Abstract: Rotaviral diarrhea in foals is caused by two dominant G3P[12] and G14P[12] genotypes of equine rotavirus A (ERVA). Protection of foals against ERVA infection and disease is achievable by passive antibody transfer through colostrum from mares receiving inactivated monovalent G3P[12] vaccine. Simian rotavirus SA11 G3P[2] is also included in ERVA vaccines to protect foals. Here, we characterized cross-neutralization and protection among three distinctive rotaviruses carrying the same or different G (defined by VP7) or P (defined by VP4) genotype by using a rabbit and equine monospecific antisera panel coupled with structural and computational analyses of viral epitopes. Data from these experiments demonstrated that (i) rSA11 G3P[2] and equine G3P[12] neutralized well with each other in rabbit antisera but with less cross-neutralization capacity against equine G14P[12]; (ii) interestingly, rabbit antisera to equine G14P[12] provided more robust cross-protection against rSA11 G3P[2] than the reverse; (iii) despite only a few amino acid differences in VP8* between two equine viruses, rabbit antisera to VP8* of equine G3P[12] moderately cross-neutralized G14P[12] but with potent neutralizing activity against rSA11 G3P[2]; (iv) surprisingly, the breadth and magnitude of cross-neutralization among three viruses in equine antisera were broader and stronger than those observed in rabbit antisera; and (v) multiple highly solvent-exposed amino acid residues conserved in VP7 and VP8* among three viruses may serve as novel B cell epitopes that contribute to the observed cross-neutralization. Taken together, these results highlight that cross-neutralization determinants among different rotaviruses are complex and dependent on specific viral context and animal species. Objective: Our findings support that the G genotype determined by the VP7 protein plays a more important role, within the virus panel examined in this study, in determining broad neutralization specificity than previously thought. Our work has implications for vaccine design, suggesting that the inclusion of diverse G genotypes may be necessary to achieve broader protection. The P genotype, determined by the VP4 protein, exhibited variable levels of cross-neutralization, indicating that the P genotype alone may not be sufficient to induce strong cross-neutralization among different rotaviral strains. G genotype- or VP7-driven cross-protection may be conferred by novel epitopes identified structurally in this study. Finally, our study revealed that horse sera were more capable of cross-neutralizing different equine and simian rotaviruses than rabbit sera. This finding has implications for vaccine development, underscoring the need to evaluate candidate vaccines across multiple species or in species-relevant models to ensure broad and effective vaccine-mediated protection against rotavirus infection.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This research investigates how different strains of rotavirus A from horses and simians cross-neutralize each other, focusing on the roles of viral proteins VP7 (G genotype) and VP4 (P genotype) in eliciting immune protection.
The study aims to better understand immune responses to inform vaccine design against equine rotavirus infections by analyzing antibody reactions from different species and identifying key viral epitopes responsible for cross-neutralization.
Background
Rotaviral diarrhea in foals is mainly caused by two genotypes: G3P[12] and G14P[12] of equine rotavirus A (ERVA).
Foals gain protection through antibodies obtained from the colostrum of vaccinated mares, specifically those vaccinated with an inactivated G3P[12] monovalent vaccine.
Simian rotavirus SA11 G3P[2] is also included in ERVA vaccines to help protect foals, despite being a different species’ strain.
Research Objectives
Characterize cross-neutralization and protection among three distinct rotaviruses with either matching or differing G (VP7 protein) and P (VP4 protein) genotypes.
Use rabbit and equine monospecific antisera to evaluate cross-neutralization capacity.
Combine serological assays with structural and computational analyses of viral epitopes to understand molecular determinants of cross-protection.
Key Findings
Cross-neutralization between rSA11 G3P[2] and equine G3P[12]:
Rabbit antisera showed strong cross-neutralization between these two strains.
However, both had less cross-neutralization ability against equine G14P[12].
Asymmetrical cross-protection:
Rabbit antisera raised against equine G14P[12] provided stronger cross-protection against simian rSA11 G3P[2] than the other way round.
Role of VP8* domain in VP4:
Despite only minor amino acid differences between VP8* domains of the two equine viruses, antisera to VP8* from equine G3P[12] moderately neutralized G14P[12].
These antisera showed potent neutralization against simian rSA11 G3P[2], indicating cross-reactive epitopes.
Differences in species-specific responses:
Equine antisera exhibited broader and stronger cross-neutralization among the three viruses compared to rabbit antisera.
This underscores how antibody response varies depending on the host species.
Identification of novel epitopes:
Structural analyses revealed multiple amino acid residues that are highly exposed on VP7 and VP8* proteins and conserved across the three viruses.
These regions likely function as new B cell epitopes facilitating cross-neutralization.
Implications for Vaccine Design
Importance of the G genotype (VP7):
The study suggests that the VP7-defined G genotype plays a more crucial role in determining cross-neutralization specificity than the P genotype (VP4).
Incorporating diverse G genotypes in vaccines might improve breadth of protective immunity against different rotavirus strains.
Limited role of P genotype (VP4) alone:
Variability in cross-neutralization by the P genotype indicates it may not be sufficient as the sole target for broad protection.
Novel epitopes as vaccine targets:
Newly identified conserved B cell epitopes in VP7 and VP8* could be promising components for designing vaccines that elicit cross-protective antibodies.
Need for species-relevant vaccine evaluation:
Differences in cross-neutralization efficacy between horse and rabbit antisera highlight the importance of assessing vaccines in the target species or relevant animal models.
This approach ensures vaccines confer broad and effective protection in natural hosts.
Conclusions
Cross-neutralizing antibody responses among equine and simian rotaviruses are complex and influenced by viral protein genotype combinations as well as species-specific immune responses.
VP7-defined G genotypes exert a dominant influence on the breadth of neutralization, and vaccines incorporating multiple G types may offer enhanced protection.
The identification of conserved solvent-exposed amino acids as novel epitopes could guide future vaccine antigen design aimed at broad cross-protection.
This study emphasizes the necessity to include diverse viral genotypes and consider host species differences in developing effective rotavirus vaccines for horses.
Cite This Article
APA
Soni S, Eertink LG, Shuisong N, Loynachan A, Barnum SM, Adam EN, Kennedy MA, Wang D, Li F.
(2026).
Cross-neutralization and antigenic characterization of simian and equine group A rotaviruses.
J Virol, e0019926.
https://doi.org/10.1128/jvi.00199-26