Analyze Diet
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia2009; 36(1); 9-17; doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00420.x

Determination of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in Shetland ponies using constant current or constant voltage electrical stimulation.

Abstract: To determine the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane in Shetland ponies using a sequence of three different supramaximal noxious stimulations at each tested concentration of isoflurane rather than a single stimulation. Methods: Prospective, experimental trial. Methods: Seven 4-year-old, gelding Shetland ponies. Methods: The MAC of isoflurane was determined for each pony. Three different modes of electrical stimulation were applied consecutively (2 minute intervals): two using constant voltage (90 V) on the gingiva via needle- (CVneedle) or surface-electrodes (CVsurface) and one using constant current (CC; 40 mA) via surface electrodes applied to the skin over the digital nerve. The ability to clearly interpret the responses as positive, the latency of the evoked responses and the inter-electrode resistance were recorded for each stimulus. Results: Individual isoflurane MAC (%) values ranged from 0.60 to 1.17 with a mean (+/-SD) of 0.97 (+/-0.17). The responses were more clearly interpreted with CC, but did not reach statistical significance. The CVsurface mode produced responses with a longer delay. The CVneedle mode was accompanied by variable inter-electrode resistances resulting in uncontrolled stimulus intensity. At 0.9 MAC, the third stimulation induced more positive responses than the first stimulation, independent of the mode of stimulation used. Conclusions: The MAC of isoflurane in the Shetland ponies was lower than expected with considerable variability among individuals. Constant current surface electrode stimulations were the most repeatable. A summation over the sequence of three supramaximal stimulations was observed around 0.9 MAC. Conclusions: The possibility that Shetland ponies require less isoflurane than horses needs further investigation. Constant current surface-electrode stimulations were the most repeatable. Repetitive supramaximal stimuli may have evoked movements at isoflurane concentrations that provide immobility when single supramaximal stimulation was applied.
Publication Date: 2009-01-06 PubMed ID: 19121154DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00420.xGoogle Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Clinical Trial
  • Journal Article

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research investigated the minimum amount of isoflurane—an anesthetic—needed in Shetland ponies, using different methods of electrical stimulation. It indicated that ponies may need less isoflurane than larger horses, and found that repetitive stimulation could cause movement even at doses that would keep the animal immobile under single stimulation.

Research Method

  • The experiment involved seven 4-year-old Shetland ponies.
  • To determine the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of isoflurane—anesthetics gas—for each pony, the researchers used three different modes of electrical stimulation.
  • The methods of stimulation included two that employed constant voltage (at 90 V) on the gingiva through either needle- (CVneedle) or surface-electrodes (CVsurface), and one that used a constant current (CC; 40 mA) with surface electrodes on the skin above the digital nerve.
  • The stimulations were applied consecutively at 2-minute intervals, and the reaction, response time, and resistance between electrodes was recorded.

Results

  • The MAC values of isoflurane for the Shetland ponies were between 0.60% and 1.17%, with an average of 0.97% (+/-0.17).
  • Responses were most clear when using constant current (CC), but the difference was not statistically significant.
  • Surface-electrode stimulation (CVsurface) took a longer time to produce a response.
  • The resistance between the electrodes in needle-stimulation (CVneedle) varied, which meant the intensity of the stimulus couldn’t be controlled effectively.
  • At an isoflurane concentration of 0.9 MAC, the third stimulation produced more movement than the first one, regardless of the stimulation method used.

Conclusions

  • The MAC of isoflurane in the ponies tested was lower than the researchers suspected, with a significant variation between individuals.
  • Of the forms of stimulation, using a constant current and surface electrodes was found to be the most repeatable.
  • A succession of three supramaximal stimulations seemed to generate a cumulative effect around the 0.9 MAC mark.
  • The finding that Shetland ponies potentially require less isoflurane than regular horses introduces the need for further investigation.
  • The data suggest that repeated supramaximal stimuli can cause movements at isoflurane concentrations that would normally render the subject immobile when a single supramaximal stimulation is applied.

Cite This Article

APA
Levionnois OL, Spadavecchia C, Kronen PW, Schatzmann U. (2009). Determination of the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in Shetland ponies using constant current or constant voltage electrical stimulation. Vet Anaesth Analg, 36(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2008.00420.x

Publication

ISSN: 1467-2995
NlmUniqueID: 100956422
Country: United States
Language: English
Volume: 36
Issue: 1
Pages: 9-17

Researcher Affiliations

Levionnois, Olivier L
  • Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Berne, Berne, Switzerland. olivier.levionnois@kkh.unibe.ch
Spadavecchia, Claudia
    Kronen, Peter W
      Schatzmann, Urs

        MeSH Terms

        • Anesthesia, Inhalation / veterinary
        • Anesthetics, Inhalation / administration & dosage
        • Anesthetics, Inhalation / pharmacology
        • Animals
        • Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
        • Electric Stimulation
        • Horses / physiology
        • Isoflurane / administration & dosage
        • Isoflurane / pharmacology
        • Male
        • Pain Threshold / drug effects

        Citations

        This article has been cited 2 times.
        1. Yavari S, Khraim N, Szura G, Starke A, Engelke E, Pfarrer C, Hopster K, Schmicke M, Kehler W, Heppelmann M, Kästner SBR, Rehage J. Evaluation of intravenous regional anaesthesia and four-point nerve block efficacy in the distal hind limb of dairy cows. BMC Vet Res 2017 Nov 7;13(1):320.
          doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1250-xpubmed: 29115948google scholar: lookup
        2. Lambertini C, Spaccini F, Mazzanti A, Spadari A, Lanci A, Romagnoli N. Lidocaine constant rate infusion in isoflurane anesthetized neonatal foals. Front Vet Sci 2023;10:1304868.
          doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1304868pubmed: 38298459google scholar: lookup