Analyze Diet
Anatomia, histologia, embryologia2000; 29(5); 295-299; doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0264.2000.00278.x

Computed tomography of normal cranioencephalic structures in two horses.

Abstract: The purpose of this investigation was to define the anatomy of the cranioencephalic structures in horses using computed tomography (CT). Transverse images of two isolated equine cadaver heads were obtained using a Toshiba 600 HQ (third-generation equipment TCT). CT images were compared to corresponding frozen cross-sections of the cadaver head. Relevant anatomical structures were identified and labelled at each level. The resulting images provided excellent anatomic detail of the structures of the central nervous system and associated formations. Annotated CT images from this study are intended as a reference for clinical CT imaging studies of the equine head.
Publication Date: 2000-12-05 PubMed ID: 11103519DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0264.2000.00278.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This study aims to provide detailed understanding of the horse’s cranial and brain structures using computed tomography (CT). The research was conducted on two horse cadaver heads, whose CT images were compared with frozen cross-sections to identify and label significant anatomical aspects. The study offers beneficial insight for future clinical imaging of equine heads.

Research Methods

  • The researchers used computed tomography, a type of imaging technology that provides detailed pictures of areas inside the body, to scan the heads of two horse cadavers.
  • These scans were taken using a Toshiba 600 HQ machine, classified as third-generation computed tomography equipment.
  • Transverse images were captured, that is, the images were taken cross-sectionally, slicing through the top to the bottom of the head.

Comparison and Labelling

  • The CT images that were obtained were then compared to frozen cross-sections of the same cadaver heads. This technique involves freezing the subject and then slicing it thinly to be viewed under a microscope.
  • The researchers matched the structures seen in the CT images to the structures visible in the frozen cross-sections.
  • Through this comparison, they were able to accurately identify and label various anatomical structures.

Results and Applications

  • The researchers were able to obtain clear and detailed images of the cranioencephalic structures, which includes the brain and its associated formations, like nerves and blood vessels.
  • By comparing these images with frozen cross-sections, they were also able to annotate these images with the names of various anatomical structures.
  • This set of annotated CT images could then serve as a reference guide for future studies and clinical imaging of horse heads, improving understanding in this field.

Cite This Article

APA
Arencibia A, Vázquez JM, Rivero M, Latorre R, Sandoval JA, Vilar JM, Ramírez JA. (2000). Computed tomography of normal cranioencephalic structures in two horses. Anat Histol Embryol, 29(5), 295-299. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0264.2000.00278.x

Publication

ISSN: 0340-2096
NlmUniqueID: 7704218
Country: Germany
Language: English
Volume: 29
Issue: 5
Pages: 295-299

Researcher Affiliations

Arencibia, A
  • Departamento de Morfología (Anatomía y Embriología), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Vázquez, J M
    Rivero, M
      Latorre, R
        Sandoval, J A
          Vilar, J M
            Ramírez, J A

              MeSH Terms

              • Animals
              • Brain / diagnostic imaging
              • Horses / anatomy & histology
              • Male
              • Skull / diagnostic imaging
              • Tomography, X-Ray Computed / veterinary

              Citations

              This article has been cited 10 times.
              1. Masoudifard M, Zehtabvar O, Modarres SH, Pariz F, Tohidifar M. CT anatomy of the head in the Ile de France sheep. Vet Med Sci 2022 Jul;8(4):1694-1708.
                doi: 10.1002/vms3.834pubmed: 35639620google scholar: lookup
              2. Goodarzi N, Zehtabvar O, Tohidifar M. Applied anatomy of the skull in the Arabian horse: A computed tomographic, cross-sectional, volumetric and morphometric study. Vet Med Sci 2021 Nov;7(6):2225-2233.
                doi: 10.1002/vms3.618pubmed: 34453414google scholar: lookup
              3. Kaminsky J, Bienert-Zeit A, Hellige M, Rohn K, Ohnesorge B. Comparison of image quality and in vivo appearance of the normal equine nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses in computed tomography and high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging. BMC Vet Res 2016 Jan 19;12:13.
                doi: 10.1186/s12917-016-0643-6pubmed: 26786270google scholar: lookup
              4. Bahar S, Bolat D, Dayan MO, Paksoy Y. Two- and three-dimensional anatomy of paranasal sinuses in Arabian foals. J Vet Med Sci 2014 Jan;76(1):37-44.
                doi: 10.1292/jvms.13-0172pubmed: 24004969google scholar: lookup
              5. Arencibia A, Blanco D, González N, Rivero MA. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging features of the temporomandibular joint in two normal camels. Anat Res Int 2012;2012:242065.
                doi: 10.1155/2012/242065pubmed: 22567308google scholar: lookup
              6. Perrier M, Schwarz T, Gonzalez O, Brounts S. Squamous cell carcinoma invading the right temporomandibular joint in a Belgian mare. Can Vet J 2010 Aug;51(8):885-7.
                pubmed: 21037891
              7. De Zani D, Borgonovo S, Biggi M, Vignati S, Scandella M, Lazzaretti S, Modina S, Zani D. Topographic comparative study of paranasal sinuses in adult horses by computed tomography, sinuscopy, and sectional anatomy. Vet Res Commun 2010 Jun;34 Suppl 1:S13-6.
                doi: 10.1007/s11259-010-9381-6pubmed: 20461459google scholar: lookup
              8. Jaber JR, Morales-Bordon D, Morales M, Paz-Oliva P, Encinoso M, Morales I, Roldan-Medina N, Ramírez Zarzosa G, Morales-Espino A, Ros A, Conde-Felipe MM. Comparative Analysis of Sectional Anatomy, Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance of the Cadaveric Six-Banded Armadillo (Euphractus sexcintus) Head. Vet Sci 2025 May 1;12(5).
                doi: 10.3390/vetsci12050433pubmed: 40431527google scholar: lookup
              9. Morales-Espino A, Fumero-Hernández M, Suárez-Cabrera F, Encinoso M, Conde-Felipe MM, Jaber JR. Computed Tomography Anatomy of the Juvenile Cory's Shearwater (Calonectris borealis) Normal Nasal Cavity. Animals (Basel) 2024 Oct 18;14(20).
                doi: 10.3390/ani14203015pubmed: 39457944google scholar: lookup
              10. Jaber JR, Morales Bordon D, Arencibia A, Corbera JA, Conde-Felipe M, Ayala MD, Encinoso M. Correlation between Cross-Sectional Anatomy and Computed Tomography of the Normal Six-Banded Armadillo (Euphractus sexcintus) Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinuses. Animals (Basel) 2024 Apr 8;14(7).
                doi: 10.3390/ani14071135pubmed: 38612374google scholar: lookup