Analyze Diet
Veterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal2025; 16(5); 253-259; doi: 10.30466/vrf.2024.2028438.4266

Comparison of the efficacies of Rhodococcus equi recombinant vaccine in mice.

Abstract: is an important bacterial pathogen and causes severe chronic granulomatous pneumonia in foals below 6 months of age. It has also become an opportunistic and emerging pathogen in immunocompromised humans. Vaccination is the most cost-effective strategy for controlling and preventing this infection. Although several potential virulence genes and candidate immunogens have been identified over the years, no effective vaccine is currently available to prevent disease in horses. Recently, bacterial vector vaccines have been shown to be promising for In this study, the gene of was cloned into Protein Expression System small ubiquitin-related modifier (pET-SUMO) expression vectors and transferred into BL21 (DE3). Also, adjuvant significantly affects the efficacy of recombinant vaccines. Therefore, native VapA and recombinant VapA were formulated with Immunostimuling Microparticle System (IMS 3012) or PetGel A (recommended for horses) and subcutaneously administered to mice. The immunization effect of four different vaccines was determined by assaying antibody titers and survival rates. The antibody response was slightly higher in the PetGel A formulations than IMS 3012. Survival rates were lower in the PetGel A formulations than IMS 3012. Given these results, recombinant VapA adjuvanted with PetGel A represents a promising formulation for developing new-generation vaccines.
Publication Date: 2025-05-15 PubMed ID: 40693028PubMed Central: PMC12276374DOI: 10.30466/vrf.2024.2028438.4266Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article explores the effectiveness of different forms of a Rhodococcus equi recombinant vaccine on mice, with one formulation proving to be more promising for the development of new-generation vaccines.

Overview of Research

In order to understand this research article, it is essential to comprehend that Rhodococcus equi is a dangerous bacterial pathogen primarily affecting young foals, and has evolved to pose risk to immunocompromised human beings as well. Although numerous potential virulence genes and candidate immunogens have been discovered over time, there has been no significant breakthrough in devising an effective vaccine against Rhodococcus equi.

  • In the quest to find an effective Rhodococcus equi vaccine, the authors experimented with bacterial vector vaccines, which have shown promise in handling Rhodococcus equi.
  • The researchers cloned a particular Rhodococcus equi gene into Protein Expression System small ubiquitin-related modifier (pET-SUMO) expression vectors and transferred them into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3), a type of bacteria.
  • The study also considered that the effectiveness of recombinant vaccines can significantly be influenced by the adjuvant, a substance which enhances the body’s immune response to an antigen.

Methodology

  • VapA protein (significant to Rhodococcus equi) and its recombinant form were crafted with two types of adjuvants, Immunostimulating Microparticle System (IMS 3012) and PetGel A (recommended for horses).
  • The modified vaccines were then administered to mice through a process known as subcutaneous administration, where the vaccine is injected under the skin.

Results

  • After administering the vaccines, the researchers evaluated their effects by measuring antibody titers (concentration of antibodies in the blood, indicating the strength of the immune response) and survival rates of the mice.
  • While both types of formulations stimulated an immune response, the vaccines combined with PetGel A led to a slightly higher antibody response compared to those formulated with IMS 3012.
  • On the other hand, survival rates were higher with the IMS 3012 based vaccines compared to those with PetGel A.

Conclusion

  • Despite its lower survival rates, the recombinant VapA vaccine formulated with PetGel A is considered promising for the development of new Rhodococcus equi vaccines, probably due to its higher immune response initiation.

Cite This Article

APA
Golen GS, Erganiş O, Balevi A. (2025). Comparison of the efficacies of Rhodococcus equi recombinant vaccine in mice. Vet Res Forum, 16(5), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2024.2028438.4266

Publication

ISSN: 2008-8140
NlmUniqueID: 101625812
Country: Iran
Language: English
Volume: 16
Issue: 5
Pages: 253-259

Researcher Affiliations

Golen, Gokcenur Sanioglu
  • Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Türkiye.
Erganiş, Osman
  • Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.
Balevi, Aslı
  • Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Türkiye.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 29 references
  1. Takai S, Takeda K, Nakano Y. Emergence of rifampin-resistant Rhodococcus equi in an infected foal. J Clin Microbiol 1997;35(7):1904–1908.
    pmc: PMC229871pubmed: 9196223
  2. Giguère S, Cohen ND, Chaffin MK. Diagnosis, treatment, control, and prevention of infections caused by Rhodococcus equi in foals. J Vet Intern Med 2011;25(6):1209–1220.
    pubmed: 22092608
  3. Arnold-Lehna D, Venner M, Berghaus LJ. Changing policy to treat foals with Rhodococcus equi pneumonia in the later course of disease decreases antimicrobial usage without increasing mortality rate. Equine Vet J 2020;52(4):531–537.
    pubmed: 31808183
  4. Ainsworth DM, Beck KA, Boatwright CE. Lack of residual lung damage in horses in which Rhodococcus equi-induced pneumonia had been diagnosed. Am J Vet Res 1993;54(12):2115–2120.
    pubmed: 8116948
  5. Cohen ND. Rhodococcus equi foal pneumonia. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2014;30(3):609–622.
    pubmed: 25282322
  6. Li N, Wu C, Cao P. Multiple systemic infections caused by Rhodococcus equi: a case report. Access Microbiol 2024;6(2):000600.
    pmc: PMC10928407pubmed: 38482363
  7. Lin WV, Kruse RL, Yang K. Diagnosis and management of pulmonary infection due to Rhodococcus equi. Clin Microbiol Infect 2019;25(3):310–315.
    pubmed: 29777923
  8. Golub B, Falk G, Spink WW. Lung abscesses due to Corynebacterium equi Report of first human infection. Ann Intern Med 1967;66(6):1174–1177.
    pubmed: 6067513
  9. Vázquez-Boland JA, Meijer WG. The pathogenic actinobacterium Rhodococcus equi: what's in a name?. Mol Microbiol 2019;112(1):1–15.
    pmc: PMC6852188pubmed: 31099908
  10. Giguère S, Prescott JF. Clinical manifestations, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Rhodococcus equi infections in foals. Vet Microbiol 1997;56(3-4):313–334.
    pubmed: 9226845
  11. Tan C, Prescott JF, Patterson MC. Molecular characterization of a lipid-modified virulence-associated protein of Rhodococcus equi and its potential in protective immunity. Can J Vet Res 1995;59(1):51–59.
    pmc: PMC1263734pubmed: 7704843
  12. Phumoonna T, Barton MD, Heuzenroeder MW. Recognition of a B-cell epitope of the VapA protein of Rhodococcus equi in newborn and experimentally infected foals. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health 2005;52(6):291–295.
    pubmed: 16219093
  13. Hooper-McGrevy KE, Wilkie BN, Prescott JF. Virulence-associated protein-specific serum immunoglobulin G-isotype expression in young foals protected against Rhodococcus equi pneumonia by oral immunization with virulent R. equi. Vaccine 2005;23(50):5760–5767.
    pubmed: 16112256
  14. Singh A, Yadav D, Rai KM. Enhanced expression of rabies virus surface G-protein in Escherichia coli using SUMO fusion. Protein J 2012;31(1):68–74.
    pmc: PMC7087916pubmed: 22134654
  15. Cauchard S, Bertrand F, Barrier-Battut I. Assessment of the safety and immunogenicity of Rhodococcus equi-secreted proteins combined with either a liquid nanoparticle (IMS 3012) or a polymeric (PET GEL A) water-based adjuvant in adult horses and foals--identification of promising new candidate antigens. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2014;157(3-4):164–174.
    pubmed: 24445196
  16. Erganis O, Sayin Z, Hadimli HH. The effectiveness of anti-R equi hyperimmune plasma against R equi challenge in thoroughbred Arabian foals of mares vaccinated with R equi vaccine. ScientificWorldJournal 2014;2014:480732.
    pmc: PMC3997159pubmed: 24982958
  17. Erganiş O, Hadimli HH, Sayin Z. Efficacy of experimental inactivated and live Rhodococcus equi vaccines for thoroughbred Arabian mares in mice. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2015;39(3):295–301.
  18. Erganiş O, Sakmanoğlu A, Sayin Z. Comparison of seropotency of Rhodococcus equi candidate vaccines with montanide IMS 3012 and montanide PET GEL A adjuvants in thoroughbred Arabian mares. Proceedings: 4th International VETIstanbul Group Congress; Almaty, Kazakhstan 2017. pp. O–17.
  19. Vanniasinkam T, Barton MD, Heuzenroeder MW. Immune response to vaccines based upon the VapA protein of the horse pathogen, Rhodococcus equi, in a murine model. Int J Med Microbiol 2005;294(7):437–445.
    pubmed: 15715172
  20. Giguère S, Cohen ND, Chaffin MK. Rhodococcus equi: clinical manifestations, virulence, and immunity. J Vet Intern Med 2011;25(6):1221–1230.
    pubmed: 22092609
  21. Giles C, Vanniasinkam T, Ndi S. Rhodococcus equi (Prescottella equi) vaccines; the future of vaccine development. Equine Vet J 2015;47(5):510–518.
    pubmed: 24945608
  22. Jain S, Bloom BR, Hondalus MK. Deletion of vapA encoding virulence associated protein A attenuates the intracellular actinomycete Rhodococcus equi. Mol Microbiol 2003;50(1):115–128.
    pubmed: 14507368
  23. Cauchard J, Taouji S, Sevin C. Immunogenicity of synthetic Rhodococcus equi virulence-associated protein peptides in neonate foals. Int J Med Microbiol 2006;296(6):389–396.
    pubmed: 16782401
  24. Fernandez AS, Prescott JF, Nicholson VM. Protective effect against Rhodococcus equi infection in mice of IgG purified from horses vaccinated with virulence associated protein (VapA)-enriched antigens. Vet Microbiol 1997;56(3-4):187–192.
    pubmed: 9226833
  25. Prescott JF, Patterson MC, Nicholson VM. Assessment of the immunogenic potential of Rhodococcus equi virulence associated protein (VapA) in mice. Vet Microbiol 1997;56(3-4):213–225.
    pubmed: 9226836
  26. Oliveira AF, Ferraz LC, Brocchi M. Oral administration of a live attenuated Salmonella vaccine strain expressing the VapA protein induces protection against infection by Rhodococcus equi. Microbes Infect 2007;9(3):382–390.
    pubmed: 17307012
  27. Kohler AK, Stone DM, Hines MT. Rhodococcus equi secreted antigens are immunogenic and stimulate a type 1 recall response in the lungs of horses immune to R. equi infection. Infect Immun 2003;71(11):6329–6337.
    pmc: PMC219552pubmed: 14573652
  28. Cauchard J, Sevin C, Ballet JJ. Foal IgG and opsonising anti-Rhodococcus equi antibodies after immunization of pregnant mares with a protective VapA candidate vaccine. Vet Microbiol 2004;104(1-2):73–81.
    pubmed: 15530741
  29. Pashine A, Valiante NM, Ulmer JB. Targeting the innate immune response with improved vaccine adjuvants. Nat Med 2005;11(4 Suppl):S63–S68.
    pubmed: 15812492

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.