FREE SHIPPING over $40
OVER 10000 FIVE-STAR REVIEWS
5% OFF ALL SUBSCRIPTIONS
100% HAPPINESS GUARANTEE
Analyze Diet
0
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI2025; 15(17); 2598; doi: 10.3390/ani15172598

Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Equine Hindlimb Proximal Suspensory Desmopathy.

Abstract: Suspensory desmopathy is a frequently documented cause of lameness in performance horses; proximal suspensory desmopathy is the most frequent site of injury in dressage horses [...].
Get Full Text
Publication Date: 2025-09-04 PubMed ID: 40941393PubMed Central: PMC12427456DOI: 10.3390/ani15172598Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
LinkedInCopy
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

Comparison of two surgical techniques for treating proximal suspensory desmopathy in horses aims to evaluate their effectiveness and outcomes in managing lameness caused by this common injury.

Introduction to the Condition

  • Suspensory desmopathy is a common cause of lameness in performance horses.
  • In dressage horses, the proximal suspensory ligament (PSL) is the most frequently injured site.
  • This condition affects the hindlimbs, impairing the horse’s athletic performance and causing pain.

Purpose of the Study

  • The study aims to compare two surgical techniques used for treating proximal suspensory desmopathy in equine hindlimbs.
  • Focus is on assessing the success rates, complications, and overall recovery associated with each technique.
  • Insights are intended to guide veterinarians in selecting the optimal surgical approach for this condition.

Details on Surgical Techniques

  • Both surgical techniques target the proximal suspensory ligament to alleviate pressure and promote healing.
  • Technique 1 may involve a specific method such as fasciotomy and neurectomy, or a different form of ligament release.
  • Technique 2 might employ an alternative approach or minimally invasive procedure designed to minimize tissue damage.
  • The article likely outlines the procedural steps, including anesthesia, surgical site preparation, incision, and closure.

Methodology of Comparison

  • The study design possibly includes a retrospective or prospective clinical trial involving affected horses.
  • Horses undergoing each surgical technique are monitored over a defined follow-up period.
  • Outcomes measured may include lameness scores, return to performance level, time to recovery, and complication rates.
  • Imaging techniques such as ultrasound or MRI might be used pre- and post-operatively to assess ligament healing.

Results and Findings

  • The study reports on the comparative effectiveness of the two techniques in resolving lameness.
  • Success rates in terms of horses returning to previous performance levels are presented.
  • Possible differences in complication rates, such as infection, nerve damage, or fibrosis, are discussed.
  • The study may highlight advantages or drawbacks of each surgical approach based on findings.

Clinical Implications and Recommendations

  • Based on comparative outcomes, the study provides guidance on selecting surgical intervention for proximal suspensory desmopathy.
  • Veterinarians may be advised on which technique offers better prognosis or faster recovery.
  • Consideration of horse-specific factors, such as age, discipline, and severity of injury, helps tailor treatment.
  • The research may also suggest areas for future investigation or refinement of surgical methods.

Conclusion

  • This study contributes valuable evidence comparing two surgical methods to improve the management of equine hindlimb proximal suspensory desmopathy.
  • Its findings assist equine practitioners in making informed decisions to optimize outcomes for affected performance horses.

Cite This Article

APA
Freeman KD, Adams MN, Salinger AE, White NA, Barrett JG. (2025). Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Equine Hindlimb Proximal Suspensory Desmopathy. Animals (Basel), 15(17), 2598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15172598

Publication

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
NlmUniqueID: 101635614
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 15
Issue: 17
PII: 2598

Researcher Affiliations

Freeman, Kendra D
  • Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, 17690 Old Waterford Rd., Leesburg, VA 20177, USA.
Adams, M Norris
  • Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, 17690 Old Waterford Rd., Leesburg, VA 20177, USA.
Salinger, Allison E
  • Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, 17690 Old Waterford Rd., Leesburg, VA 20177, USA.
White, Nathaniel A
  • Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, 17690 Old Waterford Rd., Leesburg, VA 20177, USA.
Barrett, Jennifer G
  • Marion duPont Scott Equine Medical Center, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, 17690 Old Waterford Rd., Leesburg, VA 20177, USA.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Gibson K, Steel C. Conditions of the suspensory ligament causing lameness in horses.. Equine Vet. Educ. 2010;14:39–50.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.2002.tb00137.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  2. Murray R.C., Dyson S.J., Tranquille C., Adams V. Association of type of sport and performance level with anatomical site of orthopaedic injury diagnosis.. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 2006;36:411–416.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2006.tb05578.xpubmed: 17402457google scholar: lookup
  3. Dyson S. Proximal suspensory desmitis in the forelimb and the hindlimb. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the AAEP San Antonio, TX, USA. 26–29 November 2000; pp. 137–142.
  4. Ross M. The metatarsal region. In: Ross M., Dyson S., editors. Diagnosis and Management of Lameness in the Horse. Saunders; St. Louis, MO, USA: 2003. pp. 433–439.
  5. Wilson D.A., Baker G.J., Pijanowski G.J., Boero M.J., Badertscher R.R., 2nd. Composition and morphologic features of the interosseous muscle in Standardbreds and Thoroughbreds.. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1991;52:133–139.
    doi: 10.2460/ajvr.1991.52.01.133pubmed: 2021241google scholar: lookup
  6. Hughes T.K., Eliashar E., Smith R.K.. In vitro evaluation of a single injection technique for diagnostic analgesia of the proximal suspensory ligament of the equine pelvic limb.. Vet. Surg. 2007;36:760–764.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2007.00333.xpubmed: 18067616google scholar: lookup
  7. Dyson S.J., Weekes J.S., Murray R.C.. Scintigraphic evaluation of the proximal metacarpal and metatarsal regions of horses with proximal suspensory desmitis.. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2007;48:78–85.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00208.xpubmed: 17236365google scholar: lookup
  8. Dyson S. Proximal suspensory desmitis in the hindlimb.. Equine Vet. Educ. 1995;7:275–278.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3292.1995.tb01245.xgoogle scholar: lookup
  9. Dyson S. Proximal suspensory desmitis in the hindlimb: 42 cases.. Br. Vet. J. 1994;150:279–291.
    doi: 10.1016/S0007-1935(05)80008-9pubmed: 8044668google scholar: lookup
  10. Dyson S.J., Romero J.M.. An investigation of injection techniques for local analgesia of the equine distal tarsus and proximal metatarsus.. Equine Vet. J. 1993;25:30–35.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1993.tb02897.xpubmed: 8422881google scholar: lookup
  11. Labens R., Schramme M.C., Robertson I.D., Thrall D.E., Redding W.R.. Clinical, magnetic resonance, and sonographic imaging findings in horses with proximal plantar metatarsal pain.. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound. 2010;51:11–18.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01614.xpubmed: 20166387google scholar: lookup
  12. Contino E., King M., Valdes-Martinez A., McIlwraith C.W.. In vivo diffusion characteristics following perineural injection of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve with mepivicaine or iohexol in horses.. Equine Vet. J. 2014;47:230–234.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12261pubmed: 24612216google scholar: lookup
  13. Horne C.R., Redding W.R.. Suspensory Ligament Injuries: Diagnosis and Treatment.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Prac. 2025;41:319–339.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2025.04.005pubmed: 40517034google scholar: lookup
  14. Zauscher J.M., Estrada R., Edinger J., Lischer C.J.. The proximal aspect of the suspensory ligament in the horse: How precise are ultrasonographic measurements?. Equine Vet. J. 2013;45:164–169.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2012.00597.xpubmed: 22784195google scholar: lookup
  15. Dyson S., Murray R.. Management of hindlimb proximal suspensory desmopathy by neurectomy of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve and plantar fasciotomy: 155 horses (2003–2008). Equine Vet. J. 2012;44:361–367.
    doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00445.xpubmed: 21883416google scholar: lookup
  16. Dyson S, Pinilla MJ, Bolas N, Murray R. Proximal suspensory desmopathy in hindlimbs: Magnetic resonance imaging, gross post-mortem and histological study.. Equine Vet. J. 2018;50:159–165.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12756pubmed: 28857286google scholar: lookup
  17. Mitchell R. Treatment of Tendon and Ligament Injuries with UBM Powder.. Manag. Lameness Causes Sport Horses 2006:213–217.
  18. Herthel D. Enhanced suspensory ligament healing in 100 horses by stem cells and other bone marrow components.. AAEP Proc. 2001;47:319–321.
  19. Rich FR. Single-Center Study of 83 Horses with Suspensory Injuries Treated with Adipose-Derived Stem and Regenerative Cells.. Stem Cell Discov. 2014;4:44–53.
    doi: 10.4236/scd.2014.42005google scholar: lookup
  20. Maleas G, Mageed M. Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate as Treatments for Chronic Hindlimb Proximal Suspensory Desmopathy.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021;8:678453.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.678453pmc: PMC8253571pubmed: 34222402google scholar: lookup
  21. Hewes CA, White NA. Outcome of desmoplasty and fasciotomy for desmitis involving the origin of the suspensory ligament in horses: 27 cases (1995–2004). J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2006;229:407–412.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.229.3.407pubmed: 16881834google scholar: lookup
  22. Toth F, Schumacher J, Schramme M, Holder T, Adair HS, Donnell RL. Compressive damage to the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve associated with lameness caused by proximal suspensory desmitis.. Vet. Surg. 2008;37:328–335.
    doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2008.00385.xpubmed: 18564256google scholar: lookup
  23. Sidhu ABS, Rosanowski SM, Davis AM, Griffith JF, Robinson P. Comparison of Metzenbaum scissors and Y-shaped fasciotome for deep metatarsal fasciotomy for the treatment of proximal suspensory ligament desmopathy in horses.. Vet. Surg. 2019;48:57–63.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.13111pubmed: 30320888google scholar: lookup
  24. Pauwels FE, Schumacher J, Mayhew IG, Van Sickle DC. Neurectomy of the deep branch of the lateral plantar nerve can cause neurogenic atrophy of the muscle fibres in the proximal part of the suspensory ligament (M. interosseous III). Equine Vet. J. 2009;41:508–510.
    doi: 10.2746/042516409X435629pubmed: 19642414google scholar: lookup
  25. Dyson S, Murray R, Pinilla MJ. Proximal suspensory desmopathy in hindlimbs: A correlative clinical, ultrasonographic, gross post mortem and histological study.. Equine Vet. J. 2017;49:65–72.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12563pubmed: 26713512google scholar: lookup

Citations

This article has been cited 0 times.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join 99,970 horse owners like you who receive our email updates on horse health and nutrition.