Analyze Diet
Mycopathologia1981; 74(2); 89-105; doi: 10.1007/BF01259464

Coprophilous fungi of the horse.

Abstract: A total of 1267 microfungi, including 35 Myxomycetes, were recorded from the fecal samples of the 60 horses; of these 395 were found on 20 saddle-horse feces, 363 on 20 race-horses and 509 on 20 working horses. Eighty two species representing 53 genera were recorded; of these 7 were Zygomycetes, 18 Ascomycetes, 1 Basidiomycetes and 25 Fungi Imperfecti: 2 Myxomycetes. Common coprophilous fungi are in decreasing order Pilobolus kleinii, Saccobolus depauperatus, Mucor hiemalis, Lasiobolus ciliatus, Podospora curvula, Petriella guttulata, M. circinelloides, Coprinus radiatus, Dictyostelium mucoroides, Sordaria fimicola, C. miser, C. stercorariusm, Acremonium sp., Coprotus granuliformis, Graphium putredinis, Iodophanus carneus, Chaetomium murorum, Podospora communis, P. inaequalis, P. setosa, Saccobolus versicolor and Cladosporium cucumerinum. Species of Myrothecium verrucaria, Actinomucor elegans, Kernia nitida, Spiculostilbella dendritica and Mucor parvispora were found exclusively in working-horses feces. Badhamia sp., Anixiopsis stercoraria, Echinobotryum state of D. stemonitis, Geotrichum candidum and Oidiodendron sp. were found only in saddle-horses feces. Chlamidomyces palmarum, Philocopra sp. were found exclusively in race-horses feces. Notes on infrequent or interesting fungi include Thamnostylum piriforme, Phialocephala dimorphospora, Rhopalomyces elegans and Spiculostilbella dendritica.
Publication Date: 1981-05-08 PubMed ID: 7242651DOI: 10.1007/BF01259464Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article focuses on the study of microfungi found in horse feces. A total of 1267 microfungi were recorded from the feces of 60 horses with varying uses, including saddle horses, race horses, and working horses. The researchers identified 82 species from these fecal samples, detailing which were most common and which were exclusively found in certain types of horses.

Objective and Methodology

  • The primary goal of the study was to identify and catalogue the variety of microfungi present in horse feces, specifically observing diversity among saddle horses, race horses, and working horses.
  • This was achieved through collecting fecal samples from 60 horses and using laboratory analysis to identify the different types of microfungi present within them.

Findings

  • From the collected samples, the researchers discovered a total of 1267 microfungi, which included 35 Myxomycetes.
  • The identification process led to 82 species from 53 genera being recorded, representing a variety of microfungi types such as Zygomycetes, Ascomycetes, Basidiomycetes, Fungi Imperfecti, and Myxomycetes.
  • The authors listed the most common coprophilous fungi in order of decreasing frequency.
  • Some species were found to be exclusive to certain types of horses. For example, species like Myrothecium verrucaria, Actinomucor elegans, among others were only found in working-horses feces. On the other hand, species like Badhamia sp. and Geotrichum candidum were only found in saddle-horses feces.

Implications

  • The research provides valuable insights into the micro-ecosystem of horse feces and the variety of fungi that inhabit them.
  • The identification and documentation of these fungi could be useful for further studies on equine health, as the presence and distribution of these microorganisms could potentially have implications for horse nutrition, digestive health, or susceptibility to disease.
  • The different types of fungi found in the feces of different types of horses also suggests a possible link between the horse’s lifestyle and the diversity of its gut microflora.

Cite This Article

APA
Pointelli E, Santa-maria MA, Caretta G. (1981). Coprophilous fungi of the horse. Mycopathologia, 74(2), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259464

Publication

ISSN: 0301-486X
NlmUniqueID: 7505689
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 74
Issue: 2
Pages: 89-105

Researcher Affiliations

Pointelli, E
    Santa-maria, M A
      Caretta, G

        MeSH Terms

        • Animals
        • Feces / microbiology
        • Fungi / isolation & purification
        • Horses / microbiology

        References

        This article includes 1 references
        1. Angel K, Wicklow DT. Relationships between coprophilous fungi and fecal substrates in a Colorado grassland.. Mycologia 1975 Jan-Feb;67(1):63-74.
          pubmed: 1167620

        Citations

        This article has been cited 4 times.
        1. McGorum BC, Chen Z, Glendinning L, Gweon HS, Hunt L, Ivens A, Keen JA, Pirie RS, Taylor J, Wilkinson T, McLachlan G. Equine grass sickness (a multiple systems neuropathy) is associated with alterations in the gastrointestinal mycobiome. Anim Microbiome 2021 Oct 9;3(1):70.
          doi: 10.1186/s42523-021-00131-2pubmed: 34627407google scholar: lookup
        2. Kong Q, Liu S, Li A, Wang Y, Zhang L, Iqbal M, Jamil T, Shang Z, Suo LS, Li J. Characterization of fungal microbial diversity in healthy and diarrheal Tibetan piglets. BMC Microbiol 2021 Jul 3;21(1):204.
          doi: 10.1186/s12866-021-02242-xpubmed: 34217216google scholar: lookup
        3. Pöggeler S. Evolution of multicopper oxidase genes in coprophilous and non-coprophilous members of the order sordariales. Curr Genomics 2011 Apr;12(2):95-103.
          doi: 10.2174/138920211795564368pubmed: 21966247google scholar: lookup
        4. Li C, Zhou Z, Chen X, Tang Q, Zhang Q, Tang J. Shifted microbial network characteristics govern soil N(2)O emission following paddy-to-vegetable land conversion. Front Microbiol 2026;17:1750894.
          doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1750894pubmed: 41695958google scholar: lookup