Analyze Diet

Demographics, management, and welfare of nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island.

Abstract: There are no detailed, representative, horse-level data about equine management practices in different parts of Canada. To help address this, the demographics, management, and welfare of 312 nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island were examined in a randomized, horse-level survey during summer 2002. Owners completed a pretested questionnaire, and a veterinarian examined each horse. Owners were experienced caregivers and the horses were generally in good condition. Areas for improvement included parasite control, dental and hoof care, and tail docking. The mean fecal egg count was 428 eggs per gram; 76% of owners never removed manure from the pasture. Sixty-two percent of horses had never had a veterinary dental examination. Many horses had hoof defects (excessively long hooves, 26.8%; hoof wall breaks, 32.0%; and white line disease, 8.5%). Many (54.9%) draft horses had docked tails. These results suggest owners might benefit their horses by receiving education in aspects of equine care. Résumé — Démographie, gestion et bien-être des chevaux ne coursant pas à l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard. Il n’existe pas de données détaillées et représentatives se rapportant directement au cheval sur les pratiques de gestions équine dans les différentes régions du Canada. Afin d’aider à corriger cette situation, la démographie, la gestion et le bien-être de 312 chevaux qui ne coursent pas de l’Île-du-Prince-Édouard ont été examinés dans une étude au hasard centrée directement sur le cheval au cours de l’été 2002. Les propriétaires ont complété un questionnaire validé et un vétérinaire a examiné chacun des chevaux. Les propriétaires avaient de l’expérience dans le soin des chevaux et ceux-ci étaient généralement en bonne condition. Les points où une amélioration était souhaitable comprenaient le contrôle des parasites, le soin des dents et des sabots et le coupage de la queue. Le compte moyen des œufs fécaux était de 428 par gramme; 76 % des propriétaires n’enlevait jamais le fumier des pâturages. Soixante-deux pour cent des chevaux n’ avait jamais subit d’examen dentaire par un vétérinaire. Plusieurs chevaux présentaient des anomalies du sabot (sabots excessivement longs, 26,8 %; brisure de la muraille du sabot : 32 %, et maladie de la ligne blanche, 8,5 %). Plusieurs chevaux d’exposition (54,9 %) avaient la queue coupée. Ces résultats permettent de présumer que les propriétaires pourraient améliorer le bien-être de leurs animaux en suivant une formation sur les soins à donner aux chevaux. Traduit par Docteur André Blouin
Publication Date: 2005-01-14 PubMed ID: 15646847PubMed Central: PMC554751
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research study explores the demographics, management, and welfare of non-racing horses in Prince Edward Island, Canada, during the summer of 2002. The results suggest opportunities for improvement in methods of equine care such as parasite control, dental and hoof care, and tail docking used by experienced horse owners.

Summary of Research

The study conducted during 2002 concentrates on a perceptible gap in the data related to the management and welfare of non-racing horses in Prince Edward Island, Canada. In the research, a sample of 312 non-racing horses was studied using a randomized, horse-level survey to determine the current state of equine care and suggest improvements needed. Key findings from the research suggest that despite owners being experienced caregivers, there are areas of horse welfare and management that need improvement.

Questionnaire and Veterinary Examination

  • As part of the study, the horse owners were asked to fill a pretested questionnaire, providing their perspective on horse care and management.
  • Furthermore, each of the 312 non-racing horses was examined by a veterinarian, providing a professional assessment of the horses’ health condition. Both the responses from the questionnaire and the vet’s findings present a comprehensive picture of the current state of horse care in the sampled population.

Areas of Improvement

This research identified various areas where owners could better care for non-racing horses, including:

  • Parasite control: The mean fecal egg count was found to be 428 eggs per gram, an indication that there is a high level of internal parasitic infections among the non-racing horses. Furthermore, the survey also discovered that 76% of horse owners never removed manure from their paddocks, creating a favorable environment for the propagation of parasites.
  • Dental and hoof care: The survey discovered that 62% of the horses never had a veterinary dental examination. Identifying and addressing dental issues early on can significantly impact horse health and performance. Similarly, many horses had hoof defects, such as excessively long hooves (26.8%), hoof wall breaks (32.0%) and white line disease (8.5%) indicative of deficiencies in hoof care.
  • Tail Docking: Many draft horses (54.9%) were found to have docked tails. Tail docking is a traditional practice in some parts of the world but is increasingly viewed as not in the best interests of horse welfare by many in the equine veterinary community.

Educational Recommendation

In light of the findings, the research suggests that horse owners could greatly benefit their horses by receiving further education in aspects of horse care. Specifically, the areas identified for improvement point towards the need for better equine veterinary practices and ongoing parasite control strategies. The study underlines the importance of continuous education among horse owners to ensure the welfare of their animals.

Cite This Article

APA
Christie JL, Hewson CJ, Riley CB, Mcniven MA, Dohoo IR, Bate LA. (2005). Demographics, management, and welfare of nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island. Can Vet J, 45(12), 1004-1011.

Publication

ISSN: 0008-5286
NlmUniqueID: 0004653
Country: Canada
Language: English
Volume: 45
Issue: 12
Pages: 1004-1011

Researcher Affiliations

Christie, Julie L
  • Sir James Dunn Animal Welfare Centre, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.
Hewson, Caroline J
    Riley, Christopher B
      Mcniven, Mary A
        Dohoo, Ian R
          Bate, Luis A

            MeSH Terms

            • Animal Husbandry / statistics & numerical data
            • Animal Welfare / statistics & numerical data
            • Animals
            • Demography
            • Horses
            • Humans
            • Ownership / statistics & numerical data
            • Prince Edward Island / epidemiology
            • Surveys and Questionnaires

            References

            This article includes 50 references
            1. Rollin B. Animal welfare, science, and value.. J Agric Environ Ethics 1993;6:44–50.
            2. Duncan IJH, Fraser D. Understanding animal welfare.. Animal Welfare 1997:19–32.
            3. Broom DM. Physiological indicators of stress and welfare.. Ethics, Welfare, Law and Market Forces: The Veterinary Interface. Proc Royal Coll Vet Surg & Univ Fed Anim Welfare Symp 1998:167–176.
            4. Mason GJ. Stereotypies: a critical review.. Anim Behav 1991;41:1015–1037.
            5. Mills DS, Nankervis K. Equine Behavior: Principles & Practice.. 1999:134.
            6. NAHMS. Part I: Baseline Reference of 1998 Equine Health and Management.. 1998.
            7. Mellor DJ, Love S, Gettinby G, Reid SW. Demographic characteristics of the equine population of northern Britain.. Vet Rec 1999;145:299–304.
              pubmed: 10515615
            8. Mellor DJ, Love S, Walker R, Gettinby G, Reid SW. Sentinel practice-based survey of the management and health of horses in northern Britain.. Vet Rec 2001;149:417–423.
              pubmed: 11678214
            9. Canadian Agri-Food Research Council. Recommended Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Farm Animals: Horses.. 1998:6–7.
            10. Evans V. Canadian Horse Industry Research Study.. 1998.
            11. Salant P, Dillman DA. How to conduct your own survey.. 1994.
            12. Luescher UA, McKeown DB, Dean H. A cross-sectional study on compulsive behaviour (stable vices) in horses.. Equine Vet J Suppl 1998;27:14–18.
              pubmed: 10484997
            13. McGreevy PD, French NP, Nicol CJ. The prevalence of abnormal behaviours in dressage, eventing and endurance horses in relation to stabling.. Vet Rec 1995;137:36–37.
              pubmed: 8525580
            14. McBride SD, Long L. Management of horses showing stereotypic behaviour, owner perception and the implications for welfare.. Vet Rec 2001;148:799–802.
              pubmed: 11467606
            15. Shoukri MM, Martin SW. Estimating the number of clusters for the analysis of correlated binary response variables from unbalanced data.. Stat Med 1992;11:751–760.
              pubmed: 1594814
            16. Henneke DR, Potter GD, Kreider JL, Yeates BF. Relationship between condition score, physical measurements and body fat percentage in mares.. Equine Vet J 1983;15:371–372.
              pubmed: 6641685
            17. Kennedy MA, Hoekstra KE. Field method for determining the weight of the miniature horse.. World Equine Vet Rev 1998;3:14–18.
            18. Draft Horse Resource. My weight tape; [about 6 screens].. c1997–2001 [updated 2003 Apr 26; cited 2004 Jun 10].
            19. Bowman D. Georgis’ Parasitology for Veterinarians.. 1999:124,170,172,290,344.
            20. Patronek G. Tuft’s animal care condition (TACC) scales for assesseing body condition, weather and environmental safety, and physical care in dogs. A manual to aid veterinarians in preventing, recognizing, and verifying animal abuse.. 1997.
            21. EpiData.dk. EpiData.dk [homepage on the Internet].. c2002–2003 [updated 2004 May 2; cited 2004 Jun 10].
            22. Lin L. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproductivity.. Biometrics 1989;45:255–268.
              pubmed: 2720055
            23. Bland J, Altman D. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.. Lancet 1986;1:307–310.
              pubmed: 2868172
            24. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression.. 2000:164–167.
            25. Bray G. Complications of obesity.. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:1052.
              pubmed: 4062125
            26. Reed SM, Bayly WM. Equine Internal Medicine.. 1998:139,230,529.
            27. French NP, Wall R, Morgan KL. Lamb tail docking: a controlled field study of the effects of tail amputation on health and productivity.. Vet Rec 1994;134:463–467.
              pubmed: 8059511
            28. Molony VJ, Kent JE, Robertson LS. Behavioural responses of lambs of three ages in the first three hours after three methods of castration and tail docking.. Res Vet Sci 1993;55:236–254.
              pubmed: 8235093
            29. Schrøder-Petersen D, Simonsen H. Tail biting in pigs.. Vet J 2001;162:196–210.
              pubmed: 11681870
            30. Tucker C, Fraser D, Weary D. Tail docking in dairy cattle: Effects on cow cleanliness and udder health.. J Dairy Sci 2001;84:84–87.
              pubmed: 11210053
            31. Burchard J. Removing of whiskers in horses, International Society of Applied Ethology.. 2002.
            32. Speirs V. Clinical Examination of Horses.. 1997:27.
            33. M’Aburi KM. The epidemiology of equine strongylosis in the maritime region of eastern Canada.. 1995.
            34. Uhlinger CA. Equine small strongyles: epidemiology, pathology and control.. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1991;13:863–869.
            35. Jones SL, Snyder JR, Spier SJ. Obstructive conditions of the large intestine.. Equine Internal Medicine 1998:682–694.
            36. Mfitilodze M, Hutchinson G. Prevalence and abundance of equine strongyles (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) in tropical Australia.. J Parasitol 1990;76:487–494.
              pubmed: 2380857
            37. Osterman L, Hoglund J, Ljungsrom B, Nilsson O, Uggla A. A field study on the distribution of strongyle infections of horses in Sweden and factors affecting faecal egg counts.. Equine Vet J 1999;31:68–72.
              pubmed: 9952332
            38. Lyons ET, Swerczek TW, Tolliver SC, Bair HD, Drudge JH, Ennis LE. Prevalence of selected species of internal parasites in equids at necropsy in central Kentucky (1995–1999). Vet Parasitol 2000;92:51–62.
              pubmed: 10936545
            39. Love S, Murphy D, Mellor D. Pathogenicity of cyathostome infection.. Vet Parasitol 1999;85:97–122.
              pubmed: 10485358
            40. Earle C, Kington H, Coles G. Helminth control used by trainers of thoroughbreds in England.. Vet Rec 2002;150:405–408.
              pubmed: 11999277
            41. Proudman C, Matthews J. Control of intestinal parasites in horses.. In Pract 2000:90–97.
            42. Tarigo-Martinie JL, Wyatt AR, Kaplan RM. Prevalence and clinical implications of anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomes of horses.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2001;218:1957–1960.
              pubmed: 11417741
            43. Baker G. Problems involving the mouth.. Equine Internal Medicine 1998:602–608.
            44. Chase BE. Hoof care review: shoeing and trimming the equine foot.. Large Anim Vet 2000:30–34.
            45. Stashak TS, Hill CH, Klimesh R, Ovnicek G. Trimming and shoeing for balance and soundness.. Adams’ Lameness in Horses 2002:1081–1143.
            46. Slater MR, Hood DM. A cross-sectional epidemiological study of equine hoof wall problems and associated factors.. Equine Vet J 1997;29:67–69.
              pubmed: 9031868
            47. Mench JA, Mason GJ. Behaviour.. Animal Welfare 1997:127–142.
            48. Willard J, Wolfram S, Baker J. Effect of diet on cecal pH and feeding behaviour of horses.. J Anim Sci 1977;45:87.
              pubmed: 18431
            49. Duncan IJH, Rushen J, Lawrence AB. Conclusions and implications for animal welfare.. Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare 2003:193–206.
            50. Pell SM, McGreevy PD. Prevalence of stereotypic and other problem behaviours in thoroughbred horses.. Aust Vet J 1999;77:678–679.
              pubmed: 10590799

            Citations

            This article has been cited 6 times.
            1. Riley CB, Padalino B, Rogers CW, Thompson KR. Human Injuries Associated with the Transport of Horses by Road. Animals (Basel) 2023 May 10;13(10).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13101594pubmed: 37238024google scholar: lookup
            2. Ross M, Proudfoot K, Merkies K, Elsohaby I, Mills M, Macmillan K, Mckenna S, Ritter C. Horse Housing on Prince Edward Island, Canada: Attitudes and Experiences Related to Keeping Horses Outdoors and in Groups. Animals (Basel) 2023 Jan 13;13(2).
              doi: 10.3390/ani13020275pubmed: 36670815google scholar: lookup
            3. MacMillan KM, Millican LJ, Burns JJ, McClure JT, Vanderstichel R. Compliance with the Code of Practice for the Care and Handling of Equines on 50 horse farms in Prince Edward Island. Can Vet J 2020 Sep;61(9):985-989.
              pubmed: 32879525
            4. Durham AE, Frank N, McGowan CM, Menzies-Gow NJ, Roelfsema E, Vervuert I, Feige K, Fey K. ECEIM consensus statement on equine metabolic syndrome. J Vet Intern Med 2019 Mar;33(2):335-349.
              doi: 10.1111/jvim.15423pubmed: 30724412google scholar: lookup
            5. Christie JL, Hewson CJ, Riley CB, McNiven MA, Dohoo IR, Bate LA. Management factors affecting stereotypies and body condition score in nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island. Can Vet J 2006 Feb;47(2):136-43.
              pubmed: 16579039
            6. Christie JL, Hewson CJ, Riley CB, McNiven MA, Dohoo IR, Bate LA. A preliminary equine abuse policy with potential application to veterinary practice. Can Vet J 2005 Mar;46(3):250-2.
              pubmed: 15884648