Abstract: This study aimed to develop a standardized ultrasound (US) protocol using selected thoracic and abdominal acoustic windows, to assess its feasibility and applicability in healthy foals, and to evaluate its usefulness for detecting common thoracic and abdominal conditions in sick foals. The Focused US (FUS) protocol included 12 thoraco-abdominal windows (4 right-side, 3 ventral, 5 left-side) using a curved-array probe. It was applied to cohorts of healthy (n = 17) and sick (n = 23) foals by a veterinary clinician with limited US experience. The FUS showed good feasibility and applicability, with clear visualization of target abdominal structures. Diagnostic usefulness was high for identifying gastrointestinal disease and peritoneal effusions. However, several challenges emerged: the need to change recumbency, the relatively large number of US windows, the need for staff to restrain foals, and the prioritization of other diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in sick foals. A shortened Foal Oriented Compressed US (FOCUS) protocol was developed, including 7 thoraco-abdominal windows from a single right recumbency (4 right-side, 3 ventral), and was tested in healthy (n = 3) and sick (n = 3) foals by three clinicians with varying levels of experience. The FOCUS proved significantly faster than FUS, with a short acquisition time (median 7 min, range 3-10 min). Main limitations include single-operator image acquisition, the small cohort of sick foals assessed using FUS, and limited evaluation of the FOCUS protocol. In conclusion, FUS can be performed by veterinarians without extensive US experience. However, in emergency settings, FOCUS may be preferred due to its greater time efficiency.
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.
Overview
This study developed and tested a standardized ultrasound protocol for assessing the thoracic and abdominal areas of neonatal foals to aid in diagnosing health conditions.
Two protocols were created and evaluated: a detailed Focused Ultrasound (FUS) protocol and a simplified, quicker Foal Oriented Compressed US (FOCUS) protocol designed for emergency situations.
Research Objectives
Develop a standardized ultrasound protocol using selected thoracic and abdominal acoustic windows for neonatal foals.
Assess the feasibility and applicability of this protocol in healthy foals.
Evaluate its utility in detecting common thoracic and abdominal diseases in sick foals.
Protocols Developed
Focused Ultrasound (FUS) Protocol:
Included 12 thoraco-abdominal windows: 4 on the right side, 3 ventral, and 5 on the left side.
Performed using a curved-array ultrasound probe.
Foal Oriented Compressed US (FOCUS) Protocol:
A shortened version with 7 thoraco-abdominal windows: 4 right-side, 3 ventral.
Designed to be performed from a single right recumbency position to reduce examination time and complexity.
Study Population and Operators
FUS protocol applied to 17 healthy and 23 sick neonatal foals.
FOCUS protocol tested on 3 healthy and 3 sick foals.
Operators included veterinary clinicians with varying levels of ultrasound experience, including those with limited prior experience.
Feasibility and Applicability of FUS
Good feasibility demonstrated, showing clear visualization of target abdominal and thoracic structures in most cases.
Applicable for both healthy and sick foals despite the varying clinical conditions.
Challenges encountered included:
Need for changing foal recumbency multiple times during the exam.
Large number of ultrasound windows increasing procedure complexity.
Requirement for additional staff to restrain the foals safely.
Potential conflicts with prioritizing other diagnostic or therapeutic interventions in sick foals.
Diagnostic Usefulness of FUS
Highly effective in detecting gastrointestinal diseases.
Accurate identification of peritoneal effusions (fluid in the abdominal cavity).
Demonstrated value in assessing common thoracic and abdominal pathologies in neonates.
Advantages of FOCUS Protocol
Significantly reduced examination time compared to FUS—median time of 7 minutes (range 3-10 minutes).
Performed from a single position, minimizing the need for moving or repositioning the foal.
Easier to perform in emergency settings where time and resources are limited.
Successfully conducted by three clinicians with different levels of ultrasound expertise, indicating ease of learning and use.
Limitations Noted in the Study
FUS protocol requires a single operator to manage image acquisition, which may limit simultaneous management of critically ill foals.
Small sample size, especially for sick foals assessed with the FOCUS protocol, restricting broad generalization of results.
Limited evaluation and validation of the FOCUS protocol compared to the more extensively tested FUS protocol.
Conclusions and Clinical Implications
Focused Ultrasound (FUS) can be effectively performed by veterinarians without extensive ultrasound experience, making it accessible in clinical practice.
In emergency or time-sensitive situations, the abbreviated FOCUS protocol offers a practical alternative to quickly assess foals with suspected thoracic or abdominal disease.
Further studies are needed to validate the FOCUS protocol in larger and more diverse populations of sick foals.
The protocols provide structured tools to enhance imaging diagnostics in neonatal equine medicine and support timely clinical decision-making.
Cite This Article
APA
Ellero N, Maggi A, Busoni V, Imposimato I, Castagnetti C, Lanci A, Mariella J, Freccero F.
(2025).
Development and application of a focused ultrasound protocol in neonatal foals.
Vet J, 315, 106543.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106543
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna 40064, Italy. Electronic address: nicola.ellero3@unibo.it.
Maggi, Alessandra
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna 40064, Italy.
Busoni, Valeria
Diagnostic Imaging Section, Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals and Equids, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liège, Sart-Tilman, Liège 4000, Belgium.
Imposimato, Ilaria
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna 40064, Italy.
Castagnetti, Carolina
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna 40064, Italy.
Lanci, Aliai
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna 40064, Italy.
Mariella, Jole
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna 40064, Italy.
Freccero, Francesca
Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences (DIMEVET), University of Bologna, Via Tolara di Sopra 50, Ozzano dell'Emilia, Bologna 40064, Italy.
MeSH Terms
Animals
Horses
Ultrasonography / veterinary
Ultrasonography / methods
Animals, Newborn
Horse Diseases / diagnostic imaging
Female
Gastrointestinal Diseases / veterinary
Gastrointestinal Diseases / diagnostic imaging
Conflict of Interest Statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.