Analyze Diet
Journal of clinical microbiology2010; 48(5); 1987-1988; doi: 10.1128/JCM.02307-09

Detection and identification of Staphylococcus lugdunensis are not hampered by use of defibrinated horse blood in blood agar plates.

Abstract: No abstract available
Publication Date: 2010-03-19 PubMed ID: 20305013PubMed Central: PMC2863894DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02307-09Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Letter

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research aims to prove that the use of defibrinated horse blood in agar plates does not inhibit the detection and identification of Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a pathogenic bacterium.

Introduction and Previous Research

  • The bacterium in focus is Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a pathogen with properties resembling Staphylococcus aureus. Due to varying identification methods, the detection rates are inconsistent across different laboratories. A previously published work introduced certain criteria apt for detecting this bacterium, but these only appeared accurate when samples were cultured on Columbia sheep blood agar and not on agar with horse blood. This led to inconsistencies in detection rates across different regions.

Research Setting and Methodology

  • This study was conducted at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Central Hospital, in Växjö, Sweden. Over the span of ten years, the research team identified between 40 and 90 cases of S. lugdunensis annually, using methods such as assessing odor and colony pleomorphism, and performing a number of tests.
  • The testing medium initially consisted of blood agar base with 5% human blood, but in 2009, it was changed to use 5% defibrinated horse blood instead. Following the change, the same criteria were used to identify S. lugdunensis.
  • The research set out to determine S. lugdunensis’s detection rates from skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) samples, which were then compared to the detection rates of S. aureus.

Results and Conclusions

  • Even though the odor and β-hemolysis were slightly less distinct, the researchers did not witness any change in the isolation rate of either S. aureus or S. lugdunensis following the switch to the defibrinated horse blood agar. The ratios between the bacteria remained consistent, with S. aureus appearing 20 to 40 times more frequently per year.
  • Overall, the study underlines that the use of defibrinated horse blood does not appear to interfere with the identification rate of S. lugdunensis, contradicting the concerns raised in some earlier studies. The authors suggest that factors other than the type of blood used in the agar may be more significant in influencing the detection of S. lugdunensis.

Cite This Article

APA
Sundqvist M, Bieber L, Smyth R, Kahlmeter G. (2010). Detection and identification of Staphylococcus lugdunensis are not hampered by use of defibrinated horse blood in blood agar plates. J Clin Microbiol, 48(5), 1987-1988. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02307-09

Publication

ISSN: 1098-660X
NlmUniqueID: 7505564
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 48
Issue: 5
Pages: 1987-1988

Researcher Affiliations

Sundqvist, M
    Bieber, L
      Smyth, R
        Kahlmeter, G

          MeSH Terms

          • Agar
          • Animals
          • Bacteriological Techniques / methods
          • Blood / metabolism
          • Culture Media / chemistry
          • Horses
          • Humans
          • Soft Tissue Infections / diagnosis
          • Soft Tissue Infections / microbiology
          • Staphylococcal Skin Infections / diagnosis
          • Staphylococcal Skin Infections / microbiology
          • Staphylococcus / growth & development
          • Staphylococcus / isolation & purification

          References

          This article includes 4 references
          1. Bieber L, Kahlmeter G. Staphylococcus lugdunensis in several niches of the normal skin flora. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2010;16:385-388.
            pubmed: 19519842
          2. Böcher S, Tonning B, Skov RL, Prag J. Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a common cause of skin and soft tissue infections in the community. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009;47:946-950.
            pmc: PMC2668335pubmed: 19244465
          3. Frank KL, Del Pozo JL, Patel R. From clinical microbiology to infection pathogenesis: how daring to be different works for Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008;21:111-133.
            pmc: PMC2223846pubmed: 18202439
          4. Sotutu V, Carapetis J, Wilkinson J, Davis A, Curtis N. The “surreptitious Staphylococcus”: Staphylococcus lugdunensis endocarditis in a child. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2002;21:984-986.
            pubmed: 12400533

          Citations

          This article has been cited 2 times.
          1. Hussain M, Kohler C, Becker K. Role of SrtA in Pathogenicity of Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Microorganisms 2020 Dec 11;8(12).
            doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121975pubmed: 33322541google scholar: lookup
          2. Ho PL, Leung SM, Tse H, Chow KH, Cheng VC, Que TL. Novel selective medium for isolation of Staphylococcus lugdunensis from wound specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2014 Jul;52(7):2633-6.
            doi: 10.1128/JCM.00706-14pubmed: 24759715google scholar: lookup