the ID group developing this complication.
  • Suture sinus formation, surgical site infection and incisional hernia were less common, occurring in a few horses in the CO group but none in the ID group.
  • The overall rate of surgical site infection was 9.5%. The CO group had a higher rate at 20% compared to 0% in the ID group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
  • Neither the type of suture pattern (CO or ID) nor the time elapsed since the surgery had a significant impact on the size of the edema.

Conclusions

  • Both the CO and ID suture patterns were deemed appropriate for skin closure following ventral median celiotomy in horses, however the ID suture pattern appeared safer with zero reported incidence of surgical site infections.
  • The findings of this research could potentially inform best practices for post-surgery care in veterinary medicine, particularly for horses undergoing abdominal surgery.

Cite This Article

APA
Scharner D, Gittel C, Winter K, Blaue D, Schedlbauer C, Vervuert I, Brehm W. (2018). Comparison of incisional complications between skin closures using a simple continuous or intradermal pattern: a pilot study in horses undergoing ventral median celiotomy. PeerJ, 6, e5772. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5772

Publication

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
NlmUniqueID: 101603425
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 6
Pages: e5772

Researcher Affiliations

Scharner, Doreen
  • Department for Horses, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Gittel, Claudia
  • Department for Horses, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Winter, Karsten
  • Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Blaue, Dominique
  • Institute of Animal Nutrition, Nutrition Diseases and Dietetics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Schedlbauer, Carola
  • Institute of Animal Nutrition, Nutrition Diseases and Dietetics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Vervuert, Ingrid
  • Institute of Animal Nutrition, Nutrition Diseases and Dietetics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Brehm, Walter
  • Department for Horses, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

This article includes 42 references
  1. Anderson SL, Bracamonte JL, Hendrick S. Ex vivo evaluation of 7 polydioxanone for closure of equine ventral midline celiotomies.. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 2014;78(2):156–160.
    pmc: PMC3962281pubmed: 24688180
  2. Anderson SL, Devick I, Bracamonte JL, Hendrick S, Barber SM, Carmalt JL, Wilson DG. Occurrence of incisional complications after closure of equine celiotomies with USP 7 polydioxanone.. Veterinary Surgery 2015;44(4):521–526.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2014.12275.xpubmed: 25230697google scholar: lookup
  3. Barie PS, Eachempati SR. Surgical site infections.. Surgical clinics of North America 2005;85(6):1115–1135.
    doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2005.09.006pubmed: 16326197google scholar: lookup
  4. Bischofberger AS, Brauer T, Gugelchuk G, Klohnen A. Difference in incisional complications following exploratory celiotomies using antibacterial-coated suture material for subcutaneous closure: prospective randomised study in 100 horses.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2010;42(4):304–309.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2009.00020.xpubmed: 20525047google scholar: lookup
  5. Chism PN, Latimer FG, Patton CS, Rohrbach BW, Blackford JT. Tissue strength and wound morphology of the equine linea alba after ventral median celiotomy.. Veterinary Surgery 2000;29(2):145–151.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2000.00145.xpubmed: 10730707google scholar: lookup
  6. Colbath AC, Patipa L, Berghaus RD, Parks AH. The influence of suture pattern on the incidence of incisional drainage following exploratory laparotomy.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2014;46(2):156–160.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12091pubmed: 23663132google scholar: lookup
  7. Coomer RPC, Mair TS, Edwards GB, Proudman CJ. Do subcutaneous sutures increase risk of laparotomy wound suppuration?. Equine Veterinary Journal 2007;39(5):396–399.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407x195123pubmed: 17910262google scholar: lookup
  8. Darnaud SJM, Southwood LL, Aceto HW, Stefanovski D, Tomassone L, Zarucco L. Are horse age and incision length associated with surgical site infection following equine colic surgery?. Veterinary Journal 2016;217:3–7.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.004pubmed: 27810207google scholar: lookup
  9. Durward-Akhurst SA, Mair TS, Boston R, Dunkel B. Comparison of two antimicrobial regimens on the prevalence of incisional infections after colic surgery.. Veterinary Record 2013;172(11):287.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.101186pubmed: 23268187google scholar: lookup
  10. Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP, Krepel CJ, Johnson CP, Lewis BD, Brown KR, Towne JB. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2006;203(4):481–489.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.026pubmed: 17000391google scholar: lookup
  11. Freeman DE. Abdominal closure.. In: White NA, Moore JN, Mair TS, editors. The Equine Acute Abdomen. Jackson: Teton NewMedia; 2008. pp. 539–550.
  12. Freeman KD, Southwood LL, Lane J, Lindborg S, Aceto HW. Post operative infection, pyrexia and perioperative antimicrobial drug use in surgical colic patients.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2012;44(4):476–481.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00515.xpubmed: 22150829google scholar: lookup
  13. French NP, Smith J, Edwards GB, Proudman CJ. Equine surgical colic: risk factors for postoperative complications.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2002;34(5):444–449.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776117791pubmed: 12358045google scholar: lookup
  14. Gibson KT, Curtis CR, Turner AS, McIlwraith CW, Aanes WA, Stashak TS. Incisional hernias in the horse. Incidence and predisposing factors.. Veterinary Surgery 1989;18(5):360–366.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1989.tb01100.xpubmed: 2530684google scholar: lookup
  15. Honnas CM, Cohen ND. Risk factors for wound infection following celiotomy in horses.. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1997;210(1):78–81.
    pubmed: 8977653
  16. Huskamp B. Diagnosis and treatment of acute abdominal conditions in the horse; various types and frequency as seen at the animal hospital in Hochmoor.. Proceedings of the 1st Equine Colic Research Symposium; Athens, Georgia 1982. pp. 261–272.
  17. Ingle-Fehr JE, Baxter GM, Howard RD, Trotter GW, Stashak TS. Bacterial culturing of ventral median celiotomies for prediction of postoperative incisional complications in horses.. Veterinary Surgery 1997;26(1):7–13.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01456.xpubmed: 9123817google scholar: lookup
  18. Isgren CM, Salem SE, Archer DC, Worsman FCF, Townsend NB. Risk factors for surgical site infection following laparotomy: effect of season and perioperative variables and reporting of bacterial isolates in 287 horses.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2017;49(1):39–44.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12564pubmed: 26713622google scholar: lookup
  19. Johnson A, Young D, Reilly J. Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance.. Journal of Hospital Infection 2006;64(1):30–35.
    doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.03.020pubmed: 16822582google scholar: lookup
  20. Klohnen A. New perspectives in postoperative complications after abdominal surgery.. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2009;25(2):341–350.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2009.05.003pubmed: 19580944google scholar: lookup
  21. Kobluk CN, Ducharme NG, Lumsden JH, Pascoe PJ, Livesey MA, Hurtig M, Horney FD, Arighi M. Factors affecting incisional complication rates associated with colic surgery in horses: 78 cases (1983–1985). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1989;195(5):639–642.
    pubmed: 2777714
  22. Lippold BS. Incisional complications following median laparotomy in horses.. University of Bern; 2001. Doctoral thesis.
  23. Mair TS, Smith LJ. Survival and complication rates in 300 horses undergoing surgical treatment of colic. Part 2: short-term complications.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2005;37(4):303–309.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054529364pubmed: 16028617google scholar: lookup
  24. Marco F, Vallez R, Gonzalez P, Ortega L, De La Lama J, Lopez-Duran L. Study of the efficacy of coated Vicryl plus® antibacterial suture in an animal model of orthopedic surgery.. Surgical Infections 2007;8(3):359–366.
    doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.013pubmed: 17635059google scholar: lookup
  25. Phillips TJ, Walmsley JP. Retrospective analysis of the results of 151 exploratory laparotomies in horses with gastrointestinal disease.. Equine Veterinary Journal 1993;25(5):427–431.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02985.xpubmed: 8223375google scholar: lookup
  26. Proudman CJ. Postoperative complications.. In: White NA, Moore JN, Mair TS, editors. The Equine Acute Abdomen. Jackson: Teton NewMedia; 2008. pp. 564–577.
  27. Proudman CJ, Smith JE, Edwards GB, French NP. Long-term survival of equine surgical colic cases. Part 1: patterns of mortality and morbidity.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2002;34(5):432–437.
    doi: 10.2746/042516402776117845pubmed: 12358043google scholar: lookup
  28. Rothenburger S, Spangler D, Bhende S, Burkley D. In vitro antimicrobial evaluation of Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 with triclosan) using zone of inhibition assays.. Surgical Infections 2002;3(3 Suppl 1):S79–S87.
    doi: 10.1089/10962960260496361pubmed: 12573042google scholar: lookup
  29. Salem SE, Proudman CJ, Archer DC. Prevention of post operative complications following surgical treatment of equine colic: current evidence.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2016;48(2):143–151.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12517pubmed: 26440916google scholar: lookup
  30. Santschi EM. Prevention of postoperative infections in horses.. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2006;22(2):323–334.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2006.03.002pubmed: 16882478google scholar: lookup
  31. Scharner D, Winter K, Brehm W, Kämpfert M, Gittel C. Incisional complications following ventral median coeliotomy in horses does suturing of the peritoneum reduce the risk?. Tierarztliche Praxis: Ausgabe G, Grosstiere/Nutztiere 2017;45(1):24–32.
    pubmed: 27831593
  32. Smith LJ, Mellor DJ, Marr CM, Reid SWJ, Mair TS. Incisional complications following exploratory celiotomy: does an abdominal bandage reduce the risk?. Equine Veterinary Journal 2007;39(3):277–283.
    doi: 10.2746/042516407x193963pubmed: 17520982google scholar: lookup
  33. Storch ML, Rothenburger SJ, Jacinto G. Experimental efficacy study of coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture in guinea pigs challenged with Staphylococcus aureus.. Surgical Infections 2004;5(3):281–288.
    doi: 10.1089/sur.2004.5.281pubmed: 15684799google scholar: lookup
  34. Swanwick RA, Milne FJ. The non-suturing of parietal peritoneum in abdominal surgery of the horse.. Veterinary Record 1973;93(12):328–335.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.93.12.328pubmed: 4760376google scholar: lookup
  35. Tnibar A, Grubbe Lin K, Thurøe Nielsen K, Christophersen MT, Lindegaard C, Martinussen T, Ekstrøm CT. Effect of a stent bandage on the likelihood of incisional infection following exploratory coeliotomy for colic in horses: a comparative retrospective study.. Equine Veterinary Journal 2013;45(5):564–569.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12026pubmed: 23294287google scholar: lookup
  36. Torfs S, Levet T, Delesalle C, Dewulf J, Vlaminck L, Pille F, Lefere L, Martens A. Risk factors for incisional complications after exploratory celiotomy in horses: do skin staples increase the risk?. Veterinary Surgery 2010;39(5):616–620.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2009.00636.xpubmed: 20636556google scholar: lookup
  37. Traub-Dargatz JL, George JL, Dargatz DA, Morley PS, Southwood LL, Tillotson K. Survey of complications and antimicrobial use in equine patients at veterinary teaching hospitals that underwent surgery because of colic.. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2002;220(9):1359–1365.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.2002.220.1359pubmed: 11991416google scholar: lookup
  38. Trostle SS, Hendrickson DA. Suture sinus formation following closure of ventral midline incisions with polypropylene in three horses.. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1995;207(6):742–745.
    pubmed: 7657574
  39. Wilmink JM, Van Weeren PR. Second-intention repair in the horse and pony and management of exuberant granulation tissue.. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 2005;21(1):15–32.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2004.11.014pubmed: 15691597google scholar: lookup
  40. Wilson DA, Badertscher RR, Boero MJ, Baker GJ, Foreman JH. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the healing of ventral midline abdominal incisions in the horse.. Equine Veterinary Journal 1989;21(S7):107–110.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb05667.xpubmed: 9118090google scholar: lookup
  41. Wilson DA, Baker GJ, Boero MJ. Complications of celiotomy incisions in horses.. Veterinary Surgery 1995;24(6):506–514.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01362.xpubmed: 8560746google scholar: lookup
  42. Wong DM, Sponseller BA, Alcott CJ, Agbedanu PN, Wang C, Hsu WH. Effects of intravenous administration of polymyxin B in neonatal foals with experimental endotoxemia.. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 2013;243(6):874–881.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.243.6.874pubmed: 24004237google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 1 times.
  1. Rockow M, Griffenhagen G, Landolt G, Hendrickson D, Pezzanite L. Current Antimicrobial Use in Horses Undergoing Exploratory Celiotomy: A Survey of Board-Certified Equine Specialists. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 22;13(9).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13091433pubmed: 37174470google scholar: lookup
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,357 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.