Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS2003; 32(6); 501-506; doi: 10.1053/jvet.2003.50057

Complications associated with cannula insertion techniques used for laparoscopy in standing horses.

Abstract: To report our experience and complications associated with different cannula insertion techniques for laparoscopy in standing horses. Methods: Retrospective study. Methods: Forty horses that had laparoscopy for diagnostic or surgical purposes. Methods: After a physical examination, including rectal palpation, standing laparoscopy was performed in 40 sedated horses. Local anesthetic was injected at each site of cannula insertion in the left flank. Horses were divided into 5 groups: Pneumoperitoneum was induced before cannula insertion using a Verres needle (group 1, n = 3) or a 12-g catheter (group 2, n = 14); the cannula was inserted before inducing a pneumoperitoneum (group 3, n = 9); the cannula was inserted under visual control, using an operating laparoscope (group 4, n = 2) or a Visiport Optical Trocar (group 5, n = 12). Horses were observed for 7 days. Results: Problems with insufflation or cannula insertion occurred in 12 horses: 6 had peritoneal detachment, 4 had a splenic puncture, and 2 had descending colon puncture. Eleven of these complications occurred in groups 1 to 3 and only 1 in groups 4 and 5. Conclusions: The Visiport optical device allows controlled insertion of the initial trocar, and thus avoided potential problems associated with "blind" cannula insertion techniques and was used effectively in horses that had feed withheld for 12 hours. This technique enables direct insertion of a cannula directly into the right flank. Conclusions: Complications associated with initial cannula insertion in the paralumbar fossa, for laparoscopy, in standing horses can be minimized with the use of an optical cannula.
Publication Date: 2003-12-03 PubMed ID: 14648527DOI: 10.1053/jvet.2003.50057Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study evaluates the complications that arise from different techniques used for the insertion of a cannula during laparoscopy procedures in standing horses. The research found that using an optical cannula can significantly minimize these complications.

Methodology of the Study

Different cannula insertion techniques for laparoscopy were applied on forty sedated horses. A physical examination inclusive of rectal palpation was performed on these horses, and local anesthetic was injected at each cannula insertion site in the left flank. The horses were divided into five groups based on the cannula insertion techniques:

  • Group 1: Cannula insertion after pneumoperitoneum induction with a Verres needle.
  • Group 2: Cannula insertion after pneumoperitoneum induction with a 12-g catheter.
  • Group 3: Cannula insertion before pneumoperitoneum induction.
  • Group 4: Cannula insertion under visual control with an operating laparoscope.
  • Group 5: Cannula insertion under visual control with a Visiport Optical Trocar.

The horses were then observed for a duration of seven days.

Study Findings

The study revealed complications involving insufflation or cannula insertion in twelve horses. Of these complications:

  • Six were identified as peritoneal detachments.
  • Four involved a splenic puncture.
  • Two cases involved puncture of the descending colon.

Most complications were found to occur in groups that used traditional or “blind” insertion techniques (Groups 1 to 3), while only one occurred in the groups that used visual control for cannula insertion (Groups 4 and 5).

Conclusions from the Study

The Visiport optical device showed an effective reduction of complications. This device offers controlled insertion of the initial trocar, which helps to prevent potential issues relating to “blind” cannula insertion techniques. The technique was successfully adapted in horses that were withheld feed for 12 hours and allows the direct insertion of a cannula into the right flank. In conclusion, complications associated with the initial stage of cannula insertion in the paralumbar fossa for laparoscopy in standing horses can be significantly reduced with the use of an optical cannula.

Cite This Article

APA
Desmaizières LM, Martinot S, Lepage OM, Bareiss E, Cadoré JL. (2003). Complications associated with cannula insertion techniques used for laparoscopy in standing horses. Vet Surg, 32(6), 501-506. https://doi.org/10.1053/jvet.2003.50057

Publication

ISSN: 0161-3499
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 32
Issue: 6
Pages: 501-506

Researcher Affiliations

Desmaizières, Louis-Marie
  • Département Hippique, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Lyon, France.
Martinot, Stephane
    Lepage, Olivier M
      Bareiss, Emmanuel
        Cadoré, Jean-Luc

          MeSH Terms

          • Anesthetics, Local
          • Animals
          • Catheterization / adverse effects
          • Catheterization / instrumentation
          • Catheterization / methods
          • Catheterization / veterinary
          • Female
          • Horses / surgery
          • Laparoscopes / veterinary
          • Laparoscopy / adverse effects
          • Laparoscopy / methods
          • Laparoscopy / veterinary
          • Male
          • Needles
          • Postoperative Complications / etiology
          • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
          • Retrospective Studies

          Citations

          This article has been cited 5 times.
          1. Vázquez FJ, Vitoria A, Gómez-Arrue J, Fuente S, Barrachina L, de Blas I, Romero A. Complications in Laparoscopic Access in Standing Horses Using Cannula and Trocar Units Developed for Human Medicine.. Vet Sci 2023 Jan 15;10(1).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci10010061pubmed: 36669062google scholar: lookup
          2. Straticò P, Guerri G, Palozzo A, Varasano V, Petrizzi L. Current Use of Equine Laparoscopy in Urogenital Disorders: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2000 to 2021.. Vet Sci 2022 Jan 22;9(2).
            doi: 10.3390/vetsci9020041pubmed: 35202295google scholar: lookup
          3. Hendrickson DA. A review of equine laparoscopy.. ISRN Vet Sci 2012;2012:492650.
            doi: 10.5402/2012/492650pubmed: 23762585google scholar: lookup
          4. Pizzi R, Cracknell J, Dalrymple L. Postmortem Evaluation of Left Flank Laparoscopic Access in an Adult Female Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis).. Vet Med Int 2010;2010:789465.
            doi: 10.4061/2010/789465pubmed: 20445792google scholar: lookup
          5. Babkine M, Desrochers A, Bouré L, Hélie P. Ventral laparoscopic abomasopexy on adult cows.. Can Vet J 2006 Apr;47(4):343-8.
            pubmed: 16642872