Analyze Diet
Journal of microbiological methods2020; 172; 105887; doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105887

Development of a nested PCR assay for detection of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi in clinical equine specimens and comparison with a qPCR assay.

Abstract: Streptococcus equi subsp. equi is a Gram positive bacterial pathogen commonly associated with strangles in horses, a respiratory disease characterized by abscessation of submandibular and retropharyngeal lymph nodes which can lead to obstruction of the airway. Several real-time PCR (qPCR) assays have been developed for detection of S. equi from horses with many targeting conserved regions of the S. equi cell wall-associated M-protein (SeM), a major virulence factor and immunogen of S. equi. Our objective was to develop a nested PCR (nPCR) targeting SeM and an 18S rRNA internal control gene for detection of S. equi from horses with potential improvement in detection sensitivity compared to a qPCR. Primers and probes from the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (KSVDL) S. equi clinical testing assay were utilized for all qPCR testing. Primers flanking the SeM qPCR target region were selected for an initial end-point PCR step of the nested assay; PCR product from the end-point reaction then served as template for the qPCR reaction step of the nested assay. Sample nucleic acid was also tested directly with qPCR to allow for assay comparison. Nucleic acid from clinical specimens (n = 188) submitted to KSVDL were tested in parallel with each assay. The nPCR and qPCR assays identified 22.9% (43/188) and 13.3% (25/188) of samples positive for S. equi, respectively. None of the samples positive by qPCR were negative by nPCR. The PCR products from all positive samples were submitted for DNA sequencing. Each of the 25 samples positive by both assays had a high nucleotide identity match (>96%) to the SeM gene. Among the samples positive by nPCR but negative by qPCR, 17 of 18 were sequence confirmed for SeM at greater than 96% nucleotide identity. Based on the nPCR Ct (37.8) of the one sequence un-confirmed case, it is likely that the S. equi bacterial load in this sample was below the necessary concentration for successful sequencing. Limit of detection (LOD) for the nPCR was established at a Ct of 37, and based both on the LOD of the qPCR assay (Ct of 37), as determined by standard curve data, and on the highest nPCR Cts (~37) of clinical samples able to result in SeM sequence-confirmation. As demonstrated by sequencing confirmation, the nPCR assay targeting the SeM gene is highly specific to S. equi. The increased sensitivity of the nPCR, compared to the qPCR, may reduce the number of false negative sample results in clinical testing and provide a superior detection method during low bacterial shedding periods.
Publication Date: 2020-03-09 PubMed ID: 32165161DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105887Google Scholar: Lookup
The Equine Research Bank provides access to a large database of publicly available scientific literature. Inclusion in the Research Bank does not imply endorsement of study methods or findings by Mad Barn.
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support
  • Non-U.S. Gov't

Summary

This research summary has been generated with artificial intelligence and may contain errors and omissions. Refer to the original study to confirm details provided. Submit correction.

The study presents the development of a technique known as nested PCR (nPCR) for detecting the bacterial pathogen Streptococcus equi subspecies equi (S. equi), a cause of respiratory disease in horses. The new method is compared to the existing real-time PCR (qPCR) assay and is found to be more sensitive, potentially reducing false negatives during low bacterial shedding periods.

Objectives and Methodology

  • The primary goal of this research was to improve upon existing methods for detecting the presence of S. equi in horses by developing a new nested PCR technique targeting specific genes within the bacterial pathogen.
  • Two genes were targeted: the S. equi cell wall-associated M-protein (SeM), which is a key virulence factor, and an 18S rRNA internal control gene.
  • The newly developed method was then compared to existing qPCR methods, utilizing the same primers and probes from the previous clinical testing assay from the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (KSVDL).

Testing and Results

  • A total of 188 clinical specimens submitted to KSVDL were tested parallelly with the nPCR and qPCR assays.
  • Results showed, nPCR identified 22.9% of samples as S. equi positive, whilst the qPCR assay flagged only 13.3%. This indicated a higher detection rate in nPCR method.
  • None of the samples tested positive by qPCR were found to be negative by nPCR, validating the increased sensitivity of nPCR.
  • All positive samples underwent DNA sequencing for further validation, with the basis of matching high nucleotide identity with the targeted SeM gene.
  • A sequencing result showed that 17 out of the 18 samples that tested positive with nPCR, but not with qPCR, had over 96% nucleotide identity to the SeM gene.

Assessing Limit of Detection (LOD)

  • The limit of detection (LOD) for the nPCR method was determined to be at a Ct of 37. This was favourable compared to the LOD of the qPCR (also a Ct of 37) as established by standard curve data.
  • The assessment of LOD was important to establish the concentration necessary for successful sequencing and shows the ability of nPCR to confirm sequence even at low concentrations of the bacterial load.

Concluding Points

  • The study concludes that the developed nPCR method is highly specific to S. equi as validated by DNA sequencing.
  • The improved detection sensitivity of the nPCR method, compared to the conventional qPCR, holds the potential to reduce false-negative results, which is especially beneficial during periods of low bacterial shedding.

The research has significantly contributed to veterinary microbiology by developing a more sensitive detection method, which may greatly benefit the clinical diagnosis and treatment of equine respiratory diseases caused by S. equi bacteria.

Cite This Article

APA
Noll LW, Stoy CPA, Wang Y, Porter EG, Lu N, Liu X, Burklund A, Peddireddi L, Hanzlicek G, Henningson J, Chengappa MM, Bai J. (2020). Development of a nested PCR assay for detection of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi in clinical equine specimens and comparison with a qPCR assay. J Microbiol Methods, 172, 105887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2020.105887

Publication

ISSN: 1872-8359
NlmUniqueID: 8306883
Country: Netherlands
Language: English
Volume: 172
Pages: 105887

Researcher Affiliations

Noll, Lance W
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA. Electronic address: lwnoll@vet.ksu.edu.
Stoy, Colin P A
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Wang, Yin
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Porter, Elizabeth G
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Lu, Nanyan
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA; Bioinformatics Center, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Liu, Xuming
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Burklund, Amy
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Peddireddi, Lalitha
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Hanzlicek, Gregg
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Henningson, Jamie
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Chengappa, M M
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA.
Bai, Jianfa
  • Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA. Electronic address: jbai@vet.ksu.edu.

MeSH Terms

  • Animals
  • DNA, Bacterial / analysis
  • Horse Diseases / diagnosis
  • Horse Diseases / microbiology
  • Horses
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • RNA, Ribosomal, 18S / genetics
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Streptococcal Infections / diagnosis
  • Streptococcal Infections / microbiology
  • Streptococcal Infections / veterinary
  • Streptococcus / genetics
  • Streptococcus / isolation & purification

Conflict of Interest Statement

Declaration of Competing Interest Authors declare that there are no competing interests to this research.

Citations

This article has been cited 8 times.
  1. Zu H, Sun R, Li J, Guo X, Wang M, Guo W, Wang X. Integrated CRISPR-Cas12a and RAA one-pot visual strategy for the rapid identification of Streptococcus equi subspecies equi. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2025;15:1526516.
    doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1526516pubmed: 40918251google scholar: lookup
  2. Iduu NV, Raiford D, Cohen ND, Landrock KK, Wang C. High-resolution melting curve FRET-qPCR rapidly distinguishes Streptococcus equi subsp. equi and zooepidemicus. Microbiol Spectr 2025 Sep 2;13(9):e0152925.
    doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01529-25pubmed: 40736350google scholar: lookup
  3. Veiga RF, Clarindo LN, Fensterseifer AL, Pompelli LH, Sfaciotte RAP, Schwarz DGG, Eloy LR, Ferraz SM. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus equi isolated from horses in Santa Catarina state, Southern Brazil. Braz J Microbiol 2024 Dec;55(4):4147-4155.
    doi: 10.1007/s42770-024-01479-8pubmed: 39155341google scholar: lookup
  4. Knox A, Zerna G, Beddoe T. Current and Future Advances in the Detection and Surveillance of Biosecurity-Relevant Equine Bacterial Diseases Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP). Animals (Basel) 2023 Aug 18;13(16).
    doi: 10.3390/ani13162663pubmed: 37627456google scholar: lookup
  5. Nadruz V, Beard LA, Delph-Miller KM, Larson RL, Bai J, Chengappa MM. Efficacy of high-level disinfection of endoscopes contaminated with Streptococcus equi subspecies equi with 2 different disinfectants. J Vet Intern Med 2023 Jul-Aug;37(4):1561-1567.
    doi: 10.1111/jvim.16740pubmed: 37232523google scholar: lookup
  6. Garner C, Stephen C, Pant SD, Ghorashi SA. Comparison of PCR-HRM, colorimetric LAMP and culture based diagnostic assays in the detection of endometritis caused by Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus in mares. Vet Res Commun 2023 Jun;47(2):495-509.
    doi: 10.1007/s11259-022-10047-0pubmed: 36538151google scholar: lookup
  7. Noll LW, Highland MA, Hamill VA, Tsui WNT, Porter EP, Lu N, Sebhatu T, Brown S, Herndon DR, Grossman PC, Bai J. Development of a real-time PCR assay for detection and differentiation of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae and a novel respiratory-associated Mycoplasma species in domestic sheep and goats. Transbound Emerg Dis 2022 Sep;69(5):e1460-e1468.
    doi: 10.1111/tbed.14477pubmed: 35166453google scholar: lookup
  8. Hanafi M, Tahzima R, Ben Kaab S, Tamisier L, Roux N, Massart S. Identification of Divergent Isolates of Banana Mild Mosaic Virus and Development of a New Diagnostic Primer to Improve Detection. Pathogens 2020 Dec 12;9(12).
    doi: 10.3390/pathogens9121045pubmed: 33322809google scholar: lookup