Analyze Diet
Veterinary surgery : VS1995; 24(6); 506-514; doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01362.x

Complications of celiotomy incisions in horses.

Abstract: Complications of celiotomy incisions were evaluated retrospectively in 274 horses that survived at least 1 month after surgery, or died or were euthanatized within 1 month of surgery, as a direct result of these complications. Horses were divided into four groups; group A, a ventral median celiotomy for intestinal disease; group B, ventral median celiotomy for nonintestinal disease; group C, repair of an umbilical hernia; and group D, celiotomy in a region other than the midline. Specific incisional complications were peri-incisional edema, drainage, incisional abscess, suture sinus, and dehiscence. Incision-related complications occurred in 30% of the horses (group A, 40%; group B 18%; group C, 7%; and group D, 88%). Complications occurred more frequently in group D than group A (P = .009), which were higher than in groups B and C (P < .00001). Incisional hernia occurred in 28 of 256 (11%) horses that survived at least 4 months and were available for follow-up. Hernia formation was more common P < .00001) in horses that had other incisional complications (23 horses) than those without (5 horses). Serous or purulent incisional drainage, were more likely to be associated with hernia formation than was serosanguineous drainage or other incisional complications.
Publication Date: 1995-11-01 PubMed ID: 8560746DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01362.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research article investigates the complications related to celiotomy incisions in 274 horses that either survived for at least one month post-surgery, or died or were euthanized due to the complications within a month of surgery. The horses were divided into four groups based on the nature of their surgery, and complications like peri-incisional edema, drainage, incisional abscess, suture sinus, and dehiscence were studied. Results showed that 30% of the horses experienced incision-related complications, with those in certain surgical groups showing higher rates of complications than others, and incisional hernia development was significantly more common in horses that had other incisional complications.

Methodology

  • 274 horses were studied for this research. They were included if they either survived for at least one month after surgery, or died or were euthanized within a month due to direct complications from the surgery.
  • The horses were divided into four groups based on the type of surgery they had undergone. Group A had a ventral median celiotomy for intestinal disease, Group B had the same surgery for non-intestinal disease, Group C underwent repair of an umbilical hernia, and Group D had celiotomy in a region other than the midline.

Findings

  • Out of all the horses, 30% experienced incision-related complications.
  • Complications were most frequent in Group D (88%), followed by Group A (40%), Group B (18%), and Group C (7%). The difference in complications rates between the groups was statistically significant, particularly between Group D and Group A, and between Group A and Groups B and C.
  • Incisional hernia occurred in 11% of the horses that were available for follow-up after surviving at least 4 months.
  • In relation to the horses that developed an incisional hernia, it was statistically more common in horses that had other incisional complications. Out of the 28 horses that developed hernias, 23 had other incisional complications.
  • Horses with serous or purulent incisional drainage were more prone to hernia formation, as compared to those with serosanguineous drainage or other incisional complications.

Conclusions

  • The research concluded that complications from celiotomy incisions in horses are fairly common, occurring in 30% of cases.
  • The type and locale of surgery influences the likelihood of complications, with non-midline surgeries showing the highest rates of complications.
  • Horses with incisional complications were found to be more in danger of developing hernias, particularly in cases involving serous or purulent drainage conditions.

Cite This Article

APA
Wilson DA, Baker GJ, Boero MJ. (1995). Complications of celiotomy incisions in horses. Vet Surg, 24(6), 506-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.1995.tb01362.x

Publication

ISSN: 0161-3499
NlmUniqueID: 8113214
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 24
Issue: 6
Pages: 506-514

Researcher Affiliations

Wilson, D A
  • Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, USA.
Baker, G J
    Boero, M J

      MeSH Terms

      • Abdomen / surgery
      • Age Factors
      • Animals
      • Body Weight
      • Female
      • Horse Diseases / surgery
      • Horses
      • Intestinal Diseases / surgery
      • Intestinal Diseases / veterinary
      • Male
      • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
      • Postoperative Complications / veterinary
      • Retrospective Studies
      • Sex Distribution
      • Sutures / classification
      • Sutures / veterinary
      • Time Factors
      • Treatment Outcome

      Citations

      This article has been cited 16 times.
      1. Rockow M, Griffenhagen G, Landolt G, Hendrickson D, Pezzanite L. Current Antimicrobial Use in Horses Undergoing Exploratory Celiotomy: A Survey of Board-Certified Equine Specialists. Animals (Basel) 2023 Apr 22;13(9).
        doi: 10.3390/ani13091433pubmed: 37174470google scholar: lookup
      2. Gehlen H, Klein KS, Merle R, Lübke-Becker A, Stoeckle SD. Does colonization with MRSA, ESBL - producing Enterobacteriaceae, and/or Acinetobacter baumannii - increase the risk for postoperative surgical site infection?. Vet Med Sci 2023 Mar;9(2):729-737.
        doi: 10.1002/vms3.1073pubmed: 36646070google scholar: lookup
      3. Stöckle SD, Kannapin DA, Kauter AML, Lübke-Becker A, Walther B, Merle R, Gehlen H. A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Short-Term Perioperative Prophylaxis Regimen to a Long-Term Standard Protocol in Equine Colic Surgery. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021 May 16;10(5).
        doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10050587pubmed: 34065712google scholar: lookup
      4. Averay K, van Galen G, Ward M, Verwilghen D. Effect of three different needle holders on gastrointestinal anastomosis construction time and bursting pressure in equine jejunal segments. BMC Vet Res 2021 Apr 15;17(1):167.
        doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02871-4pubmed: 33858391google scholar: lookup
      5. Crosa AT, Katzman SA, Kelleher ME, Nieto JE, Kilcoyne I, Dechant JE. Incidence of incisional complications after exploratory celiotomy in equids affected with enterolithiasis. Can Vet J 2020 Oct;61(10):1085-1091.
        pubmed: 33012825
      6. Scharner D, Gittel C, Winter K, Blaue D, Schedlbauer C, Vervuert I, Brehm W. Comparison of incisional complications between skin closures using a simple continuous or intradermal pattern: a pilot study in horses undergoing ventral median celiotomy. PeerJ 2018;6:e5772.
        doi: 10.7717/peerj.5772pubmed: 30430040google scholar: lookup
      7. Mijele D, Njoroge M, Kaitho T. Surgical treatment of an umbilical hernia in a free-ranging sub-adult African elephant in Samburu National Reserve, Kenya. Vet Med (Auckl) 2015;6:165-170.
        doi: 10.2147/VMRR.S74756pubmed: 30101103google scholar: lookup
      8. Sassot LN, Ragle CA, Farnsworth KD, Lund CM. Morcellation for testes extraction in horses undergoing standing laparoscopic cryptorchidectomy. Can Vet J 2017 Nov;58(11):1215-1220.
        pubmed: 29089662
      9. Rousseau M, Anderson DE, Rozell TG, Hand JM, Faris BR. Comparison of polyglactin-910 and polydioxanone for closure of the linea alba following caudal ventral midline laparotomy in sheep. Can Vet J 2015 Sep;56(9):959-63.
        pubmed: 26345301
      10. Southwood LL, Long A, Perez J, Daniel S, Bittinger K, Aitken M, Redding L. Effect of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis duration for colic surgery on complications and resistome. Equine Vet J 2026 Mar;58(2):390-403.
        doi: 10.1002/evj.70137pubmed: 41369016google scholar: lookup
      11. Baldwin CM, Gillen A. An ex vivo comparison of jejunal transection angles and the effect on lumen diameter following end-to-end jejunojejunal anastomoses. Vet Surg 2026 Feb;55(2):484-490.
        doi: 10.1111/vsu.14294pubmed: 40525474google scholar: lookup
      12. Crabtree NE, Capper AM, McKinnon LH, Epstein KL. Perioperative factors and outcomes associated with antimicrobial therapy duration in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy. Can Vet J 2025 Jun;66(6):653-662.
        pubmed: 40510283
      13. Cerullo A, Di Nicola MR, Scilimati N, Bertoletti A, Pollicino G, Moroni B, Pepe M, Nannarone S, Gialletti R, Passamonti F. Intra- and Post-Operative Bacteriological Surveys of Surgical Site in Horses: A Single-Centre Study. Microorganisms 2025 Apr 17;13(4).
      14. Griessel TS, Muñoz Morán JA, Byaruhanga C, Smit Y. A single-centre retrospective study of surgical site infection following equine colic surgery (2013‒2021). Vet Rec 2025 May 17;196(10):e5227.
        doi: 10.1002/vetr.5227pubmed: 40123113google scholar: lookup
      15. Isgren CM, Pinchbeck GL, Salem SE, Hann MJ, Townsend NB, Cullen MD, Archer DC. Evaluation of a stent dressing and abdominal bandage on surgical site infection following emergency equine laparotomy: A randomised controlled trial. Equine Vet J 2025 Nov;57(6):1466-1477.
        doi: 10.1111/evj.14482pubmed: 39967458google scholar: lookup
      16. Recchi L, Cribb N, Côté N, Dubois MS, Koenig J, Valverde A, Monteith G. Retrospective study of perioperative antimicrobial use in horses undergoing elective laparoscopy at a single institution. Can J Vet Res 2024 Jan;88(1):24-29.
        pubmed: 38222072