Analyze Diet
Journal of equine veterinary science2019; 82; 102770; doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.06.009

Conspicuity Equipment and Its Contribution to the Welfare of Horse and Rider Combinations Using the Road System in the United Kingdom.

Abstract: Limited research exists regarding proximity of vehicles to "vulnerable road users" and effects of "conspicuity equipment". Previous studies stated over 60% of horse/rider combinations experience near-miss traffic collisions in any one year, whereas use of fluorescent/reflective (FR) equipment did not decrease occurrences. Similarly, research into vehicle proximity to bicycles reported no significance in cyclists wearing FR. This study undertook a similar field experiment using a horse/rider combination wearing different conspicuity equipment to test proximity distance. Two horses with similar height, age, base coat color, and temperament were ridden using four conspicuity measures 60 times each (n = 240) along a straight 0.8 km lane. Measures were chosen by random crossover with two selected for each separate trip. These were an FR "tabard", a novel black/white pattern (BW), flashing lights on a helmet (L), and control of mid-blue (C). A novel proximity meter was used on the saddle pommel and distance/approach either front or rear were logged into a voice recorder. Analysis reported a significant difference between all measures and proximities observed (P = .000). Mann-Whitney tests concluded significant differences in proximity in C versus L and BW (P = .000; P = .000), respectively. FR versus C showed no significant difference in proximity (P = .005). L versus BW reported no significant difference in proximity (W = 3640.0, P = .958). Results may suggest wearing conspicuity equipment of L or BW outperforms both C and FR. Further study is recommended to test these findings, and it is pertinent to still consider suggesting the use of FR equipment due to previous positive findings with other road users.
Publication Date: 2019-07-06 PubMed ID: 31732115DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.06.009Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research explores the role of conspicuity equipment in enhancing the safety of horse-and-rider combinations on UK roads. Contrary to past studies, the data suggests that certain types of conspicuity equipment may lead to significant improvements in vehicle proximity to horse-and-rider combinations, potentially making them safer.

Research Background and Objectives

  • The article’s principle goal was to investigate the impact of conspicuity equipment – devices aimed at making horse-and-rider combinations more visible – on vehicle proximity on UK roads.
  • Prior research found more than 60% of these combinations had near-miss traffic collision experiences within a year, and using fluorescent/reflective (FR) equipment did not reduce this.
  • This study meant to compare the effectiveness of various types of conspicuity equipment, including an FR “tabard,” a novel black/white pattern (BW), flashing lights on a helmet (L), and a control of mid-blue (C).

Methodology

  • The research was conducted through a field experiment, wherein two similar horses were ridden 60 times each, wearing different types of conspicuity equipment, for a total of 240 trials.
  • A newly devised proximity meter was affixed to the saddle pommel to measure and record the distance and approach of vehicles from either front or rear.

Findings and Analysis

  • Analysis of the data found significant differences in vehicle proximities to horse-and-rider combinations wearing different types of conspicuity equipment.
  • Mann-Whitney tests (used for ranking and comparing datasets) found significant differences in vehicle proximity for the control (C) in comparison to both flashing lights (L) and the black/white pattern (BW).
  • However, there was no significant difference in vehicle proximity between the fluorescent/reflective tabard (FR) and the control (C), nor between the flashing lights (L) and the black/white pattern (BW).

Conclusions

  • These results suggest that using conspicuity equipment like flashing lights or a black/white pattern may perform better than a fluorescent/reflective tabard or a plain mid-blue outfit in improving the safety of horse-and-rider combinations on the road.
  • The authors recommend further research to verify these findings and highlight the importance of considering the use of FR equipment, as previous research has shown positive effects with other road users.

Cite This Article

APA
Scofield RM, Scofield S, Briggs E. (2019). Conspicuity Equipment and Its Contribution to the Welfare of Horse and Rider Combinations Using the Road System in the United Kingdom. J Equine Vet Sci, 82, 102770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2019.06.009

Publication

ISSN: 0737-0806
NlmUniqueID: 8216840
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 82
Pages: 102770
PII: S0737-0806(19)30440-X

Researcher Affiliations

Scofield, Rose M
  • Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gypsy Lane, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: rscofield@brookes.ac.uk.
Scofield, Simon
  • RAL Space, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK.
Briggs, Emma
  • Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gypsy Lane, Oxford, UK.

MeSH Terms

  • Accidents, Traffic
  • Animals
  • Color
  • Horses
  • United Kingdom

Citations

This article has been cited 2 times.
  1. Pollard D, Furtado T. Public Roads as Places of Interspecies Conflict: A Study of Horse-Human Interactions on UK Roads and Impacts on Equine Exercise. Animals (Basel) 2021 Apr 9;11(4).
    doi: 10.3390/ani11041072pubmed: 33918900google scholar: lookup
  2. Pollard D, Grewar JD. Equestrian Road Safety in the United Kingdom: Factors Associated with Collisions and Horse Fatalities. Animals (Basel) 2020 Dec 15;10(12).
    doi: 10.3390/ani10122403pubmed: 33334012google scholar: lookup