Analyze Diet
BMC veterinary research2017; 13(1); 75; doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-0989-4

Comparison of nasopharyngeal and guttural pouch specimens to determine the optimal sampling site to detect Streptococcus equi subsp equi carriers by DNA amplification.

Abstract: Streptococcus equi subsp equi (S. equi) is the cause of "equine strangles" which is a highly infectious upper respiratory disease. Detection of S. equi is influenced by site of specimen collection, method of sampling, and type of diagnostic test that is performed. We hypothesized i) that a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay that targets the S. equi-specific eqbE gene would be more sensitive than a realtime PCR assay that targets the S. equi-specific seeI gene and ii) that LAMP of specimens obtained by guttural pouch lavage (GPL) would be more sensitive than LAMP of nasopharyngeal specimens to identify S. equi carriers. Methods: A nasopharyngeal flocked swab, nasopharyngeal wash, and GPL specimen was collected from 44 convalescent horses and the eqbE LAMP assay was performed. The seeI realtime PCR assay and aerobic culture were also performed on the GPL specimen. Logistic regression was performed to compare sampling sites and test methods (P-values ≤0.05 were considered significant). Results: One of 41 nasopharyngeal flocked swabs, 6/38 nasopharyngeal wash and 24/44 GPL specimens were positive by eqbE LAMP. 18/44 GPL specimens were positive by seeI PCR and S. equi was isolated from 4/44 of these specimens. Detection of S. equi DNA was 51 times more likely from the GPL samples than nasopharyngeal samples (OR 51.0, P < 0.0001). When eqbE LAMP GPL samples were positive, it was eight times more likely that the guttural pouch had any abnormality on endoscopy (OR 8.2, P ≤ 0.005), almost 20 times more likely that mild empyema was found (OR 19.7, P ≤ 0.002), and eight times more likely that the SeeI PCR was positive for S. equi DNA (OR 8.1, P ≤ 0.006). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that guttural pouch lavage specimens should be used to detect S. equi and that the eqbE LAMP assay was comparable to the seeI PCR.
Publication Date: 2017-03-23 PubMed ID: 28335829PubMed Central: PMC5364677DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-0989-4Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigates the optimal method for detecting carriers of Streptococcus equi, the bacteria causing the equine respiratory illness known as strangles. The study posits that samplingguttural pouch lavage (GPL) using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay is more effective than typical nasopharyngeal swabbing methods.

Objective of the Research

The research aims to determine the most effective method for detecting Streptococcus equi subsp equi (S. equi), the bacterium responsible for “equine strangles,” an infectious respiratory disease in horses. The effectiveness of the detection method relies on the site of specimen collection, sampling method, and the type of diagnostic test performed. The researchers hypothesize that a particular type of gene-targeted assay would be more sensitive and that using samples obtained from the guttural pouch would yield more accurate results than those from nasopharyngeal swabs.

Methodology and Results

  • Different types of samples were collected from 44 horses recovering from illness, namely nasopharyngeal swabs, nasopharyngeal washes, and guttural pouch lavages (GPL).
  • The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay was applied to these samples, targeting the eqbE gene sequence specific to S. equi.
  • The seeI real-time PCR (polymerase chain reaction) assay and aerobic culture were also performed on the GPL specimens.
  • Statistical analysis revealed that the S. equi DNA was 51 times more likely detected from the GPL samples than nasopharyngeal samples. Moreover, when the GPL samples were positive, it was found to increase the likelihood of detecting any abnormality on endoscopy, mild empyema, and positive results for S. equi DNA in the SeeI PCR test.

Conclusions

The study concludes that the most effective method to detect S. equi carriers is to use guttural pouch lavage specimens, and the eqbE LAMP assay is comparable to the seeI PCR in terms of effectiveness. This finding could significantly improve the detection of equine strangles carriers, paving the way for more effective control and prevention strategies for this highly infectious disease.

Cite This Article

APA
Boyle AG, Stefanovski D, Rankin SC. (2017). Comparison of nasopharyngeal and guttural pouch specimens to determine the optimal sampling site to detect Streptococcus equi subsp equi carriers by DNA amplification. BMC Vet Res, 13(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-0989-4

Publication

ISSN: 1746-6148
NlmUniqueID: 101249759
Country: England
Language: English
Volume: 13
Issue: 1
Pages: 75

Researcher Affiliations

Boyle, Ashley G
  • Department of Clinical Studies New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA, 19348, USA. boylea@vet.upenn.edu.
Stefanovski, Darko
  • Department of Clinical Studies New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 382 West Street Rd, Kennett Square, PA, 19348, USA.
Rankin, Shelley C
  • Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3900 Spruce Street, Room 4036, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Carrier State / diagnosis
  • Carrier State / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Lymphadenitis / microbiology
  • Lymphadenitis / veterinary
  • Nasopharynx / microbiology
  • Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / veterinary
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / veterinary
  • Specimen Handling / veterinary
  • Streptococcal Infections / diagnosis
  • Streptococcal Infections / microbiology
  • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
  • Streptococcus equi / isolation & purification

References

This article includes 28 references
  1. Lindahl S, Baverud V, Egenvall A, Aspan A, Pringle J. Comparison of sampling sites and laboratory diagnostic tests for S. Equi subsp. Equi in horses from confirmed strangles outbreaks.. J Vet Intern Med 2013;27:542–547.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.12063pubmed: 23527817google scholar: lookup
  2. Newton JR, Wood JL, Dunn KA, DeBrauwere MN, Chanter N. Naturally occurring persistent and asymptomatic infection of the guttural pouches of horses with Streptococcus equi.. Vet Rec 1997;140:84–90.
    doi: 10.1136/vr.140.4.84pubmed: 9032908google scholar: lookup
  3. Newton JR, Verheyen K, Talbot NC, Timoney JF, Wood JL, Lakhani KH. Control of strangles outbreaks by isolation of guttural pouch carriers identified using PCR and culture of Streptococcus equi.. Equine Vet J 2000;32:515–26.
    doi: 10.2746/042516400777584721pubmed: 11093626google scholar: lookup
  4. Sweeney CR, Benson CE, Whitlock RH, Meirs DA, Barningham SO, Whitehead SC. Description of an epizootic and persistence of streptococcus equi infections in horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1989;194:1281–1286.
    pubmed: 2722660
  5. Sweeney C, Timoney JF, Newton JR, Hines MT. Review of streptococcus equi infections in horses: guidelines for treatment, control, and prevention of strangles.. J Vet Int Med 2005;19:123–134.
  6. Boyle AG, Boston RC, O’Shea K, Young S, Rankin SC. Optimization of an in vitro assay to detect Streptococcus equi subsp. equi.. Vet Microbiol 2012;159:406–410.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.04.014pubmed: 22560762google scholar: lookup
  7. Gronbaek LM, Angen O, Vigre H, Olsen SN. Evaluation of a nested PCR test and bacterial culture of swabs from the nasal passages and from abscesses in relation to diagnosis of streptococcus equi infection (strangles). Equine Vet J 2006;38:59–63.
    doi: 10.2746/042516406775374324pubmed: 16411588google scholar: lookup
  8. Webb K, Barker C, Harrison T, Heather Z, Steward KF, Robinson C. Detection of streptococcus equi subspecies equi using a triplex qPCR assay.. Vet J 2013;195:300–304.
    doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.07.007pmc: PMC3611602pubmed: 22884566google scholar: lookup
  9. Goldfarb DM, Slinger R, Tam RK, Barrowman N, Chan F. Assessment of flocked swabs for use in identification of streptococcal pharyngitis.. J Clin Microbiol 2009;47:3029–3030.
    doi: 10.1128/JCM.01163-09pmc: PMC2738109pubmed: 19605581google scholar: lookup
  10. North SE, Wakeley PR, Mayo N, Mayers J, Sawyer J. Development of a real-time PCR to detect streptococcus equi subspecies equi.. Equine Vet J 2013;46:56–59.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12088pubmed: 23663066google scholar: lookup
  11. Heather Z, Holden MT, Steward KF, Parkhill J, Song L, Challis GL. A novel streptococcal integrative conjugative element involved in iron acquisition.. Mol Microbiol 2008;70:1274–92.
  12. Hobo S, Niwa H, Oku K. Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification methods targeting the seM gene for detection of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi.. J Vet Med Sci 2012;74:329–333.
    doi: 10.1292/jvms.11-0317pubmed: 22032896google scholar: lookup
  13. North SE, Das P, Wakeley PR, Sawyer J. Development of a rapid isothermal assay to detect the causative agent of strangles.. J Equine Vet Sci 2012;32(Suppl 10):S54–S55.
  14. Liu C, Mauk MG, Hart R, Qiu X, Bau HH. A self-heating cartridge for molecular diagnostics.. Lab Chip 2011;11:2686–2692.
    doi: 10.1039/c1lc20345bpubmed: 21734986google scholar: lookup
  15. Mori Y, Nagamine K, Tomita N, Notomi T. Detection of Loop mediated isothermal amplification reaction by turbidity derived from magnesium pyrophosphate formation.. Biochem Biophy Res Commun 2001;289:150–154.
    doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5921pubmed: 11708792google scholar: lookup
  16. Holland RE, Harris DG, Monge A. How to control strangles infections on the endemic farm.. Proc 52nd Annu Meet AAEP 2006;52:78–80.
  17. Dallap Schaer B, Aldrich E, Orsini JA. Emergency diagnostic endoscopy.. In: Orsini JA, Divers TJ, editors. Equine emergencies. 4. St. Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2014. pp. 61–64.
  18. Baverud V, Johansson SK, Aspan A. Real-time PCR for detection and differentiation of Streptococcus equi subsp. equi and Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus.. Vet Microbiol 2007;124:219–229.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.04.020pubmed: 17531409google scholar: lookup
  19. Boyle AG, Rankin SC, D○ L, Boston RC, Wheeler-Aceto H. Streptococcus equi detection polymerase chain reaction assay for equine nasopharyngeal and guttural pouch wash samples.. J Vet Intern Med 2016;30:276–281.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.13808pmc: PMC4913660pubmed: 26678318google scholar: lookup
  20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Assessing the fit of the model.. In: Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, editors. Applied logistic regression. 3. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013. pp. 153–225.
  21. Boyle AG, Stefanovski S, Rankin SC. ACVIM abstracts: determining optimal sampling site for streptococcus equi subsp equi carriers using a loop-mediated isothermal PCR assay.. J Vet Intern Med 2015;29:1278.
  22. Boyle AG, Stefanovski D, Rankin SC. 10th IEIDC abstracts: determining optimal sampling site for streptococcus equi subsp equi carriers using a loop-mediated isothermal PCR assay.. J Eq Vet Sci 2016;39:S14.
  23. Harris SR, Robinson C, Steward KF, Webb KS, Paillot R, Parkhill J, Holden MT, Waller AS. Genome specialization and decay of the strangles pathogen, Streptococcus equi, is driven by persistent infection.. Genome Res 2015;25:1360–71.
    doi: 10.1101/gr.189803.115pmc: PMC4561494pubmed: 26160165google scholar: lookup
  24. Holden MT, Heather Z, Paillot R, Steward KF, Webb K, Ainslie F. Genomic evidence for the evolution of streptococcus equi: host restriction, increased virulence, and genetic exchange with human pathogens.. PLoS Pathog 2009;5:e1000346.
  25. Alber J, El-Sayed A, Lammler C, Hassan AA, Weiss R, Zscho M. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction for identification and differentiation of streptococcus equi subsp. Zooepidemicus and streptococcus equi subsp. Equi.. Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2004;51:455–458.
  26. Waller AS. Strangles:taking steps towards eradication.. Vet Micro 2013;167:50–60.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.03.033pubmed: 23642414google scholar: lookup
  27. Chanter N, Talbot NC, Newton JR, Hewson D, Verheyen K. Streptococcus equi with truncated M-proteins isolated from outwardly healthy horses.. Microbiology 2000;146:1361–1369.
    doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-6-1361pubmed: 10846214google scholar: lookup
  28. Waller AS. New perspectives for the diagnosis, control, treatment, and prevention of strangles in horses.. Vet Clin North Am Equine 2014;30:591–607.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2014.08.007pubmed: 25300634google scholar: lookup