Analyze Diet
Viruses2025; 17(3); doi: 10.3390/v17030354

Development and Validation of a Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals (DIVA) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Strategy for Distinguishing Between Hendra-Infected and Vaccinated Horses.

Abstract: Hendra virus (HeV) is a bat-borne zoonotic agent which can cause a severe and highly fatal disease and can be transferred from animals to humans. It has caused over 100 deaths in horses since it was discovered in 1994. Four out of seven infected humans have died. Since the release of the HeV vaccine (Equivac® HeV Hendra Virus Vaccine for Horses, Zoetis Australia Pty Ltd., Rhodes, NSW 2138) in Australia, there has been an urgent requirement for a serological test for differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA). All first-line diagnostic serological assays at the Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP) incorporate recombinant HeV soluble G glycoprotein (sG) as the antigen, which is also the only immunogen present in the Equivac® HeV vaccine. Problems therefore arose in that antibody testing results were unable to distinguish between prior vaccination or infection with HeV. This study describes the development of a HeV DIVA ELISA strategy using recombinant sG and HeV nucleoprotein (N), paired with specific monoclonal antibodies in a competition ELISA format. The validation of this assay strategy was performed using a positive cohort of 19 serum samples representing post-infection sera, a negative cohort of 1138 serum samples representing horse sera collected pre-vaccine release and a vaccination cohort of 502 serum samples from horses previously vaccinated with Equivac® HeV vaccine. For the sG glycoprotein, the diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) was 100.0% (95% CI: 99.3-100.0%) and diagnostic specificity (DSp) 99.91% (95% CI: 99.5-100.0%), using a percentage inhibition cut-off value of >36, whereas for the N protein, DSe was 100.0% (95% CI: 82.4-100.0%) and DSp 100.0% (95% CI: 99.7-100.0%), using a percentage inhibition cut-off value of >49. Taken together, these results demonstrate that the HeV DIVA ELISA strategy developed here is now an essential and critical component of the testing algorithm for HeV serology testing in Australia.
Publication Date: 2025-02-28 PubMed ID: 40143282PubMed Central: PMC11945769DOI: 10.3390/v17030354Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Validation Study

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

This research has successfully developed and validated an assay (test) technique capable of distinguishing between horses infected with the deadly Hendra virus and those that have been vaccinated against it – a critical capability because the prior assays couldn’t differentiate between vaccinated and infected animals.

Understanding the Hendra Virus and Its Vaccination

  • The Hendra virus (HeV) is a potentially lethal agent transmitted from bats to horses and other animals, and also to humans. It was first identified in 1994 and has since caused over 100 fatalities in horses and four in humans.
  • The development of a vaccine known as Equivac HeV has been a game-changer in combating the virus. However, a key challenge has been the lack of a testing mechanism that can distinguish between horses that have been vaccinated and those that have been infected with the virus.

The Problem with Existing Diagnostic Methods

  • Current serological assays (blood tests used to detect infection) use a recombinant HeV soluble G glycoprotein (sG) as the antigen. This antigen also happens to be the only immunogen used in the Equivac HeV vaccine.
  • Due to this overlap, the previous testing methods could not differentiate between a horse’s immune response caused by actual HeV infection and the response caused by the vaccination.

Development and Validation of the DIVA ELISA Strategy

  • A new and enhanced testing strategy was needed to overcome this challenge. This led to the development of the DIVA (Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals) ELISA strategy which uses specific monoclonal antibodies in a competitive ELISA format.
  • This strategy uses recombinant sG and HeV nucleoprotein (N) to differentiate between HeV infection and vaccination with Equivac HeV.
  • Steps were taken to validate this strategy using serum samples from various cohorts, comprised of post-infection sera, pre-vaccine release horse sera, and samples from horses that were vaccinated with Equivac.

Efficiency and Impact of the DIVA ELISA Strategy

  • The validation process revealed that the DIVA ELISA strategy was highly effective at accurately identifying vaccinated and infected horses, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity nearing 100% for both analyzed antigenic proteins, sG and N.
  • The successful development and validation of the DIVA ELISA strategy thus marks a significant advancement in the testing for the Hendra virus in Australia, now forming a crucial part of the serology testing method for the disease.

Cite This Article

APA
McNabb L, McMahon A, Woube EG, Agnihotri K, Colling A, Broder CC, Kucinskaite-Kodze I, Petraityte-Burneikiene R, Bowden TR, Halpin K. (2025). Development and Validation of a Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals (DIVA) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Strategy for Distinguishing Between Hendra-Infected and Vaccinated Horses. Viruses, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/v17030354

Publication

ISSN: 1999-4915
NlmUniqueID: 101509722
Country: Switzerland
Language: English
Volume: 17
Issue: 3

Researcher Affiliations

McNabb, Leanne
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
McMahon, Amy
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Woube, Ezana Getachew
  • Private Consultant, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Agnihotri, Kalpana
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Colling, Axel
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Broder, Christopher C
  • Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
Kucinskaite-Kodze, Indre
  • Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Petraityte-Burneikiene, Rasa
  • Institute of Biotechnology, Life Sciences Centre, Vilnius University, LT-01513 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Bowden, Timothy R
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Halpin, Kim
  • CSIRO Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness (ACDP), 5 Portarlington Road, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • Horses
  • Henipavirus Infections / veterinary
  • Henipavirus Infections / diagnosis
  • Henipavirus Infections / immunology
  • Henipavirus Infections / prevention & control
  • Henipavirus Infections / virology
  • Hendra Virus / immunology
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / methods
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / veterinary
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / virology
  • Horse Diseases / immunology
  • Horse Diseases / prevention & control
  • Antibodies, Viral / blood
  • Vaccination / veterinary
  • Viral Vaccines / immunology
  • Viral Vaccines / administration & dosage
  • Australia
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Serologic Tests / methods

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

This article includes 24 references
  1. Eaton BT, Broder CC, Middleton D, Wang LF. Hendra and Nipah viruses: Different and dangerous.. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006;4:23–35.
    doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1323pmc: PMC7097447pubmed: 16357858google scholar: lookup
  2. Halpin K, Young PL, Field HE, Mackenzie JS. Isolation of Hendra virus from pteropid bats: A natural reservoir of Hendra virus.. J. Gen. Virol. 2000;81:1927–1932.
    doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-81-8-1927pubmed: 10900029google scholar: lookup
  3. Queensland Business. [(accessed on 16 December 2024)]; Available online: https://www.business.qld.gov.au/industries/service-industries-professionals/service-industries/veterinary-surgeons/guidelines-hendra/incident-summary.
  4. OIE. Nipah and Hendra virus Diseases. Chapter 3.1.14.. OIE Terrestrial Manual 2018 OIE; Paris, France: 2018.
  5. Crameri G, Wang LF, Morrissy C, White J, Eaton BT. A rapid immune plaque assay for the detection of Hendra and Nipah viruses and anti-virus antibodies.. J. Virol. Methods. 2002;99:41–51.
    doi: 10.1016/S0166-0934(01)00377-9pubmed: 11684302google scholar: lookup
  6. Amaya M, Yin R, Yan L, Borisevich V, Adhikari BN, Bennett A, Malagon F, Cer RZ, Bishop-Lilly KA, Dimitrov AS. A Recombinant Chimeric Cedar Virus-Based Surrogate Neutralization Assay Platform for Pathogenic Henipaviruses.. Viruses 2023;15:1077.
    doi: 10.3390/v15051077pmc: PMC10223282pubmed: 37243163google scholar: lookup
  7. Bossart KN, Crameri G, Dimitrov AS, Mungall BA, Feng YR, Patch JR, Choudhary A, Wang LF, Eaton BT, Broder CC. Receptor binding, fusion inhibition, and induction of cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies by a soluble G glycoprotein of Hendra virus.. J. Virol. 2005;79:6690–6702.
  8. Colling A, Lunt R, Bergfeld J, McNabb L, Halpin K, Juzva S, Newberry K, Morrissy C, Loomes C, Warner S. A network approach for provisional assay recognition of a Hendra virus antibody ELISA: Test validation with low sample numbers from infected horses.. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2018;30:362–369.
    doi: 10.1177/1040638718760102pmc: PMC6505820pubmed: 29463198google scholar: lookup
  9. McNabb L, Barr J, Crameri G, Juzva S, Riddell S, Colling A, Boyd V, Broder C, Wang LF, Lunt R. Henipavirus microsphere immuno-assays for detection of antibodies against Hendra virus.. J. Virol. Methods. 2014;200:22–28.
  10. White JR, Boyd V, Crameri GS, Duch CJ, van Laar RK, Wang LF, Eaton BT. Location of, immunogenicity of and relationships between neutralization epitopes on the attachment protein (G) of Hendra virus.. J. Gen. Virol. 2005;86:2839–2848.
    doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81218-0pubmed: 16186240google scholar: lookup
  11. Di Rubbo A, McNabb L, Klein R, White JR, Colling A, Dimitrov DS, Broder CC, Middleton D, Lunt RA. Optimization and diagnostic evaluation of monoclonal antibody-based blocking ELISA formats for detection of neutralizing antibodies to Hendra virus in mammalian sera.. J. Virol. Methods. 2019;274:113731.
  12. Tan R, Hodge A, Klein R, Edwards N, Huang JA, Middleton D, Watts SP. Virus-neutralising antibody responses in horses following vaccination with Equivac(R) HeV: A field study.. Aust. Vet. J. 2018;96:161–166.
    doi: 10.1111/avj.12694pubmed: 29691855google scholar: lookup
  13. Wang X, Wise JC, Stewart AJ. Hendra Virus: An Update on Diagnosis, Vaccination, and Biosecurity Protocols for Horses.. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Equine Pract. 2023;39:89–98.
    doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2022.11.009pubmed: 36737284google scholar: lookup
  14. Halpin K, Graham K, Durr PA. Sero-Monitoring of Horses Demonstrates the Equivac((R)) HeV Hendra Virus Vaccine to Be Highly Effective in Inducing Neutralising Antibody Titres.. Vaccines 2021;9:731.
    doi: 10.3390/vaccines9070731pmc: PMC8310234pubmed: 34358146google scholar: lookup
  15. Juozapaitis M, Serva A, Zvirbliene A, Slibinskas R, Staniulis J, Sasnauskas K, Shiell BJ, Wang LF, Michalski WP. Generation of henipavirus nucleocapsid proteins in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Virus Res. 2007;124:95–102.
  16. McNabb L, Andiani A, Bulavaite A, Zvirbliene A, Sasnauskas K, Lunt R. Development and validation of an IgM antibody capture ELISA for early detection of Hendra virus.. J. Virol. Methods. 2021;298:114296.
  17. Chua KB, Wang LF, Lam SK, Crameri G, Yu M, Wise T, Boyle D, Hyatt AD, Eaton BT. Tioman virus, a novel paramyxovirus isolated from fruit bats in Malaysia.. Virology. 2001;283:215–229.
    doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0882pubmed: 11336547google scholar: lookup
  18. Pasick J. Application of DIVA vaccines and their companion diagnostic tests to foreign animal disease eradication.. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 2004;5:257–262.
    doi: 10.1079/AHR200479pubmed: 15984335google scholar: lookup
  19. Browning CFJ, Di Nardo A, Henry L, Pollard T, Hendry L, Romey A, Relmy A, Eble P, Brocchi E, Grazioli S. Inter-laboratory comparison of 2 ELISA kits used for foot-and-mouth disease virus nonstructural protein serology.. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2020;32:933–937.
    doi: 10.1177/1040638720962070pmc: PMC7645616pubmed: 33025858google scholar: lookup
  20. Sorensen KJ, Madsen KG, Madsen ES, Salt JS, Nqindi J, Mackay DK. Differentiation of infection from vaccination in foot-and-mouth disease by the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins 3D, 3AB and 3ABC in ELISA using antigens expressed in baculovirus.. Arch. Virol. 1998;143:1461–1476.
    doi: 10.1007/s007050050390pubmed: 9739326google scholar: lookup
  21. Carey KJ, Smith I, Barr J, Caruso S, Au GG, Hartley CA, Bailey KE, Perriam W, Broder CC, Gilkerson JR. Foals of mares vaccinated for Hendra virus have a suboptimal response to HeV vaccination.. Vet. Microbiol. 2024;295:110167.
    doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2024.110167pubmed: 38954881google scholar: lookup
  22. Zhu W, Pickering B, Smith G, Pinette M, Truong T, Babiuk S, Kobasa D, Banadyga L, Yang M. Development and laboratory evaluation of a competitive ELISA for serodiagnosis of Nipah and Hendra virus infection using recombinant Nipah glycoproteins and a monoclonal antibody.. Front. Vet. Sci. 2023;10:1120367.
    doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1120367pmc: PMC9929177pubmed: 36816187google scholar: lookup
  23. Daniels P, Ksiazek T, Eaton BT. Laboratory diagnosis of Nipah and Hendra virus infections.. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:289–295.
    doi: 10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01382-Xpubmed: 11334746google scholar: lookup
  24. Balkema-Buschmann A, Fischer K, McNabb L, Diederich S, Singanallur NB, Ziegler U, Keil GM, Kirkland PD, Penning M, Sadeghi B. Serological Hendra Virus Diagnostics Using an Indirect ELISA-Based DIVA Approach with Recombinant Hendra G and N Proteins.. Microorganisms 2022;10:1095.