Analyze Diet
Frontiers in veterinary science2024; 11; 1367861; doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1367861

Dental sectioning for intraoral equine cheek teeth extractions: 29 cases.

Abstract: The objectives of this retrospective study were to describe cheek teeth extraction by the sectioning technique, the decision making to use this technique and its potentially associated complications. Sectioning for dental extraction purpose was used in 29/461 (6.3%) of cases. Oro-sinusal fistula was the main post-operative complication, with 4/29 (13.7%) cases developing a macroscopic communication between the alveolus of the tooth extracted and the adjacent sinus compartment. All teeth where sectioning was attempted were successfully extracted. Sectioning for dental extraction appears to be a safe technique that can be used instead of or in addition too other minimal invasive cheek teeth extraction techniques. Thorough preoperative planning including oroscopic examination and medical imaging modalities are required to help in decision making, as well as excellent sedation and analgesia and horse compliance.
Publication Date: 2024-02-15 PubMed ID: 38425840PubMed Central: PMC10901997DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1367861Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The research article is a retrospective study assessing the effectiveness of a dental extraction technique called sectioning used in horses, its decision-making process, and associated complications.

Overview of the Research

  • The authors of this paper reviewed past instances of a dental extraction method termed ‘sectioning’, used in removing problematic cheek teeth from horses. The purpose of the study was to understand how often this technique was utilized, why it was chosen, and what complications arose as a result.
  • A total of 29 out of 461 cases, about 6.3%, utilized the sectioning method for tooth extraction. Regular post-operative checks were performed in all these cases to observe any associated complications.

Main Findings

  • The main post-operative complication noted was the development of an oro-sinusal fistula. This is a condition where there is an undesired connection between the tooth’s socket (alveolus) and the adjacent sinus compartment. Four out of the 29 cases using the sectioning technique, about 13.7%, experienced this complication.
  • Despite the observed complications, the researchers were able to conclude that the sectioning technique provided successful extractions in all cases it was used. This suggests that the technique can be reliable when used in dental extraction cases.

Implications of the Study

  • The study’s findings point towards the sectioning method as a safe and effective technique for dental extraction. It can be applied standalone or as a supplement to other minimally invasive cheek tooth extraction techniques.
  • However, the authors emphasize the importance of diligent preoperative planning. This would entail detailed oroscopic examination and relevant medical imaging procedures to understand the tooth’s condition better. By doing so, this aids in sound decision-making on whether the sectioning methodology is the most suitable approach.
  • Additionally, ensuring excellent sedation, good pain control (analgesia), and horse cooperation are vital to the method’s successful application.

Cite This Article

APA
Leps A, Korsos S, Clarysse M, Vlaminck L. (2024). Dental sectioning for intraoral equine cheek teeth extractions: 29 cases. Front Vet Sci, 11, 1367861. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1367861

Publication

ISSN: 2297-1769
NlmUniqueID: 101666658
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 11
Pages: 1367861

Researcher Affiliations

Leps, Alexis
  • Department of Large Animal Surgery, Anesthesiology and Orthopedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Korsos, Szabolcs
  • Department of Large Animal Surgery, Anesthesiology and Orthopedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Clarysse, Michèle
  • Department of Large Animal Surgery, Anesthesiology and Orthopedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Vlaminck, Lieven
  • Department of Large Animal Surgery, Anesthesiology and Orthopedics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

References

This article includes 25 references
  1. Ramzan PHL, Palmer L. Extraction of fractured teeth under oral endoscopic guidance in standing horses. Vet Surg (2011) 40:586–9.
  2. Langeneckert F, Witte T, Schellenberger F, Czech C, Aebischer D, Vidondo B. Cheek tooth extraction via a minimal invasive transbuccal approach and intradental screw placement in 54 equids. Vet Surg (2015) 44:1012–20.
    doi: 10.1111/vsu.12409pubmed: 26455833google scholar: lookup
  3. Rice MK, Henry TJ. Standing intraoral extractions of cheek teeth aided by partial crown removal in 165 horses (2010–2016). Equine Vet J (2018) 50:48–53.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12727pubmed: 28744895google scholar: lookup
  4. McIllwraight C, Turner A. Repulsion of cheek teeth. In:Hendrickson DA, editor. Techniques in Large Animal Surgery. 2 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger; (1989) p. 23–239.
  5. Coomer RPC, Fowke GS, McKane S. Repulsion of maxillary and mandibulary cheek teeth in standing horses. Vet Surg (2011) 40:590–5.
  6. Prichard MA, Hackett RP, Erb HN. Long-term outcome of tooth repulsion in horses. A retrospective study of 61 cases. Vet Surg (1992) 21:145–9.
  7. Caramello V, Zarucco L, Foster D, Boston R, Stefanovski D, Orsini A. Equine cheek tooth extraction: comparison of outcomes for five extraction methods. Equine Vet J (2020) 50:181–6.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13150pubmed: 31260572google scholar: lookup
  8. Holmstrom SE, Frost P, Eisner ER. Exodontics. In: Veterinary Dental Techniques for the Small Animal Practitioner. 2 ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; (2004) p. 238–42.
  9. Reiter A. Closed and open tooth extraction. In: BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Dentistry and Oral Surgery. 4, ed. Gloucester: BSAVA; (2018) p. 304–37.
    doi: 10.22233/9781905319602.12google scholar: lookup
  10. Kaminishi RM, Davis WH, Nelson NE. Surgical removal of impacted mandibulary third molars. Dent Clin North Am (1979) 23:413–25.
    doi: 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)01208-3pubmed: 288669google scholar: lookup
  11. Henry T, Bishop I. Adjunct extraction techniques in equine dentistry. Vet Clin Equine (2020) 36:565–74.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2020.08.002pubmed: 33067099google scholar: lookup
  12. Gergeleit H, Bienert-Zeit A. Complications following mandibulary cheek tooth extraction in 20 horses. Front Vet Sci (2020) 7:504.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00504pmc: PMC7457057pubmed: 32923469google scholar: lookup
  13. Staszyk C, Biernet A, Bäumer W, Feige K, Gasse H. Simulation of local anaesthetic nerve block of the infraorbital nerve within the pterygopalatine fossa: anatomical landmarks defined by computed tomography. Res Vet Sci (2008) 85:399–406.
    doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.02.008pubmed: 18371997google scholar: lookup
  14. Tremaine W. Local analgesic techniques for the equine head. Equine Vet Educ (2007) 19:495–3.
    doi: 10.2746/095777307X207114google scholar: lookup
  15. Tremaine W. Oral extraction of equine cheek teeth. Equine Vet Educ (2004) 19:495–503.
  16. Kennedy R, Reardon RJM, James O, Wilson C, Dixon PM. A long-term study of equine cheek teeth post-extraction complications: 428 cheek teeth (2004 - 2018). Equine Vet J (2020) 52:811–22.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13255pubmed: 32144822google scholar: lookup
  17. Dubois B, Dixon JJ, Witte TH. Assessment of clinical and computed tomographic findings for association with the outcome of intraoral cheek tooth extraction in horses and ponies. J Am Vet Med Assoc (2019) 255:1369–76.
    doi: 10.2460/javma.255.12.1369pubmed: 31793834google scholar: lookup
  18. Dixon PM, Dacre I, Dacre K, Tremaine WH, McCann J, Barakzai S. Standing oral extraction of cheek teeth in 100 horses (1998 - 2003). Equine Vet J (2005) 37:105–12.
    doi: 10.2746/0425164054223822pubmed: 15779621google scholar: lookup
  19. O'Neill HD, Boussauw B, Bladon BM, Fraser BS. Extraction of cheek teeth using a lateral buccotomy approach in 114 horses (1999 - 2009). Equine Vet J (2011) 43:348–53.
  20. Schauveliege S, Cuypers C, Michielsen M, Gasthuys F, Gozalo-Marcilla M. How to score sedation and adjust the administration rate of sedatives in horses: a literature review and introduction of the Ghent Sedation Algorythm. Vet Anal Anesthes (2019) 46:4–13.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2018.08.005pubmed: 30528671google scholar: lookup
  21. Dixon PM. Treatment of equine oro-nasal and oro-maxillary fistulae. Equine Vet Educ (2020) 471–8.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13127google scholar: lookup
  22. Hardefeldt LY, Bailey KE, Slater J. Overview of the use of antimicrobial drugs for the treatment of bacterial infections in horses. Equine Vet Educ (2021) 33:602–11.
    doi: 10.1111/eve.13371google scholar: lookup
  23. Kern I, Bartmann CP, Verspohl J, Rohde J, Biernet-Zeit A. Bacteraemia before, during and after tooth extraction in horses in the absence of antimicrobial administration. Equine Vet J (2017) 49:178–82.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.12581pubmed: 27062656google scholar: lookup
  24. Raidal SL. Antimicrobial stewardship in equine practice. Austral Vet J (2019) 97:238–42.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.12833pubmed: 31236925google scholar: lookup
  25. Christiansen MS, Rosenmeier JG, Jensen DB, Lindegaard C. Standing equine cheek tooth extraction: a multivariate analysis of the effect of antibiotics on the risk of post-operative complications. Equine Vet J (2023) 55:968–78.
    doi: 10.1111/evj.13905pubmed: 36516304google scholar: lookup