Comparison of opioid receptor binding in horse, guinea pig, and rat cerebral cortex and cerebellum.
Abstract: To compare the density and binding characteristics of opioid receptor subtypes in horse, rat, and guinea pig cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Methods: Prospective receptor binding study. Methods: Whole brains were obtained from four neurologically normal adult horses during necropsy. Rat and guinea pig brains were obtained commercially. Methods: The cerebellum and cerebral cortex were dissected from each brain, and tissue homogenates prepared. A radioligand binding technique with the highly selective ligands [(3)H]-DAMGO, [(3)H]-U69593, and [(3)H]-DPDPE was used to identify the mu- (mu), kappa- (kappa) and delta- (delta) opioid receptors, respectively. Competitive binding assays were performed with these ligands and varying concentrations of one of multiple unlabeled ligands. Results: While there were marked species differences in relative densities of opioid receptors, all radioligands interacted with their binding sites with high, nanomolar affinity in both the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. In the horse cerebral cortex, the percentages of total opioid binding sites for the mu-, kappa- and delta-receptors were 71%, 14% and 15%, respectively. In the rat and guinea pig cerebral cortex, the corresponding values were 56% mu-, 4% kappa- and 40% delta-receptors, and 25% mu-, 37% kappa- and 38% delta-receptors, respectively. In horse and guinea pig cerebellum, the binding was 37% mu-, 59% kappa- and 4% delta-receptors, and 15% mu-, 76% kappa- and 10% delta-receptors, respectively. For competitive analysis, all competitors of the mu-, kappa- and delta-receptors completely displaced [(3)H]-DAMGO, [(3)H]-U69593, and [(3)H]-DPDPE and had inhibitory constants in the nanomolar range. Conclusions: Horses used in this study had a greater density of mu-receptors in the cerebral cortex compared with rats and guinea pigs but without further characterization of the functional role of these receptors it is impossible to determine the clinical significance of these data.
Publication Date: 2007-06-12 PubMed ID: 17565576DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2006.00337.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
- Journal Article
- Research Support
- Non-U.S. Gov't
Summary
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
The research involves a comparative study of opioid receptor binding in the brain (specifically the cerebral cortex and cerebellum) of horses, guinea pigs, and rats. The study categorizes the receptors into mu-, kappa-, and delta- types and uses radioligand binding techniques and competitive assays to evaluate binding densities and characteristics.
Experiment Overview
- The study commenced with obtaining whole brains from four neurologically normal adult horses, rats, and guinea pigs. The equine brains were procured during a post-mortem while rat and guinea pig brains were commercially sourced.
- Each brain was carefully dissected to isolate the cerebellum and cerebral cortex, making separate tissue homogenates.
- Highly selective ligands, [(3)H]-DAMGO, [(3)H]-U69593, and [(3)H]-DPDPE were used with a radioligand binding technique to identify the mu-, kappa-, and delta- opioid receptors, respectively.
- Competitive binding assays were further performed with these ligands and varying concentrations of other unlabeled ligands.
Study Findings
- The researchers observed significant species differences in the relative densities of opioid receptors. However, all radioligands interacted with their binding sites with high, nanomolar affinity in both the cerebral cortex and cerebellum across all species.
- In the horse cerebral cortex, the percentages of total opioid binding sites for the mu-, kappa- and delta-receptors were 71%, 14% and 15% respectively. In contrast, the rat and guinea pig showed differing percentages.
- In the cerebellum, the horse and guinea pig demonstrated different receptor binding percentages, but in both cases, kappa- receptors had the highest density.
- The competitive analysis revealed that all competitors of the mu-, kappa- and delta-receptors completely displaced the radioligand and had inhibitory constants in the nanomolar range.
Conclusions
- The study noted that horses have a higher density of mu-receptors in the cerebral cortex compared to rats and guinea pigs.
- However, without further investigation into the functional roles of these receptors, it’s challenging to determine the clinical significance of these differences.
Cite This Article
APA
Thomasy SM, Moeller BC, Stanley SD.
(2007).
Comparison of opioid receptor binding in horse, guinea pig, and rat cerebral cortex and cerebellum.
Vet Anaesth Analg, 34(5), 351-358.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2006.00337.x Publication
Researcher Affiliations
- K.L. Maddy Equine Analytical Chemistry Laboratory, California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
MeSH Terms
- Animals
- Binding, Competitive
- Cerebellum / physiology
- Cerebral Cortex / physiology
- Female
- Guinea Pigs / physiology
- Horses / physiology
- Male
- Rats / physiology
- Receptors, Opioid / physiology
- Receptors, Opioid, delta / physiology
- Receptors, Opioid, kappa / physiology
- Receptors, Opioid, mu / physiology
- Species Specificity
Use Nutrition Calculator
Check if your horse's diet meets their nutrition requirements with our easy-to-use tool Check your horse's diet with our easy-to-use tool
Talk to a Nutritionist
Discuss your horse's feeding plan with our experts over a free phone consultation Discuss your horse's diet over a phone consultation
Submit Diet Evaluation
Get a customized feeding plan for your horse formulated by our equine nutritionists Get a custom feeding plan formulated by our nutritionists